Oh Say, I Could See
Standing on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, looking across a long column of grass and water to the Washington Monument, I felt, rising inside me… patriotism.
I’m always a little surprised to feel things. I mean the big feelings, the physical ones, passions. My dad said of my older sister when she was upset about something “She feels it more,” and it was always understood that he and I feel it less. What’s more, of all the passions patriotism is one of the most uncomfortable. Loving my mother doesn’t have implications for ideology, not the way loving my country does, and ideology seems like it should be about theory and arguments and sense. Seeing American flags in a row behind a white obelisk and feeling warmth in my chest is a reminder of my recurring suspicion—that the reason and reasons of my worldview are just circles drawn around hidden fragments of passion.
I was on those memorial steps because of a whim. My brother had a few days free before starting his new job, and so he decided to take a trip to Washington D.C. “I thought I’d see the monuments and the White House and things,” he told me. When he said it I felt my own flash of wanting-to-see-in-person-things-seen-in-pictures (which there should be a word for), and decided to join him.
The city was hot, and humid as the Mississippi summers I grew up with, though after ten years in dryer places you forget how it hits you like a club. We walked to our Airbnb sweating and stopping frequently to consult our phones about what this august neoclassical building was. Then we rented two of those electric Bird scooters, the ones that are clearly a public menace but for the people actually riding them are wonderful. At 11.6 miles per hour with the wind catching my dress and hair, the weather was perfect.
We rode as close to the White House as we could get and made sure to whisper when we pointed out to each other where we would jump the fence if we were maniac White-House-fence-jumpers. We rode along the Potomac where the air smelled like water and visited memorials in a line—MLK, FDR, Jefferson, Lincoln. I appreciated that the memorials were text-focused, with quotes from the men in question carved in stone.
Jefferson’s quotes were written in copper, and the letters wept green down the white walls of his pavilion. Curving around the top was: “I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.”
Reading that, I found that Jefferson’s personal hypocrisy didn’t matter much to how his words affected me. I am a bit of a Free Speech Warrior, and like other FSWs I have lots of arguments about why we should respect free expression and free inquiry even for offensive people. I talk about “the marketplace of ideas” and “restrictions on speech are worse for the marginalized” and “who gets to decide what ideas are acceptable?” But in the end, all of that is circles around I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.
Which is a problem for figuring out what’s actually right and true, since those who disagree with me have their own phrases that they would carve into stone walls.
The day after seeing the memorials my brother and I fled the heat by wandering through the National Portrait Gallery and Smithsonian Art Museum. Here, the exhibits blended into a haze of pan-racial, pan-regional Americana. Benjamin Franklin next to Pocahontas next to Frederick Douglas next to Joseph Smith next to Sequoyah next to Booker T. Washington. WPA murals celebrating the automotive industry in one room, posters depicting Suffrage as a Roman goddess in the next. A bronze statue representing nirvana, commissioned by a transcendalist whose wife committed suicide by drinking photography fluid; a freed slave reading the Bible; stained glass from the mansion of a Gilded Age industrialist; cowboys and flappers and American Indians mingling at an Arizona carnival; ice skating in Central Park.
Walking outside, it almost felt like I was still within the curated journey through American-ness. Those men on the corner playing trombones over a Maroon 5 song—they could be an exhibit. Also those men in suits who were probably lobbyists or something, and the people on their phones, and the Planned Parenthood volunteers in painfully pink t-shirts failing to get my signature. Even those I wouldn’t normally think of as “my people” became part of a rare, warm moment of nostalgia for the present.
So it turns out I love America. With the Democratic primaries upon us, I almost hope the candidates pile on the cheap and cheesy patriotism, with flags flapping as the last shot of campaign commercials. I also continue to send best wishes to those Republican politicians trying to forge a kinder, gentler, pan-racial nationalism to run on, even if I’m skeptical they’ll successfully change the tenor of the party as a whole.
And for myself, the next time I see someone passionately declaring their beliefs and respond with “How do you know that?” or “But what does that mean exactly?” I will remember that my own beliefs, down at their bottom, are tangled up in poetry.
I remember hearing that love is the choice you make when you really feel like hate.
Like a family member who is being cruel or a friend who is thoughtless. Choosing to look past the pain and find what is good and noble in them even if you need to squint.
Right now, when we are running concentration camps of women and children run by guards who smirk at their pain, I have to remind myself that those guards might be the face of America, but the people who protest and work for justice are also America.Report
We have to run the “concentration camps” because America is so great, so unbelievably great, that foreigners will cross piranha infested rivers, walk the length of Mexico, give their life’s savings to unscrupulous human traffickers, swim across the Rio Grande (sometimes losing family members in the process), trek through the Arizona desert, flag down a border agent, and sit in an overcrowded detention facility, all just to be in America temporarily. And they do it by the millions.
The other day there was a warning that 35,000 Africans, from countries like Angola and Congo, have crossed the Atlantic and are trying to move through Central America so they can get into Mexico and then cross the open US southern border, having heard from a previous band of African migrants who had succeeded at it. That’s dedication. Tens of millions more might try it. And I can’t blame them. If I was sitting in a village that looked like a Sally Struthers UNICEF set, and then saw how LeBron James or P Diddy were getting along in America, I’d try to cross the Atlantic on an inflatable swim toy.
And it’s not just poor people from third world countries, either. Canadians like Jim Carrey, Wayne Gretsky, and Samantha Bee did it. Australians like Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban, Brits like Emily Blunt, Pierce Brosnan, Liam Neeson, Anthony Hopkins, Rachel Weisz, and even Austrians like Arnold Schwarzenegger have done the same. British actresses would meet Harvey Weinstein, after hours, in his hotel room, just for a chance to make it to America.
Many other countries value themselves so cheaply that they’ll just let anyone in, knowing that maybe three people, probably suffering from dementia, would want to immigrate to their patch of dirt. Does Sudan or Mongolia even have immigration agencies or citizenship application forms? Why would they? Who the heck would want to live there?
Is America the greatest country on Earth? Unquestionably, because even the people who seem to hate it the most, denouncing it at the top of their lungs, won’t leave, even though their job and apartment could be given up to an Iraqi interpreter who is far more appreciative.
They reflexively blame America when a father and daughter from El Salvador die trying to get here, whereas <a href= the President of El Salvador said “We can blame any other country but what about our blame? What country did they flee? Did they flee the United States? They fled El Salvador, they fled our country. It is our fault.”
The dream of becoming an American, a desire that burns brightly among Central Americans, Africans, Middle Easterners, British, Canadians, Australians, Russians, Koreans, Chinese, and everyone else on the planet, is definitely America’s fault. Yes, Trump is making the problem worse, but only because he’s making America even more overwhelmingly awesome.
When you’re running a country that’s the equivalent of the hottest, trendiest dance club in Hollywood, one where everybody wants in just so they can see and be seen, you’re going to need some serious bouncers at the door to turn people away. It’s not a flaw, it’s a measure of success.
Some might call this view “uber nationalism” or “narcissism”, or call it something far worse. I would say no, they’re thinking of America’s World Cup women’s soccer team, who unapologetically rub our greatness in everyone’s faces while refusing to stand for the national anthem or meet with Trump.
Yet this shows the world that even our political rejects are so much better than they are that the only way their precious daughters will produce anything more than national embarrassment is to get them to America, where we not only have a seemingly infinite amount of goals, but still manage to celebrate every goal as precious.Report
Auditioning for Sarah Sanders’ old job, I see.Report
It’s to bad those people who came for the wealth of the nation will have to pack up and leave a broke nation within 30 years.
I guess we will see who was here because it was trendy and who was here for reals.Report
I can imagine it now.
“California went broke, so I guess we finally have to leave West Virginia.”
Adam Smith studied what Britain was doing differently to get rich, since historically no country had ever gotten wealthy and stayed that way. One of the keys was that as Britain’s economy grew, it’s population didn’t grow to match. Per capita incomes normally never went up over the long haul because if a country’s wealth doubled, it’s population soon doubled, so everyone just stayed poor.
Often it’s been even worse, where a population exploded without any increase in GNP. This happened to Saudi Arabia, where the relatively fixed income was comfortable enough for every citizen to have a whole lot of children, all of whom have to share that relatively fixed national income, so their per capita income plummeted.
Sometimes bright shining cities on a hill only stayed bright and shining because other factors kept their population in check. Venice, for example, though extremely wealthy back in the Renaissance, was a very hard place to build or expand, so it didn’t get overrun with masses of people flocking in from the countryside. The same is somewhat true of San Francisco.
One a smaller scale, this is part of why we have neighborhood associations and zoning laws. Without them, the best places to live often fill to overflowing, such as the many colleges that are surrounded by campus “slums”.
Australia is a wonderful place that everyone would like to move to. It’s nominal per capita income is $59,600 per person. Yet it also maintains very strict immigration and asylum policies because it’s a country of 25.4 million, yet right next door to Indonesia, which has 261 million people with a nominal per capita income of $4,120.
With open borders, they would form a pair with 286 million people and a per capita income of $9,000, which is less than the per capita income of Equatorial Guinea, and 91% of the population would be Indonesian. Basically, Australia wouldn’t exist anymore except as a poor continent that used to be a wealthy part of the British Empire.
Many countries in the Caribbean are keenly aware of limiting any influx of outsiders. Many don’t let American’s work there because if they did, American retirees would take everyone’s jobs just to keep from getting bored. Without any actions to stop it, pretty much every nice tourist place in the region would be owned, run, and almost entirely populated by Americans. The locals would be priced out of the real estate market.
Would it be ethical for us to finish wiping out their local cultures, making it as if they had never existed as a people except in some tourist brochures? If people are free just to move wherever they want, and no one is freer to move than wealthy Americans, that can happen too.
If unchecked, we might one day ask whether any Caribbean island ever had an identity that was in any way distinguishable from Palm Beach or Tampa, or we might wonder whether Florida was ever in any way distinguishable from Haiti.
Homogenization in the name of diversity is an odd goal to pursue, as is insisting on a melting pot that isn’t allowed to actually assimilate anyone because assimilation is somehow considered racist.Report
Really nice piece. I was struck by this: “Loving my mother doesn’t have implications for ideology, not the way loving my country does”. For most countries, and for many in the US, loving one’s country is as natural as loving one’s mother. We’re unusual in that we were founded on an ideology, rather than an ethnicity or geography. That’s one reason that Americans get heated when arguing about our history. We’re discussing when America has lived up to its principles. When a Frenchman calls someone else un-French (or whatever their word is, if they even have one), it’s probably a reference to his ancestry. A French leader can’t be un-French the way an American leader can be un-American.Report
“Sur la Belge”
Your mother was a Belgian.Report
“I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.”
There is a reason this country is very hostile right now.
Excellent work.Report
So one day in Navy boot the Company Commander (drill Sergeant equivalent) had us all line up at attention to listen to Lee Greenwood’s Proud to be an American song. A pretty obvious attempt to instill a kind of romantic patriotism I believe. Does that really work? If it hadn’t been somewhat dangerous to do so, it would have elicited an eyeroll in me, but that’s just me I suppose.
I would distinguish between the kind of misty-eyed, quasi-romantic, patriotism that you see on display this week, comparable to the heady feelings of falling in love, versus a more mature, clear-eyed, appreciation for the principles our country is founded on and a feeling that that is worth defending. But maybe that’s just me.Report
A lovely essay.
One of my patriotic meditations is Jimi Hendrix’s rendition of The Star Spangled Banner.
There were several takes on this song when I was growing up… the “is it patriotic” vs. “is it deliberately not patriotic” question was one of the big ones.
It’s a criticism. Criticism of war, criticism of patriotism… but now that we have cultural context of “Jimi Hendrix playing the National Anthem at Woodstock”, it’s also patriotic as hell.
Truffaut famously said (or famously has it attributed to him that he said) “There’s no such thing as an anti-war film.”
There’s probably no such thing as an unpatriotic playing of the Star Spangled Banner.
Even so, criticism is possible… but the fact that criticism is possible is patriotic too.Report
To me, born long after, Hendrix and Woodstock and anti-Vietnam activism seem… extremely American. In a way it’s hard to dissent from America-ism–your dissent will end up wrapped up in America-ism itself. Perhaps its the same way for other forms of nationalism–criticism becomes part of the story of the nation–but as you point out part of the American patriotic story is specifically “America tolerates criticism.”Report
Criticism can be compatible with patriotism, just like sticking a knife into someone can be compatible with medical treatment. Sometimes it’s surgery, other times it’s attempted murder. Context hints (but only hints) at intent.Report
This guy here? He’s talking about the government using chemtrails to make people infertile.Report
To make room for foreigners!Report
True, and it always looks different in hindsight.
I am old enough to remember the “criticism” of the Vietnam war and it was pretty ugly in just about every aspect.
The things we assume are obvious and self evident today, (e.g. that Vietnam was a travesty, that WWII was an honorable cause)- weren’t obvious and self evident at the time.
Which is why some of the gauzy sepia toned histories distort more than illuminate. They make painful decisions look easy and comfortable in retrospect, especially when historians write history as a narrative with a coherent storyline or arc.Report
We disagree about Vietnam.Report
I finished high school and was on into college while Vietnam was still going on. Nixon cancelled the draft just before I was going to have to decide whether to move to Canada or get married on paper or enlist in the Air Force (who would have demanded three years of my life, but kept me stateside programming computers) — I damned well wasn’t going to go to Vietnam and kill people that were no conceivable threat to me and mine.
I was a “We can be better. We don’t have to keep killing people to no end” guy in staunch “My country right or wrong” territory. It was ugly.Report
Did you get a lottery number? If so, what was it? No one I know can’t remember his.Report
25. That put me in the first group called. I went through pre-induction physical and testing in January, and had about three weeks to make my decision when Nixon made it moot.Report
Mom tells me that Dad got his letter about a week before Nixon pulled out. He never showed up for his physical and never heard about it ever again.Report
I was trying to juggle things. Among them, I had an academic scholarship that said “Four years, tuition and fees” but it was for a specific four years and had a “good behavior” clause. If I skipped out on any of the draft steps before I could actually get out of serving, the scholarship probably disappeared. Most of the other choices would have cost me the scholarship, but I didn’t want to throw it away until the very last minute.Report
No one fought harder to end the draft even sooner than Senator Mike Gravel, who is running for President.
Do him a solid. Vote Gravel!Report
You really dodged a bullet, so to speak. Mine was 101.Report
You guys are making me happy today. I turned 59 last week and was feeling old but I was still too young for the draft.Report
I think you’re like me: too young for the draft, too old for draft registration.Report
I love this! Beautiful work!
For a variety of reasons I was very removed from my feelings during my youth and I am still to this day often surprised by feeling things, like you’re saying. That really resonated with me.Report