How To Restrain A 17-Year-Old Client
How To Restrain a 17-Year-Old Client
Two staffers will approach the child in crisis having established that he poses a threat either to himself or to somebody else. Between them, they will have indicated to one another which staffer will be the lead on the restraint. On either side of the child, each will grab for a wrist with their outside hand, holding the arms at forty-five degree angle across their bodies. They will put their inside arms up along the hip, the ribs, and finally, behind the child’s shoulders. Their inside feet will be positioned slightly behind the child’s back feet, and from there, the child will be lowered down, first onto his butt, then his back, and finally his head. The staffers will then roll the child onto his stomach, one having released a grip on an arm so that the child ends up face down, arms along ribs and hips, legs together. One staffer will then lay across the child, pinning the closer arm with a knee and the farther arm with a combination of elbow, wrist, and hand (depending on the staffer’s and the child’s size). The second will slide down, pinning the child’s legs at the below the knee. From here, the staffer pinning arms will either begin an immediate conversation with the child or wait until a conversation is possible. The staffer will speak in the clearest possible terms, explaining what will happen next, including an allowance of a sufficient amount of time for a calm demeanor to be achieved, as well as a period of post-restraint stillness undertaken by the client. After those steps, an interview can occur, reconstructing what lead to the restraint and what can be done to avoid the next restraint. The client can then be returned to the group and the restraint appropriately documented through the use of agency specific paperwork.
How To Actually Restrain a 17-Year-Old Client
One staffer will be in the basement, monitoring a client’s laundry completion, while a second staffer remains in the commons area with a child whose anger has been slowly building all day, specifically because the nearby staffer, who is new to the facility and unknown to the child, has been enforcing the rules as they have been explained to him. The child, having decided that this enforcement has been too stringent, will instigate a conflict in an attempt to tease out where exactly the line exists with the new staffer. This will result in his instigating a physical confrontation in an attempt to figure out if the staffer is willing to engage in restraint protocol.
The new staffer will then wrap the client up in a manner that might be described as an awkward bearhug. He will also shout for assistance from his staffer downstairs while attempting to drown out the now furious child who is alternately swearing, threatening, and demanding to be let go of. This will be a standing wrestling match that will eventually end on the floor, with the child rolled over and in a vaguely approximate but not entirely appropriate position in which his hips never really square on the floor. As one attempt to break free, the child will have bitten into the arm of the new staffer, but only long enough to have the arm shoved deeper into his open mouth, forcing him to pull away. After an hour, the seething, wheezing child will eventually calm down. The new staffer will do as good a job as an new employee is capable of at doing the talking down that each client is meant to receive, but will be relieved by workers from a nearby facility who arrived to see what the unexpected commotion was. After all, this is occurring at the quieter and calmer facility. It will be repeatedly noted how rare restraints are here and how honored the new staffer ought to be to have participated in one. The appropriate post-restraint steps will be followed and, the next day, the child will joke around about having been restrained. The staffer will debrief his bosses about the restraint and asked if he is okay, which he will shrug about. He will be assured that this was a good and necessary restraint.
He will reflect upon that later with bemusement. In the meantime, his bosses will tell him to get back to work, as this restraint occurred on his third of four-and-a-half straight days in the facility.
(Image borrowed from Tact2.)
No blood? Not badly injured?
I remember needing to learn proper protocol for bites in a hospital…
(yay orientation).Report
This brought tears to my eyes. Thank you for writing it.Report
Thank you.Report
Restraining someone is always intense. I haven’t had to do it in years but it was always tense when i did. Never got bitten myself not for want of one 7 year repeatedly trying.Report
They never really emphasize the intensity of the experience. I suppose there’s no good way to recreate it with adults restraining one another.Report
No, there isn’t.
Because when you are practicing you are rational. When things are ‘for real’, many times at least one of the sides is not.
Dealing with people that are not acting in a rational way is *very* hard.Report
I really need to learn how to fight..and fight dirty.Report
This is an unexpected takeaway.Report
If you’re going to engage in resistance, best learn how to do it effectivelyReport
Interesting referring to the 17-year-old as a client.Report
I was wondering if anybody would end up asking about this. I have two explanations:
-the first is that this is one of the terms we used when working. Whether there’s some deeper meaning to it – perhaps to make us forget that we were working with children? – I can’t say for certain, but client was one of our words.
-the second is that I had originally written “How To Restrain A 17-Year-Old Boy” and I was afraid of the unintended ramifications of such a headline, so I changed it.Report
“client” implies a partnership between you and the person who needs help. The staff and the client are working together to help the client get to a place where they can re-enter society. It suggests that this is something that’s a two-way street, with the client being empowered and having a role in the decision-making process.
“boy” implies that the staff is in the role of a parent or teacher, dictating terms to a naughty child. You’re here because you were bad and you’ll stay here until you learn to do as you’re told.Report
Jim,
so client is less patronizing?Report
I’ve also seen and heard the term “consumer” used in other circumstances, although of course that word is something of a euphemism too.Report
Burt,
makes me wonder what a lawyer refers to the person he is in charge of “keeping out of trouble” when he’s not actually paying for said service (and thus, to my way of thinking, is not the client).Report
I’ve never worked with children, but I’ve lived this with adults. We consciously avoid “client” or “consumer”. When you just work with people, these moments become increasingly more rare. I like to live and work by the theory that happy people don’t do these things usually, so let’s help people be happy.Report