Inadequacy and the Problem of Misery
[Belated Preface-12/29/2012-: My original intention with sharing the below experience was to set a rather basic philosophic question in a rhetorical situation that might prove more resonant. This is about me, but it actually isn’t.
I am faced again and again with the question of what my existence means. But this one is quickly superseded by another more important one: how should I go on existing? Then there is the issue of massive scales of misery which persist in the world. Less persists in this age than in previous ones, but the responsibility to continue lessening it remains. Inevitably then, there is the contradiction between my own desires–my own sense of how to “actualize my self,” create meaning, and/or otherwise “find” my self, and be content with it–and my responsibility to people who are under siege by much more basic and real maladies. How can I do what I want when so many others can’t, and probably won’t ever get to do, at least in some small part, what they want?
To offer just one example of how I see this contradiction infesting most of our moral beliefs, let’s look at gun control. Fewer gun related deaths isn’t just better…it’s unmistakably good, and in so far as we can achieve it, necessary. Right? And even if we disagree about 1. the means to achieve that end, or 2. how to prioritize the relevant values, so that maybe some number of gun related deaths becomes part of a necessary trade-off, we still agree that there is a point above which we are morally required to do something about the phenomenon. Right?
At the very least, this is a conceivable train of thought, which is why the country is having a national debate about this right now. And yet every day we indulge in luxuries at the expense of other people’s basic needs. We have a national mission to find sources of cheap energy, renewable or otherwise, and yet there is no similar national mission, with as much attention or resources, to find a way of feeding everyone who is hungry, and preventing those diseases which are preventable. In so far as there are social and administrative obstacles to be overcome, let us work on overcoming them. But do we all agree that whereas our moral sentiments demand we do something to seek a lower number of gun related deaths, we do not see the basis for that responsibility also ultimately requiring that we invest vastly greater amounts of our time and capital to try to prevent the loss of other innocent lives?
This is why I was being stupid and needlessly wandering downtown at 3AM in the morning. But this is not ABOUT ME needlessly wandering the streets. Rather, it is about the lengths to which common notions of morality which are often trotted out in some circumstances, are helpfully bracketed when it comes causes which would require more sacrifice.]
***
It started with a discussion of Marvel’s Avengers and it ended quite badly. I was drunk…my friends perhaps less so. Though I cannot, despite my current clarity of mind, retrace exactly how we went from A to B, the fact is that we did, with the debate devolving from one regarding the merits of big action blockbusters and their budgets, to one consisting mostly of me shouting about how WRETCHED IT IS that *we* go around spending money to purchase tickets for them while *they* invest hundreds of millions in making them, all while millions of people starve, fall prey to diseases, and otherwise live lives of severe destitution.
I was so angry, so anxious, so frightened. And I cannot say why the reality of this took hold of me so powerfully in those moments, as it has in others, though I can say that the fact that I was apparently alone in my mini-existential crisis only pushed these emotions to their breaking points.
I departed at a reckless hour, leaving behind my two friends and their apartment, marching east toward Philadelphia’s center city. My uncomfortable pace and residual buzz swatted away the cold, but nothing stemmed the tide of angst that had overtaken me. Passing the Greenline Cafe at Locust and 45th I thought about death. Not the millions that occur every year, but the one that will eventually greet me.
I thought about Christmas Eve, when, lying awake in the bed at my parent’s house I struggled to make sense of not being, of eternity, of inevitability. I began contorting my body, breathing furiously and venomously, in an effort to distract my mind. The uselessness of this approach drove me to fix a drink instead, and wait until it took the edge off my meditations.
Walking toward Upen’s campus I darted through some shrubs on my right to find a place to piss. It was someone’s backyard and the lights were off but I felt tremendously vile and ashamed. Footsteps came close and I finished up right before another guy came through the same opening to replicate the transaction. He muttered something to me in a bid for kinship but I don’t remember it now.
Every day people die and many of us don’t do anything to help them. Basic needs go unmet, and most of us don’t do enough to try and see that they don’t. I am the first problem. I did a few service projects during college. I have donated money this year to, I have been told, some extremely effective organizations. But I have never set foot in a soup kitchen or a homeless shelter, volunteered on a regular basis or met the Peter Singer requirement for charitable giving.
I crossed one of Penn’s courtyards and then a pedestrian bridge before coming to one of the campus’ more attractive boulevards. Large buildings, some sophisticated, others simple and elegant, stalked me on either side. Did the university needs these to do its research and educate its students? What if some of them could be sold, or rented, and the proceeds donated, or invested in life saving endeavors?
The path east led me to an alley on the other side of which was a loading dock for the university just below Walnut Street. I climbed up the cement stairway toward the moonlight and pushed past Drexel and across the river. Bars were beginning to close on the outskirts of downtown, and drunk people started queuing up outside of late-night pizza parlors and 7/11s, like I have done so many times before. I hated myself for the $35 I’d spent on micro-brews and hipster bacon burgers earlier in the night. Hated my addictions and desires and my ineffectual awareness of them.
By the time I reached City Hall it was still barely 3 o’clock. My bus to head out for work at my job in the suburbs wouldn’t arrive until just after 5AM. I sat for a while on a bench and tried to read some of my book about Modernism. I’d gotten it for Christmas from my folks after putting it on a list per recommendations from the Millions or some place like it. Reading it by my parents’ fireplace the night prior I’d found it riveting. Now I could barely ignore the cold long enough to finish a passage. I felt foolish for trying to read it and selfish for spending time on such abstractions. What does it mean for an old man to write about literature, a university to pay him, and I to read it, when there are so many bad things we all must ignore to do so?
I decided to start circling the block. After doing this a few times I decided to expand the radius of my laps. This helped warm me up, even as my feet blistered in my dress shoes, and I was grateful. It struck my mind more than once to duck into one of the nooks of the buildings I passed to get out of the wind and to huddle on the pavement. But these spots were always already taken. So I kept walking in circles, looking at the same signs and parked police van, embarrassed by my intrusive tour.
I could have turned back and still reached my friends’ apartment with time for a few hours sleep, but I am stubborn, and was ashamed, and still existentially inconsolable. So I went back to the bench. It was now almost 4AM. I sat. I watched taxis drive nobody nowhere. I let the cold back in as my blood flow slowed down again.
I do not know what to do, and the irony of posting this experience online is not lost on me. I feel it very sharply. My response to misery is inadequate, and sentimental expressions are not a substitute. But my incapacitation has not changed on its own. Expression is an inadequate step, but perhaps it will not be the last one. Perhaps a simple expression is the necessary first one–an initial step toward solving the initial problem: me.
Wow.
I’ve been there.
It takes a certain strain of self-centeredness to think that you’re alone in thinking about this (ah, I laugh at myself, not at you!).
But, still… if you have that human desire to change things yourself, rather than removing your responsibility by donating to have it done for you… Find something you’re good at. Really, really good. And do that. An example: http://www.goosinator.com/ That’s military grade computer vision. But what it does? Frees money for good things. There is a certain satisfaction in doing something yourself, even if it is foolish.
Or, take this challenge: eat for $2 a day for a month (It’s not terribly hard). Donate the rest of your food bill. Or break bread with strangers, sit on a corner and have a chat.
Or dress up as a gloomy goofy clown (more Marx than whiteface)… and go to a Children’s hospital.
Helplessness is a state of mind — its cure is action.Report
There’s a certain privilege, and a certain arrogance in the sort of misery you feel. I don’t mean this as a judgment. I’ve felt that misery, too. Sometimes it can be crushing. It’s also, I think, more a manifestation of self-loathing than perspective.
It’s a sort of arrogation of the perspectives of the subaltern. A denial of aspirations and progress and yes, frivolity. Frivolousness is a sign of human progress.
….I don’t have an answer for you, Ethan. I wish I did.Report
Brutal. I don’t envy you your powerful social conscience and your high levels of humanistic empathy one bit.
My own much lower levels of those characteristics rarely penetrate my cynical matter of factness and on the rare day that they do I am able to shrug and agree “yes, people die, are miserable, disease ridden and starving the whole world over. But… a smaller proportion of them are then every have been before. The vector is virtuous.” And then I sleep like a baby at night.Report
It is a luxury to be able to consider such things.
There is a distinct difference between sentiment and caring.Report
Could you elaborate?Report
Sure; and thanks for giving me that opportunity. The initial statement was likely unduly harsh.
The idea of such concerns as a luxury:
You’re out of the line of fire. You’re in a safe enough position to be able to consider such things.
Which isn’t exactly the case, fully. I’ve been in a number of extraordinarily dangerous situations, and often what keeps me going through that is a concern for others.
Sentiment v. Caring:
Sentiment is a passive state which operates internally.
Caring is an active state which demands that it be expressed externally. See the last sentence to the previous section.
Right now, I know of a pressure relief valve that leaks. There was no work order (a DWRQ) for that valve to be replaced in the last turnaround at that refinery. I was phased out of that area before I had a chance to submit another DWRQ for modification to authorize replacement.
It will be four years until another turnaround at that unit.
That weighs on me.
Those men that work in that refinery have a right to work safely, to come home with the same body parts that they went to work with, and to exit that gate under their own power. I don’t want to be the one to take that away from them.
That is, I understand where you’re coming from.
I know this as “human frailty;” a part of the human condition; lacking the power and the means to do those things which we feel truly important to do, whether for ourselves or others.
The solution is to embrace it; not to reject it. It’s a part of the journey. You don’t see the whole of the journey from where you stand. That too is human frailty.Report
Can you give an anonymous tip?Report
It’s not really that type of situation.
They already know about it. It was an operator that worked on the unit that pointed it out to me.
There’s just no work order for it.
And the turnaround has been done for almost two months by now.
The problem isn’t so much that it’s a leaker (which is definitely bad, because it affects process downstream), but the stuff that it’s leaking. That’s some bad stuff.Report
Welcome to humanity. You had a druken night of self-pity and wondering about the injustice of the world. Countless young people have had these thoughts, feelings, and conversations through the centuries. I’m sure people at Oxford in the 18th century felt conflicted thoughts about pretty snuff boxes while there was so much misery in the world. And they saw a lot more of it at hand.
I believe the Buddha was correct when he said Life is Suffering. He was also probably correct when he said the Suffering is caused by Desire. This is a universal and axiomatic truth. Though obviously there are scales and life is a lot more painful for some then others. This is completely random chaos. There are many things I have seen and heard happen to people and I am very grateful that they have not happened to me. At least not yet.
But we also need pleasure in life. Most humans were not meant or capable of living like acestic hermits and monks. We need to laugh and feel good and forget the pain of the world and our own lives. We need the company of friends and family. You probably have a point that if we spent even just a fraction of money from entertainment on fighting hunger and disease that we can do a lot of good but this does not mean we should all abstain from pleasure.
“A man must have aunts & cousins, must buy carrots & turnips, must have barn & woodshed, must go to market & to the blacksmith’s shop, must saunter & sleep & be inferior & silly.”-Ralph Waldo EmersonReport
“Though obviously there are scales and life is a lot more painful for some then others.”
I have heard the claim that suffering is distinguishable from feeling pain. On an intuitive level, I think that claim is probably true, although I have a hard time defending it or even grasping it.Report
I can see how it is true.
Perhaps suffering deals with your ability to get on and do things in life. A person might be in a great deal of pain (physical or psychological) but if he or she can get up, take care of themselves, and do what needs to be done; perhaps they are suffering less than the person who is bed-ridden and unable to take care of themselves for what ever reason.
Though I have a hard time defending this as well.Report
It’s probably nothing more than the way my brain is hardwired, but I’ve always believed that the best response to the existence of misery is not, in fact, succumbing to misery yourself. Rather, I prefer the re-discovery of joys in everyday life. (I won’t bother you with what those things are for me.)
One of the perverse side effects of the American belief that financial success equals happiness is its reverse corollary – that lack of wealth must equate to to unhappiness, and that where you are on that spectrum of poverty is directly proportionate to your level of misery. I have, over time, come to reject this commonly held assumption.
Which is not to say that poverty is a good thing; part of what keeps me from being a social conservative is my belief that there are some conditions we as a society should not allow our fellow travelers to endure. And misery, of course, absolutely does exist – a quick glance at the parents in Newton this Christmas should be proof of that.
This past decade I witnessed the gradual unwinding of each of my parents as a result of cancer. (They say that there is nothing so terrible as burying your own child, but I’m here to tell you that burying those that raised and cared for you with unconditional love is no picnic either.) The breaking down of their bodies and minds was a source of misery for each of them, and that misery was infectious to the many of us who loved them so. I can absolutely assure you that a time of mourning came with each bit of ash, be they buried or scattered. Eventually, however, the joy of who they were broke through the misery of what they endured – as is, I know, what they would have most preferred.
If I may be allowed to quote from opposite ends of the intellectual spectrum:
Jesus: “There will be poor always, but me you have not always.”
Shatner/Kirk: “How we face death is at least as important as how we treat death.”
Both of these sentiments are connected in my mind, and each speak volumes. As a young unbeliever, I used to find Jesus’s statement arrogant and self-serving. As an older man, however, I think he got it exactly right – if I’m willing to replace his divinity with the people and experiences I love and cherish.
Empathize as you can, Ethan – it can lead you to great works. But always remember that empathy is (or at least should be) a two way street: a smiling, happy, and helpful young man serving soup will usually do far more to help those in need than will a mordant poet.
Recognize misery, but cling to joy.Report
Good response old boy.
And a Shatner quote! +10 points to Gryphendor!Report
I endorse this worldview.
Recognize misery, but cling to joy.Report
This is a great comment Tod.
But also, and per my added preface, I am on the whole not usually like this. My cynicism and sometimes pessimistic feelings are definitely something to be combated, I think.
And yet I feel that at the same time an unwillingness to grappled with these things by many people is part of the problem. Why must we collectively turn our backs?
This is not to say that I couldn’t stand to be a much cheerier person. Anyone who knows me would agree with that (even though I prefer comics to Nietzsche, and video games to the news).Report
Why must we collectively turn our backs?
Who’s to say that we do? Collectively, maybe… but individually, people do what they feel like they can do. The summation of that is abysmally short, sure.
But speaking for myself, I’m not Mother Theresa. I can work at my kids’ public school and support my wife choosing to spending a huge chunk of her time there and work as a volunteer for the city’s citizen disaster plan, but I have to draw lines, somewhere. I’m part of a community, but I’m also part of a family unit, and I’m an individual.
Already I’m not putting enough away for my kids’ college tuition. I have obligations to them. I don’t buy new cars, I don’t go out to dinner often, I have virtually zero luxury expenditures. The only reason I have a nice TV is because I have generous relatives.
I could certainly give more, yes.
I could also go bonkers for never taking any time for myself, too.
We aren’t communal animals like ants. I’d argue that we don’t even really want to be communal animals like ants, but I don’t think there are many people who would be arguing against me on that score.
The needs of the many don’t always outweigh the needs of the few. Sometimes they do.
I don’t know what to tell you except everybody has to figure this one out on their own.Report
“I don’t know what to tell you except everybody has to figure this one out on their own.”
So my question is why the moral logic we use for gun control doesn’t apply here. What’s the determining distinction? The Joe Scarborough et al argument goes well beyond, “everyone figure it out for themselves.”Report
I don’t see that we have a moral obligation to cut down on unnecessary gun related deaths.
I see that we have quite possibly a moral obligation to cut down on unnecessary harm, generally. Sure.
But moral obligations… well, there’s two things here.
One is that all moral obligations are held in conflict, just like rights. You have a whole bevy of moral obligations and as near as I can tell it’s always going to be impossible to meet all of them. We’re accursed creatures, Ethan. The human condition is not a solvable problem space. I don’t want to sound too pontificaty here but… you can accept that or live in misery.
The second is that the consequence of our human condition not being solvable is that there’s no real way to determine that any given course of action is provably more optimal than another. We can all make guesses based upon our assumptions, but when it comes right down to it most of our wrangling about whose guesses are better (or best) comes down to us arguing about whose assumptions are better.
You see it here all the time. Most of the threads come around to those discussions; arguments about assumptions, not about practicals.
I find that I’m least dissatisfied with my own approach to things when I don’t assume that my assumptions are right, and I listen to arguments on individual cases, rather than Gigantic Struggles about Foundational Principles.
Because really, sometimes… sometimes I suspect that one set of assumptions is fine for a particular problem and totally off base for another. The search for Truth isn’t about a search for Optimal Foundational Principles (not for me, anyway), because I don’t think there are any.
I don’t know that I’m explaining this well.Report
” The human condition is not a solvable problem space.”
I don’t believe this. I think, we each make solutions, bridge gaps, solve problems. And, eventually, everything gets solved.
Not that this makes people happy (people’s set point on happiness varies, but is relatively constant vis material needs). But it does reduce stress, and relieve unhappiness.Report
Be grateful for the insights you were granted. Stop pitying yourself for having been open to the world. Take the insights you got and make something of them; turn them into useful action. Be grateful that you have the chance to do so. And, finally, for Pete’s sake, don’t walk around the block multiple times in dress shoes, no matter what the circumstances.Report
My suggestion is that The World is not your responsibility. Your room? That’s your responsibility. I’d suggest that, when you’re ready, you find someone else and share a mutual promise to take care of each other. If various other traits are aligned, you can make some new people (no worries if the traits don’t align, there’s always adoption) and then take care of these new people.
It’s a small thing, but it’s a lifetime thing.Report
In the Land of Shmoos everybody’s problems are ours, and nothing ever gets solved. I’m with Jaybird. Start with your own room and work out cautiously from there.Report
There is one very real thing you can do, which seems to be where your cri de cour started in the first place:
Don’t consume Avengers and all the like junk. Put the money in a bag or a box and then give it to a school to buy real books with or even toilet paper.
If I recall correctly, I got hipped to this site via Back of Town.Report
On reflection, I think this post could be attached as a kind of epilogue to the Charity Roundtable of a month or so ago. It’s a real question how to wrestle with the problem of the coexistence of plenty and want. People can pursue more or less stringent responses, but it’s not clear that in the end any response by individuals in the wealthy world will be meaningful, to say nothing of being satisfactory. But if you think it’s worth doing something, as Jason pointed out, you might as well do what you can to make your contribution as meaningful as you can make it.Report
Jason’s initial post has affected me the most out of probably any other this year. And I have been channeling my contributions accordingly.Report
All respect, but this is bullshit. I save 100 people per year from burning to death, with something I make? I’ve done some good. I save 1000 people from dysentery with something I make? I’ve done some good. (not mythical shit here, I know someone who’s helped with both of these, and I can cite the inventions).
I think we ought to focus on how we can find the folks bright enough to -solve- the big problems, and then help them prioritize their time.Report
I have struggled to formulate a response to this piece, as I have multiple responses, ranging from empathy (dark nights of the soul are no fun), to admonitions to suck it up and not be “that guy” – the one who turns a night of companionable drinking into a bitter and alienating rant – and please don’t think I have never been “that guy”, ‘cos I am sure I have at least once.
Nobody wants to be that guy, and nobody wants to drink with that guy.
But a couple things stick out to me on re-read:
I was so angry, so anxious, so frightened. …I began contorting my body, breathing furiously and venomously, in an effort to distract my mind.
I don’t know if you’ve ever experienced panic attacks, but what you are describing does not sound too dissimilar. Anxiety is often the boon companion of depression, I find (often common around the holidays, or so the conventional wisdom goes). I don’t know if you are prone to any of these things, and I am not going to try to remotely diagnose you or prescribe pharmaceutical relief.
But – I would strongly recommend getting sufficient sleep each night, and eating well, and getting exercise and fresh air and sunshine whenever possible (not sure where you are located, these last two may be in short supply in the winter months).
Also, this:
I was drunk…The uselessness of this approach drove me to fix a drink instead, and wait until it took the edge off my meditations.
I also would advise you to consider your alcohol consumption. I am no teetotaller – far from it – so this is not intended as judgement or moralizing. But the older I get, the more alcohol’s negative emotional and physical side-effects become apparent to me. In my experience, alcohol consumption can worsen both depression and anxiety (I often find now that after a few drinks, I get a racing heartbeat, sweat and scattered thoughts when I try to sleep at night – and your body can’t really distinguish “existential/philosophical” stress, from physical/emotional stress). You may find moderating (fewer drinks, accompanied by more food/water, or reduced frequency) or eliminating your alcohol consumption to be beneficial.
I don’t mean to downplay the philosophical factors in favor of biochemical ones. There’s no question that a spiritual crisis can precipitate a physical one. But they are not separate questions either, and I would advise you to take care of the thing that you CAN take care of – yourself. You’re no good to anyone else, if you let this thing capsize you.Report
Ditto on awareness of the effects of drinking to excess anymore. It’s not that I never do it, but I almost never do it to the extent that I used to do occasionally, and without even trying I always much more consciously consider whether I actually want to have the next one (which I often still do!). This change has been going on for a few years, but has accelerated over the last 18 months or so. I think it just comes naturally with age (to drinkers like ourselves); Ethan is considerably younger, I think, than I or Glyph, and moderation comes with age. Further, I’ve certainly had experiences like Ethan’s (though generally without the social conscience dimension – my sole mid-twenties alcohol-induced panic/asthma attack, for example, was neatly solipsistic and conscience-free), and I certainly wouldn’t say they are entirely without value in terms of gaining perspective. Smarter people, of course, are able to experience the same gains with less alcohol.Report
I’ll second this MD. When I was young(er!), I could seemingly drink endlessly without ever losing motor control, psychological control, or even having a hangover. (Well, a hangover a few times.) Now, I have to impose limits on myself, even when I’m just drinking a few cocktails at home, in the form of one rule: no drinking after 9 pm. I just can’t process the stuff anymore and drinking later in the night often leaves me in really bad shape. That night and come the morn.Report
I can drink late. I just have no interest in ever waking up with that feeling of wondering if I actually am going to be okay again. And the way to avoid that is to not come anywhere close to drinking the amount of alcohol that produces that effect.Report
It is absolutely a function of age. Until I was thirty, I thought hangovers were pretty much mostly-made-up things, most people pretending to feel awful (or at least playing it up) as a way to sort of brag about how much they drank the night before. I was always the first guy up after a night of heavy drinking (and we drank a LOT), bright-eyed and bushy-tailed, ready to go get breakfast and coffee and get the day going, driving my hung-over friends crazy. I just had a real fast metabolism when I was younger, and I could put them away and only rarely suffer much in the way of consequences.
I hit thirty, and I experienced real hangovers for the first time. They are no joke. And it really doesn’t take much now for me to know I drank the night before – like, anything more than two drinks and I will feel it to at least some degree the next day. I sleep TERRIBLY most times now when I drink at all, even just a couple.
I have considered giving it up entirely, because it sometimes also inflames my sinuses bigtime now (apparently some alcohols have histamines, and in any case alcohol dries out the mucus membranes, which can cause irritation/inflammation). I haven’t taken that step yet, but it’s something I could see happening at some point, especially if the culture and state ever decides to permit me to use cannabis as a legal replacement relaxant and social lubricant, since I frankly enjoy it more and it has fewer deleterious side-effects IMO.
But I do enjoy drinking, and it is very heavily embedded in the social fabric, so it’ll be hard to cut it out entirely.Report
I experienced real hangovers for the first time. They are no joke.
For shizz. In college, I’d drink more than I ever, ever do now, and all I’d need in the morning was a Coke, three Advil, a lot of water, an orange, and a long, hard game of pick-up hoops in the hot sun; and I’d be ready to work another closing shift in the kitchen of my college job & then do it all again if I felt like it. Now I need the first three of those plus coffee and greasy food just to get my head to stop spinning if I don’t cut myself off at the right pint, er point.Report
That sounds familiar Glyph. I spent most of my twenties as a raft guide and living in ski towns. Lots of drinking. But I was always up early – dawn, no matter what, back then – rarely had a hangover, never had crazy behavior. It actually took a while to catch up to the changes I was going thru, being the creature of habit that I am. It took a few times getting DRUNK and feeling like shit in the morning before I made the connection. (Ahh. It was the BOOZE!) That was a sad day, actually. {{sniff}} I realized, in that moment, that I was now old.Report
Alka-seltzer.
Seriously.Report
Word.
There’s a reason I had ’em on me in Vegas.Report
You know you are getting old when you talk about how drinking affects your sinuses.Report
Tell me about it.
Also, get off my lawn!Report
I’ll note two things for the record:
Drinking is why I left the apartment but not why I continued to walk. That left me early in the night.
My thinking about these things is unconnected to the drinking, except in so far as there are times when it grants and escape from them, or overwhelms my ability to ignore and/or cope with them.Report
Ethan, I don’t want to belabor the point, except to say that in no way am I imputing your thinking to the alcohol; just pointing out that not only is alcohol’s relief temporary (obviously, duh) but that in my experience its consumption can worsen the situation – both during the “high” (where you can obviously lose further control of your emotions) and during the “comedown” (whence, whether I feel “hungover” or not, I find any anxiety to not have merely “returned”, but to be greatly compounded by the physical aftereffects of even fairly mild (as little as 2-3 drinks) alcohol consumption – that is, I get all the physical (and therefore, mental) symptoms of anxiety (racing heart/thoughts, clamminess), even if I had nothing substantial to be anxious about in the first place (and so much the worse if I actually did, as do you).Report
Ethan, are you well today?
I hope so.
Sometimes, something silly, like making cookies or snow angels helps. And if you make cookies, give some away. Giving is the best gift, the hedge against the darkness of our souls.Report
Zic, I’m perfectly good actually. Playing Star Wars: the Old Republic and ignoring most of everything.Report
I am glad. Because it’s best when we go to battle with the monsters remembering joy.
I wonder if you’ve read War is a Force that Gives Us Meaning? by Chris Hedges? From it, I learned that ripples of kindness have the power to erode the most stubborn hate; perhaps our greatest danger is indifference to growing comfortably numb.Report
On the substance of the piece, I’ll say that the thing that has always gotten me in terms of the global misery index is the number of people without access to (enough) clean water. The comfort we have in that regard I think provides a stark example of the kind of schism that got to Ethan this week. I know I don’t do my share to help fix it. My showers are too long, and for that matter I really don’t know how much difference it would make if they weren’t. I think the difference between myself (and I think many of the rest of us here) and Ethan is that it’s been quite a long time since I was not aware of and pretty much at peace with my own basic vileness. If I weren’t vile, I wouldn’t be so indifferent to doing the basic moral stuff that goes along with being an informed denizen of the rich world: figuring out what difference I could make toward this aspect of suffering that troubles me, and doing it. I’m too lazy and selfish, and I don’t. Ergo, I’m vile. I regard this fact with resignation.
Why is this? I think it could have been otherwise. And surely it still can. There are personal events that occurred in my twenties that have something to do with it, I think – not that they constitute any kind of excuse. But I think one external event (again, not an excuse) caused my enduing sense of social helplessness/indifference more than any other: the December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. I was casting about at that time, more or less without income, but I was still quite concerned about global poverty and, as I say, particularly the water question. In my low-key and desultory way, I was consciously undertaking to find out what kin of things I could do with my modest means that could contribute to helping those without enough clean water. Suddenly out of nowhere, the internet was filled with the new that 100,000+ people were wiped off the earth by a wall of (very unclean) water, and millions more had lost their very modest homes and sat poised without possesions buried in filth and debris on the edge of oblivion themselves. The absolute magnitude and arbitrary contingency (Big Contingency, I like to call it) of this event bowled me over and, I think, doused the remaining embers of my active conscience’s fading flame. How could individual empathy or action be meaningful in the face of literally seismic events like this, which, in all actuality, aren’t even really that rare? I think that moment signaled the start of a slow reorientation of my concerns about wellbeing back selfward, toward country, locality, family in particular, and self proper (who in all honesty, at that time may have needed the looking after I could give more than thirsty children in rural Africa or Calcutta). Of course I remain human, so of course I still feel empathy for great suffering anywhere. But since that Christmas, it’s just true that my inner bell doesn’t toll as loudly for distant others’ suffering as it once did.
As I say, I’m at least somewhat vile and I know it. Perhaps one day I’ll be less so. But there it is.Report
Thanks for this comment Mike.Report
Glad to share it. I did want to address your point, which was clear to me. I also thought that Glyph’s point about states of mind (however achieved) was apt, though. These issues confront us all. But experiences like the one you had this week are almost necessarily about us as much as being about the external stimulus that seems consciously to bring them about.
Have a Happy New Year, Ethan, and all!Report
I liked this comment.
It’s chewy and revealing and talks about hard things.
FWIW, I’ve been reading about this stuff (seismic calamity) since I was in my teens. It ruined any chance that I’d ever be a card-carrying treehugger (kind of hard to both anthropomorphize and love Mother Earth when the bitch is trying to kill us all the time), and ruined any chance that I’d ever fall for the “but think of the children” line. Long lines of dead ones march through my head from time to time.Report
Just to note: I added a preface to this post to help qualify my intent.Report
I’ve done the same thing while sober.
Generally around Yom Ha’Atz Maut.Report