- Next story Late to the party — tardy musings about the Emmys
- Previous story I’ve got good news and bad news.
Search
TEN SECOND BUZZ
- Supreme Court issues StayFebruary 26, 202516 Comments
- From Fox News: AG Pam Bondi announces Epstein files will start to be released on Thursday the 27thFebruary 26, 202543 Comments
- Group Activity: Watching President Trump Holds First Cabinet MeetingFebruary 26, 2025No Comments
- Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025February 24, 2025300 Comments
- From WaPo: Trump Dismissed Chairman of Joint Chiefs, Navy CNO, Four OthersFebruary 22, 2025No Comments
Features
Hot Posts
Thank You!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44d40/44d40ed1471218842a7a05874dd48d8fc058c57a" alt="Devcat image"
Thanks to your generosity, we were able to upgrade our service plan. Hopefully this will help us address some of our performance issues.
HELP ORDINARY TIMES
Recent Comments
DavidTC in reply to Jaybird on From Fox News: AG Pam Bondi announces Epstein files will start to be released on Thursday the 27thMaybe he was lying! You’d think that that’d be something that we’d want to know! Gee, if only we cou…
DavidTC in reply to Damon on From Fox News: AG Pam Bondi announces Epstein files will start to be released on Thursday the 27th““I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone.” You’re assuming he worked fo…
Jaybird in reply to LeeEsq on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025What could possibly go wrong?
LeeEsq on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025Jewish law makers in California, basically Democrats to a person, are advancing legislation to comba…
Dark Matter in reply to Damon on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025Road maint problems vary wildly by state. NY has massive pot holes that can't be fixed. Florida does…
InMD in reply to Slade the Leveller on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025I'm not sure there's any clear vision and while not NY or CA there's no fear of imposing taxes. The…
Slade the Leveller in reply to LeeEsq on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025He only makes $7,200/yr. as Lt. Governor, so at least the TX taxpayers aren't getting ripped off for…
Slade the Leveller in reply to InMD on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025If MD is anything like IL, it's due to a legislature that wants to have European style social servic…
Jaybird in reply to DavidTC on Musk vs GoreIf my experience of the cafeteria is any indication, it ain't just the Trumpsters that are pro-segre…
DavidTC in reply to Jaybird on Musk vs GoreYou, now: I thought it was broad enough to cover such things as “spending” but if you insist, I’ll l…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/103f6/103f63718a95e34a1918317027c6e3ec343a1888" alt=""
Comics
-
March 2, 2025
-
March 1, 2025
-
February 28, 2025
-
February 26, 2025
More Comments
Michael Cain in reply to Ozzy! on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025
Jaybird in reply to DavidTC on Musk vs Gore
Slade the Leveller in reply to Dark Matter on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025
DavidTC in reply to Dark Matter on Musk vs Gore
DavidTC in reply to DensityDuck on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025
LeeEsq on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025
Jaybird in reply to Sihlus on Saturday Morning Gaming: Goodbye to Monolith Studios
Ozzy! in reply to LeeEsq on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025
Damon in reply to InMD on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025
Sihlus on Saturday Morning Gaming: Goodbye to Monolith Studios
InMD in reply to LeeEsq on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025
Jaybird in reply to LeeEsq on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025
LeeEsq on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025
LeeEsq in reply to Dark Matter on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025
LeeEsq in reply to Michael Cain on Open Mic for the week of 2/24/2025
At this point, what in your mind would be the defining characteristics of an “A” student, a “B” student, and a “C” student?
I’m willing to bet that one of the defining characteristics of the “A” student will be actions that evidence an attitude congruent with the sentiment of “to hell with the grade, I want to win.”Report
As we like to say when we’re stalling for time, good question. Hmmm. I want to see them actively involved in the discussion, in trying to influence what ideas are enplaced in the document and the final shape of the language. That they are prepared, when they are doing so, instead of just spouting things off the cuff. And that their ideas/proposals indicate they are taking the project seriously. I’ve also indicated that their grade depends on pursuing their state’s goals, as I’ve specified them in their state brief. Outside those limited specifications they can pursue their own preferences, and their first assignment, for next Tuesday, is a 1-2 page single-spaced writeup of the goals–both state and personal–they want to pursue as a delegate.
Honestly, I’d give high marks to someone who demonstrated a commitment to, and ability at, being a compromise maker; who kept things moving by getting conflicting sides to agree to something where each has to give a bit.
But for some, no doubt active and serious participation will overlap with desire to win. I’ve made it clear that discussions and negotiations are not limited to in-class time, because I couldn’t police such a rule anyway, and I already know some–like the two guys who are best buds (one of whom is, by the way, an Interior Design student, and whom I encouraged to take the class because I’ve had him in a previous class) are planning to try to form a cabal–if the states I’ve given them make that workable. And I imagine those that want to win will use that out-of-class time to suggest proposals, make allies, and come in ready to either bulldoze or sweettalk the opposition, as seems most strategic to them.Report
Oh, I didn’t fully answer.
A B student would be one who took it seriously, was involved, and contributed decently, but not as extensively or intelligently as the A student.
A C student is there regularly, more quiet, less actively involved and so less influential, but not detracting from the process even if they’re not really contributing a lot to it.
People who are disruptive, unserious, or miss a lot will miss that cut-off.Report
By the measure of an “A” student being the ones to make compromise as you put it, large portions of the original Constitutional Convention would’ve not passed your class.
I mean, if the person who wrote the most consistent and best “plan” was also the most strident student, either on the left, right, or maybe even another weird political typology based on the scenario, could they still get an A if they refused to compromise and actually say, manuevered around the ‘moderates’ to get something more to their liking passed?Report
I didn’t say they had to compromise to get an A. I said they could get an A even if they were a compromise-producer, rather than seeking to win.Report
It strikes me that a win-at-all-costs when providing the template for future government is a short-sighted proposition. Ultimately, you want something people are going to be satisfied with. Otherwise, you’re setting up significant problems later on.
A lot of this depends. It’s one thing to say “Rhode Island will give in eventually” and another to say “Our five states have more people and/or wealth than their nine states, so screw them.”Report
“By the measure of an “A” student being the ones to make compromise as you put it, large portions of the original Constitutional Convention would’ve not passed your class. ”
Well, he’s already said that the original Constitutional Convention screwed up a lot of things. Hanley is not saying “what you should be going for is the original American Constitution and you should follow the same process its framers did”.Report
I’m willing to bet that one of the defining characteristics of the “A” student will be actions that evidence an attitude congruent with the sentiment of “to hell with the grade, I want to win.”
So, I’m sitting here thinking (a) this sure looks like a prediction, and (b) how the hell will I ever manage to decide if it’s correct? Maybe another glass of wine will clarify things…Report
Will most of the introverts be given a C?Report
75% of the grade is based on written work, so that gives them an opportunity to build a good base upon which to get more than a C. If they participate enough to make serious efforts at promoting their own state’s interests, they’ll get above a C.Report
That’s very reasonable.Report
Just call me Dr. Reasonable.Report
Oh my goodness! Impressive article dude! Thank you so much,
However I am having troubles with your RSS.
I don’t know the reason why I can’t subscribe to it.
Is there anybody having similar RSS problems? Anyone that knows the answer will you
kindly respond? Thanx!!
Here is my web page: Sem StatisticsReport
“organized youth sports with formal rules put in place by adults have replaced sandlot baseball where the kids negotiated their own rules (the lilac bush in old man Hanley’s yard is the left field foul line, etc.). ”
On the one hand, that’s not “no rules”, that’s just adapting the basic rules to fit the situation. There still is a foul line (and a left field), they just aren’t part of a formal layout. (And if there were a baseball field available to play on then the kids wouldn’t have had to make up their own.)
On the other hand, that’s kind of what you’re doing by having them read the “Guide to Constitution-Building”.Report