What Andrew Breitbart Got Wrong
To be frank, I loved Andrew Breitbart. He died during my college years. I will always remember reading the news. I had his memoir Righteous Indignation in my backpack right next to me at the time. I was doing some homework or goofing off in one of my university’s many computer labs when the news came across whatever news feed I was using, probably Hot Air’s Headlines tab. Really hit me hard for a minute there, sort of like Chadwick Boseman.
Andrew Breitbart had one super-duper famous quote a lot of people seem to misinterpret: Politics is downstream from culture. It means culture war battles matter more than political ones. In most cases, he’s right about this, but there’s one major place he’s wrong here: The states.
Now, what? You may be asking yourself that right now. The power of states is not determined by culture in most cases, because most statewide and regional races rarely become national news stories where the culture can infest it. They don’t tap into the country’s collective zeitgeist; they don’t become “pulse of the nation” races. The Democrats’ complete dominance in culture war battles since the end of the Reagan era (and when the Bush 41 holdovers took over the party until Trump’s rise routed them out) is apparent. (Might be a reason for that, people.) It is hard to think of a single major culture war flashpoint that conservatives or Republicans won the war. Sure, a victory in a battle here or there, but liberalism of the progressive strain has racked up war victory after war victory. As an example, it is currently Pride Month. Gays have reached such a height of cultural acceptance in such a short period of time, pandering to them with virtue signaling is the norm for a multi-national corporation, not the exception. Except in countries where being gay is illegal or punished severely. Never said virtue signaling was courageous, brophalom. It is hilarious that Donald Trump was the first president elected to a first term who was in favor of gay marriage publicly when he was elected.
The best way for a Democrat to win a contentious statewide race is to turn it into a cultural flashpoint, especially during a presidential election year. Ask Todd Akin how being a national laughingstock hurt his chances at beating the senator who lost to Josh Hawley in 2018 (a great year for Democrats, if you’ll recall.) Sometimes, it is unnecessary if the Republican is an incumbent (and terrible.) The current governor of Pennsylvania, my home state, won the governor’s mansion in 2014, a uniquely bad year for Democrats. That’s how bad the Republican incumbent was, who strangely managed to win the Attorney General race in 2008, perhaps the best year for Democrats since 1996, in a state Obama won handedly (despite McCain’s best efforts.) Sometimes, political tailwinds of the personal or national variety cannot be overcome in the case of being terrible or great, respectively. That one dude in Michigan just ran for Senate in the two best election cycles for Democrats since 2008, even though the Senate would probably be blessed to have him. Sorry, bro: History only remembers the winners. And sometimes even forgets some of them. As seen in this very paragraph!
The issue at hand is where the real power is in America. In a strange twist of fate, the President actually has very little power within America. Internationally, loads. The power to declare war, for one. Within America, the true power is held by mayors, governors, and other local figures. The reason for this? The glorious American experiment of federalism, keenly defined in many places but especially the Tenth Amendment, one of my personal favorites. During COVID, Donald Trump got most of the blame (although he deserved some) when he had no true power to do anything about it. Congress had to pass monetary relief before he could dole it out, and he couldn’t force the governors who didn’t like him to do what he wanted. The President has no true power to dictate to the states if they decide to tell him no, so said The Zombies, basically. Yes, he could round up the military and force it, like Ike did during school integration in the South. But does the political will exist to do that for almost anything these days in the age of social media? With every bad actor and propagandist (but I repeat myself) jumping in front of the nearest microphone and framing what happened as positively for their side as possible? The age of Al Sharpton killed the political will to smack a governor in the face.
Noam Chomsky, on the other hand, does it slightly differently. He tells you to read 300 pages to explain his position, especially if the position is stupid and inflammatory (his bread and butter.) That’s why no one really knows of him, but has heard his ideas from people more gifted at marketing than he. I fell asleep watching one of his documentaries. If you must tie yourself into knots to explain your position, your position sucks. Brevity is the soul of wit, which I shall return to soon, friends and neighbors.
As an addendum, people ask me sometimes where I get these very random (but brilliant!) article ideas. My brain is a weird place. I just wrote this in the middle of the night early Sunday morning after humidity woke me up. My brain kept me awake. I got the idea Friday while working when that famous quote of a man I truly respected while he was alive just came across my synapses. How he would have acted in the Trump era is anybody’s guess, but that’s why Earth is for the living. You can’t force serendipity, but you can plan for it (as one of my favorite marketing professors used to say; thanks, man.) Four hours of sleep. And people wonder how I survive without coffee. When you’re happy, sleep sometimes doesn’t last long or happen easily. A blessing and a curse, as Adrian Monk used to say. My advice? Stay hydrated, folks. I will now return to watching the thirteen-minute crowdfunded music video for The Mystic Crystal for like the eightieth time. Ninja Sex Party’s magnum opus. Peep it.
Culture war is not only a terrible, yet utterly American metaphor, but toxic to thought and culture. It’s great for ginning up hate at others which is some people’s tool like breitbart. I know people love his quip because people like quips. It sounds smart and witty but that doesn’t mean it makes any sense. CW never got one person health care but politics did. CW is great for people who don’t really care much about policy, which many people dont which explains the state of conservatism and trump.Report
“CW never got one person health care but politics did. CW is great for people who don’t really care much about policy, which many people dont which explains the state of conservatism and trump.”
That’s just, it’s just not right at all. Why is health care a proper goal for politics? Who says what politics should be about? We can debate the impact of policies, and we should do so as accurately as possible, but the parameters of the conversation are ideological and thus cultural.Report
“Everything”.Report
Came here to say this.
Also came here to say that this:
Noam Chomsky, on the other hand… That’s why no one really knows of him”
Suggests the entire post was satire.Report
Obviously, Chomsky’s linguistics writing is famously dense and difficult, so much so that the Chomsky Bot was invented, and I once attended a talk of his on the Minimalist Project after which pretty much every question from the linguists was, “Could you please explain everything you just said?”
That said, he’s a famously good speaker, his political writings are highly readable, and he’s easily one of the most well known intellectuals in the English-speaking world.Report
Oh my, I just read the Chomsky-as-tankie post, and my head exploded. Calling an anarchist (a libertarian in the original sense) and all-but-pacifist who has long been one of the most fervent anti-war and anti-domination activists on the worlda tankie suggests that folks here have no idea what’s going on to the left of Nancy Pelosi.Report
To be fair, plenty of folks here did notice that the central thesis was wildly inaccurate- but their heads exploded. (R.I.P.)Report
Wait, is this by the same clown who called Chomsky a tankie?
Which would explain a lot actually.Report
He is.Report
Chomsky is an incredibly fringe figure. Just because you know of him doesn’t mean anyone else does. Ask the average American if they know who Noam Chomsky is. You’ll get blank stares.Report
Top 3 people I am glad are dead and in hell:
1. Ronald Reagan
2. Rush Limbaugh
3. Andrew BreitbartReport
I probably would have gone with with the classic unholy trinity of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler. Maybe swap one out for Genghis Khan if I wanted to indulge my inner hipster. But this is also a reasonable list that reflects a totally healthy and balanced view of politics.Report
Urban II has a lot to answer for too.Report
The thing that sort of freaked me out about Breitbart was every time I saw him speaking, I thought “Jesus, that guy’s going to have a coronary!” And then it happened.
It reminded me of when someone asked a friend “Hey, did you hear about Kurt Cobain?” and he replied, sarcastically, “No. Did he kill himself?”
“Uh….”Report
If you must tie yourself into knots to explain your position, your position sucks.
No, sometimes (or perhaps quite often) the truth is complicated and it is lies which are simple.
Sometimes even very smart people can suck at explaining stuff. Some people have a knack for explaining and simplifying complicated things, most people don’t. What this means is that even if something can in principle be explained simply, the originator of the idea is not necessarily the best person to do the explaining. As a result, the mere fact that some given person has difficulty explaining their idea does not mean that the idea is bad.Report
No, a political position does not usually require a long explanation. Morality is not that complicated. Chomsky’s views of the world are toxic, contradictory, and self-serving.Report
If morality is not that complicated, why are there moral philosophers? Philosophers have been trying to figure out the right account of morality for ages. If everything was just open and shut, we wouldn’t have spent eons thinking that slavery was permissible.Report