COVID-19: A New Black Plague?
In 1996 when I was 27, I developed pneumonia. As I said in an earlier story, I was having trouble breathing so I decided to go to the closest hospital to me, which was a public hospital in downtown Minneapolis. The emergency room doctor took x rays and decided that I had pneumonia. It was at this point that things got weird. The doctor gave me a 5-day supply of antibiotics. This was odd; I was never given a 5-day supply of antibiotics. I usually had a 10-day treatment for sinus infections, so being given a 5-day treatment made no sense. Obviously, prescription didn’t work, I ended up getting worse. Long story short, I did get better over time. But I’ve always wondered: did race had anything to do with how I was treated? I’m African American, the doctor was white. I can’t prove anything and it is as likely that it wasn’t about race than it was about race.
Does race ever factor in health care? That question has come to fore during the COVID-19 pandemic. In places like my home state of Michigan, which is being ravaged by the coronavirus, a higher amount of people infected with COVID-19 are African American. Michigan has a population, close to 10 million and about 14% of the population is African American. However, African Americans make up 40% of coronavirus cases.
Many people are wondering why that figure for African Americans is so high. Is race a factor? There are those who say yes, but there are others who think race has nothing to do with it and it is even absurd to even talk about race. Kmele Foster from the Fifth Column podcast and writer Coleman Hughes strongly believe race is not a factor. Writing in Quillete, Hughes believes there are other factors that are to blame, with race being used as a proxy:
Blacks are more likely to work in the service sector, for instance, which means they have more opportunities to contract the virus. Moreover, blacks are more likely to suffer from diabetes, asthma, obesity, and hypertension, all of which make the virus more deadly. Moreover, black Americans are less likely to have access to high-quality health care and are more likely to live in areas that are served by over-burdened hospitals and emergency response services.
But if we are going to discuss underlying risk factors, we should discuss them directly rather than immediately using race as a proxy.
Foster is perplexed why people are focusing on the phenotype of a person which is rather pointless.
Before we go any farther, you should know that when it comes to talking about race in America, my views can be closer to Foster and Hughes’ views. I tend to believe the end goal for America is to become a society that is colorblind, something that is an anathema to more progressive views on race. Thinkers like Ibram X. Kendi or Ta-Nehisi Coates who tend to see America as irredeemably racist and nurse grievances instead of solving problems. But to get to a colorblind society, you have to deal with race and where it still makes an impact on American life and find solutions to solve it. In short, to get beyond race, you have to deal with race.
I agree with Foster that’s it is absurd to judge someone on phenotype. But Foster forgets that Americans have been doing that until very recently. Up until 50 years ago we had actual laws in the United States that were based on the color of someone’s skin. My father grew up in Jim Crow Louisiana and I’ve heard stories from him about the segregated South. My mother tells the story in 1968 of her first trip South to visit relatives just after they married. She had a medical problem and needed to see a doctor, so she went to a local doctor. Mom tells me she had to go into a different entrance to a different waiting room. The room for whites was very nice and the waiting room for “colored” people…wasn’t. .Just because it is a silly thing to judge people on the color of their skin doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist and that there aren’t issues.
None of this means that America is this terrible, racist place that is beyond hope. That said, we have to acknowledge that the history of this nation includes racial discrimination. And, that history of discrimination didn’t just end because of the civil rights movement. So knowing all of this, we have to ask why the people who are getting sick and dying from COVID-19 tend to have my color of skin.
Of course, you don’t have to focus on race at all. But an odd thing happens when people say race isn’t a factor in modern American life. When you don’t focus on groups, you start to focus on the person (though in reality, it becomes a focus on groups, just under their terms). So what is common among African Americans? There are higher rates of diabetes and obesity, which are two of a number of preexisting conditions that can make COVID-19 lethal. When we talk about diabetes and obesity, we also tend to focus on the person and their habits. It becomes what a person did wrong, eating too much bad food or not exercising enough. This was summed up in a National Review article on the coronavirus and race:
Ten years ago, when it was found that 10 percent of food stamps were being spent on sugary soda, many politicians, including Mayor Bloomberg, recommended food-stamp use restrictions. Michelle Obama refused to support these restrictions and instead promoted adjustments to the food-stamp program that gave discounts for purchasing fresh vegetables and fruits. The Times reported on a research study that compared whether banning sugary drinks or incentivizing fruits and vegetables would be more effective in combating obesity rates. The researchers found that the incentive program would not. By contrast, banning sugary drinks, they said, “would be expected to significantly reduce obesity prevalence and Type 2 diabetes incidence, particularly among ages 18 to 65 and some racial and ethnic minorities.” Yet now, when Surgeon General Jerome Adams suggests consumption adjustments should be part of the response, he is condemned for raising issues of personal responsibility.
Now, my husband who is of sturdy Scandanavian stock also has diabetes. I would have to wager that people aren’t going to fault him for having diabetes.
None of this is to say that personal responsibility has no role here. But the space between personal responsibility and societal responsibility is a spectrum, not a binary choice. I don’t think the Surgeon General was being racist in chiding African Americans to not smoke. It was personal for him. However, saying that to African Americans and not white Americans can look one-sided.
It’s also important to note that not all African Americans are on the same page. For example, I grew up with asthma. But I grew up with two parents who had good jobs and excellent health insurance which meant I had good health care that kept my asthma in check. But that’s not everyone’s story. Poorer African Americans don’t always have health care and asthma can go either untreated or underrated. In our COVID world having asthma, especially if it isn’t properly treated puts people at risk of this horrible disease.
We don’t live in a colorblind world yet, so we can’t ignore the health outcomes of African Americans. Jim Crow ended long ago, but that doesn’t mean the legacies are not still being felt today.
In our day, there are no segregated hospitals or men walking around in white hoods. But there are actions that while not intentionally racist, could create an outcome that creates disparities.
Since I’m a Michigan native, I’ve been looking with interest how COVID-19 is affecting the Great Lake State. They are getting hit hard. At the time of this writing, there are over 31,000 cases in Michigan with just short of 2400 deaths. The hardest hit is Southeastern Michigan, the Detroit Area. Detroit is the city with the largest amount of African Americans. There are two stories that while on the surface are not blatantly racist, but might have had that outcome.
First off, is a story in the Detroit Free Press. Keith Grambell grieves the passing of his father and grandfather. He tells the story of how they went to three hospitals in Detroit because his father Gary was coughing and had trouble breathing. Three times Gary went to emergency and three times he was sent home being told he had bronchitis. Keith notes his father died on his recliner at home. When his mother Cheryl started having symptoms again they went to the emergency room. He tells the story of how his mother was treated as opposed to a white patient who came in:
Keith drove her to Beaumont Hospital, Grosse Pointe, the night of April 7 — just hours after her husband’s body was taken to the funeral home.
“Before they even looked at my mother, there was a young Caucasian lady complaining about sushi she got from GrubHub that upset her stomach, and they swooped her in the back like she had coronavirus,” Keith said.
“But my mom, she had all the symptoms, and they tell her just go home. That makes no sense. … They helped a girl who ate bad seafood over someone with all the signs of needing medical need help.
“I felt like they sent my mother home to die.”
Luckily, Keith was able to get her into Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit. She was placed on a ventilator, but got better and is now recuperating at home.
The second is from the Detroit News. Most people are aware of the tragic story of Jason Hargrove, a bus driver in Detroit. A woman on his bus coughed on him without covering her mouth and he feared he would get COVID-19. We know that he died from the coronavirus, but what might be not known is the fact that he was taken to the hospital three times before he was admitted:
A day later, he was so sick that he asked her to take him to the hospital. Medical staff checked him out and sent him home with orders to quarantine himself and take cough syrup, Tylenol and blood pressure medicine.
“The fever started to just progressively get worse,” said Desha Hargrove. “He started the coughing. The coughing was pretty bad. The cough syrup wasn’t doing anything.”
A few days later, Hargrove started experiencing “extreme chills” and his fingertips began to turn blue, said his wife, who took him back to the hospital. Again, medical personnel sent him back home after checking him out.
“They listened to his lungs. His temperature was 99,” said Desha Hargrove. “They said they were no signs to them that required immediate attention as far as the oxygen to where his cuticles were blue.”
At home, he began “rapidly” deteriorating, she said.
“He was just getting worse and worse,” she said. “He was like lethargic. You could tell he was out of it. He was so miserable.”
On March 29, Desha Hargrove said her husband told her to take him back to the hospital because he was not able to catch his breath or stop coughing.
“He said, ‘I need some oxygen. I can’t breathe. All I need is some oxygen,’” said Desha Hargrove, who dropped her husband off at the hospital.It was the last time she saw him alive.
Again, nothing here is blatant. That said, why was Mr. Hargrove sent away twice?
Each case, including my own from the 90s by itself, is not proof of racism. But looking at the outcomes, you have to wonder what is going on and it is hard to say that it solely poverty since someone like Hargrove wasn’t poor but working class.
I’m interested in trying to find a way to solve this issue instead of either ignoring it, explaining it away or using it as exhibit 200,987 of how racist America is. The pandemic has exposed how African Americans are treated by the health care system. So, how do we try to improve the health outcomes of African Americans? There isn’t one easy answer and it isn’t something that can easily be solved. The answer will come from the government and civil society.
I don’t know if 20 years ago, I was being discriminated against. I can’t prove it. We are not living in the bad old days of the 50s and 60s when racism was very clear. But I will always wonder why I got fewer antibiotics than usual. If this happened to me, I’m pretty sure something similar has happened to thousands and millions of other African Americans.
So let’s stop with the fighting and investigate what is going on. If there is a problem, then let’s find a way to solve it and improve health outcomes. We need to do this not simply for racial justice or payback, but because these are fellow Americans and they deserve to treated with respect.
May we long for the day when we don’t judge anyone by the color of their skin. but truly by the content of their character.
This is a really good article and frames the situation nicely. If we take the Coates/Kendi line, it’s just another #oscarssowhite, an evergreen complaint among a constellation of others that keeps the Very Concerned middle aged white ladies busy tut-tutting. But if we focus on underlying health factors that are more prevalent but not was exclusive to the black community, those issues of access to care and treatment from medical professionals you highlight don’t get fully addressed as we focus on, say, diabetes writ large.
Both problems seem intractable and slippery, with excuses aplenty for this or that particular situation always at the ready. The one thing I have confidence in, however, is that the respectable media (NYT especially) has been so geared to race-first reporting that Coatesian pain-performance and Kendian binary thinking will flood the zone and neither of those views offer solutions, just opportunities for self-flagellation among the right thinking. Rinse and repeat for the next public health emergency.
So how *do* you ensure everyone gets equal treatment from doctors? Our current menu of diversity and implicit bias training seems to simply teach people to mouth the right words when they know they’re being watched. Even More black doctors doesn’t mean most people will see one for any given medical event.Report
I think you are on to something, but not forceful enough about it. In Mississippi presently we are seeing African Americans sickened with COVID 19 at a rate that is nearly twice their relative percentage of out state’s population. Most of our African American population is in the Delta and north from there, and they are thus in parts of the state where hospitals have been closing against a backdrop of a state that refused to expand Medicare under the ACA. While many want to couch these things as economic decisions, they have roots in slavery and Jim Crow.
Thus it becomes clear to me that the plague this time will indeed impact certain population segments disproportionally. Its also no coincidence that down here many of those folks are in the lower paying service economy jobs that are now being pushed to be reopened by rich whites who don’t have to imperil themselves to earn money.Report
I’m not sure if the data would show a health care problem (of which there are plenty, but none of them might relate to the likelihood of getting the initial infection), versus being in a denser urban environment and having more daily interactions, with perhaps less wherewithal or inclination to self-isolate. How much of the difference is simply Detroit versus the upper peninsula, with other factors working around the edges?
I would break it down into the different major factors.
1) Likelihood of the infection taking hold and spreading in a population.
a) population density, and prevalence of public transportation systems like buses or subways
b) quick interactions differences, such as normal greetings (Italian cheek kissing vs German nods) and overall loquaciousness (probability of engaging in long conversations).
c) after-work social behaviors, such as going home and gardening versus hanging out in bowling alleys or Irish pubs all evening.
d) The prevalence of young “invincible” teens who won’t do social distancing, such as the Florida spring-breakers who kept spreading it all over the place.
2) differences in job-related exposure.
a) percentage who work on the front lines of public interaction.
Clerks vs stock boys. TSA screeners vs dog groomers. Cops vs firemen. ER nurses vs X-ray techs.
b) percentage who have “essential” jobs who can’t be quarantined. EMS, grocery store workers, health workers.
3) Likelihood of an infection becoming serious. – age profile, rates of obesity, diabetes, smoking, heat disease, etc.
Initial dose rate might also play a role, as evidence by the number of young front-line health workers who got serious infections.
4) Likelihood of getting good medical intervention.
a) Ability to get early treatments that might ease the course of the infection.
This depends on the scope and size of the local health care sector and how hard it’s getting hit. Urban hot spots will of course be more overwhelmed.
b) Behavioral differences in when someone seeks health care. Some folks won’t go to the doctor until they’re spitting up blood, while others will rush to the hospital for hiccups or an ingrown hair. That might be part of the reason more men die from it. Past experiences and ability to pay might figure into these choices.
c) exhaustion rate of the health care workers. Having the county’s only Covid case means the patient will get tons of focused attention. Being the 10,000th case just adds you to the assembly line, like the episodes of MASH where the OR gets swamped during major battles.
There’s plenty of room in all that for major, major differences to manifest in infections and outcomes. Racial differences are going to show up, but so are a lot of other things. Some of this will amount to “Group A had less infections than group B, so group B should behave like group A.” That logic will produce some valid arguments, such as maybe not having eight illegal immigrants sharing one apartment, but also many bad logical conclusions, such as “Nurses should avoid sick people” and “Police and EMS workers shouldn’t interact with the public.”
The cheap and easy broad-brush arguments are likely a case of someone with a hammer thinking everything looks like a nail, or the dictum “never light a crisis go to waste.”
Of course how you get from any of that to proclaiming “We must stop people from planting tomatoes!” is a different story.Report
Even taking Coleman Hughes at face value, “America isn’t racist! We just have created a society where black Americans are more likely to work in low wage jobs and are less likely to have access to high-quality health care and are more likely to live in areas that are served by over-burdened hospitals and emergency response services.”
That’s all, no racism to see here!
Americans get very very upset when racism is mentioned, and as this Vox article explains, many white people stretch to absurd lengths to avoid the conclusion.
https://www.vox.com/2020/4/23/21228636/alito-racism-ramos-louisiana-unanimous-juryReport
Does Vox make any effort to uncover why all this racism happens in white liberal cities, or is that lost on them?Report
As I mentioned yesterday, there is a lot written about white liberal racism, some by those who fight it, some by those bitterly want to partake of it.Report
Would you say that “whataboutism” is a way to maintain the status quo when it comes to white liberal racism?Report
I bet it is.
What should we do about it?Report
Which “it” are you referring to?Report
Which one would you prefer to do something about?Report
Well, if we want to get rid of White Liberal Racism, a good thing to do would be to discuss what ending it would look like and see what, if any, government policies we could enact to reach that goal.
If we’re just talking about the engaging of whataboutism as a reflex to protect the status quo, I think pointing out that people are using it to protect the status quo is a good start.Report
Great, lets have that discussion!
What steps would like to suggest?Report
About which?Report
I would prefer to have a discussion about getting rid of racism.
Would you?Report
Sure!
We’d have to define it first. I assume that we’re talking about structural racism as opposed to the whole “internal state of individuals” thing.
So structural racism is the type of racism that results in such things as so-called “apartheid schools” (among all sorts of other things, of course).
What are the parts of the country that have the most integrated schools? What government policies do *THEY* have?Report
Structural racism creates a “society where black Americans are more likely to work in low wage jobs and are less likely to have access to high-quality health care and are more likely to live in areas that are served by over-burdened hospitals and emergency response services.”
So changing the structure of society isn’t a simple discussion.
But since racism is primarily a problem created by white people, maybe a good first step is for us white people to honestly accept that yes, racism exists everywhere, and yes, it is still a big barrier to equality, and yes, the solution is going to make everyone a little uncomfortable.Report
Wouldn’t one of the best ways to address the work that black Americans have access to be to address the sub-standard education that they’re likely to receive in their so-called “Apartheid schools”?
Again, what are the parts of the country that have the most integrated schools? What government policies do *THEY* have?Report
You’re aiming at something. What is it?Report
Remember when I said “Well, if we want to get rid of White Liberal Racism, a good thing to do would be to discuss what ending it would look like and see what, if any, government policies we could enact to reach that goal.”
And then you said “Great, lets have that discussion!
What steps would like to suggest?”
And then I started suggesting steps?
That’s what I’m doing.Report
You’re aiming at something else, something specific to do with schools.
What is it?Report
I’m suggesting policies that will help address white racism.
I’m not talking about internal states (or being “uncomfortable”).
I am directly talking about policies that will address racism.
And over and over and over again, we see people say “Oh, I’d love to discuss stuff” and then, when one makes suggestions, the response is “WHAT ARE YOU AIMING AT”.
The criticism doesn’t seem to be “that won’t address it”, as far as I can tell. It’s “I need to know what you’re *REALLY* arguing.”
I’m putting forward policies that will address Liberal White Racism.Report
Jaybird, nothing can be done about liberal racism. It exists beyond their control. It’s institutional! Conservative racism on the other hand is a choice. And that’s why the Venn diagram of American Racists and American Nativists is a circle.
{{QED}}Report
There are positions that have responses like “THIS IS A MATTER OF PRINCIPLE!!!”
There are positions that have responses like “Well, you have to understand…”
And it is always interesting to see where they pop up.
Believe it or not, I saw someone say, unironically “There is no room for “it’s complicated” or complex thoughts on internet debates.”Report
But…you aren’t suggesting any policies.
Twice you’ve turned the discussion from general issues to schools, which no one else mentioned.
And you are asking us what policies those integrated schools pursue.
So obviously you are thinking of something here, and rather than us spending twenty questions, it would be simpler for you to tel us what you are thinking of.Report
But…you aren’t suggesting any policies.
Ahem: “Again, what are the parts of the country that have the most integrated schools? What government policies do *THEY* have?”
Twice you’ve turned the discussion from general issues to schools, which no one else mentioned.
Well, when we’re discussing Structural Racism, part of that is dealing with The Structure.
Education is probably one of the biggest ones, given that it’s directly under government purview.
You mentioned employment, which is great, but I believe that education is prior to employment.
So obviously you are thinking of something here, and rather than us spending twenty questions, it would be simpler for you to tel us what you are thinking of.
If the questions I’m asking don’t have answers, that’d be one thing. But the questions I have do have answers.
Here’s something I suspect: There are a lot of White Liberal Racists who benefit from the current system.
They very, very much don’t want the current system to change.Report
Your idea of a suggestion is to ask other people questions?
I honestly don’t know, what DO these integrated schools have as policies?Report
Chip, is it worth reminding you that *you* are the member of a political party which, by your own admission, has racist policies in big cities, and that *Jaybird* … isn’t?
Look, you both agree that big Dem controlled cities have racist policies. Why is it on *him* to fix your party for you?Report
It’s to ask questions that have answers. Even answers that make people “uncomfortable”.
Now, one of the wacky things is that “racism” can mean all sorts of things. If a school is majority “White Hispanic and Asian and White”, is it more diverse than a school that is majority Black Hispanic and African-American?
Because one of the wacky things I noticed while doing research is that a school that is majority White Hispanic, Asian, and White is likely to be more diverse than one that is Majority Black Hispanic and African-American.
Which tells me that “Diversity” seems to be a tool of maintaining the status quo. Which is weird. Like, the policies themselves are maintaining structural racism.
Even among White Liberals.Report
So…what policies do integrated schools pursue?Report
Which definition of “integrated” are we using?
The “Diversity Uber Alles” ones seem to be following a policy of “No Blacks”.Report
Jesus man, this is your question, the very one that you asked twice now, so you tell us.Report
Chip, if we are going to fix the problem, we pretty much have to agree on the problem we’re trying to fix.
I mean, if you said “California has among the most diverse schools in the nation!” and I pointed out the pervasiveness of so-called “apartheid schools”, I’d quickly come to the conclusion that we were talking about two different things.
I’m just trying to hammer out what we’re talking about.
But, I suppose, if I were okay with the status quo, I’d push everything onto others.Report
You asked the question, twice, and now you are trying to figure out what the question is?
Ahem: “Again, what are the parts of the country that have the most integrated schools? What government policies do *THEY* have?”
Your question, not mine.Report
These are questions that I don’t have the answer to.
That’s part of why I was asking them.
The questions have answers… right? They must!
Do I need to say “I wasn’t asking them rhetorically”?
I wasn’t asking them rhetorically.Report
I don’t think its as simple as pointing to school integration as some sort of origin point.
There really isn’t any origin point to racism, someplace where we can just apply pressure and it all falls apart.
It takes a lot of pressure on multiple fronts, everything from social shaming to lawsuits to legislation.
But here’s a start, which I referred to above, which is that white people have to become more accepting that structural racism exists, and is an invisible force behind a lot of things that seem facially colorblind.
This alone would help things tremendously. Because right now, the Roberts/ Alito faction of SCOTUS doesn’t accept that fact.Report
So the best way for White Liberal Racism to be addressed is for conservative justices to change their mind?
Well, I’m sure that White Liberal Racism will not be the status quo any day now.
Any day now.Report
Law, and the judiciary, is downstream of public opinion.Report
Yeah, that’s what this article said too.Report
For all the talk about integration being a big priority of the parents, it’s not. You can only have one top priority. That priority is to get the best education possible.
So if there are 50 schools, and the best I can get into is #4 (ranked by educational scores), then that’s my choice.Report
The expectation that people love strangers’ children as their own is a fine sentiment.
But I wouldn’t want to draw up school districts relying on it.Report
From your link (great link btw):
Stanford sociologist Prudence Carter was deeply involved in shaping San Francisco’s present student assignment system in 2010. She argued that families should take a chance on schools like Willie Brown, if they want to make San Francisco a more equitable place. That means embracing a larger vision of social change.
The problem so far, she said, has been that San Franciscans “are not thinking about the larger project of American democracy and being representative of the beautiful diversity of this country. …“That means you have to think grander, and beyond your own self-interest,”
So in other words, I’m supposed to sacrifice my kids’ education to further her view of what society should look like. If she has unrealistic views, or has confused cause and result, then that won’t work well.
As long as educating my kid isn’t her top priority, she doesn’t deserve to be involved. That’s not so much my opinion as my job.Report
oh, she’s educating kids, all right. She’s teaching them that white liberal women can’t quite manage to get everyone’s computers working but will spend millions of dollars to paint over a wall with some stupid mural that nobody even looked at.
Important life lessons, and even some applied mathematics instruction, although maybe not what’s on the actual curriculum.Report
“Jesus man, this is your question, the very one that you asked twice now, so you tell us.”
chip, my man, do you…understand how questions work?Report
The short answer is that they or their ancestors left someplace even worse.Report
I think this is the first time I have noticed that you have a husband. I think that it’s wonderful that you have a congregation that supports you and him.
I was a charter member of Ta-Nehisi Coates’ Golden Horde, back when he had a blog with a comment section. We would conversate daily. I don’t find what you think to be all that different from what he thinks, especially when compared to what the average white person thinks.
To be fair, there is a difference. I don’t want to sweep that under the rug either.
I think the 5-day course you got is probably tied to the kind of antibiotic they gave you, but who can say for sure?
One thing I note is that even supposing an encounter that takes place where the policies are in place, are non-racist, and executed effectively, there’s still going to be fears and suspicions on the part of black people encountering the system. Because of things like that doctor’s waiting room your mother experienced.Report
I can’t think of any reason why racism would lead to a doctor giving an inadequate does of antibiotics. I’ve heard speculation that doctors tend to be more reluctant to give opioids to black patients out of fear they’ll abuse them. True or not, that at least makes sense, but antibiotics don’t have potential for recreational abuse, and it’s widely believed that too short a course of antibiotics increases the likelihood of antibiotic resistance, though apparently this has recently come into question.Report
Anecdote: many decades ago I worked at a gas station in a posh suburban area. We didn’t have many black customers, and very few black regular customers.
This was in an era when you could just pull in, pump your gas, and pay afterwards. It was a different age. Anyway, at some point we changed that policy, but only at night. At night, customers had to pay for their gas before they pumped it.
However, we had a lot of regular customers. We knew them. They regularly had their car serviced in our shop. The policy was thus: if I knew the customer, they didn’t need to pay first. Only customers I didn’t know needed to to that.
Here is the scenario: a black customer pulls in, I make them pay first, then a “regular customer” arrives, usually white, and I don’t make them pay first.
This was not me being racist. Our policy was on the surface non-racist. However, after a while I began to change what I did. If I noticed a black customer had to pay first, I would then ask the regular customers to pay first also.
Why?
Because I know how it looks! I know how it makes people feel. I’ve felt excluded many times in my life. I’ve felt singled out for bullshit. I didn’t want to be part of that.
It’s a small thing to make a person feel included, but it matters. Small things add up. They form civility.
#####
Over the years I’ve learned that it’s not just about racist feelings in an individual. That’s a copout. That’s white folks (or str8 folks or cis folks, etcetera) trying to feel good about themselves, instead of achieving good in the world.
The problem isn’t only racist feelings in individual white people — although that is a problem. The problem is also two systems, one for whites, another for blacks, one for the poor, another for the rich, one for queer folks, another for str8s. On and on.
#####
I’ve used the example of compound interest before. I’ll mention it again. Small things add up, but more than just “adding,” they have a compounding effect over the course of a lifetime. Small detriments applied consistently over a lifetime can lead to very different outcomes. Perhaps cops, judges, teachers, doctors, etcetera are only “a little bit racist,” but each instance makes things a little bit harder. Perhaps “the system” is only mildly unfair, but each instance of unfairness makes everything else that much harder down the road.
Some people are openly bigoted. Others hold bigoted assumptions, but understand that it sounds bad, so they choose their words carefully and work to appear non-bigoted, even when it’s kind of obvious. They might even fool themselves, through intricate rationalization. Whatever. The results are the same. It adds up.Report
“If I noticed a black customer had to pay first, I would then ask the regular customers to pay first also.”
So you didn’t change your behavior because of customers in general, you changed it because of black people specifically? If every non-regular customer had been white, you’d have kept on with what you were doing, not changing a thing?Report
George already covered the better data-focused way to look at this. I’m going to take a different tack and be the token Republican who says “Yes, it’s probably racism (Sort of, partly)”.
I fully advocate for the “color-blind” approach in every aspect of sociology. Medicine IS NOT sociology, nor merely culture. There genuinely are disparities in which medical conditions are more prevalent/severe among different racial groups entirely aside from culture and environment, i.e. sickle-cell anemia. So there very well could be an underlying genetic issue that makes COVID-19 more dangerous to African-Americans, both by itself and/or in conjunction with co-morbid conditions. That said,…
There could also be prevalent differences in treatment, because as much as “implicit bias” is a BS excuse in most every other context of behavior, there really is good research that shows that the less visible the person, the higher the assumed tolerance for pain/resistance to harm. That’s already a problem when it comes to tense encounters with police, but it also shows up in disproportionate prescriptions for pain meds (even aside from opioids, blacks are often given weaker meds for the same self-reported pain level as whites). So yeah, I’m not saying that doctors are racist, not even implicitly, but effectively “the darker your skin, the tougher you seem” really is the inverse of “you look pale, are you sick?” and that does bias medical assessments in the absence of strict diagnostic criteria. It’s kind of counter-intuitive that a positive stereotype (“you look tough”) is harmful in practice, but when it results in under-treatment it can be lethal.Report
I’ve read a handful of stories talking about how the virus seems to do better against people with Blood Type A than Blood Type O.
Wait, that came out wrong.
People with Blood Type A have more trouble with the virus than people with Blood Type O.
I don’t even know how different types are distributed amongst populations (though googling tells me that Europeans tend to have more A than indigenous populations do, I guess).
As someone who is also Blood Type A, I worry about this sort of thing.
But if it hits Blood Type A people harder, then a Blood Type-Blind solution will help Blood Type A people “disproportionately”.Report
If so, this may be relevant: https://www.zmescience.com/science/most-common-blood-type-43253/Report
An early Chinese study from Wuhan reported that virus spread was greatest among type A, and least among type O. A couple of weeks ago a similar study out of NY had similar findings, though its only Rh positive blood types that show the effect. And this is about risk of infection from the virus, not the effect of the virus once infected.
In the U.S. this would be interesting, Type O is predominately the blood type of African-Americans, Latino-Americans and Irish/Scots. But a few weeks ago the Illinois governor spoke out against a rumor that African-Americans were “immune,” which is something he read on-line somewhere as being a widespread claim. Later the President of the California Nation-State denounced the rumor, so the rumor is being spread at the highest levels now.Report
Here is a timely point:
Michael Caputo, the new spokesman for the Trump Administration HHS Dept, and longtime Republican, is an awful racist;
https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/23/politics/michael-caputo-tweets/
What is interesting, is the “longtime” part.
Its not like this is suddenly new information, or a shocking revelation. This guy has been around a long time.
How many white reporters, liberal white reporters, covered this guy, and shrouded his racism in the soft politically correct euphemisms like “Impish”, “Controversial” and the like?
Why are people like this given aid and comfort and respectability?
What if they weren’t?
What if people like this became social pariahs, unable to find respectable work, unwelcome at nice restaurants and clubs and parties?
Well, there are people who attempt to do this, to shame and shun people l ike this, but are themselves scolded by other white people for a breach of civility.
This is the thing about white people. A lot of us, even liberal white people, look at racism as a vulgar aesthetic, a breach of decorum, but not really anything terribly bad, certainly not the sort of thing that should get in the way of socializing with other white people.Report
Steve M. has more, including a charming screen grab of one of Caputo’s emails:
https://nomoremister.blogspot.com/Report
Good news, I guess:
Report