The Terrible Ukraine Situation, With No Good Solution

Russell Michaels

Russell is inside his own mind, a comfortable yet silly place. He is also on Twitter.

Related Post Roulette

30 Responses

  1. Greg In Ak says:

    Yup, no good solution.

    What in the french fried fork is this
    “Liberals and progressives (think Sociology 101) have spent the last several decades attempting to convince people that evil doesn’t really exist in order to excuse horrible regimes the world over.” LOL. Pro tip: talk radio rambling is not that great a guide to what liberals actually think.Report

    • InMD in reply to Greg In Ak says:

      There was after all that time George W Bush looked into Putin’s eyes and saw his soul.Report

      • Dark Matter in reply to InMD says:

        Having one guy run a country for decades seems inherently a problem. This hits the radar as a human problem rather than “this one guy”. My expectation is when GWB knew him he was a lot saner by our standards than he is now.

        Now Saddam seems to have been a charming sociopath even before he took power so I might be totally off base and it could just be people like that are just attracted to those positions.Report

  2. Philip H says:

    There is evil in the world. There is evil in the US. Liberals have called it our for decades. Conservatives used to, until they looked at demographics and concluded they’d stop winning elections unless they made homegrown liberals evil too.

    Here’s a safe bet – if every Republican on Capitol Hill said “We’re behind the President no matter what” liberals would applaud and tut tut about how its great to see them coming back to their senses.

    Here’s another safe bet – any Republican Congressman or Senator who does that without also impugning Biden’s mental abilities or he greenlighting of Putin, or his handling of Afghanistan will be primaried from the Right and loose reelection.

    Both sides are not in fact like the other here.Report

    • John Puccio in reply to Philip H says:

      Perhaps Republicans and non-partisans could fully support the President if they knew what it was they were supporting.Report

      • Philip H in reply to John Puccio says:

        Seems to me he’s been quite up front so far.Report

      • Greg In Ak in reply to John Puccio says:

        Seems like Biden is supporting Ukraine here. It’s not all that complicated.Report

        • John Puccio in reply to Greg In Ak says:

          Biden is still holding back on sanctions and told us today it’s going to take a month for the ones he did levy to have an impact. These were the damaging consequences the administration promised if Putin invaded?

          Meanwhile, Kiev will fall before the end of the weekend.

          No one is actually supporting Ukraine right now. If it’s “support” it’s the foreign relations version of sending thoughts and prayers over Twitter.

          The West is all talk and Putin knows this. The guy invades another country and we – collectively – can’t even muster a half measure.Report

          • Greg In Ak in reply to John Puccio says:

            I’d go with max sanctions now but we need the support of all the other rich countries. If they dont’ go along we are limited. Japan, Taiwan and Singapore have announced sanctions. Sanctions are never going to have an immediate critical effect. Never do. So far we have banking and tech sanctions which will hurt russia. That is actually stuff. Other steps will need more support and may also be held back to ramp up measures to pressure putin.

            I’d bet significant money we are supplying Ukraine with intell of all sorts.Report

            • John Puccio in reply to Greg In Ak says:

              Max sanctions should have been yesterday – and agree this is a failure of resolve of the NATO countries. Biden can do all the bad Clint Eastwood impressions he wants, but until EU (mainly Germany) is ready to bite the bullet on some unpleasantness, Putin is going to be laughing at us all the way to the Polish border.Report

              • Greg In Ak in reply to John Puccio says:

                Taiwan is going to sanction the russians. That is a serious hit for tech/computer sectors. Lots of critical comp parts come from Taiwan.

                Sanctions are never a fast tool. Never. But short of planes/troops that is what we can do and are doing.Report

              • John Puccio in reply to Greg In Ak says:

                I imagine part of Putin’s calculus is that he will have what he wants before the sanctions begin to really hurt.

                I also have to believe he has arrangements with China designed to offset the longer term ramifications.Report

              • Jaybird in reply to Greg In Ak says:

                Half of me wonders whether this would be a good time for China to make a move.

                The other half wonders if Xi isn’t laughing his rear end off between telling whomever is within earshot that “today is my lucky day!”Report

          • Philip H in reply to John Puccio says:

            Arms are flowing:

            https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/ukraine-receives-second-batch-us-weapons-russian-stand-off-2022-01-23/

            Sanctions are growing:

            https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/24/sanctions-against-russia-at-a-glance-people-organisations-uk-us-eu

            He’s also repositioning US troops in NATO countries to shore up allied defense. And yes it will take time for sanctions to work – that’s the thing of them. Short of a ground war what exactly were you expecting would happen?Report

            • John Puccio in reply to Philip H says:

              Deploying US troops to NATO countries isn’t supporting Ukraine. It’s the right move, and necessary for when Ukraine is conquered, but has no bearing on the crisis at hand.

              As I said, all of the sanctions should have been executed as soon as the invasion started. At least whatever we could issue unilaterally. The time to keep dry powder on sanctions is over.

              I hope whatever addition arms we can get Ukraine inflict pain on the invaders, but there aren’t enough STA to offset Russia’s air superiority, and frankly, it will likely inflict just as much additional carnage to innocent Ukrainians by dragging out the inevitable.

              Short of conventional US military intervention (which I do not advocate), I think we should be hurting them w cyber. I know people fear retaliation, but I think people underestimate our capabilities. Putin is assuming we wouldn’t dare. He’s prepared for max sanctions. But is he prepared to deal w cyber attacks on mother Russia?Report

  3. JS says:

    “Putin is evil. ”

    Lazy thinking. Even sociopaths have wants and needs and goals.

    Saying “X is doing Y because they are evil” is stupid and shortsighted, because it prevents analysis of those motivations, those goals and desires. And if you don’t know THOSE, you cannot predict what they’ll do — or how to stop them.

    “He’s doing it because he’s evil” is the sort of facile, useless analysis I’d expect of a stoned teenager who doesn’t want to do the assignment.

    You might as well tell Newton “Rocks fall because God Wills It” and then wonder why, in that world, nobody ever stepped foot on the Moon.Report

    • Philip H in reply to JS says:

      Putin is evil. He’s also cold blooded and calculating. He’s highly trained in destabilizing and repressing governments. And he craves power. None of these things is mutually exclusive.Report

    • Doctor Jay in reply to JS says:

      I endorse this. “evil” has very little value as an explainer. That’s not to say I don’t think Putin is evil, it’s just that “evil” is not a motivation, and he has motivations just like everyone else.Report

    • Pinky in reply to JS says:

      Fair criticism if that was all the article said.

      “Putin is an evil psychopath with nuclear weapons who has already threatened to use them against any country that tries to stop this. He’s either suicidal or he knows he’ll get away with it. But he is not stupid.”Report

      • Brent F in reply to Pinky says:

        Putin’s personal attributes are largely irrelevant to the nuke question. The potential to use them in the event of fighting close to home against a peer enemy is longstanding NATO and Russian/Soviet doctrine. Which is why everyone knows NATO putting bodies on the line is off the table and the Ukrainians don’t expect that kind of help from us.Report

  4. Michael Cain says:

    Too little, too late in cancelling the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, Germany…

    I’ll be interested to see if that holds up anyway. Let’s see… Ukrainian transit pipeline network becomes “collateral damage.” Belarus transit pipeline has “technical difficulties.” Austria, Italy, and some of the others are looking down into a very deep recession and begin screaming at Germany to issue the certification and start Nord Stream 2. Gazprom has said they can begin delivering gas through it the day after Germany delivers the certification.Report

    • Philip H in reply to Michael Cain says:

      Germany made the decision to begin closing their nuclear plants (and thus shift to other power generation sources) in 2002. An great many allegedly deep thinkers have opined since then that buying Russia’s natural gas had a stabilizing effect because so many of the oligarchs made their fortunes off it that shutting down by this very sort of military action would not be allowed.Report

      • Michael Cain in reply to Philip H says:

        Related to my comment below, who blinks first? The oligarchs, or the major economies of Western Europe? If I had to bet, I’d bet that Germany takes its role as big dog in the EU more seriously than its much smaller role in NATO and gets the gas and oil flowing again, even if it pisses off Biden (and the Ukrainians).Report

  5. Greg In Ak says:

    Trying to remember the name of famous org of hackers that claimed they could get into all sorts of secret gov intertoobs. They worked with wikileaks and strenuously denied they were russian puppets. Boy it would be just nifty if a powerful group of hackers with white hats were at this minute f**king with the russian mil and gov. They could really help Ukraine right now.Report

    • The minute they accomplish anything significant, Russia calls it an act of war, and a war crime (if it targeted civilian infrastructure), and closes the oil and natural gas spigots to Western Europe. Probably oil to the US as well. The US may be oil independent (or nearly so) on a net basis, but there’s still a lot of importing and exporting because not all of our oil is well suited to our refineries. Nor is our refineries’ output necessarily well matched to our demand for refined products. There’s a lot of diesel-for-gasoline trade between the US and the EU, for example.

      Wags used to say that suffering through deprivation was the Russian national hobby. Once that sort of economic war starts, I’m not sure I’d bet on them folding before a number of EU states do. Something that’s been pointed out a lot today, that has me realizing how little I know, is that Germany is the big dog in the EU, but not in NATO, and may value it’s EU role more than it’s NATO role.Report

    • Doctor Jay in reply to Greg In Ak says:

      That’s a good bet that this is happening on some level. The Russians are, of course, doing their best to mess up the Ukraine this way as well.

      We’re unlikely to hear about it for a while, though, I expect.Report