Pollution: Remediation and Rebirth, But At What Cost?
Pollution. It’s all around us.
I don’t care where you live, man has altered it in some way. Sometimes for the better, sometimes not.
There are many examples of places where people’s lives were turned upside down by pollution, like the former residents of the town of Centralia, PA. While nobody seems to know for sure what caused it, the town has been on fire for approximately fifty-two years. It was either one of many fires at the town’s landfill that spread into the abandoned coal mine nearby or a fire that was never extinguished in 1932 that occurred an an adjacent mine that took thirty years to reach the Centralia landfill site. The Feds eventually offered to buy out property owners in 1984 and most took advantage of that. There were seven townsfolk who refused to leave. After lengthy court battles they gained the right to stay and live their lives with the understanding that upon their death that their property would be taken through eminent domain.
Then there is Love Canal in New York State, the nation’s first “Superfund” site. In the forties, Hooker Chemical Company used that area to dispose of large quantities of hazardous chemicals. Eight-hundred families and around four hundred homes ended up being demolished in the aftermath of that debacle. It was remediated using the funds created after the passage of the Superfund bill, officially known as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Once reporters unearthed what was going on there in the late seventies it took until 2004 until the site was removed from the Superfund list.
Today the states with the most Superfund sites are New Jersey (113 sites), California (97 sites) and Pennsylvania (95 sites). The state of North Dakota is the only state in the nation with no sites.
According to the EPA’s Toxic Release Inventory (TRI), as of this writing, the Red Dog Mine, which is one of the world’s largest zinc and lead mines, located 82 miles north of Kotzebue, Alaska is rated as the most toxic place in America.
Gary, Indiana; Battle Mountain, Nevada; Luling, Louisiana: These sites bring visions of heavy industrial pollution to mind. In my home state there are nine Superfund sites, three of them being former U.S. Army ordnance facilities and the rest related to heavy industry and chemical production.
During my stint in government I was involved in discussions from time to time about Brownfields, which are former industrial or commercial sites where future use is affected by real or perceived environmental contamination. In layman’s terms, the difference between a Superfund site and a Brownfield site is that the Superfund sites pose a real threat to human health and/or the environment. Brownfields, on the other hand, do not pose serious health or environmental threat. The degree of remediation is far less invasive on a Brownfield site.
The demise of the steel industry and other heavy manufacturing in the Rust Belt corridor of the United States has created thousands of Brownfield sites calling for millions of dollars in studies and remediation grants to bring these dead and contaminated sites back to life.
Pittsburgh, PA has been the benefit of many Brownfield projects. The South-Side Works, Washington’s Landing and the Pittsburgh Technology Center to name a few. All of these sites were former steel mills or other heavy industrial sites that were cleaned up and redeveloped successfully using a combination of public and private investment to make it happen.
Before that first delectable slice of cheesecake was consumed at the Cheesecake Factory or the first bucket of popcorn was sold at the Southside Works Cinema, the South-Side Works — formally known as the location of the LTV Steel Mill (J & L before it) — benefitted from a brownfield and mitigation plan. That plan helped pay for the demolition of the former mill site and the subsequent clean up of the land it once occupied.
Cleaning up the site and redeveloping it allowed for the land to be used once again as a catalyst for job creation and tax revenue. While an associate position at the GNC does not even come close to replacing the job of one of the 14,000 steelworkers that toiled on the seven-mile site in its heyday, its rebirth has had a positive impact on the city and surrounding area, monetarily and specifically, environmentally.
Growing up in a steel town I have memories that are rather unique when it comes to the sights, sounds and smells that permeated from the mill that loomed large in the north end of the city. In its prime, 13,000 people worked there, along with other plants that either supported the creation of or consumed the steel produced there. The first parts of the mill were built in 1909. As the decades rolled by the mill expanded. It helped build a city, fight WWII and provide a livelihood for thousands of families over decades until it all hit the fan in 1981. The mill has been suffering a slow death ever since.
I remember the graphite on my feet as a kid after running in the grass, still wet from the morning dew. The smells in certain parts of town that would make your eyes water. The eerie red glow in the night sky coming from the slag pits. The sounds of the whistles, bells and alarms along with the random thundering booms that are created by machinery and steel making procedures that are so massive you really cannot comprehend it unless you actually see it. Waiting on the trains hauling ore with the steam billowing off of them in the winter as they lumbered by. The sound of the train whistle at night if the wind was blowing right coming up the valley. My Pap and Dad worked there. Pap ran the Diesel Shop, Dad worked in the Materials Utilization Department. My Father-In-Law worked his career in the Tin Mill as a line operator.
Weirton Steel stopped making steel about 13 years ago, now regulated to a finishing mill with about 850 employees. The majority of the land the mill sits on has been sold to a company that is in the scrapping and remediation business. I have watched them slowly dismantle large swaths of the mill over the last few years. Last summer they imploded the Basic Oxygen Plant, what was once known as “The Mill of the Future” when it was built in 1967. It was a massive structure. It is where the hulking ladles of molten steel were poured into slabs that would eventually be rolled into coils. Huge overhead cranes moved the brick-lined ladles that weighed around 30 tons that could hold up to 175 tons of that molten steel.
Just imagine how strong the building was that it could hold the cranes plus the full ladles moving along the superstructure. I never thought they would be able to knock it down as a kid. They did though, just like all the other integrated steel mills up and down the Ohio Valley. Flattened. Gone forever and with it America’s ability to produce steel as it once could. It was a sad day when the BOP came down. Everyone knew steel making in Weirton was long gone but watching that structure fall into a pile of dust and debris really drove it home once and for all.
Parcels of the mill have already been redeveloped and there are supposedly big things in store for the rest of the property once it is remediated.
Today I read a report by the EPA that states that my area now meets the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for sulfur dioxide in addition to all other federal air quality standards set to protect public health. That is a good thing. I have noticed the difference over the years. The sights, sounds and smells that I remember from my youth are pretty much gone. I can stand on my porch now at midnight and hear nothing but a coyote off in the distance or the very faint train whistle blowing in the wind. Silence, it can be deafening for sure. No more air pollution; the smokestacks are either dead or gone all together. I can remember it being said many times growing up, “that’s not pollution, that’s production, that’s MONEY coming out of those stacks.”
Yes, we have clean air now. Almost as clean as it was the day E.T. Weir looked down on the valley and visualized his mill over a century ago. The cost of that clean air today is thousands of jobs, livelihoods gone forever.
So now we wait. What will rise up from the ashes of what was once the largest employee owned business in the country, the State of West Virginia’s largest employer and one of the largest producers of steel in the world? Clean air is a start; Brownfield investment is coming too, I’m sure. The land is too valuable to sit idle for very long. As an example, the former mill site is smack-dab in the center of the all the shale plays that are fueling today’s domestic oil and gas boom. I am sure the land is on someone’s radar as it gets closer to being ready for redevelopment.
Environmentalists will argue that the land should be put back to what it was before the mill was built. Realists however, will argue that the land is ripe for development and should be utilized as such. Somewhere in the middle of this debate is the answer. I am sure whatever the answer ends up being, the days of noxious smoke pouring into the sky day and night are never coming back.
Perhaps there is another E.T. Weir out there that will build something that will last the next hundred years. Maybe he or she will look at the whole picture this time, and consider the environment along with the potential economical impact his or her vision will have on the valley.
Time will tell…
E Pluribus Unum
There is an appeal to having the noisy, smelly, polluting plants gone, but we can’t pretend they don’t still exist, that they simply haven’t been shipped to China and other countries where people are still willing to trade pollution for a chance at prosperity.Report
Exactly right OG. Some of the environmental controls put in place to clean up industry in America helped to destroy it. It was by no means the only factor, not even a main factor but it is definitely part of the equation. Nations like China, India; they chose to pollute with reckless abandon. They can undercut American industry due in part to the fact that they spend little if any money on pollution control along with being heavily subsidized by their governments. Their industry today when it comes to the environment is on par with America pre-EPA (1970).
About 40 min from where I’m sitting is arguably the largest industrial development to occur in decades, a cracker plant. The site is being constructed on 386 acres of redeveloped heavy industrial property. It’s a massive build that is sure to provide jobs and tax revenue that will grow the economy beyond the site. I am sure it will have the most cutting-edge pollution controls once it’s complete.
No way it will be a “zero emission” facility though. It is the balance that must be accepted to operate heavy industry and manufacture products that consumers demand. Innovation, American ingenuity and government regulation can make it as safe and environmentally friendly as possible.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/12/business/energy-environment/plastics-shell-pennsylvania-plant.html
Thanks for reading…Report
When you said “cracker plant” I was thinking “Keebler, Zest, or Premium?” and wondering what kind of pollution a bakery would emit.Report
Yeah, those Keebler Elves have been polluting perfectly good bowls of soup for years! Haha
Thanks for reading.Report
The Chinese, too, have discovered that the environment’s capability to absorb unlimited pollution is very limited. Calculations show over 15% of non violent/accidental deaths have pollution as a cause or contributing factor (how much it was in WV, in the halcyon days of steel, I wonder).
So now China is the world’s leader in wind and solar power generation. In 2018 China had 32% of the world’s installed photovoltaic generation, serving 3.3% of their demand (EU: 70% and 4.3%, USA: 11% and 2.3%, respectively). 45% of the world’s PV power 2018 additions happened in China. China leads also the world in installed wind power, with 36% of the world’s capacity (EU: 32%, USA: 16%).
2018 India, btw, is the 5th, and 4th country in the world in installed solar and wind capacity (6% of the world’s installed capacity in both counts), and the second, after China in installing new solar generation in 2018 (4th for wind, after China, USA, and Germany).
About 15 years ago China, also, implanted significant environmental limitations on any new coal plant to be built after that date. As an anecdote from another part of the world, in the early 2000s Turkey forbade coal burning for domestic heating in any city that had natural gas services (I.e, in most large and midsized cities).
Environmental concerns is not just for western liberals anymore.Report
I wonder, though, why China, etc. are still cheaper for steel? Subsidies? Or is it close to parity with what it would cost here, but we no longer have the installed capacity to produce steel, because we got rid of the plants instead of upgrading them?Report
It’s a combination of several things: subsidies, and new technology smelters both playing significant parts. A third element is that 86% (2014 figures) of steel production comes from recycling scrap metal, which has a much lower environmental impact compared to new steel.
As a segue, most new smelters anywhere in the planet are fully automated. The smelters’ jobs, like the miners’, would be gone by now, clean air or not.Report
There are instances of government subsidies for decades, especially China. The country where they had to cancel some of the Olympic Games due to severe air pollution. China also has the worlds largest mining industry. They account for 40% of the worlds coal output and 80% of deaths due to mining around the world every year. India is second only to China when it comes to world steel production and the government is highly involved through low taxation and detrimental import practices to shore the industry. India is home to 13 out of the worlds 20 cities with the highest annual levels of air pollution. That pollution contributes to the premature deaths of 2 million Indians a year. It ranks at the bottom of air quality lists every year. On another note, we flattened Europe and Japan during WWII. Helped them rebuild their steel mills with modern technology while our mills just re-tooled and went back to making steel instead of howitzer shells. American mills didn’t keep the pace when it came to modernization. Eventually Japan ate our lunch. Now large American corporations adopt Japanese management practices to operate. 5-S of Lean Six Sigma. I’ve seen attempts of implementation a few times in my career in manufacturing. The death of American manufacturing occurred slowly. Bled out from a thousand cuts. Many of those wounds were self-imposed, some are due to the “New World Order” started under the first Bush administration. There are not enough fingers to point the blame….Report
I’ve read that American steel vs. post-war European steel was a bit like Ford vs Nissan in the 1970’s and 80’s. The Americans were smug because they were the steel kings, unworried that the newer technology and methods used elsewhere, which had lower total output, was more efficient. The result was a disaster that took a while to unfold.
Chinese production figures, like all things communist, should be taken with a grain of salt. A few years ago there was a lot of worry that their banks would collapse because so many loans were backed by collateral that didn’t exist, especially empty warehouses than on paper were full of rolled steel.Report
The cost of that clean air today is thousands of jobs, livelihoods gone forever.
I’m sorry, but this sentence really grated me. You make it sound like a new Kheops or Louis XIV decided that HE wanted clean air the the howling of coyotes to enliven HIS evenings, no matter how many slave’s or peasants lives would be destroyed to please HIM.
The reality is much more different. Our planet, our environment, has a finite capability to absorb the pollutants those factories, no, that way of life, produced. The ozone hole was real, and was a real threat. SOx produces acid rain, that would slowly kill vegetation hundreds of miles away. More accurately you could have written : “The cost of those thousands of jobs, livelihoods, was life-sustaining air, almost (fortunately, for now) gone forever.”
E. T. Weir never planned to pay the full costs that steel making involved. Bumping the slush in the river when it was too much in the way was his solution. He never wondered what happened to people that drank that water. Peasants should not stand in the way of great men’s dreams. You can ask Louis XIV about it.Report
To be fair, none of the industrial titans of the day ever planned to pay that cost. And the titans today would, for the most part, avoid paying that cost if they thought they could get away with it (because sometimes they still try to get away with it).
We don’t appear to have a good way to enforce the costs of those externalities onto polluters.Report
I concur OG..Report
So, what I’m interested in is why Weirton was reduced to “mere” finishing, but the steel mill down the road from me was able to go in a completely different direction. Colorado Fuel & Iron was in the steel business well before Weirton and went through a similar sort of history. Peak employment around 15,000 people. Added a BOF about the same time Weirton did.
Today, as EVRAZ Rocky Mountain Steel, they produce over a million tons of relatively high-value-added steel products a year. Products in over 300 alloys and/or treatments. There’s also on-site R&D for some of their major specialty products. I recall reading some of the product material for railroad rails — who knew just how much technology goes into something so simple-looking? To one of J_A’s points above, the million tons of input to the plant are all recycled steel.
Is it as simple as better luck in who acquired them? Or are there more complicated things going on?Report
Also this book covers what happened…. https://www.amazon.com/Board-Betrayal-Governance-Management-Andersen/dp/0923568514Report
And in some cases the difference is just down to common decisions that the businesses made long ago, such as you might find with IBM vs. Dell or GM vs. Toyota. Wages and benefits, total pension liabilities and payments, number of retirees, outstanding debts, age of capital stock, lean management, six-sigma manufacturing, openness to innovation, staying nimble instead of relying on being a leviathan (that becomes a dinosaur). Often our big industrial giants grew complacent and inefficient because they faced no serious competition, and when that competition finally arrived they were unequal to the task of meeting it, slowly losing market share until their backs were against the wall.Report
Michael, take some time to read this piece by a young writer Ella Jennings, a former Weirton resident and WVU grad. It explains a lot. https://www.wvpublic.org/post/what-happened-weirton-part-1-living-aftermath#stream/0
Let me know what you think…Report