Finally an actual answer. Took enough to pry the answers out of you.

So, the whole issue is it is not fair the way they applied the tariffs. Poor countries with a high relative trade imbalance should have a break from what is imposed on the other countries.

For the most part, I agree with you on the very small ones like Cambodia. We are talking about such a relatively minor amount of trade for the US and because the country is so poor, they do not buy much. Also, there is little to no ability for the country to make changes that would make this "fairer". One size fits all strategies rarely fit the outliers.

As for the rest, please, if they used AI you would be railing against it like the those above and say he has no plan. If Trump did not impose the tariffs he said he would, you would say he caved to pressure and is waffling with no plan. If he did not apply the plan evenly, you would have said he randomly applied tariffs and has no plan.

There was no tariff plan you would have been okay with. Hell, I doubt there is much of anything President Trump could do that you would agree with.

But, at least, with effort we found something we agree with.

Whew, wasted way more time than I had hoped to have an actual conversation. Time to take a break from this place again....

Typical drivel. Can't answer a question, can't stay on topic. Instead you wander into what you want to talk about regardless of the conversation.

What does that have to do with this?

Be accurate.

Here is a better article explaining how the tariffs were calculated.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/how-trump-came-up-with-his-reciprocal-tariff-formula-145530164.html

Are we seriously trying to pawn off angry Twitter/Blue Sky/whatever tweet system as real news?