Boutique!
When The Beasties’ landmark sophomore album Paul’s Boutique turned twenty-five earlier this year, I didn’t get around to doing a post on it.
Partly because I couldn’t believe that two-and-a-half decades had somehow passed; time in which Boys turned into Men.
(R.I.P., MCA.)
But partly because: what could I possibly say about this dizzying album that I’ve lived with for so long, yet still feel like I have yet to unlock all of its secrets?
Determined not to go down as one-hit wonders, estranged from their label Def Jam and producer Rick Rubin, the ex-punks holed up in sunny L.A. with producers the Dust Brothers, and created an epic love letter to their hometown of NYC.
More than that: Paul’s Boutique is a mass-media-addled portrait of late-20th-century America, that revels in the ways that low-culture iconography can serve as universally-recognizable signifiers, yet simultaneously be refashioned into something deeply idiosyncratic and personal. It’s all profoundly silly, and effortlessly cool.
For all the work obviously put into it, Paul’s Boutique comes across as a breezily psychedelic record, the sound of thousands of threads of consciousness being expertly woven by consummate channel-flippers (do I mix my metaphors? So too does this album) into a vibrant tapestry encompassing the detritus of 70’s cinema (kung fu movies, blaxploitation films, Steve McQueen and The Man With No Name all make appearances), countless TV and pop culture references, Jack Kerouac and JD Salinger and the Old Testament, and half-baked (or fully-baked, if you catch my drift) philosophizing.
In a weird way, Paul’s Boutique was Quentin Tarantino, before QT was.
The nearly 100% sample-based music shifts under your feet constantly – the Dust Brothers had already completed about half the tracks, intending to release them as club singles sans vocals, before the Beastie Boys convinced them to collaborate on an album; the Dust Brothers offered to strip the tracks down, believing they were too dense to rap over, but the Beasties said no, and instead matched the kaleidoscopic music, beat for (off)beat, with the best rhymes they ever wrote.
Containing up to 300 samples (most fully cleared and paid for, before legal and industry precedents made such a thing logistically and financially infeasible to ever do again) the record is filled to the brim with jokes, musical and lyrical.
If there are two lines that sum up this mind-expanding (and just plain expansive) album, they are:
“If I had a penny for my thoughts, I’d be a millionaire”,
and
“I got an open mind, so why don’t you all get inside”.
Though not a commercial hit upon its release, the album counted amongst its fans Miles Davis (who said he never tired of listening to it), Chris Rock, and Chuck D. Its reputation has only grown in the years since its release – without its influence, it’s nearly impossible to imagine The Avalanches, or Beck, or DJ Shadow.
The album-accompanying video above was created by some Beasties überfans; it contains some of the original music videos, interview footage, and video snippet “samples” of the kind of influences (and in some cases, the sources of the actual samples) that make up the album.
It’s an incredible labor of love, and an entirely fitting tribute to not only a great, great record, but to the very idea of cultural sampling/remixing. It’s worth thinking about what we’ve lost out on as a culture, by choosing to handle copyright in the record industry the way we have.
But even if you don’t wish to consider anything so chewy, get out some ‘phones, set aside 53 minutes of your life, and watch this.
(Mostly SFW, though there is some language).
If you’ve never heard the album, you are in for a treat; and if you have, seeing it like this, is almost like hearing it again for the first time.
Post header image sourced from Wikimedia Commons.
Great album, great post, extra points (as always) for grammar and spelling. A conversation I’d like to have sometime, ideally with me doing all the talking and other people nodding sagely and ordering drinks, is on how much more difficult it was to make sample-based records back then.
The Dust Brothers and Public Enemy’s Bomb Squad accomplished amazing things with what they had to work with. (I’m sure there are others, but I was never a hip-hop connoisseur.) With modern software, it’s all too easy to approximate that dense, buzzing tapestry of sound. You damn kids nowadays, you don’t know how good you have it.Report
Thanks! Yeah, this album (and the second and third PE albums) really blew my mind. I was late to catch up on them, not being much of a rap guy in HS. Luckily I had a college friend who was big into hip-hop, and he got me up to speed around 1991ish.
I’m not sure when sampling became easier/cheaper – this is an interesting story about DJ Shadow in 1991:
I originally had a bit in here comparing Paul’s Boutique to something like Sgt. Pepper’s, in terms of ambitious psychedelic myth-making leaps forward (PB even has its own “Paul is Dead” bit, with Mike D responding to rumors that he’d overdosed after Licensed to Ill with “I’m Mike D and I’m back from the dead / Chillin’ at the beach, down at Club Med”) but I just don’t know enough about the Beatles to comfortably feel like I wasn’t talking out my rear.
Though this made me laugh, from the PB wikipedia page:
Report
Also, I should clarify my statement: “sampling became easier/cheaper”. I’m referring of course to the technical aspects/equipment.
As noted in the OP, legally and financially, it became nearly impossible to do much sampling at all, right around the same time – the Beasties spent about a quarter-million dollars to get all the samples on this record; not chump change obviously (having had a hit debut record and a major label backing them, meant they had some money to spend), but a pittance compared to what it would take today, not just in the cash, but in the time spent on legal wrangling back and forth. Which is why mainstream artists started to rely on just one or two samples per song.
I guess I don’t understand why Congress couldn’t have passed a law stating samples under X seconds were free/fair use, so long as they are attributed.
Though I guess you’d get into all kinds of loophole/hairsplitting questions – X seconds per song? Or album? Or artist? Do they have to be two consecutive seconds? etc. etc.
You’ve got people like Girl Talk, who are clearly operating outside the mainstream paradigm and, frankly, the law (he calls his label “Illegal Art”, lampshading it.)
Others, like Shadow, I think rely largely on the obscurity of their samples (and heavily-manipulating them to obscure them further) to protect themselves legally.Report
Listening to the Beastie Boys, I always imagine that their writing/recording sessions were just a bunch of rap battles and attempts to outdo each other. Like when, in their videos, they one moves out of the way and the other takes front stage, they’re acting out what actually happened. MCA was on the mic, rapped a few lines, and then Mike D yanked him out of the way and grabbed the mic.
(Watching/listening now.)Report
Yeah, fully baked… heh.Report
It’s kinda stupid that it largely took this album to clue me into what a lot of harder/gangsta rap was about. Rap as party/dance music? Sure, I got that.
But being a white suburban kid, I won’t lie – N.W.A. and P.E. and such were…kind of scary. The stories they told, the militaristic way they presented themselves, the violent imagery – it was all pretty far from *my* experience of the world.
But then I get the Beasties doing something like “Looking Down the Barrel of a Gun”, in which they make explicit the meta-, storytelling aspects of it all.
“Because it’s all high spirit (that is, it’s joking around – talking bullshit) / You know you got to hear it / Don’t touch the mic, baby, don’t come near it” (that is, the “guns” and “bullets” here are metaphors for rhymes and beats).
Which is not to say that ALL the stuff that harder rap talks about is bullshit bravado.
Just that it’s worth listening to the genre with the understanding that there’s a LOT of tall-tale-telling and self-mythologizing going on.Report
Right. Of course, less than a decade after Paul’s Boutique, things got pretty violent, but for the most part it really is metaphorical. “Murder” and “killing” are still common metaphors for out rapping someone (Kendrick Lamar’s famous “I’m better than everyone” verse uses them), and actual battle rapping frequently includes what sounds like very serious threats of violence, but at the end everyone (usually) shakes hands and has a few drinks.Report
A post on rap battles would be fun except that it would get me banned.Report
I always remembered Paul’s Boutique as being made in the Wild West era, before people really knew what to do about sampling and paying for rights and so forth. I thought there was an egregious case where the Beasties prevailed in court against a jazz flautist whose trademark riff had been sampled and used without attribution. Someone needs to Google that for me. I think the thing was that the flute guy couldn’t claim ownership of the sound he made, because it wasn’t a melody or even notes, but just a trademark breathy sound he invented.
I’ve been drinking, though, and these goddamn headphones are so loud, I don’t know what the hell’s going on.Report
You’re probably thinking of this.Report
That is precisely the case I was jabbering about, mostly uncomprehendingly. Thank you.Report
I had just always assumed, before writing this post, that the samples were all “stolen”. But the PB wiki page says that’s not so:
If we could have had a bunch more records like this one, but don’t because of choices we made legally, it seems like a loss to me.Report
Well, the direction things actually headed was further from Paul’s Boutique and more towards “Can’t Touch This.”
In truth, PB appropriated some tunes pretty ballsily. “Eggman,” for instance, makes extremely liberal use of “Superfly.” I’m not going to argue that it’s anywhere near as lazy as MC Hammer, but it’s a tricky case to make.Report
Oh yeah, some of the samples are very obvious and heavily-relied upon.
I’m just wondering if we could have come up with something better; like I said, a length of sample/loop ceiling below which it’s “fair use/commentary”, or maybe some sort of reasonable mutually-agreed upon rates per second or something.
Writers “sample” each other all day long, re-using words/sentences/phrases/references that they read elsewhere, and we seem to have survived, with a system (with a lot of admittedly gray area) in which we seem to mostly understand when it’s time to credit/attribute and/or pay the other guy.Report
Censored version. I insert it for the many levels of its relevance.Report
I didn’t realize iTunes was already going in the background when I started the video and put my headphones on.
Based on what I just heard, Nas and Beat Happening should never do a collaboration together.Report
Glyph,
what’s your e-mail address? I’ve got a suggestion for the next music post you’ve got.Report
Kim, send it to me. I’ll set it up for next Wednesday.Report
I can see the genius and I appreciate the hard work, but no matter how hard I try it does absolutely nothing for me. Mostly when I hear the samples I want to go listen to the original (mmm, Curtis Mayfield.) I always had the same problem with Big Audio Dynamite.Report
It’s not my favorite either. I find myself tapping my feet for a bit and then tuning out.
Also, I believe I’ve said this before, but Curtis Mayfield = God. There may be no more perfect album ever recorded.Report
I think if PB has a flaw for me, it comes at the very end, with the 12-minute suite (“B-Boy Bouillabaisse”) collaging all the different sections/fragments; while I like it in itself, and it’s very ambitious (and I don’t know where else on the album it could go), I sometimes find it a little overwhelming after all the stuff that’s crammed in what came before.
Sometimes I’m just sort of spent already by that point.Report
“Also, I believe I’ve said this before, but Curtis Mayfield = God. There may be no more perfect album ever recorded.”
Which album?Report
Uh, Super Fly!Report
I bought one of those cheapie CD comps you can find sometimes on Amazon for legacy artists, that had like 5 Curtis Mayfield albums all packaged together in one sleeve.
It is awesome.Report
Hey Glyph! Thank you for the nice write up. You really pinned it down in a couple of sentences. It’s funny, because we got the same thought about QT, while working on this. Cool that you liked the movie 🙂Report
@sma-prod – thanks to you, for the video! Very, very cool work.Report
I just noticed AVC posted a piece on “Hey Ladies” today. Coincidence? I think not.
That’s the kind of influence we have here. Always on the tip.Report
Just the tip…Report