- Next story The Spanish Civil War: A Product of Appeasement
- Previous story Jury Finds Amber Guyger Guilty
Search
TEN SECOND BUZZ
- Open Mic for the week of 3/31/25March 31, 20259 Comments
- Open Mic for the week of 3/24/25March 24, 2025182 Comments
- Report: Trump to Sign Department of Education Elimination Executive OrderMarch 19, 20253 Comments
- Open Mic for the week of 3/17/25March 17, 2025238 Comments
- From The New York Times Editorial Board: The Authoritarian Endgame on Higher EducationMarch 15, 202550 Comments
Features
Hot Posts
Devcat Reports

Due to problems related to a WordPress update, the site's layout had to be moderately altered. Some of the changes are temporary.
HELP ORDINARY TIMES
Recent Comments
Philip H in reply to Saul Degraw on Open Mic for the week of 3/31/25Better then nothing at this point.
Philip H in reply to David TC on Open Mic for the week of 3/31/25Idiots.
Burt Likko on Trump’s Most Insidious Scheme (So Far)Due process is not a cookie you have to earn through your innocence or your charisma. It is a restra…
Dark Matter in reply to InMD on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came ForInMD: We either live in a world where people can deal with these kinds of questions, including when…
David TC in reply to InMD on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came ForI think you give the game away when you ask if I know what ‘important rights’ are, so much so that e…
Saul Degraw on Open Mic for the week of 3/31/25Cory Booker is doing the good old fashioned speaking filibuster: https://bsky.app/profile/andreapitz…
Marchmaine in reply to Jaybird on A Working Man ReviewedMy 17yo daughter went to see Snow White last weekend... when she got back I asked, 'So, was it woke?…
David TC on Open Mic for the week of 3/31/25China, Japan, and South Korea have teamed up to respond to US tariffs. https://www.usnews.com/news/w…
Jaybird in reply to InMD on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came ForOh, yeah. For what it's worth, the stuff they dug up about Ward Churchill *WAS* worth firing him ove…
LeeEsq on Open Mic for the week of 3/31/25NYC Doctor shocked to find going on an anti-Semitic rant gets her fired from the Jewish hospital she…

Comics
-
The Greatest Strike in History
March 30, 2025
-
March 28, 2025
-
They’re Acting Queer in Cleveland
March 27, 2025
-
A Loaf of Bread, a Container of Milk, and a Stick of Butter
March 26, 2025
More Comments
LeeEsq in reply to Dark Matter on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came For
LeeEsq on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came For
Dark Matter in reply to Jaybird on Open Mic for the week of 3/31/25
Dark Matter in reply to Jaybird on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came For
LeeEsq on Open Mic for the week of 3/31/25
InMD in reply to Jaybird on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came For
Jaybird in reply to InMD on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came For
Jaybird in reply to CJColucci on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came For
CJColucci in reply to Jaybird on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came For
Philip H on Open Mic for the week of 3/31/25
Dark Matter in reply to David TC on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came For
Dark Matter in reply to Chris on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came For
InMD in reply to Jaybird on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came For
Dark Matter in reply to Chris on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came For
Jaybird on A Working Man Reviewed
Just for fun, I plugged this into an inflation calculator here.
33 cents in 1916 (I am guessing from the ’16 on the cartoon it was drawn in that year) would be equivalent to almost $8 today. Granted, I don’t know how sugar prices have fluctuated vs. general inflation, but $8 is a pretty nice box of the typical candy sold at groceries or drugstores (think Russel Stover)Report
33 cents seems like a lot. Just googling around a bit, penny candies were a thing in 1916: “‘Penny candy’ encompassed a broad range of confection. Established and large-scale manufacturers who produced many higher priced goods also sold bulk candies designed to appeal to children and to be sold so many pieces to the penny. These might included molded hard or soft candies, suckers, licorice in all sorts of shapes, marshmallows, or caramels, and would be distributed by ‘jobbers’ to various retail stores. At the other extreme, such penny candies might also be manufactured by hand in small ‘candy kitchens’ and sold in local shops or from street carts. The conditions of manufacture, and the quality of ingredients, might therefore vary significantly. Especially at the lower rungs of the trade, ‘adulterants’ such as artificial dyes and non-food fillers were occasionally used to make candy look more appealing or to lower the price of production.”
The bulk of this piece is about the panic that emerged from a 1916 polio epidemic, which resulted in wrapping of candies on which brands could be promoted.
https://candyprofessor.com/candy-bibliography-library/polio-and-childrens-candy-around-1916/Report