Sunday Morning! “The Seventh Victim” and “An American Tragedy”
Note: I’m a bit under the weather today (and actually called in sick from work this morning), so this post might be a bit abbreviated. But I did want to mention a few pieces of art from this week that really made an impression on me.
First, I’ve been on a Val Lewton kick for the Halloween season (it helps that the Criterion Channel put up a Lewton collection). Lewton was an insanely-driven (and nearly driven insane) producer for R.K.O. Pictures who was given the responsibility of making cheap B (for budget) horror films very quickly in order to compete with the Universal horror flicks. Perhaps this meant there was less oversight and meddling because the movies he made there, mostly completed during the Second World War, are strange, surreal, eerie, and haunting and, narratively, a little bonkers. The best-known are Cat People and I Walked with a Zombie, but I also especially like The Curse of Cat People, a “sequel” that has very little to do with its original and instead seems like an early Tim Burton film in which a lonely girl with an active imagination (based on Lewton’s childhood) makes an imaginary friend who’s most likely her father’s dead girlfriend from the first picture!
But narratives don’t get much riskier or more bonkers than The Seventh Victim– this movie really threw me for a loop! The story of a private school girl whose wealthy sister has gone missing, the film is typical for Lewton in featuring an innocent who finds herself drawn into a shadowy underworld and goes deeper to satisfy her own curiosity. It’s also quite a bit darker than the average 40s thriller. As she explores the hidden corners of Greenwich Village, our heroine discovers a conspiracy of well-heeled Satan worshipers, murder, suicide, and worse. These films were all shot on R.K.O. sound-stages, often constructed for other films, and made to look like the Black Forest in a Grimm Brothers fairy tale. But there are certain conventions that old movies usually keep; we’re not used to seeing a movie from this era in which evil triumphs over good, especially considering in 1943 it wasn’t clear that good would triumph in Europe. But, without giving away the staggeringly bleak ending of this movie, I will say it’s amazing how completely evil triumphs in The Seventh Victim. If David Fincher made a film like this today, it would even seem bleak for him!
In one of the key moments in The Seventh Victim, a character fails to explain why good is preferable to evil, or even what good and evil are. The book I read this week, Theodore Dreiser’s epic An American Tragedy, is all about an evil act committed by a young man who doesn’t seem to be particularly evil, only weak and selfish. Clyde Griffiths was raised by poor street preacher parents in the Midwest and might have grown up to be sinless, but we see in him, from the very first chapter, a burning desire to live a better life, have better things- ambition in other words. Dreiser realizes that this quality is in no way a negative one in American life- nor life in the Americanized word, for that matter; I live in a Canadian steel town that has tried to “re-brand” itself as “The Ambitious City”. Dreiser was working from a real court case that he chose because it felt particularly American. If Clyde had only made one different choice, he would probably have been an admirable character. Alas, he did not.
Clyde’s ambition takes him first to hotel bellhopping in Kansas City, where he learns about booze and prostitutes before being involved in a tragic accident that, while not his fault per se, he flees from nonetheless, setting up a pattern in his life. He winds up in Chicago and works again as a bellhop, where he encounters his wealthy uncle Samuel Griffiths, owner of a collar manufacture in upstate New York. The uncle eventually gives Clyde a supervisory role in the factory, but it is clear from the start that he will never move into the high society in which his well-born relatives live- clear to everyone, that is, except Clyde. I only underlined one sentence in the 856 pages, but it seems apt:
“He was, as he saw it, really too good for the commonplace world by which he was environed.”
Clyde falls in love, briefly, with a factory girl who, like him, comes from meager beginnings. He then falls in love with a girl from much better beginnings in the smart set that has sort of taken a shine to him. Clyde is, we are told, very attractive. However, if he was smarter, he’d have gotten himself born to better parents. Complicating matters greatly, he was in love with the factory girl for a sufficient time to get her pregnant and now the rich girl is offering him a chance at a better life. Whatever will he do?
Clyde feels trapped by a situation he has created, but the reader can see he was trapped from the beginning. Trying to outrank his birth, he would never be accepted by the wealthy set who see him, correctly, as a striver. The rich girl is genuinely infatuated with Clyde, but her parents will never let them marry, or allow the relationship to continue. Nor should he have begun a relationship with a girl who, incorrectly, sees him as a step to a better life. But, he was lonely, and looking for something he was missing in women and luxury and nice clothes. Most of all, he was selfish.
I’ve wondered before what failing we could call the ur-sin. Timothy 6:10 holds that the love of money is the root of all evil, but I think it’s really selfishness that most often does us in, even when there’s no money involved. When we put our needs above the needs of others to their detriment, bad things happen. In this case, very bad things happen because Clyde cannot see the women in his life without considering their use value. The ending of this story is as bleak as that of The Seventh Victim, and even worse because it can, and did, happen.
And yet, as Dreiser reminds us, Clyde is only twenty-one and many young men are swayed by lust and the desire for a more comfortable life. His failings would have been human and understandable, and not truly tragic, if not for one hasty decision…
So, what are YOU reading, watching, creating, pondering, or playing this weekend?
I seem to be reading a polar opposite, The Razors Edge. Wherein a man of society, after the war, starts to throw his position, both that of birth and of finance, away to find, possibly, god. Due to some personal issues, this is really resonating with me, but in a way that it would not have if I had read it in youth. I am not able to read it in large gulps, as it is making the ol’ noggin work. That is quite nice.
Also, and I thought of you when I came across this, but I found an English website that lists for sale a huge number of early eastern bloc movies on DVD. It is great because so many of them are also on YouTube, although untranslated. But that doesn’t matter, as you can pick up a lot of what is going on just by context clues. So, I found Milos Forman’s very first movie, Cerny Petr (Black Peter) from 1963, and the delightful Daisies (Sedmikrasky) from ’66. Both are Czech, which I don’t speak a lick of, and my German doesn’t help but are fascinating to just sit and watch. https://www.secondrundvd.com/index.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPpPpnVwRgYReport
I’ve seen Daisies twice and I still feel like I’m missing something. It’s funny, to be sure. But my understanding is it was a revolutionary movie that couldn’t have been made after Prague Spring and, well, it seems like a Marx Brothers movie to me. Which is not a bad thing, mind you.Report
It could be that things get missed in the cultural translation. Things so… essential to the film and Czech society at that time that we cannot even grasp them. To go back to Black Peter, it is a sharp look at the totalitarianism that was thawing in the ’60s and moved through the Daisies period. Maybe this would shed some light on it? In other words, we cannot grasp the levels of repression they were experiencing and how they permeated every aspect of life. I would guess that an African American, who lived during that period, would have great and interesting things to say about it.
And yes, many things were lost in ’68.Report
I’ve wondered before what failing we could call the ur-sin.
I’ve read somewhere (and I can’t believe that this isn’t googleable) that the first prayer was “please make it not have happened”.
The ur-sin is a short time horizon.Report
I was three paragraphs into this post without checking the byline when I said, “This must be a post by Rufus!” I always enjoy them, though I might never see/read the works referenced.
I recently rewatched the “Samurai Trilogy”, directed by Hiroshi Inagaki and starring Toshiro Mifune. This is film is an adaptation of a novel by Eiji Yoshikawa about the life of Musashi Miyamoto.
I’m a bit underwhelmed by Inagaki, but very impressed with Mifune, not that he’s a stranger to me. But he has a way of letting you see everything about his characters internal process that makes the character completely transparent, even while he’s mostly stonefaced.
The film is less an action film than the story of Musashi’s quest for spiritual peace, and a way to exist in the world. Because early on, he didn’t fit at all. A man made for fighting when the fighting all ended with Sekigahara. This battle changes everything in Japan, since it ushers in the Pax Tokugawa – there are no more civil wars, Tokugawa has conquered. Musashi (or Takezo, as he is known before becoming samurai) is incredibly willful and physically big and strong. So he does not have a place in the new order.
At the beginning of the second film, he fights a duel with a chain and sickle master, in the end killing his opponent. Then, an old man – I don’t think he’s a monk, but he has that sort of presence – chastizes Musashi, with the words, spoken rudely, “You’re too strong!” Musashi is not mentally relaxed, and has little understanding of chivalry.
I love this formulation of what Musashi’s flaw is: “You’re too strong”. Musashi did nothing “wrong” by the lights of the society. Yet he keeps doing things that get people riled up and alienated. But his reflectiveness and willingness to change and learn allow him to progress.
One of the things that seemed significant this time through is how much Sekigahara changed everything. Multiple characters go from being rural peasants/merchants to rich city dwellers (though not all of them are of what we might call good moral character).
This seems an apt subject for 1950’s Japan, but one we could stand to learn from right now: You’re too strong!Report
Haha! Well, check out the Seventh Victim, if you can find it! I swear, if David Fincher did a straight remake of that movie, it would still work and we’d all be talking about how dark it was.
Mifume is brilliant! The Samurai trilogy is in my queue.Report
It’s so wonderful to read an appreciation of Dreiser. I’m always astonish how many people–English majors, writers, etc–who haven’t read him. Especially An American Tragedy (not to mention Sister Carrie). It truly strikes me as a WTF moment. So thank you for this! You’ve made my day.Report
I’ve wondered before what failing we could call the ur-sin.
The answer is pretty grizzly.Report
The film The Tenth Victim was based on Robert Sheckley’s story The Seventh Victim. The film The Seventh Victim was not.
I think they do this just to mess with me.Report