Own Goals, Email Servers and Classified Documents
Own Goal: A goal scored inadvertently when the ball is struck into the goal by a player on the defensive team.
Back when Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, it was discovered that she was using a much quicker but less secure server at her New York home to handle State Department email. At the time she and her staff denied any wrong doing, and pushed back harshly on any criticism that she had mishandled classified emails in this way.
After a years-long FBI investigation, it was determined that Clinton’s server did not contain any information or emails that were clearly marked classified.[1] Federal agencies did, however, retrospectively determine that 100 emails contained information that should have been deemed classified at the time they were sent, including 65 emails deemed “Secret” and 22 deemed “Top Secret”. An additional 2,093 emails were retroactively designated confidential by the State Department.[2][3][4][5]
The controversy was a major point of discussion and contention during the 2016 presidential election, in which Clinton was the Democratic nominee. In May, the State Department’s Office of the Inspector General released a report about the State Department’s email practices, including Clinton’s. In July, FBI director James Comey announced that the FBI investigation had concluded that Clinton had been “extremely careless” but recommended that no charges be filed because Clinton did not act with criminal intent, the historical standard for pursuing prosecution.[9]
On June 14, 2018, the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General released its report on the FBI’s and DOJ’s handling of Clinton’s investigation, finding no evidence of political bias and lending support for the decision to not prosecute Clinton.[16] A three-year State Department investigation concluded in September 2019 that 38 individuals were “culpable” in 91 instances of sending classified information that reached Clinton’s email account, though it found “no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information”.[17]
A notable exception was during the Bush administration, when dozens of senior White House officials conducted government business via approximately 22 million emails using accounts they had on a server owned by the Republican National Committee.[53]
This all came against two important backdrops – Clinton was running against Donald Trump for President, and there was documented evidence of prior Republican Secretaries of State using private emails accounts to conduct public business. And in the world of using sports metaphors for political situations, it was certainly an own goal.
Now, it appears Team Center has scored another such goal with President Biden’s classified document handling.
Here’s the story Garland laid out today: On November 2, Biden’s lawyers found a batch of documents from the time of the Obama-Biden administration when they were cleaning out Biden’s office at the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement, the Washington, D.C., think tank where Biden worked after his time as vice president. They immediately contacted NARA, which took possession of the documents the next morning. On November 4, NARA’s inspector general contacted the Justice Department to notify it of the document exchange, and on November 9 the FBI began to assess whether Biden had illegally mishandled classified information.
According to journalist Matthew Miller, classified documents often get taken from government facilities by accident. Those errors are reported, the documents recovered, and a damage assessment made to determine whether further action needs to be taken, all of which took place here.
As one might expect in a functioning Administration, Attorney General Merrick Garland has appointed a Special Counsel to look into all of this. That hasn’t stopped House Republicans from promising to run a few flags up the flag pole, most likely in their handily named but probably useless Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Government.
So far, what we know suggests that while the outcomes are the same in both Biden and Trump’s incidents – Classified Documents in places they shouldn’t be – the mechanisms of getting them there, the responses of each President to the discovery, and the level of cooperation are different.
And that may well make Trump and Biden’s handling of these document NOT ALIKE legally.
It doesn’t change that fact that neoliberal Democrats have savaged themselves unnecessarily at a critical juncture. It is likely that the DoJ will soon begin indicting people close to Donald Trump for their involvement in the January 6th Insurrection. It is likely that the State of Georgia will also indict the former President for election interference. Its also true that the clown car of a House GOP “Majority” clearly intends to keep thumbing their noses at the American people who elected them to deal with inflation.
None of that however gives Democrats (which my smart phone loves to correct to Demi rats) reason to throw caution to the wind and prance about crowing as if they are somehow superior in every way. They are not. As we saw with the railroad strike threat last year, Democrats are not really the party of labor anymore. Their support of Ukraine is noteworthy, but so is their history of war mongering in the Middle East.
It’s unforced errors like these – own goals – that break faith, and lead us to the low institutional trust situations that Jaybird is always crowing about (mostly wrongly IMHO). They prove that old white men, and sometimes old white women, need to get really invested in the 21st Century where most anything you do online will exist until the end of time. They also reinforce the idea that the left really has no good options left in terms of national leadership, because in driving ever rightward trying to out Republican the GOP (with things like making the Patriot Act surveillance programs permanent under President Obama), Democrats are leaving the left behind.
Mostly though, they remind us that the nation’s so called “leaders” are no good at policing themselves, and we the voters take our management and oversight duties far too lazily.
They prove that old white men, and sometimes old white women, need to get really invested in the 21st Century where most anything you do online will exist until the end of time.
It seems to be something about being rich and/or powerful. In the Microsoft antitrust case back in the late 1990s, it was clear that the senior executives at MS didn’t care that e-mail was discoverable written material in court cases. They committed all sorts of incriminating statements to e-mail. And these were the big tech bros of the day, who damned well should have known better.
Because of lifelong habit I read through every e-mail one last time before I hit send. While the big problem today is my fingers have developed a homonym habit, there’s one corner of my mind that’s asking if I really want to put that in writing.Report
I’ll go out on a limb and say that this will fail to stick, like the “Twitter Files”.
To clarify, by “fail to stick”, I mean have any measurable impact on public opinion. The battle isn’t for the hearts and minds of committed partisans, but for the hearts and minds of the low information apolitical voter.
And this slice is remarkably tiny, worth at most a couple points in any given election.
Biden and Trump are fixed, well known quantities, the brands of both Democrats and Republicans are very well entrenched.
In this particular episode, the Democrats have a simple and clear message- Trump not only took the documents, but refused to give them back. Biden gave them back promptly when asked. The Republicans don’t really have any sort of coherent message here.
In a larger sense though, I think its becoming harder and harder to make any sort of scandal really stick.
The Trump years have sort of normalized freakish and depraved behavior.Report
Point of order – Biden gave them back before he was asked.Report
Black people are even worse.
(What, Rice and Powell are black, right?)Report
I saw a metaphor that I thought made sense: Biden was caught going ten miles above the speed limit because he was not paying attention. Trump was caught after leading the cops on a wild chase because he killed another cop after said cop found his trunk was filled with meth.
This won’t stop the media from trying to both sides because it is deeply in their blood.Report
RE: Clinton
There seems to have been no reason for the home server to exist except to shield her from lawsuits which require her to hand over emails for her borderline criminal activities. However agreed, this didn’t quite step over the line.
RE: Biden’s emails
Unlike Trump, he and his team didn’t escalate this. They handed over the docs without a pissing match.Report
I don’t “crow” about the loss of trust in institutions.
I point it out to people who deny it, then explain how it’s not anybody’s fault, and then try to diffuse the responsibility among everyone making it everyone’s fault.
I imagine we’ll hit “but it’s good actually!” at some point.Report
Low-trust culture is real, earned, and in no conceivable understanding good. You and I disagree about a good number of things but not this.Report
“Perfectly Justified! Because of you people!”, then.Report
Putin’s mouthpiece Adam Schiff has put on the red hat and attacked our Commander in Chief on ABC News and in Pravda, probably, by saying:
Report
Schiff is right that intel needs to do a damage assessment. Notice who tried to stop that and who didn’t.Report
Pete Strzok, a Georgetown School of Foreign Service adjunct professor and alum, has reached the obvious conclusion:
Report