19 thoughts on “Riddle!

      1. If you’d like to write a post, of course.

        I actually wrote it some time back, although it wants significant editing. But the math posts were your thing, and submitting it as a candidate guest post always felt like it would be horning in. Now that I’ve wangled an invitation, though…Report

      2. @chris , thank you for the kind words, but at least IMO, I don’t have that much to say, and I don’t say it well enough, to assume the invitation. I have two math posts I want to write; after the first, we’ll see if Mr. Schilling is willing to let me do the other.Report

    1. You beat me to it, @michael-cain — I actually knew this one!

      But only because I read The Baroque Cycle (which has lots of references to the fallout of Frederick and Elizabeth Stuart’s politically inconvenient fecundity) and saw a lot of Monty Python as a kid and asked my dad where the theme music came from.Report

      1. To whom was their fecundity politically inconvenient? I’m guessing the Catholic Stuarts, because the succession went through the 12th of their 13 children. If they’d had fewer, their would have been no Protestant royally available.Report

      2. Yeah, that’s a big part of it. No particular reason for England having to go to Hanover for a king, except for that religion issue admired with the complex bloodlines. Or, several years earlier, to get a queen who came with a whole load of Dutch baggage at a time it seemed like it would have made sense to find common cause with France to keep the Netherlands in check.Report

Comments are closed.