92 thoughts on “A matter of taste”

  2. I actually like the process of finding pics for posts. And it can lead to me finding pics I really love. The picture of the kid-made toy gun from my last post was an especially awesome find; it felt like it captured so much of what I was trying to say in one simple, uncomplicated image.Report

    1. I absolutely agree (and loved that pic also.) Have you tried out Pinterest yet? I think you might really like it. It’s a great way to search pics by following like minds. The image above is from AMC Theatres, and they have tons of cool stuff on there – and like mounds of Star Wars geekery which is just awesome.Report

  3. EDK, since we have a “Comment Culture,” in the recently discarded format, it was easy to pop in a pic or a link. No more. It took me awhile to learn the rich HTML window [if that’s what it’s called], but eventually I did, and it was gold.

    Comments could read like posts, but no more, unless you want to expend the effort of generating yr own HTML a href= etc. I don’t even know how to deposit a picture, and frankly, what I do know about it is that it’s too much trouble.

    After undertaking the time to learn it, I liked that other window a lot as a frequent participant in our “Comment Culture.” Everybody knows that I comment and participate in discussions far more than I grab the Front Page, EDK. I think that’s what you meant by the LoOG comment culture, and I liked having the same tools available as a commenter as I do as a poster.

    Consider it, anyway, Erik. Respectfully submitted.Report

      1. It was buggy for a month with the jumps, EDK, but then smoothed out perfectly. Links, pics, blockquote, and un-linking, grabbing text and then unlinking its links to not exceed our default 2-link limit.

        It was a beautiful thing. Typing out a href=”whatever, etc.” just to have it ignored, it just ain’t worth the trouble anymore. If you want the “comment culture” to be more fact than opinion, inserting links and pics needs to get easier not harder.

        Respectfully submitted. Plus, we can’t preview or edit in comments and so if this works, I guess I’ll STFU.

        sometextReport

        1. I read somewhere that the family of the soldier in the above picture has been asking for years for the picture to be removed because he never consented to having his image used in this way.  Of course the picture is owned by the government which isn’t acting, and it’s the internet so no one really cares about permissions….

           Report

            1. That’s what I meant.  I might be wrong too, but yeah, because it was part of a propaganda poster it is public domain now, though even if it weren’t, I wonder if the whole “parody/ satire” thing would protect it.

               Report

              3. Jeff Koons gets sued for pretty much every major work of art he “creates.” I’ve given up saying he’s not an artist, though, because he is very well able to provoke an emotional reaction from nearly everyone.

                A friend of mine was a curator at LACMA and told me the story of trying to get one of Koons’ stainless steel balloon dog sculptures (which stands taller than a man and weighs over two tons) up three flights of stairs to display in the appropriate gallery. Two men almost died.

                I’m convinced that the obscene amounts of money he charges — and gets — for his “art” is part of the art itself.Report

    2. Are you on Windows? If you’re uncomfortable with HTML, may I recommend the Coffee Cup free editor. It’s simple and obvious. And free. Me, I’ve been writing HTML since the dawn of the Internet and SGML before that, and I still can’t remember how to correctly put an IMG tag together.

      How we all screamed when Netscape went ahead and implemented the IMG tag without anyone’s input. It’s been a horror ever since. It could have been so much more obvious.Report

  5. Three issues:

    1. Copyright. Let’s make sure that we have the right to use pictures someone else has created. Lots of pictures can be found that you can use, generally with only attribution and a link, at Wikimedia Commons.

    2. Hotlinking. There are several people who don’t like it when you link your picture back to their site — when it pops up here, you’re using their bandwidth to use their picture. Once or twice back when I used blogger, I went back to an old post and found someone had been upset with me for hotlinking, so I try not to do that anymore.

    3. Size. Not dimensional size, but memory and compression. Believe it or not, there are still people who use dial-up connections and if you embed a 2-meg photograph in your post, it’ll take them a painfully long amount of time to load and even for a high-speed connection it can take a while (especially true if you’ve hotlinked). Be sure that the picture you use is small enough that it can load up quickly.

    But yeah, pictures add a lot. With a wider column for the articles, it should be easier to come up with a good looking format.Report

    1. All good points! There’s lots of resources out there that are useful to avoid copyright, and I could probably get some plugins rolling that can auto-generate pictures, too. For the most part this doesn’t worry me. If we get our wrists slapped, so be it. It’s happened before. It’s a pain to take something down but the risk is minimal.

      Hotlinking – yeah, don’t do it. Upload photos only. And size does matter, as you say. We will run out of room at some point and have to pay for more. I think all that being said it’s still worth it in the long run.Report

      1. We can’t upload images from the comment box, it is all hotlinking nowadays. Few complain in the big leagues, far less than if you simply “appropriated” their image. Recognize that many of these sites get paid for eyeballs so anything that tweaks their packet counters is a good thing.
        That said, I suspect img src isn’t going to work without the widget. Testing here:
        Report

    2. Burt made the same point I was thinking about. On my personal blog I am less diligent about attributing photos than I should be. Here though with a large readership it seems the polite thing to do.

      Anyone know a way to imbed the source data in the photo without having it junk up the post?Report

          1. No Mike, the comment box has a simpleimage.image_desc widget in the lower right hand corner, left of the toggle full screen widget and right of the omega symbol widget for inserting funky characters like ™. The other trick to this comment box is that you don’t want to finish with a carriage return, that’s what generates all the white space between comments.Report

        2. Well that didn’t work. If you’re running Firefox ver 10 on Windoze and right click with your mouse you’ll see a selection called “View Image Info”. That selection will show you the image description I typed in that the buggy comment box doesn’t or can’t put on the page. Of course when I see an image I like I usually just right click on it, select the “View Image” option and I get to see where the image came from and visit the site if I want by playing with the URL box (usually deleting the .jpg text at the end and backing up to the .com or .org portion).Report

  6. Related…sort of… Anyway, there was a funny sketch on Comedy Central’s “Key and Peele” about Republican reactionism to President Obama. If someone could post and/or comment on that, positively or negatively, I think it’d be interesting fodder for discussion. It will probably be up on the CC website by tomorrow. Photos are just half-assed movies anyway.Report

      1. I haven’t seen all their stuff, but they strike me as prett goddamn smart. Not everything is LOL, but the humor is often deeper than that and is never cheap. They take on a lot of real issues and their racial humor is far more than the typical “white folks do this… Black folks do that.”Report

  7. On the topic of site design, if this blog is going to be hospitable to long exposition, then it should perhaps not have two columns of blank space on the right and left.

    In particular it makes comments several layers down the tree squashed rather badly.Report

      1. Magazine style layout?   Cool!      I hope you’ll have liquor ads, and cover art with Lady Gaga, and scratch-and-sniff perfume samples.Snark aside, the sub-blog integration has been problematic here, and any improvements would be welcome.   And if there are any tools that would help track ongoing conversations over time, that would be double-fantastic.One word about the formatting tool:   it seems quite functional (athough I  suspect you’ll regret the “font size” option), but when composing, there is leading between lines while composing (at least on my browser).    This makes it rather difficult to read, but I suspect that a simple css tweak could resolve it.Report

  9. When I was growing up we had ascii characters. You know what we did in the absence of graphics? Ascii art.

    You kids today have no idea of how good you’ve got it.Report

    2. When I was growing up, people had punch card computers. (a friend of mine got to work on one… in the 1990’s. no clue why CMU still had one lying around).Report

  10. Seeing as how someone has seen fit to delete at least two of my comments today, I’m going to presume that you made some pronouncement against me while I was not looking at conversations here.

    Feel free to email me. That’s the email I usually use right there provided for you.

     Report

  11. First – I am not anyone named “Mike.” My name is Kendrick McCormack. I go by “Kenneth” because many of my friends have remarked of the similarity of my name to the South Park character and I happen to enjoy the show. That’s also why I use that phrase in email fields when I don’t want to get spammed.

    Second – I like my online privacy, in case you haven’t caught on to it from the fact above. Therefore, I browse the internet primarily using the EFF’s TOR software.

    Third – I resent the implication from you that I am someone else, and I resent your using it as a nonsensical and pretextual justification for your behavior.Report

        1. Kenneth –

          If you have any specific questions, you can email either myself, Erik, Mark or Jason.  Or, if you prefer, I believe Mark will be making a post later.  At this time, however, I would like to respectfully ask that even though you have the ability to get new IP addresses and post here that your please refrain from doing so.

          Again, feel free to email any of us if need be.

          Thank you.Report

          1. No, apparently I can’t. Your “contact us” link only goes to a generic webform, which I’ve filled out already. Clicking on your names yields posts by you, but no contact email address.

            You do, of course, have my email address. And I previously posted asking one of you to email me, above.

            Dishonestly saying “well just email me” when your friend has disabled all ways to do so is ridiculous and you know it.Report

        2. I’m all about respecting someone’s desire for anonymity.  I’m not about going out of my way to adjust existing protocol to enable someone to use a site that isn’t theirs while they’re deliberately making more work for me.

          Of course, I’m not Erik, and I’m not presuming to speak for him.  But I’ve used TOR to get to the site before, and I know how TOR works… so if you’re getting blocked because “Mike” was using TOR and an exit node is on the list of suspicious IPs *and* you just happen to be routing out through that same exit node… well, this seems both highly coincidental (and very improbable) and perhaps unfortunate, but not really anything for which it’s Erik’s responsibility to go out of his way to compensate.Report

  12. This picture sure is something.  From what I’ve read, this is his third return from a tour overseas and the first time he has been able to greet his partner in the way he would have preferred.Report

    1. I read a similar story about these guys. Apparently the Marine had a crush on the civilian guy, and the civilian guy had a crush on him back, but they were platonic friends for a long time who were both very shy about admitting their respective interest. (IIRC, I think the civilian guy was not out and the Marine was discreet about it; might be wrong about that.) So they corresponded while the Marine was on deployment, confessed their attraction to one another over e-mail, and this picture captured their first kiss ever. It’s incredibly romantic.Report

    2. I’m just going to keep it real here and admit that I am less disturbed by two guy’s kissing (hooray for personal evolution) but I am bothered by seeing the soldier in a submissive position. Call me a traditionalist…Report

          1. Three comments have been written in response to this comment and I’ve deleted every one.

            This is the fourth.

            Anyway.

            Ever since I’ve found out that George Michaels is gay and all of my “who is dating whom in the ‘Wake me up before you go-go’ video” theorizing was for naught, I’ve tried not to imagine which one in the relationship is in charge of punching the other in the nose while they’re peeing on each other in the shower because I am inevitably wrong whenever I come up with a guess.

            Best to leave those theories alone and just see two people who are delighted to see each other and say “awwwwww”.Report

            1. I look at it this way; if I was goofily in love with a 6″9″ 265 lb powerlifting woman, I might jump on her like that, too.  That’s what goofs in love do when they’re smaller, they jump on the bigger one and say “gotcha!”

              The woman I’m goofily in love with is shorter than me and probably would not appreciate taking on the task of holding up my fat ass, as it currently stands.Report

              4. Mid 40s. And the back thing was an exaggeration, but oh my god it’s crushing when my kid leaps into my arms… which he only does because he knows that it’s crushing. (he’s a little proud of being taller than I am)Report

              2. No worries.  It’s interesting though who assumes what, and from what, when it’s not like it should matter all that much anyway.

                Some straight couples never have sex.  Some have lots of sex.  Some have kinky sex.  Gay sex is complicated like that too.  And — again, a similarity — most people probably don’t really want to know about it anyway.  Well and good, they shouldn’t.Report

              3. It’s not even a gay thing, or a sexy-sex thing. I’m amazed at how many people at work assume I do certain things and home and my wife does certain things just based on the fact that we’re married and non-gender-neutral.

                I work with a guy, and maybe every few months he’ll ask something about what my wife cooks; I explain each time that I’m th cook, and each time he looks startled. And then blocks it out.Report

              4. I get some of that, too. I’m the cook, although a number of other divisions of labor in the Likko household do break down along more traditional gender lines. Right on down to me cleaning up after the dogs and she cleans up after the cats.Report

              5. So, out of genuine curiosity (if it is not insensitive for me to ask):

                To what extent among gay couples is the stereotype of one half being more “butch” while the other half being more “swish” true?

                And to what extent is it the case that the “butch” and “swish” halves respectively perform male and female gender roles?Report

              6. To what extent among gay couples is the stereotype of one half being more “butch” while the other half being more “swish” true?

                Think for a moment about the question.  How would you even begin to quantify it?

                Some same-sex couples have clear gender roles.  Most I think don’t.  Trying to determine who is the butch and who is the femme in a lot of cases is like trying to determine who is the bigger fan of Dostoyevsky vs Proust in the relationship:  It’s not a terribly interesting metric for anything, and anyway, most couples don’t view their relationship through the framework that you’re trying to squash it into.

                And that’s just gender.  It’s well-known in the gay community that when you hit the bedroom, everything can change in an instant.Report

              7. Some same-sex couples have clear gender roles.  Most I think don’t. 

                Thanks, that’s all I needed. sorry again if I was insensitive in asking. This is just a part of the culture that is very well hidden where I come from.Report

  13. Has the comment box changed recently? I haven’t noticed any difference. I know it changed some time ago from a purely coding view to one with the Visual tab. Bu that was many months agoReport

  14. God I am so hot now after reading about peeing in showers and punching in the nose. Thank goodness there is a “Murder, She Wrote” marathon on Hallmark so I can take a hot bath while watching Angela.Report

Comments are closed.

Related Stories

OTLC-Airship-e1612526045259-1024x515.jpg

Linky Friday: Lies, Slander, and Calumny Edition

Andrew Donaldson June 4, 2021 30
OTLC-Airship-e1612526045259-1024x515.jpg

Linky Friday: Tangled Webs, Weaved and Otherwise Edition

Andrew Donaldson May 28, 2021 48
OTLC-Airship-e1612526045259.jpg

Linky Friday: People, or Lies, Slander, and Calumny Edition

Andrew Donaldson May 14, 2021 13

You may have missed

ratedr

Less Than a Decade Prior to the MPAA

Clare Briggs April 23, 2025 2
catcher

Movie of a Fan Playing the Game

Clare Briggs April 22, 2025
Patriots Opposed Kings

Back When Patriots Opposed Kings

David Thornton April 22, 2025 12
somebodyalways

Somebody is Always Taking the Joy out of Life

Clare Briggs April 21, 2025 5