10 thoughts on “Lax Regulation: It’s not just for Republicans

  1. Well sure, but on top of that it’s bipartisan. Everyone from affordable housing people on the left to big corporate finance on the right is in favor of this stuff which is what makes it so durable.Report

  2. Oh no! Americans can’t afford to make an investment that they aren’t at all qualified to be making!
    The Horror!

    (Seriously, who the HELL makes a deal with five involved parties for a quarter of a million dollars, without a lawyer? — only your average joe shmuck.)Report

  3. Good post, Vikram. I think this does a great job of showing how little politics often has to do with principle and how much instead it has to do with serving the narrowly defined interests of constituent interest groups even as we deceive ourselves into thinking and talking as if we’re really serving a set of broad, coherent, and universal ideals.Report

    1. @mark-thompson

      It’s not a matter of narrow interests either. House buyers wants houses to be cheap, house owners want them to have a high price. The only way to please both groups is to make finance cheap. The only way to reliably make finance cheap is to make it risky. Add in the fact that most people have little to no understanding of risk and you have a disaster waiting to happen … again. This is baked into the structure of democracy.Report

  4. Great post. There’s a whole other part to Mel Watt’s speech that I’m writing about as we speak. I guess I better get off my ass and finish it.Report

  5. “The real-estate-agent lobby might not like this, but Loan-To-Value ratios largely dictate the health of a mortgage.”

    Not only does the real-estate lobby like it, but all the mortgage lenders hate it; post-2007 nobody will buy loans at 3% down, because you can’t resell them.

    Except, now, apparently, to Freddie and Fannie.

    This is not good news.Report

Comments are closed.