The Silence of The Mandalorian
It did not take long to realize that Disney’s The Mandalorian was good. It was at the 23 minute mark that I paused the first episode just to see how much time had elapsed, so smooth and engrossing was the story and presentation.
It took longer to put my finger fully on why it was so good.
Many have pointed to the fact that being in a serial format seems to have freed up Jon Favreau and company to present the story in a fresh way. The borrowing from American westerns is apparent. Less noticeable, but there if you know where to look for it, is the call-backs to Japanese cinema and the serial story telling of early US television and film, something George Lucas himself has often remarked on as inspirations for Star Wars.
And maybe that is where the answer lies to why it is succeeding.
“Star Wars films” George Lucas explains, “are basically silent movies, and are designed as silent movies.” He goes on to tell how the music should carry the plot, the scenes and imagery telling the story more so than traditional dialogue. It’s a lesson that he applied well in the original trilogy, seemed to forget in the prequels, and is sorely lacking in the latest batch of Star Wars films. Those soaring John Williams scores with the stunning visuals are an unbeatable combination that unlocks the true power of visual arts, whether on the big screen, small screen, or phone screen. The story is the main thing, and it takes more than just writing to make it sing. Which brings us to that thing that was initially hard to specify but seems obvious now:
The Mandalorian knows when to just shut up and enjoy the scenery.
The second episode takes a good ten minutes for there to be any dialogue at all. The first is full of worldbuilding and narrative that is conveyed in actions, and hints, and expressions more than dialogue. Pedro Pascal’s lead character is given the plot device where taking off his helmet is verboten, making the nuances of physical acting all the more important. With his dialogue being a built-in monotone, the head nods and shoulder sighs are just as important as anything he says.
Fittingly, the series’ breakout star to date — “Baby Yoda” — doesn’t speak at all other than squeaks and squeals. Add in a unique score that hints at Star Wars but has a driving quality to the music-only scenes that hint more at a “Rocky” film, and the visuals are definitely driving the story with the dialogue just helping out occasionally. Which works well. With each episode of a bounty hunter series destined to be one fetch quest after another, caring about the characters in a way other than being told to care is essential.
This use of restrained storytelling is in sharp contrast to the current set of Star Wars films, the third of which is upon us. Unlike The Mandalorian, the latest trilogy has been a narrative assault, demanding the importance of characters and stories without them actually earning their right to demand anything from an audience other than brand name. The reach for epic then feels forced, the fetch quests seem distracting, and the Macguffin of each just never seems quite worthy of the three minute screen crawl that opens each film. They aren’t bad, but just good enough in a Star Wars film isn’t going to cut it. It takes confidence to do something subtle and let it grow into something great, not just go big and hope the bigness sticks as greatness. The Last Jedi sure felt that way, which is the brilliance of letting The Mandalorian be its own self-contained thing.
No doubt as it goes along their will be more call-backs to the known universe of Star Wars, but they now seem like flourishes instead of gimmicks. The confidence to just be quiet, let the title character walk into a room and establish himself, and not beat the audience over the head with overwrought narrative and dialogue. Let those sweeping shots of setting alien suns and fantastical characters chew up the eyes and minds of the viewers while the music lets them know how to feel about it all. Letting the silence speak the loudest as to how special this has the potential to be, and how the viewer is going to be a huge part of it.
That is a recipe for successful storytelling, whether as an Eastwood “man with no name” western, or a Kurosawa Samurai film, or even the silent movies Lucas spoke of involving Buster Keaton telling a story with no words. The sum of those parts and influences is letting The Mandalorian organically build a foundation to truly be something special, which is the thing the Star Wars product has been sorely lacking of late.
The Mandalorian is the strong silent type of a character. That might just be the ticket to re-ground and re-center the Star Wars franchise that has seemingly disintegrated some of the very storytelling methods that had made it so successful across generations like the Jawas who crossed our new helmet clad hero. Let him keep his own counsel, and let us in only a little at a time, and worry about just this weeks fetch quest for the Macguffin of the hour instead of trying to save the entire universe every single time. Let Baby Yoda be cute and the action be crisp.
Let it breath. Less talking, more action, the old saying goes, and in comparison to some of the dialogue Star Wars films of the past have been saddled with, this is a good thing. The Mandalorian is at its best when it does a lot with a little.
I like the action, but the use of silence — and the respect that shows the audience from the makers to keep up and stay involved — is making me love this series.
Long may it last. I have spoken.
First off, credit where it is due, the Mandalorian is excellent television and I endorse Andrews analysis unreservedly. Something that really rammed home to me while watching it, however, is how utterly nonsensical the economics are in the Star Wars world.
Mild spoilers:
Around Episode 3 or 4 we see Mando go running off to hide on a fringe world where bandits are raiding a village that farms krill in pools. In the very first episode we see them raid the village shooting up villagers and then making off with the fish harvest. In that opening raid scene we see a droid get shot with a blaster and blown up. I couldn’t help but comment on this and my husband shrugged “It’s just a droid.” Ummm.. yeah a complicated robotic artificial intelligence possessing machine? In any sane economic universe the first thing those bloody raiders should do is bundle up all the expensive ass robots! That droid they blasted would, in any sane universe, be worth a hell of a lot more currency than a few bags of fish! And then, as if to mock me, the same episode in a later scene the farmers are all out happily fish farming their krill ponds and there’s a droid WORKING IN THE FISH POND!!! How does human slavery exist in a world with droids? How? Droids work tirelessly and are much easier to maintain and control. How are sacks of food worth more than sci-fi super advanced tech? Whyyyyy? Whyyyyy???
But, I will reiterate- the Mandalorian is fine fine television and if Disney keeps channeling their properties into those kinds of products on the television format then their competitors had better start looking out.Report
Well, crime often doesn’t make a lot of sense, and sometimes value is highly situational.[1] In strange settings like period pieces, Westerns, or sci fi, the audience is used to not thinking through a cost-analysis of retail prices.
He leaned over and whispered “Mary Jean, he had them throw their guns down and hand over their money, but their guns were worth at least three times the cash they were carrying.” She whispered back “Don’t you know anything? Cowboys never steal other cowboys’ guns. It’s just not done.”
A thief steals the horse but not the wagon. We just take that as something that happened without trying to figure out if a horse was worth more or less than a wagon.
Another interesting aspect of that episode is that the story of a traveling warrior defending a farming village from well-armed raiders might be one of the oldest types of stories there is, arising with the dawn of agriculture. Archaeological work in Turkey and the Fertile Crescent point of a period when farmers, who necessarily had stockpiles of food after harvest season, co-existed with hunter gatherer bands whose food supplies could be far more tenuous. After a bad hunting season, it would be natural for the hunting parties to go raid the farming villages, so some warrior heroes were needed to defend the villages. But the warrior needs a backstory to explain why he’s bothering to put his life on the line for some farmers. Money, love interest, recovering from an injury, seeking vengeance, or on the lamb? All have certainly been used successfully time and again.
Now, it may seem lazy to go back to what might be the world’s oldest trope, but it’s all in how you tell such an authentically human story. The Mandalorian did it really well, and as an aside, Ron Howard’s daughter, Bryce Dallas Howard, directed the episode.
Someone former Star Trek writer now working for Disney may have suggested that, through lots of dialog and diplomacy, the farmers should convince the raiders to use light-sabers to cut down trees and use the Imperial Walker to haul them to the saw mill, thus becoming lumber magnates and bringing about an era of peace, mutual understanding, and economic growth, but if such advice was given, thank goodness it was ignored.
[1] Cops, pretty much every episode.Report
Good response George, well done. Off the cuff I’d guess a wagon costs a lot less than a horse or two but you probably have a point with the guns.
And yeah, true, it’s the trope and they stick to the trope just retelling it in a sci-fi setting. The sci-fi settings edges just grate on the ancient trope a bit more than it does in westerns. But your point still stands- the trope is the story and I have no answer for it.Report
A thief steals the horse but not the wagon. We just take that as something that happened without trying to figure out if a horse was worth more or less than a wagon.
I’ve always tended to think about it in terms of getaway and fencing the stolen property. You can take a horse through places that the wagon can’t go. And I suspect it was a lot easier for a thief to explain a spare horse than to explain why they had a wagon for sale.Report
Farmer: We can become lumber magnates!
Mandalorian 1: (looks at Mandalorian 2)
Mandalorian 2: (looks at Mandalorian 1)
Mandalorian 1: (points at Farmer)
Mandalorian 2: (shakes head)
Mandalorian 1: (nods)
Mandalorian 2: (shakes head)
Mandalorian 1: (nods)
Mandalorian 2: (shrugs, nods)
Farmer: What? What is it?
Mandalorian 1: Magnets don’t work with wood.Report
Groan…Report
I think it is fine. Will watch more type fine. I’m ok with that level of appreciation.
Do you think it is really really good? Do others (no tweets please. twitter is for idiots and their derivatives).Report
I agree wholeheartedly with Andrew’s analysis.
I call Mandalorian a spaghetti Western in outer space because it reminds me of nothing so much as the Sergio Leone films with Eastwood’s Man With No Name, right down to the soundtrack that echoes Enio Morricone.
Part of what makes a film rise above good to truly great is when things like the economics make no sense, or like how the whole helmet thing make no conceivable sense (He is forbidden to take it off infront of anyone, yet needs to take it off to eat; So presumably eating is a secret thing among Mandalorians, something they do in private?); And yet, even though none of this really makes sense, it doesn’t matter because the storytelling is that good.
This is the way.Report
“Star Wars films” George Lucas explains, “are basically silent movies, and are designed as silent movies.”
This explains a lot about their dialog.Report
Somehow I missed the Star Wars wagon. Even the original trilogy doesn’t do anything for me. I think I wasnt exposed to them at the right age, so there’s always been an over promise under deliver aspect to them.
This write up made me interested in the Mandalorian though, and I do like Werner Herzog. He wouldn’t attach himself to crap right? Maybe I’ll give it a try after I finish thr Expanse.Report