Terror On The Potomac: The DCA Collision
The United States has had a long run when it comes to airline safety. The last serious airline crash involving a domestic airliner was in 2009 when Colgan 3407 crashed in Buffalo. To find a domestic jetliner crash, we have to go back to Comair 5191 in Lexington, Kentucky in 2006 or, for a mainline carrier, Southwest 1248 (although some might dispute whether Southwest is a mainline carrier), a runway overrun accident at Chicago-Midway in 2005. Asiana 214, a Korean airline, did crash a Boeing 777 in San Francisco in 2013, the last time a heavy airliner crashed in the US.
That streak broke on Wednesday night when a regional airliner operated by an American Airlines contractor collided with a US Army Blackhawk helicopter near Reagan National Airport in the District of Columbia.
First, a word about airline organization. There are two tiers of airlines. When you buy a ticket on an airline, you may expect to fly a Boeing or Airbus product, but many smaller markets are served by regional jets or turboprops that are operated by companies that contract with the major airlines.
This situation dates back to the 1990s and the advent of regional jets when major airline pilots represented by the Airline Pilots Association negotiated scope clauses that didn’t allow the new jets to be crewed by mainline pilots. RJs, as they came to be known, were operated under contract by less experienced crews and used as a stepping stone to gain experience for the more lucrative mainline jobs. The major airlines farmed out regional flying to the lowest bidder and renegotiated contracts periodically, often whipsawing pilots of competing contractors against each other.
The accident aircraft, a Canadair Regional Jet (CRJ) 700, was operated by PSA Airlines, a wholly owned subsidiary of American Airlines. As such, it’s correct to say that it was PSA Flight 5342 as well as American 5342.
On a personal note, I used to fly a CRJ-700 for Atlantic Southeast Airlines (ASA), a Delta Connection carrier based at Atlanta Hartsfield. The CRJ is a few decades old at this point, but it is a good airplane that is very capable and has an impeccable safety record.
I say all that to say this: The CRJ pilots had years of training and flight experience. They also had federal Airline Transport Licenses, but they did not have nearly as much experience as the crew of an American 737 or Airbus would have. Still, I don’t think that made a difference in this case.
On January 29, the CRJ was on approach to Reagan National (DCA) after departing Wichita, Kansas. At about 8:47 pm, the plane collided with a US Army VH-60 Blackhawk. One of the first things I notice from the video is that it was a clear night. Low ceilings and visibility were not a factor unlike an earlier crash into the Potomac in 1982 when ice on the wings drove Air Florida 90 into the frigid waters after only a few seconds of flight.
The Blackhawk is the Army’s workhorse helicopter that replaced the venerable UH-1 Huey of the Vietnam era. There are a multitude of variants of the Blackhawk including a special operations version and a naval “Seahawk,” but the helicopter involved in the accident was a VH-60 variant assigned to a VIP transport unit, essentially a government “business” helicopter.
The Blackhawk was reportedly on a training flight, leading many to ask why it was flying at 300 feet at night on a training flight. The answer is that the crew wasn’t necessarily a new crew doing primary training, but they were probably training to carry out their mission. Army helo crews fly low and fast because that enhances their chances of survival in a hostile environment. They might also have been using night vision goggles (NVGs).
Video of the accident shows the CRJ approaching the runway with its bright landing lights shining. A smaller light approaches from the left of the video, which would be from the right side of the airplane where the copilot sits. When the two lights converge, there is an explosion.
A replay of the radar tape on Facebook (I’ll caution that the validity of this post is unverified) shows the helicopter crossing between the runway and the approaching CRJ at about 300 feet. The airliner was descending towards the runway and the two craft converged, falling into the river. Below is a representation of the radar data superimposed on a satellite map, also taken from Facebook.
Thanks to modern technology, the ATC recording is also available online. As you listen to the recording, the CRJ is Bluestreak (the PSA callsign) 5342 and the helicopter is Pat 25.
Twice the controller asked the pilot of Pat 25 if he had the CRJ in sight. Twice the helo pilot acknowledged that he had visual separation. The helicopter was instructed to pass behind the CRJ.
The big question in the aftermath of the crash that killed 64 passengers and crew on the CRJ and three crewmembers in the helicopter is why the helicopter failed to see and avoid the jetliner with the big bright landing light.
If the helicopter was to the aircraft’s side, the landing light would not be visible. Unlike car headlights that shine onto the ground in front of the car, landing lights have nothing to illuminate to make them visible to the side, but other aircraft lights should have been visible
As a pilot who flies into congested airspace, I can tell you that it is not uncommon to have helicopters buzzing around near airports. Law enforcement, news organizations, and the military all often operate near airport traffic patterns. It is unusual to have a helicopter cross in front of you on short final, however, but then Pat 25 was not supposed to be in front of the airliner.
Airliners are equipped with safety equipment such as TAWS (terrain avoidance warning system) to warn about proximity to the ground and TCAS (traffic alert and collision avoidance system) to warn about proximity to other aircraft. The problem is that the TCAS is inhibited at low altitude to avoid distracting nuisance alerts around airports. Below 1,000 feet, the crew would not have been alerted.
It’s still early in the investigation process, but it looks as though the cause of the crash will likely be pilot error on the part of the helicopter crew. We may never know why the helicopter flew into the CRJ, but one possibility is that he thought he had the traffic in sight but was looking at the wrong airplane. I do not know whether the Blackhawk had flight data and cockpit voice recorders that would be installed on the airliner.
Washington, DC has some of the busiest and most restricted airspace in the country. Reagan National is located near a number of sensitive sights such as the White House, the Capitol, and the Pentagon. The approaches to DCA are very demanding in terms of both navigation and traffic avoidance.
I have flown into DCA as a pilot, but I probably never will again. After September 11, the airport was heavily restricted to private traffic with onerous approval requirements that include carrying an armed security officer. These days, most business jets go to Dulles. I can tell you that pilots are busy when they fly into DCA, but the view of Foggy Bottom from the cockpit is fantastic.
An additional factor in the crash may be short short-staffing in the Reagan National Tower. Listening to the audio, it is difficult to tell how many controllers are on duty, but some towers often have only one controller at night. At some smaller airports, I have been cleared for the approach, landing, and taxi to the gate by the same controller… at the same time!
The controller on duty Wednesday night sounded busy but competent and professional. Nevertheless, another pair of eyes may have caught the fact that the Blackhawk wasn’t following instructions.
The only real question I have about the controller’s actions is whether he pointed out the helicopter to the CRJ crew. If he did, it wasn’t on the audio that I heard, and the PSA pilots may have been totally unaware of the danger without such a warning. The NTSB accident report may fault the controller for that omission.
What I can tell you with certainty is that the crash does not fit the hot takes by partisans on either side. There is no evidence that DEI had anything to do with the crash as Donald Trump and some Republicans have suggested. Both pilots and controllers are certified to federal standards before they can get their jobs. Controllers also have to get checked out on the specific airspace that they control. Aviation is a merit system, at least to a degree, despite what some talking heads say.
In fact, FAA standards for pilots have gotten higher in recent decades. The 2009 Colgan crash spurred a reform of pilot licensing that increased requirements for Airline Transport Pilot candidates and also reformed airline rest rules.
Beyond FAA standards, airlines do have the ability to set their own minimum standards for pilot experience. These standards fluctuate due to supply and demand rather than DEI. In the mid-2000s, it was difficult for even high-time, experienced pilots to find jobs. In the years prior to the pandemic, the situation was reversed with the airlines hiring as many pilots as they could to replace a wave of retirees. That isn’t to say that minorities might not be hired with lower flight time than a white male, but they still have to be competent and licensed.
The crash also was not due to Donald Trump’s spending freeze or the fact that Trump had not appointed a replacement FAA administrator after the Biden-era administrator resigned effective January 20. While federal agencies do need good leadership, they don’t fall apart in nine days.
In summary, ignore the hot takes (except mine) and let the NTSB work. At the moment, the most likely cause seems to be pilot error by the Blackhawk crew, but that still does not fully explain the accident.
An actual pilot!
This is good info.
The hot take that I heard was that the helicopter pilots were using NVGs and it was the job of people *NOT* using NVGs to keep an eye open for all of the stuff NVGs suck at seeing.
I guess I just wonder if the helicopter gets parked at the same airport that the planes were flying into. If so, well, I guess I understand why a training flight was so close to regular traffic.
If it wasn’t, well… I guess we have a big thing for the “lessons learned” whiteboard.Report
Along that section of the Potomac there are several military installations that helicopters routinely fly into and out of. David mentions this. The corridor the helicopters fly is designed to mostly de conflict with this approach to Reagan – which was established after 9/11 to restrict airspace access for non-military aircraft. The two designated corridors intersect at this place. The military helicopters do not generally land or park at Reagan.Report
“mostly de conflict”
We should probably look at “mostly” some more, then. Maybe underline it.Report
I suspect the NTSB will do so.Report
Like Philip said there are multiple military bases nearby. They don’t use DCA.
However there have been fears about something like this periodically bubbling up for the last couple of years. DCA is a very small airport for the volume it does and that volume has only grown. I’m not totally sure why this is but the location is also… strange. Even as a passenger the descent seems noticeably more harrowing than other airports I’ve gone through, including the other two that serve the area (BWI and Dulles). The drop is noticeably precipitous (though the view is incredible).
The airport itself is in Arlington, VA and there’s also an ongoing battle between residents and the airport due to the noise and low flying aircraft in what has become a much denser, more highly populated area over the last couple dozen years.Report
Peterson is right next to the Colorado Springs airport and they share a runway.
It’s one thing to have a base next to an airport if they have two different runways. It’s quite another if they’re both flying into the same one.
I was thinking of Pete when I asked that.Report
Midway in Chicago is very similar. Steep ascents and descents because the airport is ringed by neighborhoods. In the ’70s, a plane crashed right into some houses across the street.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Air_Lines_Flight_553Report
I’ve heard that they do have another source of audio that includes the helicopter pilot’s responses that he did see another aircraft; the current thinking is that since it was night and he could only see groups of lights, he was looking at one much further away and thought that’s what the controller meant.
Questions I’ve seen, and I imagine will be addressed in the investigation:
* Why was the helicopter operating above 400 feet altitude in an area where it was not supposed to be above 200 feet?
* Why didn’t the controller notify the CRJ crew of the approaching helicopter?
* Why didn’t the controller more forcefully direct the helicopter crew?Report
I am going to go on record as saying that this incident is not the thing Democratic politicians need to make hay over. They do need to remind folks that Trump created the diversity hire Programs he now decries to try and get more controllers into the ATC system. Not that he will be shamed by hypocrisy. They also need to bring y for every time republican controlled ci greases failed to full fund ATC system needs. But his maniacal hiring decisions of the last two weeks didn’t cause this.Report
Whether or not the maniacal decisions of the last two weeks have any relation or not, the Serbian prime minister recently resigned after something that may not have *technically* been his fault still became a flashpoint for more general anticorruption public sentiment.
https://apnews.com/article/serbia-protests-vucevic-resigns-b71e3a0aacf5d0368b2bd1f4500170f5
So from the perspective of “Dear GOD Democrats, do what works and FAST, and stop playing nice and fair with a party that demonstrably will not play nice and fair with you” political-strategy POV, I’m not sure “the buck stops on the President’s desk” is an awful approach.
Yes, I am aware this makes me a hypocrite, and I’m not happy about it. But I think we are rapidly learning that there are worse things than hypocrisy, since once upon a time we at least had leadership pretending to do the right things whilst doing other in private.Report
From inside the federal workforce we’d really appreciate it if people stopped Blaming other people and events that have nothing to do with what actually occurs. Yes the buck stops with him. No, none of the decisions he has made in the last two weeks are likely to have caused this. Our civil service system is built to keep working regardless of the churn during and administrative transition. Having all those chairs filled would have made zero difference in the outcome that night.Report
This is an interesting take from a (former?) Blackhawk pilot:
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/31/us/video/black-hawk-helicopter-pilot-elizabeth-mccormick-plane-crash-digvid
She mentions that the helicopter should have been at 200 feet instead of 350-400, that the controller should have told them where to look, not just “do you see the plane?”, and that the size of the Blackhawks crew may have played a role.Report
A lot is going to come out in the investigation, but it looks, on first blush, as though there will be plenty of fault on all sides.
Plus, why on earth are Army training flights being conducted in the midst of a busy commercial air corridor?Report
A former pilot has pointed out that training as used by the military includes “maintain operational proficiency”. Experienced pilots whose job includes flying that route at night practice by flying it at night on a regular basis.
I’d rephrase your question as why does so much military and commercial traffic all get routed through that twisty little corridor over the Potomac River? Ultimately the blame goes back to Congress, which hates making hard decisions. Do they give up their lovely little close-in airport used for the weekend commutes home? (See, eg, why there is a 60-seat direct flight between Wichita and National.) Do they relocate the military facilities? Do they insist that admirals and generals sit in DC ground traffic rather than taking a helicopter up and down the Potomac corridor?Report
Perhaps we’re just trying to squeeze too many aircraft in too little space. Though one crash in who knows how many years isn’t really worth getting too worked up about.
I’ve only ever flown into DC by way of National, and you couldn’t ask for a more conveniently located airport.Report
Which is why Congress won’t ever consider closing it.Report