Me and a Gun
Note: This post is part of our League Symposium on Guns In America. You can read the introductory post for the Symposium here. To see a list of all posts in the Symposium so far, click here.
The right turn was the first stupid decision.
It was the late evening, and I was making my way back to the medical school for studying of some sort with one of my good friends. The specifics of our plans are lost to me now. But I remember quite well turning off of one of that city’s main thoroughfares onto a side street because doing so allowed me to circumvent a couple of slow traffic lights.
I should probably have known better. The city I lived in at the time was (and remains) one of the most crime-ridden in the nation. I think I had a notion that the neighborhood I had turned into was sketchy, but it was right next to one of the major traffic arteries, and it didn’t really occur to me to be concerned. (Later, when taking my statement, the businesslike but kind police officer was compelled to clarify, somewhat sheepishly, if I’d been in the area looking for drugs or a prostitute. It seems I really should have known better.)
It was a block or two after I’d turned that I saw the men at the side of the road. I remember one of them lying on the ground, and the other ran into the road to flag me down. I thought the man on the ground had been hurt. I stopped my car.
That was, of course, my second stupid decision.
In hindsight and with the benefit of a few more years’ experience, the abject stupidity of stopping stands out in high relief. But I was a medical student, and full of a naive idealism. I thought I would be able to use something I’d learned to help someone who needed it. And so I stopped the car and rolled down the window.
As I recall, I asked the man in the street if they needed help. And I remember him asking me two questions. The first was what time it was, and the second was if I knew where a certain street was. These questions alerted me that there was something Wrong. You don’t flag people down to ask them the time, and the street he asked about was right at the corner. Wrong, wrong, wrong. I said I needed to go, and looked down to put the car back into drive.
His gun was pointing at my head when I looked back up.
I don’t know what kind of gun it was, other than that it was a handgun. I don’t know its capacity, whether it was a revolver or pistol, or its caliber. All I know is that it had a barrel, and it was pointed at me.
The details get a little bit hazy from there. I remember saying I’d do what he said, and asking him not to kill me. I think he said he wouldn’t if I did as I was told. I remember lying facedown on the street with my hands on my head as he went through my pockets. I remember seeing his buddy, no longer lying on the ground, as he looked around the back of the car at me. I remember the man was excited for some reason when he felt the tube of ChapStick in my pocket and my telling him frantically what it was and that he could have it. (Someone later suggested the plausible explanation that he had mistaken it for a vial of crack.)
And then I was instructed to walk back toward the main road with my hands still on my head. I feared being shot the most then, as I walked away. I heard the car doors slam, and the car drive off. And I was still alive.
I had kept my composure this entire time. It was as I made my way to the street and across to the convenience store on the other side that I decompensated completely. By the time I stumbled through the doors and shrieked at the startled man behind the counter to call the police because I had just been robbed at gunpoint, I was a wreck. I sat crying in a corner until the police arrived.
A few days later they found what remained of my car, which had been totaled. Far worse than the car, which was insured, was that the robbers had removed all of its contents. Those contents comprised all of my textbooks and notes for my coming finals, a week or two away. All of it was gone. My professors were all very sympathetic, and with their help I managed to pass everything. (My virology prof was particularly merciful and all but gave me the answer key to study.) In addition, my study materials for Step 1 of the USMLE were also in the car, and I was to take it in the coming weeks. Somehow I managed to pass it, too, though with almost no studying at all I got a pretty crap score.
The only thing of possible value to the robbers they had destroyed, and those things that were useless to them but priceless to me were gone.
Some time later they caught the man who stole the car. A policeman came to my house with a bunch of photos, and I was asked to sign the back of the one I recognized. It was with dry, dry amusement that I put my name under several others. Quite busy he had been, it seemed.
I never appeared in court. Someone from the prosecutor’s office called and asked if I had a statement to give the judge that he might consider during sentencing. I told her that I was in medical school and would one day soon be a doctor, and because of what happened I would never, ever pull my car over to help anyone ever again. (I was forced to revise my edict many months later when a stranger pulled over to help me on the highway when I blew out a tire. God is an ironist.) I believe the man was sentenced to seven years in prison, and all else being equal should have been released the better part of a decade ago.
It seems hysterical and overwrought to describe myself as a victim of gun violence, particularly in the wake of a gun-related tragedy as profoundly monstrous and horrifying as the killings in Newtown. I didn’t get shot. I wasn’t injured. I survived the ordeal.
But I was a victim of a crime, and the crime was accomplished with a gun. Had the perpetrators kept their ruse up a bit longer and coaxed me out of the car, perhaps they could have stolen it with nothing more than a knife or their own brute strength. However, that crime was committed in that way with that degree of ease because of a gun. And so a victim of gun violence I am, just like everyone else who has been menaced, assaulted or terrorized by a firearm without actually getting shot.
I don’t have a great deal to say about which laws might be passed to make the crime I experienced less likely to happen to someone else. Hell, I don’t even care to weigh in on whether or not preventing a crime such as that warrants any change at all. Others participating in the symposium will doubtless take up those themes. I do know that allowing me to carry a concealed weapon would have made little difference, as lunging or reaching for a gun would quite likely have induced my assailant to shoot me. However, assuming his handgun wasn’t more souped-up than it appeared from my angle, banning assault rifles or certain kinds of magazines wouldn’t really have helped, either.
Others here have very different experiences with guns, and I have little interest in depriving them of it. That vast majority of gun owners and users who have them to hunt or shoot recreationally or protect themselves do not bother my sleep in the least. (I do hope they keep them locked up, however.) How they relate to guns will obviously differ quite a bit from how I do. I don’t own one, and have never fired or even held anything more powerful than a BB gun.
No, my only experience of a gun is what it’s like to stare down the wrong end of one and hope it doesn’t fire. My only experience of one is to pray I survived looking at it, and watching as it (with the help of my own stupidly kind-hearted credulity) allowed a man to rob me of my property and seriously jeopardize my academic career. It is, admittedly, quite a limited experience, but one I thought deserved a mention in our conversation.
I’m glad you told the story, and in such a moving way. And this should be told at this symposium.Report
Very moving post Russell. This is the kind of stuff I hoped we would see in the symposium. Personal experiences with guns. It’s a very diverse and complicated thing and your story is just as important as someone like myself who has only had positive experiences around guns.
And obviously we’re glad you survived the experience : )Report
Thanks, Mike.
What’s kind of striking to me is how little this very significant personal experience has actually informed my opinions on gun laws. As I hope comes through clearly in the post, I’m not at all sure what reasonable solution I might have to preventing this kind of crime, or if seeking a statutory solution is even warranted. I grew up in a relatively rural area and knew many, many law-abiding, responsible gun owners, and I really have no interest in keeping guns out of their hands. I am thus chary of well-intentioned measures that would be inappropriately broad in scope.
I do think there is a place for municipal gun restrictions. I do think it’s reasonable that there be different rules in Chicago than in rural Kentucky. But thinking things are reasonable is a far cry from knowing how to craft them well.Report
Russell,
Ironically, my positive experiences with guns don’t really do a whole lot towards informing my gun position anymore either.
Municipal guns laws are a good idea in theory but the problem is always in the execution. I travel with a firearm regularly. It’s hard enough to make sure I am in compliance with the state laws of everywhere I pass through. Municiapl laws would be a nightmare. Maybe there’s an app for that though? You could put in the parameters you want (ex. unloaded gun in glove box) and it would alert you when you are in a jurisdiction that doesn’t allow it.Report
But your positive experiences with guns inform my gun position.Report
Ah – thanks Kim.Report
Thanks, Doc. I’m so sorry this happened to you.
But it’s really important that you shared. Because this is the other use of guns. Intimidation. You gotta obey the person holding the gun when intimidation’s the game.Report
Thanks, zic.
And I was proofing this post last night when I read your comment in another thread about all the violence that has orbited your life, too. My experience kind of pales to yours, when viewed in aggregate.Report
This was quite excellent – as per usual. It’s also an important part of this entire debate that often gets overlooked.
I think this post, along with Michelle’s reminiscing about working for the DS’s office, speak to me of the cost of guns in a way statistics don’t always manage.Report
Part of why I thought it might be in some way useful to share is as a reminder that focusing solely on gun-related deaths misses large swaths of how guns relate to crime. Lots of people are victimized by them but aren’t (physically) injured, and so their experience is lost in the conversation when it focuses (obviously quite understandably, particularly in our country right now) on deaths.Report
No doubt the weapon made the crime possible. It would have been much more difficult for the thug to carjack the future Dr. Saunders without it. A part of me wants to argue that the guy would have found some other way to commit some other property crime, though. Less dramatically than the Doc’s story, when my car was broken into and the CD player stolen* I wasn’t there to witness it so if I’d have had a gun, again, it wouldn’t have prevented the crime and could easily have escalated a mid-level event into a deadly one. I suspect a substantial percentage of crimes are like this, and that is a substantial grain of sand in the idea that the presence of guns serves as a deterrent to crime.
On that note, I stumbled across this collection of data. Guns are much more severely restricted in the UK and particularly London than they are in the US. And apples-to-apples statistics are surprisingly hard to find. One journalist did, and tackled the question of whether New York or London is safer, although her particular inquiry was as to policing styles. The answer, which ought to surprise no one, is ambiguous: London’s murder rate is lower than New York’s, but its rate of other kinds of both violent and property crimes is higher.
Guns may serve as a deterrent to some kinds of crime like burglary, I’ll buy that. But not crime in a general sense: criminals are going to break the law. What it seems guns really do is shift the kinds of crimes that are committed from one sort to another.
* Which gives you an idea of how long ago this was — CD players were still valuable enough back then to be worth the bother of someone stealing them.Report
Guns don’t really deter burglars, though. A burglar wants to get in and get out, without being detected. He’s not in it to find people, and you can deter him just as easily by -calling the cops- (loudly).Report
Guns may very well provide a good defense against people breaking restraining orders. Or otherwise “battered spouses/significant others” escaping from relationships.
Not that I’m suggesting it be the battered person using it.Report
I have little doubt that the man who robbed me would have found some other criminal mischief to accomplish. He might have selected mine at random to hotwire and steal, assuming he had those skills. He might have broken in and stolen the CD player (this was also back in the day when doing so still had some upside). But I wouldn’t have feared for my life, and would gladly have given the car away to have avoided that experience.Report
I am not sure if guns would deter burglars. Burglars seem to get caught when they enter a place at a wrong time.
My apartment was burgled during my first year of law school. I went to the library to study on a Saturday and when I got back my apartment looked fairly normal. No great mess. It took me a few minutes but then I realized “Hey, where is my laptop?” The criminals seemed to have waited until they noticed I was gone and then found a way in without causing much damage and simply walked out the front door. I imagine they got someone to naively buzz them in. The burglars simply took everything that was light and not bolted down. This included my laptop, ipod, digital camera, and interestingly my laundry quarters. They did not take my stereo, silverware, plates, CDs, DVDs, clothing, etc.
A few months later, there was another burglary in my apartment and it was on the same floor. This time the burglar jumped the back fence and climbed up to the apartment. However, someone in the apartment above heard him and called the police. They caught this guy. IIRC he had a long list of property crimes going back to the 1970s and was a middle-aged white guy. Also a junkie. If he was not caught, he would have gotten away with my neighbor’s very expensive jewelry. After this, my landlord installed a steal door and the apartment has not been burgled since.
A lawyer I worked with used to be a public defender in San Francisco and he told me that a shocking amount of burglaries go uncaught in San Francisco. IIRC the number was 80 percent. I tried to find statistics on-line to verify but could not. Most burglars do what the guys who broke into my place did. They case until they know someone is not in and move in and out as quickly as possible. Burglars also seem to know which places to steal from. IIRC if a place is the victim of one successful burglary, the odds of it being stolen from again increase significantly.
I have not seen it as much recently but when I first moved to San Francisco, I remember noticing that a lot of cars parked in the street did have their windows broken into while parked overnight outside. So this kind of crime still happens. San Francisco also has an issue with thieves stealing copper wiring because it is easy to sell for scrap and an unregulated market.
http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/SF-man-provides-window-into-lucrative-copper-3605271.phpReport
“stealing” scrap metal is an industry around here. Nobody actually dumps stuff off at the dump, they just abandon it on the North Side, and trust that someone else will take it to the scrapyard, and get the money for it. Not that theft doesn’t happen too…Report
Not that this is anything like the doc’s story. But just on the idea of having a gun with you. One time, I was involved in a merge into one lane into a construction zone. The guy I was driving with decided that everyone should alternate, the other car clearly didn’t want to let us in. The other car “won.” Once we were in one lane, the other driver parked his car, got out, and started kicking my car, dented my fender, and then tried to break my window with his fists. I was pretty terrified. I’ve often thought that if I had a gun, I might have shot him. But we didn’t. So we drove away from him into the construction zone. And he got into his car and drove away.Report
Rose,
I had a similar story that went a bit further. I accidentally cut someone off one evening pulling out onto a busy street. It was two guys in a large truck. They got about 6 inches from my rear bumper and stayed on my tail for about a mile. Then we stopped at a light and they pulled up next to me and were yelling things out the window. I ignored them and continued on. They got behind me again and rode my tail for another mile or so. Then I decided I had enough.
What they didn’t realize was that I was coming home from a hunting trip and had a friend in the car. So I popped the hatchback and he pointed an unloaded shotgun at them. Needless to say they stopped their truck and left us alone.
Not very proud of that story (we were 19 at the time) but hotter heads might have fired a warning shot instead of simply threatening them. That is the reason I don’t keep my gun loaded in my car. I’m not prone to road rage but anyone can lose their cool.Report
This gets to what is really the core of the conundrum of weapons.
Anyone can lose their cool, and in that moment, you’re not thinking rationally or cautiously. Every one of us is nineteen and immature and making bad decisions at one point or another in our lives, and guns escalate the consequences of those bad decisions dramatically. By definition, there’s no deterring irrational people, and there’s probably no deterring negligent people. So isn’t it safer to get the weapons out of the equation?
But at the same time, the negligent and the irrational are also the ones most likely to disregard rules about guns and therefore to have them when they shouldn’t. So it doesn’t matter how many rules we make, these are the people who are going to break them. The thug in the OP, who carjacked the Doc when he was still in med school — that was a premeditated act, one set up with his co-conspirators and thought out in advance. It wasn’t going to matter what rules were out there, this cat was going to find a gun and he was going to do some crimes with it.
Unless we fire up the time machine and go back in history and uninvent guns, there doesn’t seem to be a way out of that — the very people who we can most easily agree ought not to have guns are the very people most likely to have them even if they’re not allowed at all.Report
” there’s no deterring irrational people” — put enough obstacles in someone’s way, until they cool down.Report
“I’ve often thought that if I had a gun, I might have shot him.”
Isn’t it easier to say that given that you didn’t have a gun? Why do you assume your motivation to act would have been vastly different had you had a gun than had you not? And I think it is fair to classify it as “vastly different” given that in one circumstance you’d opt to “do nothing” and in another you’d opt to “possibly kill a man”.Report
I can attest that I’m reasonably certain that at one point in my life, if I had known I had access to a firearm, I probably would have wound up killing somebody.
I might get that post up before the weekend, but no promises.Report
PC,
That isn’t impossible to believe. But my guess is that, absent the firearm, you still did something in that situation, no?
Sans gun, Rose could have called the police, screamed for help, run the guy over… any number of things. But she didn’t do any of that because of restraint or fear-induced-paralysis or whathaveyou. That she would have reacted wholly differently with a gun in her hands seems a bit incredible, and the type of thing that is easy to say given that never was (and likely never will be) her reality.
And I don’t mean to pick on Rose in anyway… I just am a bit doubtful that she actually would have taken out the gun and shot the man had there been one in her car.Report
A very good essay that gets down to the heart of the problem.
I wish that that guy didn’t have a gun. I wish that we didn’t have gun crime. I wish that that had not happened (not only to you, but to the other folks who had reason to sign).
And I don’t know what could be done to prevent that sort of thing.Report
I’ve been very lucky- my few mugging experiences have only involved being outnumbered or beaten senseless by a few guys in places I shouldn’t have been. They were easily forgotten. I don’t know how easy I’d let go of something like that if it happened to me with a gun pointed at me.Report
police officer was compelled to clarify, somewhat sheepishly, if I’d been in the area looking for drugs or a prostitute
In other, less-stressful circumstances, I can imagine this line of questioning putting “Millicent” in high dudgeon.Report
Shouldn’t this be titled “A Gun and I”.
Seriously, though, thanks for sharing what I’m sure is not an easy story to tell.
If I may ask, was it Baltimore?Report
You really didn’t know? Here’s your reference.Report
Do I look like someone who listens to Tori Amos?Report
It was not Baltimore.
And the events described happened a very long time ago, and whatever trauma I suffered has lost its power to bother me. (I do wish I could go back and take the USMLE again. Oh, well.)Report
Buddy of mine is doing residency in Boston, and tells me apparently the neighborhood around his hospital is so bad the staff do not stop at stoplights at night, and the hospital posts a guard at the nearest intersection.Report
that’s not bad. bad is when they have boards with nails across the roads, to pop your tires.
(that’s not big city, that’s small town america)Report
Maybe I’m a bit ignorant/brash/arrogant, but Baltimore is the only city I’ve ever really felt afraid in when ending up in the wrong part. That is why I thought of it when you were describing the story.
I’ve lived in Boston, NY, and DC for extended periods, rendering most “scary” parts not so scary anymore. Which doesn’t mean I didn’t face a risk there; just that I ended up in most of those parts often enough that avoiding them would have required major sacrifices in how I lived my life, something I wasn’t willing to do out of fear.Report
I did get lost in a bad part of Detroit once in the early 90’s and it was pretty hairy then. I can only assume that now it is completely controlled by the C.H.U.D.’s.Report
if you went to detroit nowdays, militia would be trying to recruit ya. place is pretty hairy still, I hear.Report
I believe that many people are terribly unobservant.
If you’ve been to the bad parts of DC, you’ve seen buildings that have been hit by some pretty decent explosives (grenades/mortars).
Unless they’ve cleaned them up (“gentrified”).
Naturally, my “adventurous” friend has managed to stumble into KKK meetings in DC — that’s one scary thing to do! (“whoops, wrong room!” *run like hell*)
Philly’s worse than Baltimore, nowadays. Crime runs downhill, and Philly’s the cheapest part of Boswash.Report
If you e-mail me at my Real.name@institution account, I’ll tell you the city where this happened. Not that there’s a crack team of sleuths out to break my pseudonym, but since I went to the trouble of creating one I may as well gesture toward preserving it.
And the state where this occurred is largely rural, “safe” territory, including my hometown. (Attention, folks! A clue!) When I told people I was moving to New York City, many evinced concern for my safety. The above events allowed me to give them a rueful smile, inform them that NYC had much better crime stats than where I had been living, and having been the victim of a violent crime I figured I’d already met my lifetime quota.Report