“I’m The Forgotten Man”: A Look At 1936’s My Man Godfrey

Luis A. Mendez

Boricua. Floridian. Theist. Writer. Podcaster. Film Critic. Oscars Predictor. Occasional Psephologist. Member Of The Critics Association Of Central Florida, The International Film Society Critics, And The Puerto Rico Critics Association.

Related Post Roulette

6 Responses

  1. Jaybird says:

    When Godfrey asks, “Is the family that exacting?” he response is “No, they’re that nutty.”

    I’ve had jobs like that.

    This sounds like a treat.Report

  2. Saul Degraw says:

    It is a good movie but like a lot of Hollywood movies of the time, someone (probably) a studio head decided to soften the blows of the social message and the movie ends up looking like it lacks some of its convictions. Why are problems of the forgotten man, caused by the callous rich who are bored and seek amusement often sadistically, relieved by starting a nightclub where the formerly destitute forgotten men wait and serve on the callous rich?Report

  3. rexknobus says:

    Thanks for this write-up. An absolute favorite that I have owned (one way or another) for years and have watched many, many times (FemRex fave as well). The superlatives go on and on. Inimitable Powell, Palette (amazing), over-the-top Lombard, Jean Dixon (perhaps the heartbeat of the show), Alice Brady (perfect), the fantastic Gail Patrick (later to exec prod “Perry Mason”). Even Grady Sutton has his terrific moment. Sparkling Round-Table-esque script. I’m glad you mentioned the title card. Worth watching the opening just to see that.

    And now for something completely different…

    SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS

    For all that I love this film, I have some real questions/concerns/puzzlements that I have never been able to satisfy and I hope someone here can address them, or lead me to some answers.

    1. As much as Irene (Lombard) shrieks that Godfrey loves her (largely because of the shower — the staging of which doesn’t work anyway), Godfrey never shows the slightest romantic inclination toward her. It is the easiest thing in the world for a filmmaker to show a character falling in love. We expect it, accept it, demand it. No problem. But Godfrey, while appreciating Irene’s efforts and considering her a friend, never shows a bit of romance toward her.

    1a. Godfrey should (to me) obviously end up with Molly. They are made for each other. She can match him for wit and intelligence. Molly’s the one.

    1b. The finale, with Irene showing up at the nightclub with the wedding basically a fait accompli, doesn’t fit the rest of the film at all. Godfrey can’t get a word in edgewise. Suddenly, as opposed to every other scene in the film, he’s a mute, passive victim of circumstance. I don’t believe. I don’t like it.

    2. Can we please go back in history and take Mischa Auer out of both this film and “Destry Rides Again”? Talented guy, but he brings both films to a crashing halt with his antics. Not his fault, of curse. He’s a doing his job as directed. But please…

    END SPOILERS

    O.k., back to loving the film. I want to call attention again to the nuances in Pallette’s and Patrick’s performances. They really score some absolutely transformative line readings: Pallette: “Say…who are you?” Patrick: “What good did you find in me?” I just got shivers.

    Everyone! Watch this flick! You will love it. And discuss my little problems and help me sleep at night. Thanks!Report

  4. I’ve never seen it, and should fix that sometime. My favorite screwball comedy in Bringing up Baby, which starts Katharone Hepburn as a ditzy heiress, Cary Grant as a handsome paleontologist, and a leopard.Report