Why on Earth Would Trump Plan This Speech At This Location At This Time
This week, Donald Trump will hold a rally in Howell, Michigan, where he will give a “major speech” on the topic of “Crime and Safety.”
Because crime rates are actually down and have been trending thus for decades, the expectation is that Trump’s remarks will lean pretty heavily into pointing out the fact that he is white and his opponent Kamala Harris is not. This in and of itself isn’t that surprising, as his attacks on Harris to date have mostly centered around her not-white-sounding name, her people’s inability to control their sexual urges, how you can just tell she has a low IQ, an assumption that people of her sort are all interchangeable, or just throwing up his hands because really what’s the deal with people having mixed race kids.
What is surprising, however, is where Trump has decided to give this speech about criminals making our streets unsafe: the township of Howell, Michigan — which at first blush is a head-scratching place for a POTUS candidate to hold a major campaign rally.
Which is not to say that there are no reasons for a politician to come to Howell; there are.
For example, Biden gave a speech in Howell during the first year of his Presidency, despite knowing it would be hostile territory. His staff understood in advance that even in a small town, there would be a lot of visible local protesters (and there were). But at the time Biden was working to build bipartisan union, rural, and working class support for both his Infrastructure Bill and his Build Back Better Bill. The Howell stop was one of several on a tour of smaller or mid-sized rustbelt, midwest, and northeast towns, which also included cities and towns like Scranton, Kennet Square, Elk Grove Village, and Storrs.
Trump, on the other hand, has no obvious traditional strategic reason to hold a rally centering on ‘Crime and Safety’ in Howell.
Howell is, by almost any measure, a pretty normal American town. It has no history of systemic crime issues, and because of this, there is no previously-passed-policy ‘success-story’ of successfully combatting high crime rates to offer as a blueprint. It’s not centrally located, and because of this it risks amplifying his recent problem of suddenly not being able to fill smaller venues than he filled in 2020. Howell is not a town he used his executive power to assist when he was president, so the only federally-funded infrastructural improvements over the past decade he can point to happened under, well, let’s say someone else’s watch. And there are no political bridges to be built; people in Howell are going to overwhelmingly vote for him whether or not he visits them.
There is, however, a less-obvious, less-traditional strategic reason for choosing Howell. Because there is one thing that Howell is known for even more that it is known for melons: Howell, Michigan is a symbolically important city with the nation’s far-right white supremacist organizations.
And to be clear, when I use the phrase “white supremacist” here, I’m not using it in a Robin-DiAngelo-esque, “in American everyone is a white supremacist” kind of way. I’m not even using it in a Richard-Spencer-esque, V-Darey, “the science of race realism” kind of way. I’m using it in the straight up, hardcore, literal Neo-Nazis and Aryan Brotherhood type of white supremacist kind of way.
Howell, Michigan, you see, has a national reputation — fair or not — of being deeply connected to the Ku Klux Klan.
****
Nestled almost perfectly between the state capital Lansing and Detroit, Howell’s current population bristles at the suggestion that it is somehow a hotbed of Klan activity. And they have a point.
The region surrounding Howell has historically been a hotbed of Klan activity. Most of that activity, however, took place in the nearby rural township of Cohoctah; those activities were mostly limited to Klan meetings, rallies, and cross-burning ceremonies. Over time, however, perhaps due to a combination of its larger size and proximity, Howell replaced Cohoctah in white supremacist lore as the hub of midwestern white nationalism, and this would on occasion lead to various Klan or Aryan groups traveling to Howell. Often, these visits resulted in transgressions, such as the burning of a cross on the lawn of a black family, and a small but national-news-worthy Klan Rally in 1994. All or most of the agitation inside Howell, however, has historically come from people outside of the town. And all of the above activity, be it in Cohoctah or Howell, was directly linked to one man: Robert “Pastor Bob” Miles.
Originally from New York City, Miles is perhaps the most venerated (by white supremacists) of the Northwest Territorial Imperative (NTI) movement. A loose affiliation of far-right Christian white nationalists, the NTI encouraged white nationalists to move their families from across the country and relocate them to rural areas in Oregon, Washington, Western Montana, and — especially — Idaho. The idea was to grow a Christian “white homeland” inside the US that would eventually branch off and form its own nation, repatriating any remaining Jews, blacks, Catholics, and other minorities to the US and Canada.
The NTI movement was and is small, but has somehow always been surprisingly far-reaching in modern US history, politics, and culture (especially online culture).
For example, if you’re of a certain age and you remember the nationally-covered court cases against skinhead cults in the 90s, those cults were part of the NTI movement. Every cliche you may have heard about Idaho being full of Nazi and Aryan camps comes directly from public perception of the NTI at that time, as do those apocryphal stories about whole communities of white supremacists turning out to all be embedded reporters and federal agents. The shorthand of both “88” and “14 words” come from leading proponents of the NTI. Ruby Ridge’s Randy Weaver fatefully moved his family to Idaho to be part of the NTI. The Oath Keepers, Three Percenters, and Constitutional Sheriffs movements all flow directly downstream of the NTI, as do both Bundy standoffs.
Over the past forty years, the NTI’s influence on right-wing populism, west-coast libertarianism, conservative talk radio and online rightwing spheres has been growing. And the most influential voice within the NTI was Pastor Bob Miles.
Miles was a Klan Grand Dragon in the 1960s, but like other Klansmen of that era he let the lines separating the KKK and other violent white supremacist organizations dissolve and bleed together; by the 1970s he had relinquished the title to try his hand at forming his own violent Aryan organizations. And make no mistake, Miles was violent. When school segregation came to Michigan, he and his followers were convicted of bombing ten school buses in Pontiac. He was also convicted of kidnapping and torturing a deputy school superintendent in Ann Arbor. (Miles had originally planned to kill the deputy superintendent, but decided at the last minute that having him live to tell the tale would gather more publicity.)
Today, Miles is something of a patron saint to people inside extreme supremacist organizations, and Howell’s role in his life has made the township something special as well. That small Klan rally in ’94 described above was in his honor, two years after his death. Just last month, a small group of Neo-Nazis made the news when they traveled to Howell to chant “We Love Hitler” to commemorate the sacred 25th anniversary of Miles’s death.
Although that group did get their dates of commemoration slightly wrong. Because Pastor Bob Miles didn’t actually die 25 years ago last month.
Pastor Bob Miles died 25 years ago this week.
*****
One of the difficulties in dealing with the very worst actions of Donald Trump is that much of it is so crazy that it’s easier to pretend everything’s all a big coincidence and move on.
And because of this I suspect that, faced with the question “why on Earth would Trump plan this speech at this location at this time,” most will do exactly that. But before you move on, consider: since Trump announced his Howell stop, he has added four additional campaign rallies.
One of these rallies will be in Phoenix, which is certainly a fairly normal place to have such an event. The others, however, are in locations less well known nationally. One is in York, Pennsylvania, a mid-sized city that was a hub of Klan activity throughout the last century, and which has seen a resurgence over the past decade. Another is Glendale, Arizona, a suburb of Phoenix in Maricopa County which is the global headquarters of the Klan and several other white nationalist organizations. The last is Asheboro, North Carolina, relatively in the middle of nowhere outside of Greensboro, where racial tensions flared during Trump’s first term, including Klan rallies and cross burnings. (Full disclosure: in 2017 I was sent to the last by Marie Claire Australia to cover one such Klan rally, which doubled as a Trump electoral victory celebration.)
That’s a lot of coincidences.
*****
If you were to look for some kind of precedent for Trump choosing Howell to give a speech on “Crime,” the most immediate comparison point might be Ronald Reagan’s famous (or infamous, depending on who you ask) speech in August of 1980 on “States’ Rights” in Neshoba County, near the site where three civil rights workers were buried in shallow graves after having been tortured and kill by Klansmen a quarter century earlier. That was a speech which, according to Reagan, was meant to appeal to southern “Georgia Wallace-inclined voters.”
Today, Reagan fans will tell you all of that was a wacky coincidence of which the Gipper could not possibly have been aware, while others will say, of course he knew, how could he not. Regardless, the degree to which Trump’s rally this week mirrors Reagan’s is uncanny. However, in some ways the comparison is not perfect.
When Reagan made his Neshoba speech, he was a son-of-liberal-Hollywood, union-president, Californian west-coaster fighting to be seen by a bunch of right-leaning Southerners as exactly none of those things. He was trying to convince a certain group of people he was something they didn’t necessarily believe that he was, and that they should reject the only actual Southerner in the race. That is decidedly not what Trump is attempting in Howell. The Venn diagram of “People For Whom The Symbolism Of Howell Pulls Heartstrings” and “People Who Are Planning To Vote For Kamala Harris” are two distinct, not-touching circles in different rooms of different houses on different, distant planets. It does’t come with the potential electoral advantage Reagan’s speech had. So, as I said, Reagan does’t work that well as a comparison.
However, we need not look to Reagan, because there is another past president whose experience is more comparable, and to whom we might look to understand Trump’s decisions here — a past president whose actions more closely match the actions of the current GOP nominee this week.
Like the current GOP nominee, this other president was also looking down the barrel at an election he was worried he might lose. Like the current GOP nominee, this president had also begun to prepare for his possible loss by insisting that if he did lose, it was only because the other side cheated, and thus he should be declared the winner regardless. Like the current GOP nominee, this president also cozied up with extremist far-right, violent organizations — groups like the Three Percenters, the Proud Boys, and the Oath Keepers —and signaled quite publicly that they might be needed to answer a call to violence to protect his claims. Like the current GOP nominee, this president was surprisingly transparent throughout everything, explaining to people at his rallies what his intentions were — knowing that the mainstream political press would find it so untoward to take him at his word that they’d largely ignore it.
That is the past president Trump is clearly modeling himself after this week: himself.
And we will all be fools to pretend we don’t see it happening.
Many of us keep seeing it happen. And we keep being met with arm waving “whataboutism” because the policies he supports are polices the arm wavers support. As a son of the south, who had to vote against David Duke for governor at one point, All of this is far too clear.Report
White grievance and resentment is the well to which the conservatives can always return again and again.
The reason resentment works again and again is that it is the perfect problem to rouse voters, in that it is a problem which can never be solved but always addressed.
When you look at the culture warriors like Trump or Vance or DeSantis or the rightwing activists like Prosobiec or Charlie Kirk and listen to their complaints about modern American culture, it becomes clear there is no possible state of affairs which would satisfy them.
They might claim that they merely want a restoration of culture from before the 1960s for instance, or maybe before the New Deal. But this is contradicted by the fact that their words and complaints are almost verbatim the complaints of people from the 1950s and 1920s.
Then as now, there were black people agitating for civil rights. Then as now there were gay and trans people existing and thriving. Then as now there were childless cat ladies living out loud.
Grievance is the perfect political tool since it remains forever potent, and is powerful enough to drive people to subordinate every other desire. As we can see from current affairs, some voters will happily surrender freedom and democracy and the rule of law in an effort to pursue their grievance against the hated outgroup.Report
There is also what I think of as the Charles Krafft problem. Imagine someone told you that a dear friend of yours had been participating on white supremacist sites for years and gave you proof.
Are people going to be angry at their friend or angry at the person who pointed out their friend was a white supremacist?Report
Luckily, the York, PA speech was a bomb as far as I can tell.
The question though is who is ignoring it. Joe Biden has tried with all his valiance and might to highlight Trump’s racism and was largely rewarded with being seen as too old and whatever Grandpa because have you seen egg prices and he was allegedly Genocide Joe.
Harris is pointing it out and seemingly doing better because he campaign knows how to troll people well and people see her youthful 59 and now think he us old and unfit on many levels for the Presidency.
Interestingly depending on who you ask, she is a moderate or heavy favorite to win the Presidency or people still see it as a 50/50 chance Trump wins because Harris polling is way better than Biden’s but still in margin of error territory.
I think it is places like OT unfortunately that make it easier for Trump to get sway with these kind of stunts and antics and barely hidden messaging. This site does it because the PTBs have a view that it is possible to debate all topics including contentious topics with the tones of dulcet tea party and maintains this through aggressive word blocking that moderates words like N##i in order to avoid Godwin’s Law. They might think this avoids OT becoming just another internet site but I think the practical effect is that it helps Trump supporters and penalizes his opponents because it enforces indirect confrontation. Sometimes people need to be confronted directly even if it makes others squirm.
Trump is a racist, white supremacist, and his staff is filled with white supremacists and xenophobes even if some of them are too stupid to realize “those trains are never late” like Ben Shapiro, Stephen Miller, and Libs of Tik Tok lady. The last train to Auschwitz is still a train to Auschwitz.
The cult of “polite dialogue and a wide views is always possible” isn’t worth it if means giving cover to explicit or implicit Trumpists* (whether they admit it or not) and the kind of leftist whose view seems to be it is the perfidious Democratic Winemoms from Mill Valley and Roslyn who are the real roadblocks to socialist revolution (TM) and hey, at least the Trumpists hate Democrats too.
*There have been various times that OT has tried to recruit writers from rural America because it is an underheard voice and the pattern is always the samre. The writer starts off reasonably enough but eventually the full force of white resentment and cultural grievance comes out.Report
Thank you for writing this Tod!
As you touched on a bit, what is the point of a rally at a place where you are assured a win? Is it just for his ego? I mean, the latter is a distinct possibility, of course. It just seems like a waste of time to just go shout at and pump up your most ardent supporters. I guess this is not something unique to Trump, but it always seems like a waste of campaign resources to me as opposed to going somewhere in which voters are maybe on the fence, and trying to win them.
Then again… do undecideds go to rallies?Report
I think its more an admission that his campaign has no intent to go after undecided voters, but will rely on boosting turnout among the base.Report
Politicians who don’t have rallies tend not to win. So the rallies must help somehow, or politicians wouldn’t have them.
Maybe they help because they create positive-looking environments for free media to come and rebroadcast what is said to the already-converted. Maybe they help because they generate money that can be used for persuasive outreach or GOTV efforts later, to get at the less-motivated or the less-engaged come election day. Maybe they help because they enthuse the already-faithful to go out and evangelize to their less-engaged friends and neighbors.
My personal theory is that it’s more of that last possibility than anything else: increasing engagement from the already-converted generates a downstream effect of more votes from the previously-unengaged. But YMMV.
But they surely help somehow. If they didn’t, it would be a hell of a lot cheaper and less exhausting to just stay home and have your comms team issue cleverly-worded Tweets, and spend all your money on paid media instead of the movable feast that’s associated with having rallies at all.Report
I like to see politicians campaign everywhere, rather than the few (perceived) swing states. I think it’s also an untapped source of contributions, and a way to support other candidates on the ticket.Report
I get the appeal of seeing politicians campaign everywhere, of candidates for President telling every American that their votes matter. Totally.
The Electoral College is the basic reason this doesn’t happen. At the Presidential level, there’s no real point in a Presidential candidate spending a lot of time and effort campaigning in a state they can’t possibly win, or in a state they’re going to win regardless.
Why should Trump go to Hawaii, for instance? He can’t possibly win there or rather, if he does win there, it means he’s winning basically everywhere in a 1984-for-Reagan style landslide, and therefore still doesn’t need to go. Or, for that matter, why should he go to Mississippi? If Trump is losing in Mississippi, ain’t nothing he does anywhere will salvage the campaign.
Now, supporting a downticket race that can be influenced by a Presidential candidate’s visit might be worth a trip. For instance, Trump recently went to Montana, which he’s going to win regardless, because the Senate race between Tester and Sheehy is really close; if both Trump and Sheehy win, Sheehy owes Trump a favor. Maybe Trump also raised some money there too. But without a close race to influence, why go? Trump’s time is better spent in places like Pennsylvania and Arizona. (As is Harris’, and for the same reason.)
If you wanted to change the incentive structure such that politicians would have incentives to go everywhere for the sake of influencing votes, switch from the Electoral College to a national popular vote. With a popular vote governing who wins, you can either find regions that have a lot of undecided votes, or you can spend your time working in safe places to pump up turnout in regions where you’re likely to win by big percentages. For Democrats that’d be urban areas (even in otherwise red states, places like St. Louis, Missouri) and for Republicans that’d be the denser-populated rural areas (even in otherwise blue states, places like Bakersfield, California).Report
As long as the list of swing states changes over time, there’s natural selection going on. So I don’t see this as a systemic problem, but a lack of vision. My gut says that a smart state party in conjunction with the national party and campaigns could turn any state viable in 16 years.Report
It would take at least a generation if not two to turn most southern states purple, much less blue. The last democrat to hold statewide office in Mississippi – Jim Hood – couldn’t turn being a pro life, gun rights, law and order Democrat into a win against an ineffective younger Lieutenant Governor named Tate Reeves (who even back then was known colloquially as Tater Tot). Why? because the GOP has Gerrymandered itself into a supermajority and convinced the majority of the state’s white electorate that Democrats want to take from them and give to undeserving low economic status whites and all black folks, and we can’t have that now can we? Democrat could get Mike Espy elected to the Senate against Cindy Hyde-Smith because Espy is a light skinned black man.
Your gut is ill informed at best.Report
Democrats have been getting 40-45% of Mississippi at the presidential level. This is doable. Not quickly, but it is.Report
Correct – not quickly, and likely not inside a generation.Report
The two political geography stories in the US over the last 30 years (and a bit, now) are (a) the Midwest’s swing from Democratic to Republican and (b) the West’s swing from Republican to Democratic.
I’ve lived through Colorado’s swing from solid red to solid blue. Our change was initiated by four local billionaires and their hired experts, almost entirely ignoring the state and (especially) national parties in the process. The whole thing took about 12 years, pretty close to your gut.Report
It’s a lot like how a company can prioritize short-term success or long-term success. Presidential campaigns often aim for 280 or so electoral votes. Spending a fortune on an unlikely state, or even more important, spending time on one, that’s wasteful. Listen to your pollsters. Then – throw them out of the office and plant a tree for the next campaign.Report
The GOP has played a long game – almost 50 years. Democrats play to the next election, then reset. It shows.Report
I’ve said before that I think this is mostly perception, the same as we all think our favorite team should win every game even though we also think every move they make is a mistake. But one hobby horse I will go back to is the way neither party’s presidents have been using their cabinets to build a new generation of leaders. House members tend to form career-long alliances, but most other top political figures don’t bother (the only word I can think of has a bad implication, but it’s the right word) grooming.Report
Better to call it succession planning.
And for once you and I agree.Report
I actually think Biden has done more than most, with Harris, Buttigieg, and Raimondo (who I was predicting as Harris’s running mate). Trump was the nadir, surrounding himself with unqualified people while destroying the futures of them and others. But so much of this happens with undersecretaries, state AG’s, failed first-time congressional candidates, et cetera that it needs to be handled deliberately and the results probably won’t even show for years.Report
I’m not nearly so skeptical as Philip about your gut instinct here, Pinky. 16 years may well be enough time to turn a state around — with skill, money, vision, and some help.
Arizona from 2004-2020 seems like a good example. Not all of that was AZ Dems being smart about growing their base but some of it surely was. Some of it was demographic changes that neither party could directly control but which worked out to favor the Dems, and and some of it was the AZ Republicans making a string of sub-optimal decisions about which we need not dwell here.
Would AZ have flipped on the strength of the demographic changes alone? I don’t know.Report
Yeah, it feels like it can’t happen when you’re there, just as a watched pot never boils. And perceived-as-winnable isn’t the same thing as turned. But as a former Ohioan, seeing it not even listed as a swing state, man that’s weird.Report
Hey, Pinky! O-H!Report
Right? Always known for its sane Taft Republicans, Ohio has now gone completely bonkers.Report
This is a real “fact check” a reporter wrote and the media published on Trump refusing to accept election results if he loses. Our media is hopeless
https://bsky.app/profile/thearchduke.bsky.social/post/3l24s6jass62jReport
They have nothing but hysteria and fear to peddle:
Trump returns to Michigan to talk crime, but data shows rates dropped after he left office
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/08/20/donald-trump-howell-michigan-crime-campaign-speech-kamala-harris-illegal-immigration/74844154007/
National violent crime data from the FBI showed the rate of violent crime decreased from 2017 to 2019 during the Trump administration before jumping in 2020 to 398.5 incidents per 100,000 people. In 2021 and 2022, the first two years of President Joe Biden’s administration, the nation’s violent crime rate dropped, hitting 380.7 in 2022, according to the FBI data.
..
Apparently they do not, in fact, accept FBI statistics:
However, the Trump campaign said Tuesday the federal data was “totally unreliable at the present time” because the FBI arrived at the statistics by using “estimated crime numbers” for law enforcement agencies that didn’t report numbers.Report