Sunday!
So we went to go see Pixar’s new film Inside Out.
The reviews of the movie that I had seen so far have been of the form “PIXAR IS BACK, BABY!” and “bring tissues!” so I went to the movie both looking forward to a good flick and somewhat apprehensive that I might lose it in the middle of the day, in the middle of town and I don’t really have time for that sort of thing.
But I did want to see it…
But before we get to the review, let’s get into a relatively spoiler-free review.
Remember Herman’s Head? This is the animated film version of that.
A somewhat more spoilered review follows, read at your own risk.
Okay. So, like, people have emotions, right? Joy, Fear, Disgust, Anger, and Sadness, right? Well, imagine if any given person is, effectively, a Voltronish machine being run by these five emotions and the head/brain is the control room. Memories are created and the “Core Memories” keep the other various aspects of personality running.
We are given insight into the head of Riley whose control room is run by Joy with the help of the other emotions. Riley moved from her old house into her new neighborhood and this creates – A Situation. Joy is trying to keep running things but Sadness keeps horning in and messing things up. In an attempt to remove Sadness from the control room, both Joy and Sadness are expelled out to the more pedestrian parts of the brain leaving Disgust, Fear, and Anger in charge of Joy’s actions. In her attempts to get back to the control room, Joy learns that Sadness does some important stuff and balance is re-established once everyone gets back to where they belong and each gets to run things as appropriate.
And, along the way, heartstrings are pulled.
The movie is expertly crafted, the voice actors are perfectly chosen and at the top of their respective games, and the animation is vibrant and memorable.
I just wish that I couldn’t see how they were manipulating me so very expertly.
I mean, with Up? I was too busy crying to see how they were trying to make me cry. Inside Out had me noticing how good they were at trying to get me to cry to actually do so.
I don’t know if Up gave me a Pixar callous or whether I now know which strings to look for or what… but instead of feeling like having a good cry, I just felt manipulated.
(But I should also talk about stuff that I liked: I liked how different emotions were sitting in the boss’s chair in different people’s heads. I thought it was telling that Sadness was in charge of Mom and Anger was in charge of Dad. The cat scene at the end was pretty good too.)
Now, don’t get me wrong: it wasn’t a *BAD* movie. It was pretty good and I think it’d be a good movie for you to take your loved ones to. But if you’re looking for a good cry, just watch Up again.
With that said, I feel like there is some pretty rich soil in the universe of Inside Out and I wouldn’t mind seeing more stories being told with that basic conceit… here’s some of the stuff I’d like to see:
Inside Out retold with three characters: Id, Ego, and Superego.
Inside Out retold with three characters: A Janus-faced Joy/Sadness, a Janus-faced Excitement/Disgust. A Janus-faced Anger/Fear.
Inside Out retold with the exact same original five characters, but nobody leaves the control room.
As it is, I know I’m stuck with the Inside Out I have rather than the Inside Out I wish I had. But, still… I wish that they hadn’t made the strings so easy to see.
So… what are you reading and/or watching?
(Photo is “Movie Night“, taken by Ginny, used under a creative commons license.)
They’re reshowing a lot of the Canada Heritage Minutes on CTV this morning; is this something they do every year this week, or have they just been looping these continuously for 20 years?Report
There’s about 5 minutes worth of the same thing in Saving Private Ryan as far as I’m concerned. I loved this movie, and then the frame story, particularly the end part, just kind of goes on too long and is too tear-jerky. I kind of want to say, “Allright! Enough already! I get the point!”. I still love it though.Report
I’m in Juneau, fishing with my wife’s cousin.
Life is good.Report
Reading lots of stuff, most interestingly Brian Vaughan and Tony Harris’ comic Ex Machina which I had not gotten to before now. (I’d been reading Saga as part of my Hugo voting process and realized “oh yeah, I probably WOULD like that other one too”. I’m basically a Brian Vaughan fangirl at this point.)
Watching the same batch of stuff you’d expect me to be watching – finishing up the Hamish MacBeth’s at the moment.
Listening to the same podcasts, no new ones. (MORE than enough podcasts, may end up jettisoning a couple.)
Saving the long Coode Street where they talk to Kim Stanley Robinson about Aurora for after I get to read it (waiting on a pre-order). Also looking forward to Jo Walton’s The Philosopher Kings and K.J. Parker’s Savages, which are sitting on my table waiting for me to be less behind on library books. When the KSR arrives I may just chuck it all in, library-book-wise, return ’em, and wallow in all my lovely new SFF for a while :).Report
Loved, loved, loved Ex Machina. More than Y. Pride of Baghdad is wonderful as well.
I kind of stalled out on Saga.Report
Pride of Baghdad is the other thing I oughtta read.Report
I forgot to say, also, that Around the Block, an art-house take on the popular “white lady inspires a bunch of non-white high school kids to change their lives” scenario, was unexceptional EXCEPT for a handful of utterly superb performances, most notably Hunter Page-Lochard as the young male lead (protip, you wouldn’t know from the trailer that he gets more screen time than Ricci, but he totally does).
Which is notable because a) maybe you, like me, watch movies mostly for the acting, and might like this one and b) he’s going to have a (smaller) role in Cleverman, a show that is going to come out this year? next year? in Australia. It couldn’t sound more like a show I would enjoy if it tried.Report
Rounding out the Foundation series, on the seventh and final book. After that, probably going back to crime (either Michael Connelly or the Lucas Davenport series).
I finished Daredevil! V jnf xvaq bs ubcvat gung Xvatcva jbhyq npghnyyl jvttyr bhg bs vg, or noyr gb cerfreir fbzr qrterr bs univat n “tbbq anzr” naq nyy bs gung, fvapr uvf anzr vf cerggl zhpu jung ur unf. Gur pbfghzr jbexf, gubhtu V jvfu gurl unqa’g xrcg gur rlrf bcra.
And one episode in to the new season of Game of Thrones.Report
There;s also the Second Foundation Trilogy (three books authorized by Asimov’s estate), but I don’t particularly recommend them.Report
I’ll take a look if I ever get through Asimov’s writing and feel a hunger for more.
I don’t suppose these books picked up where the fifth left off?Report
No, they’re set at various times before and during Foundation, since Hari Seldon is one of their main characters.
There is an unauthorized sequel called Psychohistorical Crisis, by Donald Kingsbury, that takes place after Seldon’s Plan is complete. (Because it’s unauthorized, he does things like refer to the Mule as “Cloun-the-Stubborn”.) I read it a long time ago, and I recall it being very good but very complicated. I should probably read it again some time.
Kingsbury is an interesting guy. He’s only written about three novels, one every ten years or so, The most famous is Courtship Rite, which is about a human colony on a planet where almost everything is poisonous, so humans practice cannibalism for lack of other foods. It’s also highly libertarian. (No snark; both are true and important to the story.)Report
The rumor that I have heard is that Daredevil Season Two won’t involve Kingpin.
Which makes sense.
Give him a season to recover.Report
Punisher! Punisher! Punisher! Can’t wait!
Even so, in my mind someone like Kingpin actually works best as a side villain. He could make all kinds of mischief in a Daredevil-Punisher battle royale!
But setting aside the whole “They didn’t do it how I would have done it”… I did like Daredevil.Report
I thought they relied a little too much on the old ultra-v in the first 3 or 5 episodes. Once they tamed the violence down to “punching people” and “kicking people” and only bad guys (and, I suppose, reformed bad guys) used guns or other instruments, it found its feet.Report
We’re watching Season 2 of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., and I’m half-heartedly watching season 2 of OITNB, but with the weather being so amazing, I’ve barely been in the house to watch TV.
Rereading some old favorites.Report
@chris
I found the perfect book for you- Stanislaw Lem’s Cyberiad. It’s like Calvino writing SF! Here is a short story Right up your alleyReport
Now you’ve joined Schilling in his quest to bankrupt me with book recommendations, I see.Report
Well, whatever you do, DO NOT TRY READING Report
bleh, totally mucked that up.
Don’t try reading The Vorrh; the link above works properly. It’s a clear and easy to understand as these two garbled comments; and as mystical and cryptic as Jaybird at his most Jaybirdish. (JB, that’s a compliment, in case you weren’t sure.)Report
OH GOODReport
Ugh, not you too, zic. Not you too!Report
Aha! I got Cyberiad for free! Foiled again, aaron david. Foiled again!Report
Two words: public library.Report
Aaron David,
Working my way thru TBOTNS a second time. It’s a very different read, I have to say. It’s almost (almost!) an entirely different story. Which is a very strange thing to experience….
I read a bunch of discussion threads where folks were trying to figure out exactly what the hell is going on in the book and a couple things mentioned and explored make quite a bit of sense, especially on a second reading. I won’t post them here cuz Spoilers!, but man it’s a lot of work trying to figure out even the most basic plot themes. And I mean that in a good way. One way to say it as that this feels like a truly interactive book. The reader needs to bring it when reading or the best bits won’t even be recognized.
Again, thanks for the initial recommendation.
(Oh, and I haven’t read the fifth book in the series, where (apparently) a bunch of weird issues get maybe-kinda-sorta resolved.)Report
@stillwater
Yeah, there is a bunch of things going on that you can’t even attempt to pick up on with the first reading. Mostly because you don’t think to look for them, but also because they operate outside the both the central plot (how he becomes Autarch) and also because that might not be the central plot (which you don’t know ’cause Wolfe misdirects you, or you misdirect yourself)Report
Oh, at this point I’m not sure I could pick up on most of them, let alone all of them. Seems to me Wolfe has written this book from the outside in and presented it as a series of minimally revealed puzzles for the reader to figure out. A very intelligent and REALLY careful study of the entire book might reveal all the mysteries and plot devices/constructions. Course, I’m giving Wolfe a lot of credit here for constructing a much larger world than he explicitly reveals in the book, one he only hints at. And a coherent on at that. As of right now, I think I’m correct in attributing that much to him. 🙂Report
By the way, the old favorites I mentioned rereading are Zweig’s Der große Krieg der weißen Männer cycle and Broch’s The Death of Virgil. All books worth the time (though “the time” means something very different for Zweig and Broch).Report
I haven’t read any Zweig, but the wife loved Post Office Girl. The short story I linked is super quick, only take you about a minute. I really do think it is perfect for you.Report
Different Zweig (Post Office Girl is Stephan, and also very good; the WWI cycle is Arnold).
I will read the short story on the bus this afternoon, for sure.Report
Greece votes no. Life in Europe is about to get a lot more interesting. Is the EU only a political body? What happens when [Alabama, whose transfer payments {Social Security, highway funds} were denominated as loans] tells the rest of the world that they’re never getting paid back?
In the US, we call that the price of union. In Europe, now what?Report
(Mindless Diversions posts are meant to be – relatively – politics free. In the future, “Open thread” style comments are best placed on to Linky Friday threads.)
Anyhow, my response is here. You can scroll up a bit and see other comments.Report
I just ran across this: a history of Western Civilization as taught by Eugen Weber, in 52 half-hour shows. It says it was originally broadcast on PBS in 1989. I watched a few minutes of the first one: he led off with a clip from Why Man Creates, which I’ve loved since I was small. I’ll watch an episode or two and report back.Report
The only thing that I could possibly imagine that would be more awesome is a history of Western Civ originally broadcast in 1979. Or 1969! OOOH! 1959!!!!Report
Or 1689, because there would have been ether magic or time travel.Report
That one could be one of the sources used by the 1959 one.Report
Watching The Wire…
Does anyone notice Elba’s accent in that? My friend has it tracked down to West London, and without looking it up either.
I can’t freaking hear it at all…
Also wondering why the FBI building in Baltimore has that odd warbling hum…Report
During my scouting this week, I picked up some nice books, The Moon and Sixpence by Maughm, The Wayward Bus by Steinbeck and Cyberiad by Stanislaw Lem. So my reading pile just got a little taller…
Watched Moone Boy, which is quite funny, while still binging on Seinfeld.Report
I finally caught up on all the Walking Dead episodes that have been languishing on my DVR. I do enjoy the actors and the characters, but some things have me yelling at the TV.
– “Url Abnu, V abgvprq lbh unir n uheg yrt. Jr unir n fhetrba jub zvtug or noyr gb uryc. Va gur zrnagvzr, jul qba’g lbh tb bhg fpniratvat sbe hf.”
– “Trr, gurfr jnyxref ner pbairavragyl genccrq oruvaq n punvayvax srapr. Vg jbhyq gnxr whfg n srj zbzragf gb qvfcngpu gurz nyy naq znxr fher gurl jba’g rng hf yngre. Yrg’f whfg vtaber gurz.”
– “Gur jbeguyrff cevrfg jubfr yvsr jr fnirq vf onq-zbhguvat hf gb gur yrnqre bs guvf frggyrzrag naq gelvat gb trg hf xvpxrq bhg. V’yy whfg xrrc guvf haqre zl ung.”
– “Yrg’f tb sbe n jnyx va gur mbzovr vasrfgrq jbbqf. V qba’g jnag gb pneel bar bs gur cyragvshy evsyrf be fubgthaf, fb V’yy whfg gnxr 1 cvfgby.”
“Bx, V qba’g arrq nal thaf ng nyy, V’yy whfg gnxr n xavsr.”
Gur bire-gur-gbc tber jr’ir frra guvf frnfba ybbxf yvxr evqvphybhf O-zbivr ubeebe fcrpvny rssrpgf, rfcrpvnyyl Abnu’f qrngu. Vg ernyyl qvzvavfurq gur vzcnpg bs n flzcngurgvp punenpgre’f qrngu. Fbzrgvzrf yrff vf zber.Report
So I decided to watch an episode of Dukes of Hazzard because reasons. (No politics!)
Imagine my surprise seeing (a very young!) Mr Belding (from Saved By The Bell) as one of the thuggy bad guys pulling a gun on the Dukes. He was apparently in three episodes! (as different characters).Report
Considering the average age of the Dukes audience, the producers probably thought that viewers would be too young or dumb to notice.Report