“In my opinion it is a grand book…. Morally and philosophically I find myself in agreement with virtually the whole of it: and not only in agreement with it, but in deeply moved agreement.” ~ Keynes on Hayek’s “Road to Serfdom”
See also: Karl Smith.
Erik Kain
Erik writes about video games at Forbes and politics at Mother Jones. He's the contributor of The League though he hasn't written much here lately. He can be found occasionally composing 140 character cultural analysis on Twitter.
Devcat is watching over, but if you notice any problems contact the editors and Devcat will be notified and deployed immediately.
on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024"the elected politicians threatening to take away your civil rights are a distraction from the real…
on Weekend Plans Post: On a Plane to IcelandAh, I gotcha. Then they're providing an amazing service above and beyond and taking into account how… on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024I always interpreted "The South will Rise Again!" differently as a kid but now I understand the prop…
on The Mandate That Wasn’tYou're the worst kind of troll. Refuse to answer the question. Start a new adjacent conversation bec…
on Weekend Plans Post: On a Plane to IcelandWhen I was there last winter, I could see the red glow from that direction and there was a bored-loo…
on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024What North said. I guess I was so incredulous at the suggestion that something happened without us t…
on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024Shoot, it was the classified docs case. I guess foreign entities can start lining up at the window.…
on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024Whew, worried I'd miss some earth-shatteringly (maybe literally) important news.
on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024Big Ag begs Trump to spare their workers from deportation. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-farm-… on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024The Shen Yun dance troop, associated with Falun Gong, is in trouble over disturbing child labor prac…
It’s Going to be a Hard Winter
November 25, 2024
Hunting the Wild Goose – It’s a Funny Game
November 24, 2024
November 23, 2024
November 22, 2024
on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024
on The Mandate That Wasn’t on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024 on Saturday Morning Gaming: Game Awards Game of the Year Nominees are in on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024
on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024
on Open Mic for the week of 11/25/2024
on Weekend Plans Post: On a Plane to Iceland
on Saturday Morning Gaming: Game Awards Game of the Year Nominees are in
on Paper: Inflation and the 2024 US Presidential Election on Weekend Plans Post: On a Plane to Iceland on Weekend Plans Post: On a Plane to Iceland
I think a Tastes Great vs. Less Filling open thread would good myself.Report
Tastes great always wins. Why is less filling supposed to be good anyway?Report
It allows you to drink it all day and maintain a comfortable buzz for hours.Report
Ah yes. This is where I have a cultural deficiency in not having gone to college in the US, or otherwise hung out with drinkers here. Where I went to school, anyone looking for a beer that was less filling would probably suffer some kind of physical assault.Report
I don’t know. Where I live that pretty much applies as well.Report
It’s a marathon, not a race.Report
I agree. Busch Ice (or OE) was the norm among my friends.Report
McEwan’s 80/-. Less filling is not the phrase.Report
“Less filling” is a euphemism for “doesn’t give you a beer gut as quickly”.Report
I thought it meant it gets you less fished up. A eufemism.Report
I thought it just meant “tasteless”. Its hard to claim anything with more corn syrup than alcohol isn’t going to make you fat.Report
I think it was originally “less fulfilling” but the truth ended up not selling as well as a lie.Report
Any ideological disagreement between Keynes and Hayek is greatly exaggerated.Report
That’s kind of what I was thinking watching that Battle of the Century rap.Report
I’ve always loved this quote, and every time I see it, I find a new reason to fall in love with it.
Today’s reason: it shows just how different the times were. Nowadays, their disciples generally act as if they’re at opposite extremes of the political spectrum. And in any analysis of mainstream political thought, they are in fact more or less at opposite ends of the spectrum. Then? Not so much. That spectrum just ain’t what it was.Report
Its definitely changed. When Keynes and Hayek were writing, it was respectable to advocate a centrally planned economy under a democratic government. While Keynes didn’t advocate any such thing, Hayek thought his political prescriptions would provide too much scope for it.
However, while Hayek represented the least interventionist position that was respectable then, there are people now who hold even less interventionist ones. Hayek was quite at ease with state-provided services and safety nets, provided they didn’t interfere with the coordinating role of prices.Report
Nor can certain harmful effects of deforestation, or of some methods of farming, or of the smoke and noise of factories, be confined to the owner of the property in question or to those who are willing to submit to the damage for an agreed compensation. In such instances we must find some substitute for the regulation by the price mechanism. But the fact that we have to resort to the substitution of direct regulation by authority where the conditions for the proper working of competition cannot be created, does not prove that we should suppress competition where it can be made to function.
F. Hayek, from Road to Serfdom.Report
I’m definitely a libertarian of a Hayekian stripe. I’m OK with welfare (I have some bones to pick on specific points, but I don’t want to tear down the whole edifice) and if there are real market failures, I support government action tailored to correct those failures if it passes basic tests of good quality policy.Report
Sounds about right to me.Report
Yeah, exactly. I keep maundering on playing my Symphony for Single Cymbal here: welfare needs to demonstrate positive results: if at the end of all the addition and subtraction we’re not getting the desired results, hard questions must be asked and changes made. It’s an ongoing process and we must not tolerate excuses. Sometimes it’s just easier to start over: no point putting new wine in old wineskins.Report
Indeed. I think this is almost the centre line of present-day politics, at least in the anglosphere. Where the consenus breaks down is on one exactly constitutes a market failure and what degree of collateral damage is acceptable in government attempts to correct them.Report
I don’t want to understate my disagreements with the left. My conception of the proper role for government would result in the state doing a lot less, whether you’re talking about your government or mine (though I’m happier with mine than yours on the whole).
I’m a critic of government, but ultimately I’m one of the Loyal Opposition. I want to hold the government to the fire because I care about whether its working or not, and where is isn’t working I want to fix it.Report
Well, let’s not confuse the Left of yore with today’s exponents: the Left is not entirely devoid of common sense. LBJ thought he could legislate away poverty: we know that’s impossible today. The Left wants government to work, in all the senses of that word: nobody is sicker of ineffective bureaucracies than we are. I think all social welfare programs should have sunset provisions attached, otherwise these goddamn agencies turn into Institutions, more interested in self-preservation than actually doing their jobs.
Some of the Greek states used to routinely put their leadership on trial at the end of their terms. That might be a great idea for these agency heads. We need results, not more of this cheap talk about Oh Those Poor Children, as if anyone who dares to question the efficacy of these schemes is a heartless bastard.Report
Yes, I shouldn’t overstate my differences with the left either. Actual socialism is no longer advocated by the mainstream left, which puts us much closer together than in times past.
I think one of the reasons I spend more time arguing with liberals than conservatives is that I feel with liberals we both have a similar view of what good government is, our disagreements are about mechanisms. With conservatives, I don’t think we share even basic premises which makes debate kinda pointless.
And I totally agree about monitoring and evaluation of welfare programmes (of all programmes in fact). I push for this whenever I can in my own Department. It’s tragically underdone in government, with monitoring and evaluation frameworks often created as an afterthought, if at all.Report