It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad Joker World

Alex M. Parker

Alex Parker is a policy writer in Washington, D.C. with 15 years of journalism experience.

Related Post Roulette

4 Responses

  1. Jaybird says:

    Here is the biggest problem with The Joker. Or, I guess, The Joker’s biggest strength. He’s now a criticism.

    In the mid-80’s, The Joker was reimagined as a criticism of Batman.

    My goodness, what a criticism! I mean, Batman is absurd as hell. A billionaire who dresses up as a bat and fights crime! A guy who owns a mansion, has a butler, and who is never allowed to be happy!

    What better criticism of a miserable person who has everything than a clown?

    Joker is not only a criticism of Batman, of course, he’s a criticism of Society. Hey, your institutions have failed. You can’t help. You’re a billionaire and you’ve donated billions to this city to create things to help, create jobs, and help people and you’re still having to deal with men in alleys shooting people with children. It’s kinda funny, when you think about it.

    And this is a criticism that you can apply to anything. Holy cow. Maybe Batman is fake, but The Joker isn’t. Look around! We live in a society!

    And so The Joker’s criticisms have a real bite. There are a *LOT* of criticisms that one could make of not only Batman but of civilization in general and all you have to do is put those criticisms in the mouth of The Joker and you’ve got yourself a decent issue of Batman. Maybe not an entire *ARC*, of course… depending on the criticism, but you could probably turn that into 22 pages.

    And, like most post-modern criticisms, The Joker doesn’t understand the point of criticism. Or maybe he does, but doesn’t care about it. Ideally, the point of criticism is to burn away the dross and leave the gold. Leave it shinier than ever.

    Anybody can criticize. Anybody can point out that our society doesn’t come close to achieving what it wants. Anybody can point out that we do not, in fact, live in a comic book utopia. We’re hypocrites. We’re venial. When given the opportunity to eat someone else’s marshmallow, we take it. It’s kinda funny, when you think about it.

    But the point of criticism isn’t to leave ash. It’s to leave gold.

    And Batman writers don’t tend to be good enough philosophers to do anything but punch Joker in the face and put him back in Arkham. And even if the Batbooks were cancelled (HA!) tomorrow, we’d still be left with Joker’s criticisms and left without someone capable of merely punching him in the face and locking him up, if only for another month.Report