“Schools are becoming a dangerous place to work.”
(Please note that the title of this post is a quote which is further described in the post itself. I implore you to read the post and not just reply solely to the quote/title itself.)
No. They’re not.
The title of this post reflects a text message I received from my wife, as we frantically attempted to confirm the safety of her family living in Connecticut. She’s wrong. Schools will be no more dangerous on Monday than they were on Friday morning, before the tragic shootings in Newtown, Connecticut took place. I know a lot of folks feel differently. I know this because I work with some of these folks and had dinner with a pair of them Friday evening as we attempted to process what happened.
A colleague of mine teaches 4th grade. She came to me Friday afternoon with a question: “How do we talk to kids about this?” I responded that first and foremost we need to assure them of their safety at school. She asked: “How do we do that if we don’t feel safe?”
We are safe in our schools. Our children are safe in our schools. In spite of what happened in Newtown, our children are safe. Approximately 77 million students attended school of one kind or another on Friday. Approximately 77 million returned home safe. I realize this is of little consolation or solace to the parents and families of the children needlessly killed on Friday. But the reality is that schools are, were, and will be safe places for our children.
Details continue to emerge about what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Friday. It appears that the shooter forced his way into the building. Do you know what would have prevented that? Armed guards at every door. Metal detectors wouldn’t have stopped him. Swipe card access wouldn’t have stopped him. Stop-and-frisk wouldn’t have stopped him.
Parents at my school have already begun to ask what steps we are taking to secure the safety of their children, an appropriate and understandable response in the wake of children who looked like theirs being killed. Would we lock all exterior doors and funnel visitors through a single entrance? Would we increase police patrols of the area? Would we add security? I don’t know what we’ll ultimately do, but none of that will make their children noticeably safer.
The reality is that mass school shootings of the type we saw on Friday are exceedingly rare. This does not mean that we should not attempt to determine why and how they happen and what can be done about them. But it also does not mean we should overreact and take a series of steps that are unlikely to do anything but assuage fear and anger. Any steps we take now would likely seem unnecessary long before a similar event happens. When this event leaves our consciousness, as it will for the vast majority of us relatively soon, increased security measures are likely going to be the first things axed when budget crunches hit in schools that don’t face regular threats of violence. And they should be. Because employing armed guards at every door of a school building is a waste of resources when we are talking about a 20-in-77,000,000 event.
Again, I realize this sort of calculus may seem cold and unfeeling in a way. And it is. As a teacher who is not yet a parent, my job requires a sort of cold calculus when working with children. My job is not to emote, but to act, and to act in their best interests, largely independent of my emotion. And I will concede again that this post offers little to nothing to those impacted directly by this tragedy, and I am willing to take criticism from those parts of our audience should they exist.
But the reality is that our schools are safe. Your children are safe in schools. Send them to school on Monday. Hug and kiss them as much as you feel necessary and even more. But send them to school. They need it. You need it. We need it. We need not make victims of the other 76,999,980 students because of the awful, tragic, and needless deaths of 20. Your children are safe. Your children are safe.
What you write is something we all need to keep in mind.Report
There is an important defect in the way people evaluate risk by default – availability bias. People judge the likelihood of something occurring based on how easily they can think of examples of it happening.
The danger of course, is that it leads people to overestimates the probability of rare but easily-remembered events occurring. It’s something more people should be aware of, because it distorts the way we demand governments manage risk in a way than can be harmful in a lot of ways.Report
I think there’s something else going on here besides availability. There are some things we do knowing we are taking a risk, however small, e.g., driving or eating too many cookies. What is scary about school or mall or movie shootings is that it feels like a risk-free scenario. Or at the very least, one that we can’t do something differently without becoming totally withdrawn.
I think the other thing that freaks people out is the fact that it was intentional. If a fire broke out in a school and a similar number of people died – well, that’s just as imaginable. It would have been memorable. But it wouldn’t terrify people. Malevolence is extra terrifying.Report
I think the other thing that freaks people out is the fact that it was intentional. If a fire broke out in a school and a similar number of people died – well, that’s just as imaginable. It would have been memorable. But it wouldn’t terrify people. Malevolence is extra terrifying.
You just explained the answer to something that’s always mystified me – why we focus so heavily, and spend such a large portion of government money, on things like crime and terrorism when disease and natural disasters kill far more people.Report
I’ve been to malls staffed by people with AK-47’s. It doesn’t feel safer.Report
I’d add to this that a common (and understandable) reaction to a problem is often “something must be done”. While this is as I say an understandable attitude it can lead people to support solutions that don’t work just because they are seen as doing something.Report
Alright, you’ve got a point, but I don’t like it. I would still feel better following 10 feet behind my kid all day making sure he’s safe.Report
And what kind of an adult would a child thus protected grow up to become?Report
I know, I know, I know. I don’t it, I just *want* to do it.Report
Teach your kid wisely. Loud noise, hit the floor. hide under desk.
Then the next time someone fires a cannon at the building they’re in, they’ll… be safer?
(true story. someone was actually blanks. “it happened in college”).Report
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKqXu-5jw60
Because hiding under a desk will save you from a nuclear explosion.Report
How many schools have locked doors? Buzzer entries? Metal detectors?
How many schools don’t have the old lady down the street, the one who used to teach kids how to knit, come help with the after school program? Or the old man who taught bird carving?
How many schools, in the desire to keep their students safe as they prepare them for the world, lock the world out?
No, schools are not safer; not if they’re shutting the bonds that hold us together out as they try to shut the monsters out, too. It’s even possible that shuttering opens the path to fostering new monsters, because they see and respond to the power of fear.Report
Freerangekids.com
Lenore Skenazy can be a bit extreme but her underlying message is a sorely needed one.Report
Yes.
We used to live in the Boston area while our kids were small. Every weekend, we’d pile in the car and drive to the White Mountains to hike, camp, etc.
One day, a bunch of the other moms cornered me, concerned about this; about taking our kids out miles and miles into the woods, all seasons of the year, far from a road, and, even worse, far from a teaching hospital. (That’s Boston for ya.)
Funny thing, parents. Now, with cell-phone texting and curated face book pages, children have no privacy, little chance to range free. Every minute scheduled.Report
Yeah. I remember hearing stories about kids getting snakebit, with their parents drawing lines on their arms, saying “if the swelling gets above here, we go to the hospital.”
Among the thousand and one things that parents ought to know about:
“if you panic, it doesn’t help.”
and
“head wounds bleed. a lot. doesn’t mean they’re serious”
I don’t go out into the woods without knowing enough first aid to get me home (including carrying a 200 lb. man home, if necessary). But I don’t imagine you do either. 😉Report
I am a retired high-school science and math teacher (35 years). I always joked that I wanted to be better armed than the kids. After Columbine I told my students that we would do the best we could to avoid trouble, but in our school we were trapped like rats, so we would have to be prepared to fight. We had lots of weapons in my room: lab equipment, lumber, noxious chemicals and tools…enough for everyone. When the school had security drills, we passed out our weapons, set up our barricades and waited to kill whoever came through the door. I believe the kids felt safer. I even hid two machetes in the drop ceiling that the kids never knew about.
For the last 4 years of my career I was in a classroom trailer while the main building was being refurbished. Now we had escape routes to go along with our weapons. Again, our drills made the kids feel they had some control over whatever crazy situations might come up. We did not talk about who might threaten us, we just got ready.
It sounds like the teachers in Newtown were ready to protect their kids, and several paid with their lives. I hope I would be as brave.Report
Reminds me of a news program yesterday, interviewing a fellow from the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy. He was deriding the idea that more guns at school would make people safer. He might be right (not opining on that here), but the interesting thing was a verbal corner he got himself into. Something like (I don’t have the exact quote): “People think that if they had guns handy they could….” Then he struggled to complete the sentence. In my mind I heard “…defend themselves.” He ended up with “… take down the bad guy.”Report
This guy was going down the hall with gun drawn.
By the time he was in the door, the teacher was dead.
All her having a gun would have done is given him an opportunity to take her gun and be that much more armed.Report
Did she hear a shot? If so, any decent combat training would get her down, and safe. And get the kids down and (mostly) safe (time to death doubled or tripled, I’d say).Report
“Be prepared”
…. umm… yeah.
Am I the only person who knows someone who’s hurt someone else during a “safety drill”?
Teenager is pouring sulphuric acid into a bit of water (two test tubes).
T.A. comes up behind him, and covers his eyes.
Teenager splashes both vials into T.A.’s face.
(T.A. wanted to check to see if he could navigate to the eyewash station while being “blind”).Report
The T.A. did this while not wearing PPE?
He’s an idiot.Report
Yes, yes indeed. Although even with normal protective eyewear, you’d still see some scarring…Report
Well, the other thing is that even having security guards at the doors wouldn’t have stopped Brenda Ann Spencer from doing it. She wasn’t even on campus. Only if you never let the students leave the building and what child would be happy with that?Report
Of course, not even she could have realized she would be directly responsible for the career of Bob Geldof, which one would hope comes up in her parole hearings.Report
“How do we talk to kids about this?”
It is a valid question. Students will ask questions about last Friday’s event. It isn’t so much that we are unsafe in schools as educators, as much as alleviating the fears of innocent school-age children who may have fears about their safety in light of what has happened to peers in CT.
School-age children are subject to monthly “lock-down” drills, as safety precautions. How do educators explain to their charges what went wrong? Can what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary School, happen to them?
lock all exterior doors
All exterior doors are locked. At all times. All day. There is protocol. Parents and visitors must report to the office, sign-in.
It remains uncertain, exactly how did Adam Lanza force his way into the building. And, of course why.Report
Count my school among those that do not practice lock-down drills and which do not lock all exterior doors. We shall see if that changes.Report
“Details continue to emerge about what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Friday. It appears that the shooter forced his way into the building. Do you know what would have prevented that? Armed guards at every door. Metal detectors wouldn’t have stopped him. Swipe card access wouldn’t have stopped him. Stop-and-frisk wouldn’t have stopped him.”
I don’t think armed guards would have been a deterrent. Sure, it might have deterred someone not 100% committed, but the old saw about not being able to stop someone willing to give up their life to take another’s is true. I’d expect the shooter would have shot the armed guard. There wouldn’t be more than one armed guard to a door. Budgetary issues you know. MAYBE the shots would have given folks more advanced warning, but not much. MAYBE the guard could have returned fire and discourage the shooter or possibly killed him, but a determined shooter is going to get in.Report
I’m not sure how armed guards at every door would have prevented it, because if you know there are armed guards, you just shoot first, right? Maybe what the school needed was a bulletproof door with armed guards behind it, through which any potential shooter would have to enter? Or maybe gun detecting lasers that instantly vaporize anyone who has an assault rifle who tries to enter the school without a security badge?
Seriously, prevention of these sorts of things can only happen well before someone shows up to the school, or the mall, or the movie theater with a bunch of guns and enough rounds to take out everyone.Report
That’s sort of my point. A lot of people wanted to talk about increased safety measures in school. Nothing is going to stop someone as committed as this individual was one he sets events in motion.Report
And let’s be clear here. “Nothing is going to stop someone as committed as this individual was one he sets events in motion.” NOTHING. Not a law on magazine sizes, not a law banning AR-15s, not a law banning anything.
Those weapons still exist and will be available. Even if, magically, they were removed off the face of the earth, the cops still would have them. Someone truly intent to cause mayhem knows he can find anything he needs in the trunk of a cop car.Report
I remember in the 80s and early 90s, when “Schools are not safe for teachers” was a common refrain, with the fear being that attacks on teachers by students were becoming more and more common. I think this is something we’re going to hear at least once a generation.Report
After VA Tech there was some serious concern about how to handle problem students. It revived a bit after the discovery that the Aurora guy was a grad student. But there was no serious change that came down to my level. No locked doors, no red buttons, no nothing. There is some protocol to follow, and a team of people who now monitor mental health of students. But nothing serious ever happened. I wonder if that will be true for elementary schools.
This semester, a student made some vaguely menacing comments to me. I reported it to my department chair, who took it very seriously, and to the mental health team, who thought it sounded like no big deal – like a slightly nutty but non-violent student.
But really, no change occurred.Report
I have seen changes after the VT shooting. The most obvious one is the notification system. There was a shooter in the main UT library a couple years ago, and within minutes, everyone associated with the university had received emails and text messages notifying them of the shooter and giving them instructions (stay where you are, basically, and if you’re not off campus, don’t come on campus). The same happened during a bomb threat this semester. And though the alert system clearly has a hair trigger, because the university will always be looking to cover its ass, I actually think it’s a good thing.Report