Love, Marriage, and Character Development
This post is part of our Love Symposium. An introduction to the symposium can be found here; all of the posts written for the symposium can be found here
I honestly think that the above may be the most profound love song ever written.
Some time back, a girl with green eyes and I debated the merits of God and the belief in a single, completing person out there for us. I believed in the former and she did not, while she believed in the latter while I did not. The debates felt like we were going around in circles. I would be over here, and then she would be over here, then I would be over there and then she would, depending on what we were talking about.
What she didn’t understand was how love could be real if it was actually replaceable? If there are hundreds that you could successfully partner with, were any of the partnerships really successful? Or were they just tolerable. I didn’t have great answers at the time. It was just something that was. I wasn’t looking for a prosaic partner. I was looking for a life partner. A soulmate, in a way, but a soulmate chosen and cultivated rather than one ordained by the God I believed in and she did not.
Minchin focuses on the shared experiences of love, which is a perspective that I agree with a great deal. A life with a Portuguese skier who brews her own beer is entirely theoretical. And while he can come up with a million other possibilities, in joke form or in earnest, it is his wife who he married, had a child with, and so on. It’s not inertia that keeps people together (when they stay together) but a bond that really does grow over time. The thought of dropping everything to start over with someone else seems… silly.
The larger element, however, is not about the person who made the decision to get married at all. It’s about who that person becomes.
I didn’t marry the girl with the green eyes. I married the girl with the brown ones. Without getting into too many of the details, there was a choice involved. There was a moment, and a crossroads. I knew at the time that I would be stuck with a ghost in my mind imagining how things would be going on the other road. A lifemap that the girl with the green eyes herself had me draw out, once upon a time.
As things moved along, though, the conflict in my mind faded. It faded because of time and because of distance, but also because of something else: With each passing year, I was growing into somebody different from who I was at that crossroads. As my life changed, I changed. My wife was a big part of that change because I had to step up in some places and back off in others. I had to learn to control my temper and I had to learn to be the easygoing one without sacrificing my own wants and desires. She, too, had to make changes and had to learn things about herself that she wouldn’t have if I weren’t in her life. Her priorities had to start becoming mine, and mine had to start becoming hers.
The question I wish I had been asking myself – or asking myself more directly – is whether or not I liked the person that she brought out in me and whether or not I wanted to be that person. Had I done that, the answer would have been obvious. The girl with the brown eyes inspires in me a greater degree of honesty, integrity, and patience. The girl with the green eyes fed in to my temper, insecurities, and overall anxiety. It’s not fair to mention the positives on one side and the negatives on the other as neither are the sum of how they influenced me, but they are indicative of what would have lead me to the right conclusion. I made the right choice anyway, of course, but not exactly for the right reasons.
At Leaguefest in 2012, the group of us sat in a hotel-casino and chatted. It took me a few minutes to realize something: A few years earlier, the girl with the green eyes was married in that very building. The idea of getting married in Las Vegas was never something that had great appeal to me, though had things turned out differently I could see myself coming around to it. There are a lot of things I would be doing on that other road that I haven’t done on this one. It no longer matters whether or not I would be happy on that road or not, as the guy on that road wouldn’t be me. It is cliche to say that when you love someone, and are with them long enough, that they become a part of you. But on a fundamental level, it’s true because “me” is a construct influenced by the girl with the brown eyes more with each passing day.
She isn’t unique in this regard. There was a time when the girl with the green eyes was playing a role in my formation. The girl with the hazel eyes before that. They came and went, however, while my marriage to my wife is – I hope – indefinite. While the person I would be had I chose differently is a nice-enough bloke, full of intensity, passion, and moral certitude, and though we otherwise would have a remarkable number of things in common, I have a life and self that I look forward to.
That was just lovely. In the most loving sense.Report
I think we’re often negligent, when talking to our children about love. We don’t really put much emphasis on helping them understand that ways the people we love treat others will eventually come home to roost, and that’s how they’ll treat us. We don’t really tell them that how they treat us will have great influence on the people we will become. Too much of our notion of the person we are seems fixed and not flux.
We celebrate the thrill of falling in love, the notion that there’s some one soul mate, etc.; but don’t really discuss the people we’ll be once the thrill is gone or worn thin, unless it’s as people looking for the new thrill.
Particularly for women, there’s this sense that she’ll rein him in, help him be a better person. But never much acknowledgement that the reverse — he (or she) may well help you become a worse person. As a result, we see so many people stumbling around, shell shocked from the trenches of love, so many families disintegrate.
One thing I greatly admire about my Catholic friends is the conversation, study, thought, and planning they seem to partake of with the aid of their church before wedding. I do not know if envisioning their future selves and their moral growth is a part of this, but it seems to be.Report
Opposites attract. But mix vinegar and baking soda and you get a volcano.
Similar people are generally more compatible — but it’s less of a rush.
If there’s one bit of advice all parents should give, it’s “Don’t Date Crazy”…
I know it looks like fun, but oh, man, it will burn you bad.Report
Great post, and thanks for that brilliant song.
I remember, at the religious college I once attended, the serious discussions about whether God had a one-and-only-true-partner for each of us. And then the follow-up worry about, “what if I make the wrong choice and don’t end up standing in front of city hall in El Paso, TX at the exact moment she walks by and drops the stack of papers she’s carrying, giving me the opportunity to pick them up for her and meet her?”*
To which my response was, “You’ve got yerself a mighty weak God, then,” which somehow never went over well (they always took it as me criticizing God, instead of their faith).
_____________________
*The example might be slightly exaggerated.Report
That’s just about the perfect response (I say as a person of faith).Report
Whatever half-assed version of a deity I might talk myself into sort of believing in, surely isn’t the type to reach into creation and micromanage the romantic entanglements of hairless primates on a tedious backwater planet.
So, I tend to take the opposite tack – if there is one and only one soulmate for us, odds are we don’t speak the same language and will never set foot on the same continent, we’re quite possibly not of the same species, living on the same planet, or even coexisting in time.
Given that, it’s practically impossible that anyone you ever met has met their soulmate, much less ended up married to them. And yet look at all the happy couples you know. So chill out about the soulmates already – not meeting them is clearly no big deal.Report
I’m pretty sure that the theory involves soulmates instinctively being drawn to each other to the point where they’d deliberately be born near each other, or be in a hurry to move away to somewhere else, or *SOMETHING* so that they end up close despite the ignorance of the host knowing why s/he chose to go to Dartmouth instead of Worchester.
I mean, assuming the existence of souls and then soulmates.Report
I think one of the things it took me too long to understand is how much who I am is, perhaps not determined, but at least influenced by the person I share my life with. I think this gets at part of what love is, in fact. It’s not simply a matter of caring or lusting or whatever. It is an opening up of oneself to another person, and if the dynamics are off, or limited, the opening can be as well.Report
I liked this post a lot. Jaybird and I often speak of having grown up together (even though we fell in love when I was nineteen and he was twenty-four), and this is part of what we mean.Report
“I didn’t marry the girl with the green eyes. I married the girl with the brown ones.”
As far as I’m concerned, anything that allows you to utilize a Van Morrison song is a positive development.Report
I’m still not entirely convinced that I shouldn’t find a woman named Amanda, for this:
Report
Maybe she already came and gave without taking, but you sent her away:
Report
Or when we’re older, I can lament that she didn’t end up with someone better than me:
Report
She didn’t appreciate all those jokes. “Hugginkiss” is her family name, dammit!Report
This is why we can’t have nice things.Report
You know that Seinfeld episode in which Jerry’s convinced that Tim Whatley converted to Judaism for the jokes? I’m not entirely sure that I’m above dating for the songs.Report
Chris,
I actually do know someone who converted to Judaism for the jokes.
(in all honesty, it’s a great way to evaluate a culture).Report
Chris – As far as I know, Pattie Boyd is single now. Rosanna Arquette is currently married, though.Report
This is a really great, thoughtful and insightful post. Thanks, Will.Report
It is.Report