Kacey Musgraves Does What Taylor Swift Hasn’t: Grow Up

James Erwin

James Erwin is Federal Affairs Manager for Telecommunications at Americans for Tax Reform and the Executive Director of Digital Liberty. He previously worked four years for Senator Susan Collins on the Senate Aging Committee and in her personal office. A native of Yarmouth, Maine, Erwin holds a B.A. from Bates College. He currently resides in Washington, DC, and his work has appeared in The Hill, National Review, and Townhall. Follow James @erwin1854 on the platform formerly known as Twitter.

Related Post Roulette

15 Responses

  1. Hei Lun Chan
    Ignored
    says:

    “If she sang instead about having genuine grace for her exes”

    Have you heard Afterglow?
    “Why’d I have to break what I love so much?
    It’s on your face, and I’m to blame, I need to say
    Hey
    It’s all me in my head
    I’m the one who burned us down”

    or Happiness?
    “No one teaches you what to do
    When a good man hurts you
    And you know you hurt him too”

    or The Great War?
    “You drew up some good faith treaties
    I drew curtains closed, drank my poison all alone
    You said I have to trust more freely
    But diesel is desire, you were playin’ with fire
    And maybe it’s the past that’s talkin’
    Screamin’ from the crypt
    Tellin’ me to punish you for things you never did
    So I justified it”

    You really need to listen to Swift’s last 4 albums to appreciate how much her music has changed.Report

    • Burt Likko in reply to Hei Lun Chan
      Ignored
      says:

      That excerpt from “The Great War” is pretty moving to read just as poetry. I enjoyed reading the Musgrave excerpts in the OP too. It turns out to be possible that both Swift and Musgrave are good songwriters who can explore complex, ambiguous emotional territory.Report

  2. Bria
    Ignored
    says:

    Mmmhmm knew this was written by a man.Report

  3. LeeEsq
    Ignored
    says:

    The cult of authenticity is one of the weirdest aspects of Anglophone music criticism. From what I can tell only English speakers seem to really care about whether a musician is authentic or grown up or whatever you want to call it. Outside the Anglophone world, there doesn”t seem to be these concerns at all.Report

    • DensityDuck in reply to LeeEsq
      Ignored
      says:

      It’s an American thing in general; cosplayers will include “who made this” in their assessment of a costume’s artistic merit, and the player making something themselves is more highly regarded than one who bought pieces. (Versus Japan, where nobody really cares either way so long as the result looks good.)

      This is a thing for art, also; I recall a Twitter thread about AI artwork, and someone lamenting that the only thing of theirs that their parents have ever had framed was a pencil-sketch of a flower they did in high school, even though their whole job now is creating artwork, for which they use Photoshop. “They keep telling me it doesn’t look real,” the person said.Report

      • LeeEsq in reply to DensityDuck
        Ignored
        says:

        British music critics seem to be just as into the authenticity cult as American music critics. One reason why the United States has only had a few commercially successful hip-hop acts is that very few could pull off street cred and appear like they were from the hood. This is also why manufactured pop acts get denigrated in Anglophone music criticism. East Asians don’t seem to care.Report

        • Michael Cain in reply to LeeEsq
          Ignored
          says:

          What’s the old saying about it? Those who can, do. Those who can’t, teach. Those who can’t do or teach get jobs as critics.Report

        • InMD in reply to LeeEsq
          Ignored
          says:

          I don’t think it’s so weird. There are lots and lots of talented performers out there, far more than there are great creators. Just because someone can perform doesn’t mean they can also create. I think it’s therefore fair to hold those that can do both in a higher artistic esteem than those that can only do one or the other. The cult of authenticity grows out of the idea that people are creating something from themselves, and that there’s something more intensely artistic or unique than doing a kind of pastiche, even a really good one.

          But I also just think that the internet has shined a spotlight and we now know way more than we used to. You mentioned hip hop. As an example, I believe Dr. Dre, while having a tough youth, still had a few false starts in the 80s doing less serious more commercial projects, and the prominent form of him that came out in the 90s was a very intentional reinvention and image overhaul. It’s just that back then there was no wikipedia and YouTube and other social media and whatever else documenting it so it was easier to get away with.Report

    • John Puccio in reply to LeeEsq
      Ignored
      says:

      Johny Cash never actually served hard time. Bruce Springsteen never worked a blue collar job in his life.

      Some artists seem to get away with it.Report

  4. DavidTC
    Ignored
    says:

    I admit I don’t really pay attention to any of this, besides sometimes listening to Taylor Swift, but even I know her current concert tour is _literally_ about having different musical ‘eras’. I just checked the Wikipedia synopsis, and, yup, she’s got ten of them, apparently. (And as a theatre person, reading the descriptions cause me to go ‘What the hell? This is a full theatrical show, not a concert!’)

    To quote Wikipedia: The versatility of the show’s music, visuals, and performance art was often a point of praise in its reviews. Journalists Rebecca Lewis and Carson Mlnarik of Hello! and MTV, respectively, commended Swift’s stage presence and commitment to her artistry; Lewis described Swift’s alter egos during the tour as shifting from “country ingénue to pop princess and folklore witch”,[145] whereas Mlnarik affirmed that the on-screen visuals stayed true to every album’s aesthetic.

    So I seriously doubt anyone is supposed to see her as some ‘perpetual adolescent’.

    I actually suspect the difference is that Taylor Swift does mostly does _pop_ music, with the slightest amount of country once, and Kacey Musgraves does country music.

    And those have notably different themes. And the article-writer doesn’t like pop themes, so thinks this is…something to do with Swift, for some reason?

    But, anyway, of all the people out there, I suspect the person who _doesn’t_ need any advice is Taylor Swift, billionaire. (And one of the few billionaires who actually did get there just by selling a product people wanted.)Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *