A Meathead Watches Gilmore Girls (“Rory’s Dance” and “Forgiveness and Stuff”)
Notes
I was asked already if I’m even enjoying doing this. Through eight episode’s worth of reviews, it is apparently becoming clear to at least some readers that this might not be my favorite show. And to a certain extent, that’s true. My preferred shows are a laundry list of predictable answers: The Wire, Breaking Bad, Terriers, etc. Those are all great shows. But I’ve seen those shows, often times more than once, and rewatching old favorites strikes me as too easy a thing to do.
Then there is my wife and our friends. They love Gilmore girls. I want to know what it is about this show and not others that so captures their attention. Maybe I’ll never know – my reaction to certain episodes is very different than theirs – but surely it’s worth the attempt.
Finally, there is the promise of greatness. These first few episodes haven’t been greats. The show’s biggest fans willingly concede this. “It gets much better,” they’ve promised me and I trust them. Ask me again in a few weeks though.
“Rory’s Dance”
Rory shrugs off Chilton’s first dance, much to Emily’s consternation, and then, perhaps more surprisingly, to Lorelai’s. We’re meant to think that Emily and Lorelai are forever at odds but there are moments where their interests – but not their methodology – overlap. Rory agrees to go and Lorelai agrees to make her a dress. Rory asks Dean if he’ll accompany her and he agrees haltingly. He is not a dancer.
Emily wheedles her way to Lorelai’s before the dance. She wants to see Rory off but discovers Lorelai has injured herself. They watch Rory leave with Dean but Emily then remain to care for Lorelai. It is a motherly act tinged predictably with passive aggression. The way this show portrays conflict is so different than what I am used to. Forget the absence of swearing – although the next post in this series will revisit that issue – and focus instead on the never-ending series of freely-flowing critical comments. Perhaps more amazing is how often these comments are seemingly absorbed, as though passive-aggressive conflict is a perfectly normal, perfectly healthy thing.
Speaking of conflict, Chilton has thus far produced three substantive characters within the broader Gilmore girls mythology: (the boring) Max Medina, Rory’s academic rival Paris, and Tristan. Tristan is an amalgamation of every 80’s teen movie bad guy. He’s arrogant, he’s presumptuous, he’s preppy. He’s basically vintage James Spader circa Pretty In Pink. The ongoing tension between the three results from Paris’s unrequited love for Tristan, Tristan’s occasional pursuit of Rory, and Rory’s position squarely between two people that she does not like but cannot avoid. At the dance though, Rory has backup: Dean.
Dean attracts everyone’s attention precisely because he sticks out. He isn’t of this crowd, not only financially, but academically, but his difference here is a strength, one that Tristan is immediately threatened by. And because teenage boys are testosterone driven maniacs, Tristan’s solutions is to think about butting heads with Dean, a plan which goes surprisingly poorly for a man surrounded by his own people on his own turf. Dean’s having none of it, warns Tristan against additional bad behavior, and then leaves with Rory in tow.
This, I should note, is precisely the sort of conflict I can easily identify with. Having once been a testosterone fueled maniac too, as well as having been paid to spend three years working with testosterone fueled maniacs, I recognize this pattern of conflict all too well. It makes sense to me. And because it doesn’t come to blows in this particular case, it strikes me as a particularly useful conflict mechanism.
Earlier I decried Emily’s and Lorelai’s passive-aggressive relationship. Here I am praising two boys almost coming to physical conflict on the basis of traded words. I didn’t title this series, “A Meathead Watches Gilmore Girls” by accident after all. My response to this particularly male. “Conflict like this!” I want to shout at the television, “But not like that!” As if there’s a right answer. As if there’s a better way. As if all human beings don’t tend toward inefficient dummy-dom.
Having left the dance, Rory and Dean end up at a local dance studio (what) where they settle down to read a book (what) and eventually fall asleep together (what). Lorelai and Emily fall asleep waiting for them, waking up the next morning to an empty house. As you can imagine, Emily’s and Lorelai’s response to this is vicious. Emily decides that this would be a perfect time to criticize Lorelai. Lorelai decides this would be a perfect time for Emily to leave. And when Rory finally appears – after a reassuring call from the dance studio’s owner, Patty – Lorelai responds as though Rory at 16 is what Lorelai was at 16. Lorelai suggests birth control – woah! – and Rory balks, understandably, expecting more trust than she’s getting despite assurances that nothing (sex) happened. Save for a young couple reading novels together in an oddly unlocked dance studio.
“Forgiveness and Stuff”
Stars Hollow is having a Christmas Pageant – the War On Christmas hasn’t made it into twee Connecticut apparently – but tensions haven’t cooled between Lorelai and both Rory and Emily, although they’re fighting for entirely different reasons. The critical bombs Emily threw in Rory’s late-night absence were extremist and Lorelai (quite rightly) isn’t interested in enduring that anymore. Meanwhile, Rory isn’t quick to forget Lorelai’s immediate distrust. But, life moves on. Lane counsels Rory to think about gifts that would make Dean happy, not gifts that might serve a transformative purpose in his life. This, I imagine, might be hinting at a theme.
Things have gotten so bad that Lorelai ends up not being required at the Gilmore’s annual Christmas Party. Rory still is though, and so it ends up that Rory attends and Lorelai doesn’t. This suaree, which we’re meant to believe is a serious to-do, is attended by few other couples, and maybe I’m missing something, but its hype doesn’t match its execution. This year’s will be memorable though. First, Emily lies about Lorelai’s absence, insisting that it is because she is sick, rather than the fault of the war between them, something Rory predictably notices. Then, Richard has what appears to be a cardiac macguffin and is hospitalized.
Emily and Rory are desperate for Lorelai, who has been consoling herself, first during a fences-mending conversation with Dean, and then at Luke’s Diner. Luke closes down when Lorelai gets the call about Richard and he drives her to the hospital. He spends the majority of the evening by her side and in case we hadn’t known before, it is plainly clear that Luke pines for Lorelai, although silently and shyly. Emily notices Luke’s presence but is too consumed by understandable fear and a desire to control what she can: getting Richard the best care that she can easily afford.
The cardiac event ends up being nothing major but it does get Lorelai and Emily in the same room. Lorelai puts out fires that Emily either will not or cannot, something that she is capable of appreciating at least. But Lorelai’s afraid too and in fact balks at actually seeing her father in a hospital bed. She has good reasons for her cleavage with her parents but at the end of the day, they’re her parents.
Meanwhile, the night in the hospital also lays the groundwork for the fact that when Lorelai needs him, Luke is willing to literally drop everything to be at her service. He is, in this regard anyway, ideal. (He is also, we are meant to believe, less attractive to Lorelai than Max Medina, which is dumb.) As this season goes on, it will be extremely difficult to believe that Lorelai and Luke aren’t together. It frankly strains all credibility. He has thus far been portrayed as basically the perfect man. Everybody but Lorelai can see this and I boggle at the idea that we’re meant to endure and “will they or won’t they” for seasons. That though is for another day.
I am hesitant to jump on the bandwagon
quick weight loss A sneak peak into fall fashion 2012
pornoBest minimalist trail running shoe 2012
“He has thus far been portrayed as basically the perfect man. Everybody but Lorelai can see this and I boggle at the idea that we’re meant to endure and “will they or won’t they” for seasons. That though is for another day.”
To be somewhat fair, this is a problem of romantic tension on TV in general and not necessarily Gilmore Girls. Will they or won’t they? creates banter, tension, etc. And once there the question is answered, the fun of the show goes away. Moonlighting generally seems to be most common example of this.
The West Wing was pretty good at developing a relationship between Josh and Donna without having either one obviously pine for each other in silence (as far as I remember). Though I always liked Amy more.Report
Yeah, I was very pleased when the Big Bang Theory runners decided to stop teasing Leonard and Penny and just made them a couple so they could look at other issues – couple’s issues.Report
In addition to what Saul said, Gilmore Girls makes it pretty clear that Lorelai set aside pursuing any kind of romantic relationship with anyone in favor of focusing on raising Rory herself. One might argue about how realistic it is for a person in Lorelai’s position to do that, but if you accept the premise, then it is easier to understand how Lorelai wouldn’t look at Luke and think “he’s the perfect man for me!” Max, we are asked to believe, is the first man in 16 years that has broken through the limitations Lorelai imposed upon herself, and we all know hardly anyone gets it right the first time.Report
Aw, Terriers. Now I’m sad all over again.Report
It’s on Netflix. Am I hearing recommendations?Report
Only if you want to be sad, evidently.
I saw the first several episodes and it looked pretty good. Got distracted, but definitely going to go back and watch the rest of it.Report
@mike-schilling – yeah, it’s really good. It only got one season and it ends on an ambiguous note, but like the Veronica Mars finale, that ambiguous note kind of works (when you have a series about scrappy underdog [heh] PI’s, perhaps it’s fitting that not all questions are answered at the end).Report
Also, I don’t think the *show* will make you sad. I just meant I was sad when it got cancelled. It had a lot of potential I thought. The leads were great, the setting was vivid. But the ratings just weren’t there, though it got plenty of critical plaudits. Consensus was that poor marketing (and possibly its name) did it no favors. Was it a show about dogs? Who knew?Report
The ending actually ends up being perfectly ambiguous. It’s very much worth your time to watch.Report
So, it’s objectively a good show?Report
@glyph
It seems exceedingly easy to make you sad..
Are you a character in a Russian novel?Report
Nyet.
…..da.Report
I’m uncertain as to how Sam actually feels about Emily’s passive aggressiveness. She’s my favorite character on the show, and her slyly crafted criticisms are the main reason.Report
I’m baffled by the notion that anybody should like Emily so far. Maybe she gets better later but so far, she is insufferably cruel.Report
Some people like a villain…
Cersei falls into that category, ya know?Report
I hate to repeat what you’ve already heard several times, but I think it takes a few seasons. Eventually, you get to see Emily use her powers for good and how stunningly effective she is at it.Report
Vikram,
That’s totally fair. I am almost to the point where I’m simply going to pretend that the first season never happened and start anew on season two.Report
In season 2, Lorelai’s wardrobe abruptly changes from nothing but dark suits to her regular extrovert wardrobe that one friend of mine described as “trashy”. There is no explanation given.Report
Sam says “ah, testosterone filled not-quite-fighting” — I understand this.
But what rings back in my head is Sana-chan saying, “No fighting! This is a shoujo manga!”Report
I think one of the most interesting aspects of the scenario Gilmore Girls posits is the tension — and I’d say it is more tension than “conflict,” but it leads to conflict and informs how different characters respond to conflict — created by Lorelai’s attitudes toward and concerns about Rory’s behavior. I presume that’s why the show begins with Rory being about the same age Lorelai was when Rory was born. On one hand, of course parents don’t want to see their teenage daughters get pregnant and be saddled with a baby (or face making difficult decisions about adoption or abortion.) On the other, that’s exactly what happened to Lorelai and Rory is the result. Come down too hard on Rory and Lorelai is in the difficult position of over-emphasizing the extent to which Rory’s entire existence is basically the result of a mistake, one that she doesn’t want Rory to repeat. Don’t come down hard enough and (at least in Lorelai’s worst-case-scenario imagination, if not in Rory’s) and Lorelai may become Stars Hollow’s youngest grandmother. The show interested me a lot more when I looked at the conflicts that do develop, especially between Emily and Lorelai, and the decisions Lorelai makes through that prism. It’s a tough needle to thread and it has to be in backs of everyone’s minds, because everyone knows Lorelai and Rory’s backstory.
Maybe it resonates for me because I came of age in a time when a common line of LGBT advocacy, such as it was, was that we were all supposed to claim that of course we didn’t choose to be be gay and of course we would prefer that it wasn’t the case, but it isn’t and we just have to make the best of that. There was always something about that line that bothered me, long before I could articulate what it was. It’s not like looking in a mirror and wondering what you might look like with blue eyes instead of brown eyes, you’re talking about changing something that is so fundamental to who you are as a person and to how you relate to others that it becomes like being made to wish you were no longer you. Rory has to make peace with the idea that she was a mistake, which is a lot easier to do when your mother (who made the mistake) is hovering over you worried that you are going to make the same mistake. The tension between thinking “You shouldn’t be here” and “But I’m glad you are” is easier to resolve when you also aren’t contending with “Don’t put yourself in the same position.”Report
That’s a difficult one, in many circumstances. We usually get around it by saying things like “I just wish I’d been older and more settled when you were born. I could have been a much better parent,” ignoring the fact that the baby born five years later wouldn’t have been the same person.
Or, suppose you’ve always known quite well that your parents wanted two kids, and then you find out that your mother had had a miscarriage before you were born. Without it, you wouldn’t ever have existed. What the hell do you do with that?Report
I think one thing that is key is to make sure a child feels wanted, whatever the circumstances of their birth. There is a big difference between “unplanned” and “unwanted” and I think Gilmore Girls handles that well. It might be helpful if parents, generally, were more upfront about the circumstances surrounding birth (certainly, some are). I know the circumstances of my birth were unplanned because I was adopted as an infant, but I appreciate that my parents told me about this while I was still very young so that I could grow up accustomed to the idea, even before I necessarily understood or could think through its implications.Report
That throwaway comment about Luke being the perfect guy and everyone in Stars Hollow knows it except for Lorelai? Don’t forget that. IIRC, The writers gave themselves license to have a little bit of fun with that.Report