Working Through Tragedy (UPDATE!)
When, how, and even if to talk to children about tragedy are hard questions to answer. A variety of things should be considered before broaching the subject. It is particularly troublesome when the victims of tragedy are of an age that it would otherwise be inappropriate to discuss such a tragedy with, as is the case for today’s shooting in Connecticut. But here is some advise, with the caveat that I am an experienced educator with a bachelors and masters in education but am NOT a trained therapist of any kind.
1.) When deciding if you will broach a topic with your child, consider the likelihood that they will find out otherwise. You may prefer that your child remain blissfully ignorant to certain realities of the world until they are older (and this is sometimes the recommended tack) but this is not always possible. As such, if you think it likely that they will be exposed to the information, you might want to stay out in front and make sure they are introduced to it on the terms you prefer.
2.) Specifically when discussing death, consider children’s conception of such. Children younger than the victims of this tragedy often don’t understand the permanence of death; it is why young children often seem unfazed, as they assume that things that are dead are only temporarily so.
3.) Recognize the difference between what children are asking and what answers they are actually seeking. These are often starkly different. Young children are highly egocentric. For instance, when they fret over the potential death of a parent, it is rarely for the parent’s sake. They may ask, “What if Mommy dies?” What they are really wondering is, “What will happen to me if you die?” In this case, many of children’s questions will all be seeking the answer to a single question: Will or can this happen to me? The troubling thing that this tragedy exposes is we can never definitively say, “No.” And while a bit of perspective will remind us that the likelihood of being a victim of such a tragedy is remarkably low, that is beyond the conceptual understanding of a child. As such, assure your child(ren) that you and the other adults in their life are dedicated to their safety and security. Let them know that no matter what happens, you will do all that you can to ensure they are loved and cared for. As I say to children who demonstrate undue anxiety or fear, “It’s my job to keep you safe. It’s your job to play and be a kid. Let’s both get to work.”
4.) Be mindful of what you are modeling for them. You might be verbally reassuring them but if you are a nervous wreck (an understandable state to be in), most children are astute enough to pick up on that, thereby compromising your words. It is okay to let your child know that you too are saddened or sad or upset or angry or afraid at the news, but model for them how you will manage these emotions and maintain the appropriate perspective to resume living your life.
5.) Should you decide to take additional steps to safeguard your children, be mindful of what you are communicating to them. Children who grow up behind barred windows and electric fingers learn that the world is a scary place full of people they cannot trust. Do not be naive; take the steps you think are necessary. But whenever possible, do them discretely and let your children know that despite your steps to ensure safety, the world is full of people they can known and trust and love.
This list is incomplete. I will likely add to it as I think of more. I can hopefully back much of this up with additional resources but wanted to put something up in the meantime since school is getting out and children are coming home. I was fortunate enough to hug my 13 little angels on their way out the door today and look forward to doing so for the next 100+ school days, a treat I am confident I will enjoy every day that I remain a teacher.
***UPDATE***
A few more things to think about…
6.) Don’t lie. Don’t ever lie. Withhold the truth if you think it right (and it often is) but do not set them up for disappointment. Do not tell them nothing bad will ever happen to them. Do not tell them you will never die. Those things will happen. And you don’t want them compounding their grief with, “Why did mommy/daddy lie to me about this?”
7.) Less is often more when it comes to information. Do your best to control the flow of information. Kids don’t need to know every grizzly detail, even if they seem to want it. You will often only be giving them more ammo for fear and anxiety.
Thank you for this, Kazzy.Report
What I need help with is an answer to “Why would someone do something like that to little kids?”
I’ve no answer to that which would be satisfactory to an adult. How could I possibly hope to explain it to a child?Report
Burt, here’s how I answered that question for my own kids.
Everyone gets mad. Everyone has a bad day. If we’re lucky, we have people around us who care for us and sometimes we’re even mean to the people who love us. It’s just the way people are. It’s okay to be mad sometimes. Life can be terribly frustrating. Have you ever felt like you were trying to be good and things got so bad you couldn’t just go on being good any more? Everyone feels that way sometimes. It’s okay to be mad. What matters is what you do with those feelings.
This for very young people from Mr RogersReport
Great points, Blaise.Report
Burt,
I think it’s okay to say, “I don’t know.” Not all questions have answers. I would avoid oversimplified talk of good and evil. Depending on the age, I might say something along the lines of, “Sometimes people make really bad choices. They might be really angry or upset or have something else that makes it hard for them to do the right thing. Instead of asking for help, they think that doing what they did will make things better. It didn’t and it doesn’t.”
I realize that is an imperfect answer because, as you said, there is no perfect answer.Report
No shit, Burt. I volunteer as a crossing guard at my kids’ school and I cannot fathom what would possibly send someone so off-kilter that they could possibly look at the faces that I see every afternoon and still feel compelled to shoot them.
Is that the manifestation of that person’s pain? Or have they so detached themsleves from the reality we live in that it doesn’t register?Report
Discussions of insanity or evil seem so very insufficient.Report
Fortunately my kids are young enough that I won’t have to face that question. I’m unambiguously in the “they are too young for this” category, so this should not come up unless some older kid starts talking about it at school next wk.
I am also stumped by your question. Most bad acts, even horrible acts, make sense to me in some way. I can understand people who kill their girlfriend and themselves in a rage. People like McVeigh or the Unabomber also make sense in their way, a warped view of reality that explains their murderous acts. I understand sexual predators and even evil people like Hitler or Pol Pot or Stalin. But I do not understand this act on any level. Extreme antisocial acts are rightly unsettling to us, but this one is particularly baffling and therefore frightening.Report
Thank you, Kazzy.Report
Well done, Kaz.Report
Not that you need my endorsement for this, but I concur with all of it. Well done indeed.Report
I appreciate that. As noted, I have a certain experience and expertise on this matter but am far from the final word on this. You endorsement means a lot. Thank you.Report
Kazzy, Blaise, excellent.
I would add one thing: If you’ve older children, particularly teenagers, there’s a good chance violence (or the potential of) has already brushed their lives; friends brandishing, being met with suspicion themselves, friends or friends-of-friends who are mentally unstable and exhibit violente potential, and sometimes violent-seeming confrontations with law enforcement.
It’s really important that they be able to talk about it with you. Keep the door of talk open, and keep your cool. Don’t panic, breath deeply, and let them talk.Report
Thanks, Zic. If we’re going to move forward on curbing violence, it is because we are going to get better at managing the impulses that lead to violence. We will never eliminate violence entirely, but we can hopefully lessen it. Encouraging all children, young and old alike, to identify their feelings, to feel comfortable speaking about their feelings, and to appropriately seek help when they cannot manage their emotions themselves will go a long way towards this end.
As Blaise said, never fault a child for their emotion; work with them to find an appropriate outlet.Report
Kazzy,
If we’re going to move forward on curbing violence, it is because we are going to get better at managing the impulses that lead to violence.
Beautifully put. I said, not so eloquently, much the same of pedophiles the other day. It’s preventative social medicine, recognizing that something will happen, and attempting to bend the trend line down in a reasonable manner.
Thank you for that.Report
I hope my friend and colleague Kazzy will not mind if I also direct people to this similar and helpful article in the New York Times.Report
Please do. I am but one voice offering what I can.Report
Great post and comments, thanks.Report
Excellent work. Thank you.Report
Mary,
I love your avatar. Very relaxing.Report
Thank you. I grew up in a small town surrounded by Redwoods. It’s a beautiful place, but the worst thing that could happen to a teenage kid.Report
Probably not worse than growing up near devil worshipers…Report
Protip: keep a goat’s-skull mask hanging on hand in your entryway. When the Jehova’s Witnesses come knocking, put it on before opening the door to answer.
They’ll stop bothering you real quick.Report
Great thoughts K.
I especially worry about the harm of your number 5. The lasting wake of this action may be to further insulate children from the world. Over reaction seems likely.Report
Lenore Skenazy made headlines a few years back when she let her young son (I believe he was around 9 years old) ride the NY subway by himself. From there, she has started a movement called “Free Range Kids” (freerangekids.com) that documents efforts to move us towards further insulating children and steps we can take to avoid it. I believe she goes too far at times, which is understandable given that she is trying to push a pendulum that has swung too far towards absolute fear of “stranger danger”. But her overarching message is a sound one. One of my favorite things she advocates it thus (paraphrased): Tell your kids to talk to strangers. Then they’ll have one less stranger in their life. I tend not to recommend her to parents because she can be a bit whacko on stuff, but I’m confident the thoughtful folks here can discern the positive messages and advice she offers.Report
Yeah, Americans do do a lot of insulating of kids. A bothersome amount, actually.
Try telling most parents that their nine year old was setting fires (safely) in the woods…
They’d go ballistic!Report
Maybe I’m overengineering this, but how much should we talk to kids about this? Is it important to keep circling back and filling in gaps: a few days later “the person who did this is on trial”, a few weeks later “the person who did this was sent to jail”, a few months later “schools are instituting such and such a policy to prevent this”. For me, this kind of thinking helps put the whole event into some kind of context that I feel like I can at least comprehend and grapple with. But for kids, could it run the risk of forcing them to re-live the grief experience without any consolation?
I remember hearing that some kids who watched news footage of 9/11 thought it was happening over and over again each time, is that true? Are there things we should not talk about to avoid that?Report
Great question.
The kids will largely serve as your guide. They’ll ask questions. You’ll respond. When they stop asking questions, stop responding. I would only prompt them if it seemed they were struggling but not talking about it. Otherwise, return to and maintain normalcy. It won’t be necessary in this case (the shooter is dead), but I wouldn’t offer up constant updates such as what you mention here unless there was a specific reason. If a child was highly interested/focused on what was going to happen to the perpetrator in a meaningful way (more likely for older kids, if at all), it might be appropriate. Otherwise, I’d recommend let sleeping dogs lie. This is what I refer to when I talk about controlling the flow of information. There is a tendency to assume more information begets more understanding, which is not usually the case for young children. More information leads to more questions, which is GOOD in most cases, but not when dealing with something beyond their understanding, such as events like this.
I was not yet working in schools in ’01, but it wouldn’t shock me to hear that was the case for 9/11. Kids, particularly young kids, have a very different understanding of place and time, truth and fiction, reality and fantasy. Young kids seeing news reports on past events can very easily interpret them as happening in real time.Report