Live by the sword of ill-conceived laws…
The man who shot George Zimmerman will be using Florida’s Stand Your Ground law as his defense.
Tod Kelly
Tod is a writer from the Pacific Northwest. He is also serves as Executive Producer and host of both the 7 Deadly Sins Show at Portland's historic Mission Theatre and 7DS: Pants On Fire! at the White Eagle Hotel & Saloon. He is a regular inactive for Marie Claire International and the Daily Beast, and is currently writing a book on the sudden rise of exorcisms in the United States. Follow him on Twitter.
Dear Alanis Morrisette fans: this is not, technically, ironic.
Zimmerman never actually invoked “stand your ground” as a defense to the murder charges against him. He invoked simple self defense, claiming that his victim attacked first.Report
Technically, yeah.
But social-comprehensionally? Nah.Report
What does that even mean?Report
@aaron-david
That is verbal filler used by folks who refuse to accept facts.Report
IIRC, the changes to Florida’s self-defense laws revolving around “Stand Your Ground” came up in the jury instructions.
I don’t think SYG is limited to an affirmative defense, but rather a whole host of things involving the basic removal or negation of ‘duty to retreat’.
Unless I’m misunderstanding the law, that would involve changes to the jury’s directions when it comes to deliberating a claim of self-defense.Report
I’m with @morat20 , I don’t think ‘Stand Your Ground’ is actually a defense at all. Stand Your Ground modifies the *existing* defense of self-defense.
People *normally* have a duty to attempt to retreat in public, and if they don’t do *try* to do that, they don’t get to use ‘self defense’. Stand your ground removes that duty.
Now, Zimmerman claims that he didn’t have a chance to retreat, and was just attacked, so SYG wouldn’t apply. The problem is…because that claim didn’t *matter*, no one needed to prove it, and the defense didn’t waste their time trying to disprove it.
People don’t argue irrelevant things in court, and SYG made a certain claim irrelevant, the law was the same either way. I don’t know why we’d assume that Zimmerman’s claim would not have been challenged by the government if that claim *had* been relevant, or that he would have consequently *won* that claim.Report
(First sentence of linked article. Emphasis mine. Zimmerman’s lawyers used a standard self-defense, er, defense claim).Report
*grabs popcorn*Report
*grabs cop porn*Report
Lesbian?Report
No, I’m a man.Report
A man who can’t find his own beef apparently.Report
It will be a good day in the world when George Zimmerman is an old outdated cultural reference young people don’t get like pet rocks and Where’s The Beef?Report
I sadly just used “Where’s the Beef?!” yesterday. I seriously couldn’t find the ground chuck I was going to make spaghetti sauce with.
(It was at the back of the bottom shelf.)Report
It’s always at the back of the bottom shelf.
But who in your house knew you were doing a Clara Peller riff????Report
I kinda miss Bowser though.Report
So….
Allegedly Zimmerman threatens some guy. Both are in cars, and the guy responds by shooting at him and claims “SYG”.
Thinking there’s a bit more to this than that….Report
Supposedly, the guy who shot at Zimmerman has been ordered by a judge to, until his trial, A). turn in his guns B.) Avoid all contact with Zimmerman and C.) Wear a GPS monitoring device.
Maybe all that is standard procedure (or as close to it as possible, for a high-profile case); but to me, it sounds like maybe the shooter is suspected by the court to be mentally ill/obsessed.Report
@glyph
Good points. I’d agree with your conclusion.Report
Yeah, there’s a bit more to it than that.
Report
It’s just like when he killed that kid and was showered with hundreds of thousands of dollars for it: George Zimmerman is the real victim here.Report