The Engineering Process (or Of Course We Know What We Are Doing! Except That, We Have No Clue About That…)
Oscar talks about engineering and the choices that go into it.
Oscar talks about engineering and the choices that go into it.
Paging Elizabeth Picciuto! Paging Elizabeth Picciuto! We have an ethics emergency!
League Alum Jamelle Bouie asked: “On a D&D alignment chart, where would you put The Punisher?”
Conservatism stresses deference to the unseen. Trump rejects that out of hand, and he’s on the verge of the Republican nomination. What happened?
Power, in the absence, of authority, can inspire some obedience, but no respect.
Are we addicted to outrage or just narcissistic opinion-having?
How does the unregulated “free market” determine the wages paid to prostitutes?
Libertarianism and the Left, and the more general problem for metaphysically individualist liberalism.
If we are willing to admit that there are social and political problems that we do not yet seem to have solved, then an examination of other-than-democratist and other-than-modernist thought may not be merely interesting to a few, but useful for the many, or even necessary.
Vikram thinks confirmation bias may be an adaptation to a bigger problem. Also, he finally saw Star Wars VII.
I’m super-interested in this book, just like Bill Clinton is and John Adams and Thomas Jefferson probably would have been.
How does the “slippery slope” relate to “post hoc ergo propter hoc” with a discussion of “causation” in a legal context.
To be fair, Slippery Slope arguments can at times be highly predictive. But that doesn’t mean they aren’t still a blight on clear thinking and honest discourse.
Burt Likko took a sabbatical from public affairs for two months. What did he learn?
Guest Author T. Greer eulogizes the neglect of our literary heritage in contemporary rhetoric.
Pascal wrote, “Too much and too little wine. Give him none, he cannot find truth; give him too much, the same,” so I recommend a reading this with a drink or two.