34 thoughts on “Math!

  1. The Femmes put on a great live show. Saw them several times as far back as the 80’s when they were really unknown. That first album…wow..played that sucker to death. There was a dissonant part of their success to their older fans. They hit big a few years after their first records and them being college radio darlings. Then at some point everybody knew them and was their biggest fan. That their first album was pure adolescent angst and struggle was what made them great, but it was still weird to see it creep out and up over so many years.Report

    1. We’ve talked about this before I think, but that first album is the definition of sleeper hit. That tape got passed down from hand to hand to hand; someone’s older brother or sister was always the source (I did my part, and passed it to my ten-years-younger brother). The musicianship is great (all-acoustic was punk as hell at the time) and it was such a breath of fresh air lyrically (that is EXACTLY what smart-aleck, sexually-frustrated teens sound like).Report

      1. Yup…it helped that they got played all over college radio as the alt scene was being discovered. They were odd enough to not be able to get AOR airplay, but had every other damn thing needed to be successful.Report

    1. Heh. I wondered if people would feel misled.

      I can’t say that math rock is my favorite genre – I like more melody, than a lot of them are willing to give me. I like some bands on the outskirts a lot (Seam/Bitch Magnet); some I respect more than I love (like Slint – I’d rather listen to Mogwai’s Come On Die Young).

      Polvo’s OK (though on the whole I prefer the similarly-dissonant-but-more-hook-generous Archers of Loaf):

      https://youtu.be/rlV8O_1n1-MReport

      1. Well, he is on the phone with record labels everyday, so making contacts in the business. He is a marketing major at a school with a well respected business school, so even if he doesn’t go into the music world (though its what his minor is in) he should be fine.Report

    1. Comment embedding only works semi-reliably for me now, if I follow these rules:

      -1 embed per comment (sometimes more will work, sometimes not; but a single one works pretty consistently)
      -Use the YouTube URL shortlink, not the embed code
      – Don’t include any text after YT URL shortlink, it should be the last thing in the comment

      I really like a lot of Isaac Brock’s songs on record (Moon and Antarctica is a stone-cold masterpiece) but MM aren’t very good live IMO. I’ve seen them twice, once in a very small venue and once in a mid-size theater, and they just plod live (which is weird, given that they are such a rhythmically-inclined band).Report

              1. I think if I’d seen them written out (with the .) or it had been only one or the other (’38’ or ’45’), I would have gotten it.

                But just hearing the numbers in sequence made me look for some other relationship between them.

                What made 3845 a “Thievery Number”?!Report

              2. Suuuuuuuuuuuuure.

                Next thing you’re gonna tell me that you only thought a song titled “.30-06” was about the year 3006 because you didn’t see it in writing!Report

              3. Mos Def has a song called “Mathematics,” which mostly just mentions a bunch of numbers, or numbers things itself, but doesn’t really do any math. It does have some percentages.

                Also, “Resident Totologist” is going in my profile.Report

Comments are closed.