Tiger King: America’s Newest Obsession
Warning: Spoilers
Surely you, as a denizen of the internet, by now have seen a meme featuring a man in a loud shirt, armed1 with a blonde mullet, usually flanked by a real life tiger or other big cat. You may have even possibly seen or heard some reference to, “That b****h Carole Baskin.” All of this makes more sense if you plant yourself in front of the television, fire up Netflix, and watch the documentary that is taking the United States by storm.
I was a victim of social media peer pressure. I was perusing Facebook, Twitter, etc. and I kept coming upon the same weird content featuring the aforementioned characters. So I finally did a little investigating and found that Netflix had indeed a released a bonkers new documentary about the world of keeping big cats and other exotic wildlife in captivity. I am stilled floored that people like this exist.
What made it even more interesting was the main subject of the documentary was currently sitting in federal prison after being convicted of murder for hire and various wildlife offenses. At first glance, and listen, I asked myself how he hadn’t already been incarcerated. The man is a walking felony; as soon as he opens his mouth, it’s like he is speaking a different language.2
As the story unfolds, it quickly becomes apparent that Joe Exotic was once a well-meaning, if not eccentric, zoo owner. However, once he realized he could start profiting off of shameless self-promotion using exotic wildlife, the wheels came off. Joe Exotic is basically what Donald Trump would be today had he not been purchased an admission into Penn and then given some seed money from his overtly racist slumlord father.
Men and women like Exotic are pervasive in today’s ultra-connected internet society. Take for example trust fund bro, Dan Blizerian. Better yet, pseudo motivational (cult?) leader Gary Vaynerchuk. And of course, one of the best examples of narcissistic rich persons with no discernible skills, the Kardashians. Living large and always working on their #brand. It mystifies me that hordes of people enable and glorify them.
The bulk of the documentary is a description of the war between Exotic and animal rights activist, Carole Baskin. Baskin runs an exotic wildlife rescue in Florida.3I gotta say, Baskin’s rescue is not much different from a zoo. Her main rub against Joe Exotic, and other collectors of big cats, is that they profit off of the litters of kittens born in their captivity.
Her activism and Exotic’s vainglorious attempts to be famous result in some wild back and forth salvos. Most of these salvos consist of Joe simulating violent acts against Baskin on his television channel called “Joe Exotic TV.” After years of back and forth though, Exotic finally does something civilly actionable, resulting in Baskin suing him and acquiring a judgment for damages of around $1 million. That’s when things really take a dark and sad turn for Joe Exotic.
Never before have I watched a documentary where several of the interview subjects say things that are potentially incriminating in so many ways. It is like a prosecutor’s wet dream. One of the interesting interview subjects is Baghavan “Doc” Antle, a Hollywood-connected exotic animal trainer and collector who has also been in Baskin’s cross hairs. Rightfully so, because the dude basically runs a weird sex cult. Sometime in December 2019, his compound was raided, but no charges were brought.
Speaking of multiple spouses, Exotic marries three much younger men during the course of the time period (including two at the same time) covered by the documentary.4 One of his ex-husbands is interviewed extensively, let’s just say he doesn’t do a lot to dispel my feelings about the vast majority of middle America. In an even weirder turn of events, both men he married together turned out to be heterosexual.
One of Exotic’s favorite accusations to level at Carole Baskin is that she killed her first husband, a millionaire, and fed him to her tigers. It is absolutely insane at first until you hear about the circumstances of his disappearance coupled with Carole saying something in some footage about coating a person in sardine oil and how it would entice tigers to eat said person.5Exotic even tried his hand at country music, and recorded a video about Baskin feeding her husband to the tigers.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCgz9915wHw]
The country songs were later revealed to be written and performed by some obscure Canadian country artist, but Exotic, ever the showman, brings them to life.
Back to the judgment that Carole acquired. At this point, Exotic was on the ropes; he didn’t have the money to pay and it was clear that Baskin was maneuvering to execute the judgment by acquiring his animals and the zoo itself. Enter Jeff Lowe, another trust-fund bro. Kind of a low-rent version of Blizerian. What follows is a series of bad business decisions6 and extremely incriminating stuff by Exotic,7 but I think you will have to watch to find out.
Other than the comically dark and tragic circumstances that led to Exotic’s conviction and confinement, I think one of the more amazing messages this documentary seeks to show is that 1. There are estimated to be more tigers living in captivity in the United States than in the wild; and 2. A whole cast of real life characters spend hundreds of thousand of dollars fighting each other in the name of exotic animals when they could be spending it on real conservation efforts.
I enjoyed it, mostly because of how absolutely wild it is, but I am bothered by one thing. Throughout the whole documentary, they try to portray Joe as some kind of anti-hero and Carole as some kind of spouse murdering villain. In reality, almost every single person in this documentary is a villain. I only hope, since it has been so widely viewed, it can be a lesson more than a playbook.
- “Poncho was a bandit boy, his horse was fast as polished steel/He wore his gun outside his pants for all the honest world to feel…
- Yes, the majority of middle America is filled with vacuous morons, no you will not be able to convince me otherwise.
- She is up against a literal walking, talking “Florida Man;” know your enemy I guess.
- Yes, Joe Exotic is a gay, gun-toting, hillbilly, polygamist, who owned 200+ Tigers at a Zoo in Oklahoma for those of you keeping score at home.
- I am 100% on the bandwagon that this woman killed her first husband and fed him to her tigers.
- Including trying his hand at politics running for Governor of Oklahoma as a Libertarian, cementing his status as a certified idiot.
- And Lowe.
I seem like the only person with no desire to watch this doc. The whole series seems to mainly exist as a way to gawk at willfully dysfunctional people. Sophie Gilbert said it best at the Atlantic, the whole series is a moral failure.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/609568/Report
I would disagree strongly that these people are “willfully dysfunctional.” They are a product of an ideology that is becoming more pervasive everyday. Especially in America.Report
“I enjoyed it, mostly because of how absolutely wild it is…”
lol
you’re part of the ideology, apparentlyReport
Well, no, I think as a documentary it was entertaining. The subjects were horrible people and like I said, I hope it can become more of a lesson than a playbook for people that think their brand will make them famous.Report
Well, why do people become narcissists? (Because that’s fundamentally what all of the zookeepers here are, every one of them.) Many of us have had narcissists attempt to, vampire-like, glom onto us; and we are all able to see the destructive antics of the Narcissist-in-Chief. Is it an ideology that turns what would otherwise be good people into this? Or are they born psychopaths, devoid of the capacity for empathy?
I’m not a developmental psychologist to answer the nature-or-nurture question, but it does seem to me that it’s not just an “ideology.” My lay impression is that there are a certain number of people who are just this way and probably always have been. We’ve had cult leaders preying off of the emotionally or financially vulnerable for a long time. The internet just makes them more visible. And, at least as to some of the more charismatic ones, more dangerous.Report
“Because that’s fundamentally what all of the zookeepers here are, every one of them.”
Really. Carole Baskin is a narcissist cult leader preying off the emotionally vulnerable.
Really?Report
High Priestess of The Cult of the Leopard-print Pants DD, haven’t you heard of it??Report
This is what I think it is. I read parts of the original New York article and it seems like all of the, even the better meaning Baskin, made lots of personal life decisions that seem rather unwise and openly did so because they would look at our lives as being boring and the decisions we made as boring.
It is a kind of the bourgeois seeking out epartier le bourgeois on purpose for Tiger King viewers.Report
You’re not the only person with no desire to watch this “documentary”Report
Ditto.Report
Same. Like I said downthread, I saw some of the real life version of this play out in my local news.Report
I watched it out of boredom. It’s not bad but it’s not great. And it really does seem to enjoy wallowing in the sins of its subjects.
You know what it kind of reminded me of? A slick metropolitan version of Jerry Springer’s show. He used to say the popularity of his show came from allowing people to mock those they considered beneath them.Report
Looking forward to Sexy Joe Exotic and Sexy Carole Baskin Halloween costumes.Report
I said this to my wife the other day. Halloween is gonna be wild.Report
Not wild. Exotic.Report
funny to see how people are willing to buy into the Netflix narrative about Baskin. but not really all that surprising because one of the things people learn when you decide to be an Ally is that you no longer get to just dump on women, but nobody wants to talk about how doing that is fun, so they build up this big pent-up reservoir of Mean, and when a white chick comes along they just blow that load.
“yeah I know this Joe guy is a horrible asshole who killed tiger cubs and ground the bodies to hamburger, but let’s be real–this woman did make a joke about how the obligate-carnivore ambush predators she tends to would probably eat you if they got a chance!”Report
Yep. It’s Karen-bashing writ large.Report
I’m with you on this. I’m deeply confused by the Baskin bashing. Her refuge is a FHAS certified non-profit*, doesn’t breed the cats and whatever money they make goes to actually help the animals that are rescued. Ok, Baskin comes off as a bit of a crazy cat lady in the show but that could just as easily be the editing of the show and even if she is, well she uses it to help the animals she cares for. In what universe is the person trying to help these poor animals (and genuinely succeeding) in any way on the same level as a fraud meth head fabulist who exploits and abuses animals?
*which means it’s audited regularly to make sure it provides humane shelter for the animals it houses, doesn’t exploit or abuse them and spends its funds on the sanctuaries mission, not on padding the bottom line of the owner.Report
Havn’t seen this and won’t for the reason others have noted. Is part of the baskin bashing the dislike of people that Believe in Cause? It seems that there is a South Parkian dislike of people earnestly believing in things.Report
The way shes portrayed creates a question of whether what she is doing is different in kind (as opposed to perhaps degree) from what Joe and Doc Antle are doing. The bashing comes from the apparent hypocrisy.
Is that portrayal fair? Who knows.Report
Ahh okay. Thanks.Report
I’ve also seen her criticized for not paying her workforce. Baskin advocates argue that these are volunteers but the critics point out that many are working full schedules as opposed to volunteer schedules and should be paid as employers. But yes, there is a difference in degree and not kind and that Baskin is essentially running a private zoo to.Report
That’s kind of what I mean. Shes (apparently) encouraging then pressuring a bunch of well meaning ‘volunteers’ to work themselves to the bone at great personal sacrifice while basking in her own brand and moral superiority.
Is that as bad as running a weird sex cult or exploiting a bunch of drug addicts and ex-cons? I would venture to say no. But it isn’t exactly the greatest pedestal from which to direct moral outrage at others.Report
So many weasel words. “creates a question”. “who knows”. “apparently encouraging”.
Just admit that you thought it was okay to laugh, bro. Just admit that you laughed at the white chick and thought that was okay.Report
Weasel words? I did laugh. I thought it was hilarious and I’m discussing my opinions on something trashy I watched probably way too closely.
The only reason I speak carefully is because like with all salacious ‘documentaries’ I take the completeness and accuracy of what was portrayed with a handful of salt. Who knows how real it was/is?
So anyway take the snark and shove it up ye olde quacking duck ass.Report
See, here’s me thinking that you’d feel guilty about buying into a TV show’s decision to invent a villain, that your mumbling about “well her staff works kinda hard” and “I dunno, I dunno, who can say what ‘truth’ means, really” was an attempt to backfill when you realized you’d been caught out acting like a shit.
But, y’know, if you want to lean into it? Go for it. Be that guy. Be Donald Trump. Have fun with that.Report
Uh.. what? I’m saying I don’t believe everything I see on tv. Nothing more. If you’re reading a bunch of meta stuff into it that’s all you.Report
I believe they call it “projection.”Report
I think it’s more that in order to make their documentary even remotely watchable the producers had to both sanitize and cuddle up their main character Joe and drag down Baskin to narrow the moral distance between them.
For Joe this meant playing up his derpy earnest stupid side while exorcising his rabid on film racism and subsuming his exploitative and drug peddling elements into a “look what that rascall is up to now” kind of tone.
For Baskin that meant downplaying the good her organization does, eliding and squirming away from the vast difference between how her cat sanctuary and Joe’s zoo are run and heightening every quirk and oddity in her background to make her seem crazy and/or hypocritical. Also they imply, but don’t outright state, that she murdered her husband.
It’s astonishingly shady and petty on the part of the documentary creators but it’s very obvious why they did it.Report
Wow.Report
She seems nuts but I do think the implications about her go… off the deep end. I couldn’t help but google around about her after watching and shes been profiled a few times prior to the film
One thing I came across was that her first husband leased the land he had in Costa Rica from the local mafia. IIRC the documentary kind of glossed over those associations which seem pretty important when considering his disappearance.Report
I’ve seen an occasional Big Cat Rescue video from time to time and after watchin an episode of Tiger King (couldn’t really stand to watch more) I went googling. I couldn’t find anything substantive on Baskin to suggest she’s hypocritical/malevolent or evil.Report
For once (actually probably more than that), I agree with you. The whole episode focusing on Baskin was terribly tilted to make you believe she killed him.Report
I live in southern Oklahoma. I lived through a lot of this winding its way through the local news. (I do not live all that near where this dude was, but it’s a population-sparse area and people love weird news).
I have no interest in seeing it. Everyone involved is selfish and terrible. I have no desire to see selfish and terrible people get far more than their 15 minutes of fame.
I know I’m a minority in hating on this, but… I’ve seen this whole damn story already and it’s disgustingly sordid and it just makes me even more disappointed in humanity.Report
Some of the memes are funny (the Calvin and Hobbes one, for example) but I haven’t watched it and won’t for all the reasons you mention.Report
I laughed pretty hard when I saw the Calvin and Hobbes meme too.Report
I was really disappointed to find out that wasn’t him singing. While watching it I kept thinking this dude totally missed his calling as some kind of alt-country Weird Al or Dr. Demento.
It did help me understand the opposition people have to ‘zoos.’ For me growing up the zoo meant the Smithsonian, including related scientific and conservation efforts. I had no idea the term was also used for road side attractions like Joe’s.Report
Same here. For me the Zoo was the Bronx Zoo, professional run, not for profit, and with a lot of scientists involved. Outside big metro areas, zoos are a lot more dubious.Report
I’m with Saul & Kristin, not much desire to see it. It reminds me of this:
‘Their boredom becomes more and more terrible. They realize that they’ve been tricked and burn with resentment. Every day of their lives they read the newspapers and went to the movies. Both fed them on lynchings, murder, sex crimes, explosions, wrecks, love nests, fires, miracles, revolutions, war. This daily diet made sophisticates of them. The sun is a joke. Oranges can’t titillate their jaded palates. Nothing can ever be violent enough to make taut their slack minds and bodies. They have been cheated and betrayed. They have slaved and saved for nothing.”
― Nathanael West, The Day of the LocustReport
Okay, fine. It’s my turn. The entertainments I enjoy are morally superior to the entertainments enjoyed by others. My entertainments indicate that I am sophisticated. Part of this is that I disdain the entertainments of others as being beneath me.
I also didn’t watch Game of Thrones, Breaking Bad, or Stranger Things.
These shows also signal low status and, seriously, I am not low status.
I have instead been watching Rick and Morty. You have to be intelligent to watch this show. If you haven’t received at least a strong STEM education, you’ll miss half the jokes. A strong background in philosophy and history will help you truly get the other half. I find that if someone doesn’t like Rick and Morty, they’re pretty much just saying “I didn’t get the jokes.”
Which tells me that they’re either not educated, not very smart, or both.
Whew.Report
So in your world there is no moral or ethical statement made by any piece of “entertainment?” There is no analysis or broader implication of what it means for a society to produce, consume, and possibly gawk at something. Is that right?Report
It’s bait Saul.Report
Saul, I would *LOVE* to have a discussion of the importance of watching movies like God’s Not Dead 2 instead of Deadpool 2.
Would you be willing to have that conversation, if we started it?
Report
What I find odd is that the premise of all reality TV shows is that the participants present themselves to the public and ask to be judged.
Whether it is the Kardashians or these folks, the idea is that the participants are filmed and then shown to the public in the hopes that we will find them interesting or clever or charming or outrageous and then they can parlay that into an intoxicating life of celebrity and riches.
That’s why I thought of the Day of The Locust quote, because then as now they had primitive forms of this; Talent shows and confessional shows and lurid scandal sheets where earlier versions of these people would thrill to see their name in the paper and on the radio even if it was for something awful or stupid.
So it seems strange to me to hear the complaint that we have judged them, but negatively. That we don’t find them clever or charming or interesting but sad and unpleasant seems like a natural outcome of their request.Report
it seems strange to me to hear the complaint that we have judged them, but negatively
The only complaint that we have wrongfully judged someone negatively that I’ve seen in these comments involve Carole Baskin’s judgments that appear to be based in socially acceptable sexism.
Pretty much every single take I’ve seen about this show is that it’s similar to a pro wrestling match where everybody is a heel. There’s nobody to root for which means that there’s nobody to really root against. I don’t think that anybody has actually been criticized for saying “they’re all different archetypes of malignant narcissism”.
Now, I *HAVE* seen people say “Oh… I would *NEVER* watch that show” in the same way that I enjoy saying “Oh… I would *NEVER* go to Wal-Mart”… but that’s a different kind of criticism, don’t you think?Report
Base entertainment is a part of the human condition. It kind of sucks at times and can definitely be degrading for all involved.
Nevertheless I can’t help but see progress in the fact that the participation is voluntary and (most) of the really severe consequences are simulations. Definitely a big step up from life and death gladiatorial games, public hangings, and gawking at people with physical deformities and mental disabilities.Report
I live a block from Pershing Square in Los Angeles. In the square is a low wall with an inscribed quotation:
My feeling about this weirdly inflated village in which I had come to make my home (haunted by memories of a boyhood spent in the beautiful mountain parks, the timberline country, of northwestern Colorado), suddenly changed after I had lived in Los Angeles for seven long years of exile.
I have never been able to discover any apparent reason for this swift and startling conversion, but I do associate it with a particular occasion. I had spent an extremely active evening in Hollywood and had been deposited toward morning, by some kind soul, in a room at the Biltmore Hotel.
Emerging next day from the hotel into the painfully bright sunlight, I started the rocky pilgrimage through Pershing Square to my office in a state of miserable decrepitude. In front of the hotel newsboys were shouting the headlines of the hour: an awful trunk-murder had just been committed; Aimee Semple McPherson had once again stood the town on its ear by some spectacular caper; a University of Southern California football star had been caught robbing a bank; a love-mart had been discovered in the Los Feliz Hills; a motion-picture producer had just wired the Egyptian government a fancy offer for permission to illuminate the pyramids to advertise a forthcoming production; and, in the intervals between these revelations, there was news about another prophet, fresh from the desert, who had predicted the doom of the city, a prediction for which I was morbidly grateful.
In the center of the park, a little self-conscious of my evening clothes, I stopped to watch a typical Pershing Square divertissement: an aged and frowsy blonde, skirts held high above her knees, cheered by a crowd of grimacing and leering old goats, was singing a gospel hymn as she danced gaily around the fountain. Then it suddenly occurred to me that, in all the world, there neither was nor would ever be another place like this City of the Angels. Here the American people were erupting, like lava from a volcano; here, indeed, was the place for me – a ringside seat at the circus.
Carey McWilliams Southern California Country, 1946
Yeah, I guess that’s what I was thinking, that Tiger King could have been made 50 years ago, or a hundred, or a hundred years from now.Report
That’s actually pretty cool.Report
Back in the day when we had only a few networks, millions of people watched shows that ended up cancelled — rightly from the network point of view — for low ratings. With all the channels and networks available now, in a country of 300-odd (some very odd) million potential viewers, millions of people will watch just about anything. There’s no accounting for taste, and I don’t much care who watches what, but it does mean that, given a critical, but not very large mass of fans, their obsessing and arguing about marginal entertainments that the vast majority of people don’t even want to be bothered having an opinion about leach into the culture at large and take up the time of innocent bystanders, unlike, say, the disputes among opera fans, which outsiders can easily ignore.Report
The thing about the prestige tv or prestige trash is that they are consumed by relatively few people but those that do tend to be professionals with disposable incomes. Plus media typesReport
Well, you make Joe Exotic sound like a younger, gay, Donald Trump (with a mullet), and that’s just not a great sales pitch for me.Report
Like I said, Don the Con would be definitely doing something like this had he not been born into wealth and privilege.Report
His presidential campaign ad shows his strange charisma. (Maybe it’s the Gen-X in me but a guy saying “I ain’t cuttin’ my hair” as he’s running for office hits me in just the right spot.)
Report
This type of Reality TV show doesn’t seem that good for the soul of the individual or society. It celebrates the proudly dysfunctional people. The audience either engages in judgment and ends up feeling so superior or lives through the proud dysfunction and wishes they had the courage, lack of inhibitions, and sometimes the money to live like that. Its how we get a President like Trump, who treats everything as Reality TV show rather than something real and concrete with serious consequences.Report
Re: fn5. The alleged murder victim was actually Carole Baskin’s second husband, who she met after leaving her first husband. See also, Joe Exotic, who had two husbands before the three husbands depicted in the documentary (and before the Obergefell decision but a little thing like Oklahoma’s Defense of Marriage Act was not gonna slow ol’ Joe down).Report
My dude, his past relationships are irrelevant RE the documentary. But kudos to you for going the extra mile to Wikipedia to presumably comment on my thoroughness?Report
Peace, my dude. ‘Tis but a quibble, no offense meant.Report
My biggest critique of the documentary is that it gets very heavy-handed in trying to set up Carole Baskin as totally definitely the murderer of her second husband. The skew from the documentarian becomes quite obvious.
The “sardine oil” comment is played up as weirdly specific but considering the amount of interview time that the filmmakers probably had with her, and the number of leading questions and prompts no doubt fed to her (and whatever else we might think about her, she’s pretty enthusiastic about both things that big cats do and about dislike of Joe Exotic), seem to me to have led inevitably to some kind of sound bite like that being teased out of her one way or another.
The lawyer reads out some unusual language in a suspiciously-timed purported will. That’s actually the most suspicious thing to me that was out there.
It slips in that the FBI suspected the husband’s administrative assistant of foul play; we are not told why she was a suspect nor given any hint as to what her motive might have been. But we are given enough information to know that she had the means and the opportunity to have done something.
We are told the husband disappeared around the time he was considering leaving and divorcing Carole. He seemingly had at least one and possibly multiple much younger girlfriends in Costa Rica and was routinely traveling there to set up some sort of business. The business seems like it was kind of shady and had to be located in Costa Rica for some reason at least adjacent to avoiding U.S. law enforcement. But because of the filmmakers’ need to create a strong moral equivalency between Carole Baskin and Joe Exotic, we are asked to overlook the ought-to-be-obvious issue that dudes who routinely fly to Costa Rica to do shady business things with shady businesspeople and have affairs with multiple younger women there are likely to acquire enemies who are not their own wives.
None of which clears Carole Baskin of her husband’s disappearance and presumptive murder. But it certainly raises what in the trade we call “reasonable doubt.” So when Joe Exotic asks (repeatedly) why no investigation has been done into Carole Baskin’s septic tank (ewww, why does he know so much about when she had a septic tank put in) that’s why. The authorities who aren’t caught up in all this drama can see that there’s no plausible way to get a conviction on these facts.Report
Yeah, I didn’t buy the whole “she totally murdered her husband” thing. They made a bunch of smoke and insisted there must be a fire somewhere. As I understand, they left off inconvenient facts like the timing of the purchase of things that were supposedly used to commit murder.
Watching that episode, my conclusion was that he got on a plane and crashed into the ocean. Seems like the most straight-forward interpretation. Far more likely than the idea that the somewhat goofy Baskin is a vicious master criminal.Report
When I was out visiting my sister in January before she died, this was just beginning to be a thing and I mentioned it. My sister said “I know him.” And damn if she didn’t then promptly fall asleep without giving any more details. She was not really able to have conversations after that point, so that’s a story lost to the ages. I’d have loved to hear details.Report
Close your eyes and listen to Baskin speak. Whose voice is that? Whose laugh? Exactly.
Lock her up!Report
HAHAHAH, now I can’t unhear it.Report