Leave Baby Yoda Alone!
Before I get started here, I must share with you all a funny and heartwarming anecdote.
My family has been faithfully watching The Mandalorian, perhaps unsurprisingly given that my husband and I are of the Star Wars generation, those fortunate 70’s kiddos who were able to grow up right alongside the movies.
The first season of The Mandalorian we binged after all the episodes had come out, but the second season we’ve been watching as episodes are released, one per Friday.
As we sat down to watch the latest episode yesterday, I overheard my twelve year old explaining to his little brother and sister, “The REASON why they’re doing it that way is so you can wait for it all week and get excited about it!” To which my daughter replied, “That is the best idea ever!” My younger son chimed in, “That’s genius! Why don’t they do all shows like that?”
Now that your heart is suitably warmed, I’ll get to the meat of the matter.
Or more specifically, the eggs of the matter.
As those of you who watch The Mandalorian regularly already know, our hero Mando was charged with transporting a character called “Frog Lady” (just in case you need me to connect the dots for you, she is a frog, and a lady) to a planet where her husband eagerly awaits. You see, Frog Lady has in her possession a vat full of eggs that she needs her husband to fertilize. Mr. Frog Lady had traveled ahead to this foreign world to make a home for their family in a place they’d be safe from the machinations of both Empire and Rebellion, so she hops a ride (literally) on board The Mandalorian’s ship.
There’s just one problem with this plan. Baby Yoda has a taste for the Frog Lady’s eggs and eats several of them along the way.
Now, as a real Star Wars fan, not to mention a lifelong lover of sci-fi, I thought this was both hilarious and delightful. In my opinion, it was great and necessary character development for Baby Yoda, reminding us that just because he’s cute as f*ck, it doesn’t mean he’s an angel. (Angels make for boring TV, IMVVHO.) Furthermore, it was fully in keeping with the universe in which our space opera is set – a wretched hive of scum and villainy.
But of course this being 2020, a place in which everything is awful and utterly stupid people have far too much sway over cultural discourse, Baby Yoda eating a few unfertilized eggs is being called genocide.
GENOCIDE.
I will not screenshot these noxious tweets. I can’t bear their ridiculousness polluting my computer even long enough to insert them into this article. If you must prove my assertion for yourself, here’s a compilation of the worst of them: Mandalorian fans slam Baby Yoda for ‘genocide’ in egg-eating scene
Even director Kevin Smith! I hereby demand you turn in your geek card, Mr. Smith. Oh, and by the way, Kevin Smith named his daughter after Harley Quinn, a character that killed innocent children by giving them exploding video games, but I guess eating an egg is a bridge too far for this dude
Something I love, truly love, about Star Wars, the element that to my mind puts Star Wars above even my beloved Star Trek in the pantheon of pop culture science fiction excellence, is that it shows us a galactic mega culture within which a whole lot of weird and wonderful microcultures are living together in full acceptance of each other’s nature. Real acceptance, of the good and the “bad” alike (using air quotes because I do not believe that being an omnivore or a carnivore is bad). Not some sort of faux, externally applied quasi-religious morality of an external authority like Starfleet or the Jedi. The Republic, and later on the Empire, may have tried to impose their personal visions of order on the chaos of the galaxy, but if The Mandalorian shows us one thing, it’s that neither of those entities had the reach or the influence that they claimed to.
That spirit of intergalactic tolerance is one of the reasons why what Anakin Skywalker did first to the Sand People in Attack of the Clones and then the Jedi in Revenge of the Sith was so disturbing. It’s why the killing of the Jawas, Uncle Owen and Aunt Veru by the Stormtroopers in Star Wars was so shocking, and the destruction of Alderaan by the Empire was unprecedented. To paraphrase Din Djarin, that is NOT the way, not the Star Wars way at all. The Empire, under the influence of Darth Vader, clearly operated under a different set of rules than the rest of the galaxy. That’s why they were THE BAD GUYS.
The Star Wars Way is that cold blooded killers like Sarlaccs and Wampas are tolerated rather than hunted down. Dianogas inhabit trash compactors on Imperial battle cruisers and no one cares – I mean, where else is the guy gonna live, amirite? Han may have shot first, but he didn’t go to the swamps of Rodia and annihilate Greedo’s entire family. The fundamental rule of navigating the Star Wars universe seems to be “yeah, this galaxy is a dangerous place, and everyone’s out to get you, but they’re all just doing the best they can just like me and you. It’s nothing personal.”
While individual entities may have a beef with each other, no one launches a jihad over it; everyone in the universe understands that sometimes when you walk into a bar in Mos Eisely, someone may end up losing an arm. Ya screw over the Hutts, they’ll put a bounty on your head – it’s just business. If you hide your Millennium Falcon in an asteroid field there may be a space slug lying in wait, so watch your back.
And while you’re at it, better watch your front, too. There’s every possibility that even your friends like Lando Calrissian or Woody Harrelson or Apollo Creed will double cross you, sell you out, exploit you for their own benefit, but come on, that’s just because they’re looking out for Number One. You can’t even really hold it against them because the Force knows you’d do the same if it came down to that. When things get out of hand, it’s kill or be killed, may the best man or Wookie or Rancor win, but no one is EEEVVULLL for just trying to survive in a very very hard environment.
Because creature wants to survive. There is nothing inherently wrong with wanting to survive, nothing inherently immoral about fighting to sustain your own life. Even when a leopard kills a furry little baby gazelle it’s because the leopard has a right to live too. A predator is meant to eat its prey, like Baby Yoda was made to eat eggs when he was hungry even though they happened to be the last of Frog Lady’s genetic line. Anyone who says that there’s something immoral about looking out for Number One is probably saying that because they are looking out for Number One, and are trying to exploit your better instincts just long enough so they can double cross you and eat you themselves.
The Star Wars universe at its best reminds me of the complexity of the real world, in which all of us must live side by side with our fellow human beings – those of myriad religions, philosophies, cultures, moralities, and agendas, not to mention inhuman amoral beasties like lions and rattlesnakes and bacteria. The reality of being born into this world involves accepting the fact that maybe this time so-and-so is gonna kill us unless we kill them first. It may come down to that.
The reality of existence, be it on Earth or Tatooine, is that at times we must kill in order to survive.
Baby Yoda eats eggs. This is because it is in his nature to eat eggs, and if the Frog Lady didn’t like that, she probably should have kept a closer eye on her eggs. Because this is Star Wars, and everything is out to get everything else. Even cute things can be deadly. It’s nothing personal, it’s just a matter of survival. The Mandalorian knows all that, which is why he just did a little light scolding instead of locking up Baby Yoda like a very adorable Hannibal Lecter.
As it turns out, Frog Lady was pretty reasonable about Yoda’s taste for amphibian omelets. It didn’t seem to bother her too much that Yoda munched a few of them along the way. In the follow up episode, she gets to where she was going, meets her husband, and lo and behold they have plenty of eggs left to start her family. At least to start with, the Frogs only spawned one child – I’m not sure if the other eggs weren’t fertilized yet or if they hadn’t finished hatching. My husband pointed out that for all we know, it may be the Froggies’ way to only fertilize one or two or three of the eggs because there is such a thing as too many children (remember, we have five children, so we know whereof we speak). It very well may have been that most of those eggs were destined for the trash compactor anyway, so Frog Lady was ok with losing a few.
She may have even expected it. After all, the way most species of frogs reproduce is by laying a bunch of eggs and jumping ship (so to speak). While humans have a small number of children, we watch very closely to ensure they all survive, frogs do things very differently. They lay massive numbers of eggs and make a lot of offspring because they know that a large percentage of both eggs and offspring will be eaten along the way. If Frog Lady and Mr. Frog Lady had fertilized all those eggs and left as frogs often do, some of them – perhaps even ALL of them – would have been eaten anyway. That’s WHY frogs make all those eggs to begin with. The expectation is that most of them will be eaten. It’s not a leap (I’ll stop now) to acknowledge that frogs reproduce differently than human beings and thus a froglike alien life form would, too.
It’s sci-fi, people!
Personally, I found it marvelous that The Mandalorian brought us Frog Lady, her eggs, and a darling little predator who helped himself to a couple, and I suspect that I am not alone in that belief. Baby Yoda unapologetically eating Frog Lady’s eggs is entirely in keeping with the genre, the characters, and the mechanics of the Star Wars universe itself. Kudos to Jon Favreau and everyone else involved in the Frog Lady plot arc. Stick to your blasters, dudes, you’re StarWarsing right.
People who swooned in horror and proclaimed Baby Yoda to be worse than Hitler simply cannot be real Star Wars fans. To be honest I’m unsure people who are THAT ridiculously hypersensitive should be entrusted with anything fictional. If ya can’t understand storytelling isn’t meant to be sanitized for the protection of the most delicate viewers, believing instead that every work of art ever produced must cater to the whims of a tiny sliver of people who get off imposing their stunted sense of morality on everyone, then maybe the rollicking multiverses of fiction are not for you. Perhaps a nice religious tract is more your speed.
Imposing a monoculture on a diverse ecosystem? That’s the way the Empire thinks.
Type I vs. Type III survivorship curves, yeah – so it sounds like Frog Lady and her husband have gone over closer to Type I (like humans) then Type III (like earthbound frogs).
I don’t watch this show (too cheap to pay for yet another streaming service) but this sounds hilarious. Of course Baby Yoda would eat the eggs! Children want what they want! There’s also something metaphorical about his “selfishness” here – rather than calling it “genocide” and screaming for it not to happen, the people watching should maybe contemplate their own lives. I don’t mean “would you literally eat an embryo if you got peckish” but….yeah….I’m watching the news and some dude in an airport is saying “I’m 64 and I want to enjoy my life” as he’s preparing to fly during the worst pandemic in over a century where doctors and epidemiologists are pleading with people not to travel to try to limit spread….
I mean, what Baby Yoda did is hilariously terrible, but geez, these people hyperventilating need to look at the world and what people are doing and wonder, is it really so terrible this fictional event happened in a fictional story?Report
My kids (ages 5 and 7) regularly volunteer how much they love me.
But if you told them they could get a Nintendo switch if they offed me? Dude, I’d be dead before dinner.Report
Children (and some adults) are literally thoughtless and selfish, as in, they’re not even making a conscious choice, they don’t THINK about the other person involved.
I have people who have hurt me in some way and a friend reminded me that “they are being literally thoughtless, they are not doing this to harm you, they aren’t even thinking.” The outcome is the same but somehow not assuming mean intent makes coping with it a little easier.
Cripes, if 2020 has taught us anything….
But yeah, like I said, I don’t watch the series but the idea of Baby Yoda eating a frog egg of an endangered species because he got hungry and wanted it seems so freaking true to life to me that I can’t get why people are so upset.Report
I think the meaning of “thoughtless” has somehow come to involve mal intent. Which makes no sense.
The below argument is one I’ve had with MULTIPLE people…
“You were being thoughtless.”
“No I wasn’t. I just didn’t think about all that.”
“Exactly. You were thoughtless.”
“NO! I just didn’t think of it.”
“That is what thoughtless means: lacking thought.”
“UGH! WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM ME?!?!”
We all have moments of thoughtlessness. When I point them out to others, my goal is (usually) to get them to widen their “thought net” so they are taking more into account when making decisions. We could all stand to do better at that. But it is almost always taken as an attack on the person’s intent and therefore character. That may have something to do with how I approach such conversations, but the conflation of “thoughtless/selfish” with “intentional jerk” is real and confounding.Report
One of my personal pet peeves is being held accountable for things that literally did not occur to me.
To me, thoughtlessness implies things you DID think of and were just like “meh that’s not important”. You didn’t think of others.
It is dumb to expect people to think of things they did not think of LOL. As you put it, confounding.Report
It was darling and hilarious, and completely in keeping with the spirit of Star Wars.
I hope you have a good Thanksgiving today – if I could I’d have you over! 🙂 no eggs thoReport
We eat unfertilized eggs all the time. Sure, they species aren’t in danger, but still.
Genocide kinda requires an intent that Baby Yoda just does not, can not, have.Report
Also, if I ever get a Twitter account, the first thing I figure I’ll have to do is create a macro that responds to Tweets with “Are y’all fecking daft?!”Report
This is a great piece. Thank you for writing it!
I’m the kind of guy that struggles with fantasy. I tend to get too caught up in, “THAT DOESN’T MAKE SENSE!!!” And that’s on me. I tend not to read/watch it as a result. And if I do, I’ve learned to keep my opinions to myself.
I read/listened to the Harry Potter series (original 7, at least) since it felt important to tune into such a major literature phenomenon aimed at children. And I now spare everyone my opinions on the series (WHY NOT USE THE TIME TURNER MORE?!?!?! WIZARDS ARE IMMORAL MONSTERS FOR KEEPING MAGICAL HOSPITALS SECRET FROM MUGGLES!!!) because that isn’t what the books are for or about.
People like me have always existed. And we’ve probably always been irritating to folks who enjoy these works of art, ESPECIALLY if we can’t keep our opinions to ourselves.
The problem now is, as I see it, twofold.
1.) Not only do many folks not keep their opinions to themselves, but we now all have immense platforms to broadcast our opinions. So now every jamoke can make his feelings known to, well, just about everyone. This is the underlying problem but ultimately the lesser of the two.
2.) Too many folks seem to assume that because the platform is big, that their opinion is thus weighty. We’ve gone from stoned naval gazing on whether Baby Yoda is a genocidal monster to Twitter debates that people think actually matter. So while this problem is built upon the latter, it is the bigger of the two as I see it. Because you can’t just dismiss all these daft bozos for being just that: daft bozos. They assume because their opinion is now out their in the world, it needs to be engaged with.
Folks like me have always been around, ready and willing to ruin other people’s fun. But now we have bazookas and assume that makes us an army. Instead of just loud jerks.
Though, if you really want me to take up arms, get me ranting on The Lion King and its various spin offs.Report
Oh man, don’t even get me started on Harry Potter.
WHY DID HAGRID GO UP TO TALK TO THE GIANTS IF IT WASN”T IMPORTANT!?! WHY DID THEY TALK TO THE HUMAN PRIME MINISTER ABOUT LORD VOLDEMORT AND THEN SIMPLY ALLOW A CADRE OF CHILDREN AT A SCHOOL TO FIGHT HIM? WHERE WAS THE BLOODY RAF???
I agree with you completely about the navel gazing. In fact I think this particular controversy is what made me realize that what once passed as an “isn’t that weird/stupid” conversation between people now receives a ridiculous amount of cultural weight and I’m not sure fiction can exist in that atmosphere. It’s just not possible as a writer to please everyone and by giving every idiot a mouthpiece (that’s ok) and the media acting as if they’re the second coming of Roger Ebert (not ok) it is having a chilling effect on the writing process as a whole.
BTW I would love to read a Lion King rantReport
A whole lot of people seem to have forgotten about intent these days.Report
They should have two sets of stories, like the Bible.
There are the fun ones that you can tell the kids and the *REAL* ones that you tell other adults after the kids have gone to bed. You know, like tell the kids about Sampson and Delilah and David and Goliath. Once only adults are in the room, tell them the story about Yael and Sisera or David and Bathsheba.
The problem is that people think that Star Wars is only happy and nice Bible stories and when they encounter Elisha calling for some bears to maim some kids, they get confused.
Don’t make fun of bald people!
Anyway, the Mandalorian is obviously one of the Bible stories for adults after the children have gone to bed. People who demand that these stories leave them feeling good after they encounter them should probably convert. Star Trek, for example, doesn’t have any problematic stories after Roddenberry died.Report
“Don’t make fun of bald people!”
Preach the truth, brother!Report
This is a very good observation, that science fiction can address serious issues but only through a filter of fantasy.Report
A lot of religious stories, more’s the pity, have calcified. Science-Fiction, Superheroes, Fantasy stories… they allow us to discuss morality in a way that makes it alive. Our ancestors were once allowed to do the same, but a bunch of prissy jerks said “NO THE STORIES MUST BE SET IN STONE!” and, wouldn’t you know it, all of the people who wanted to tell stories and discuss things vibrantly had to scurry off and find some hidden corner in which to talk.
Look for the censorious jerks. Look for the ones policing which stories get told and who gets to tell them.
Those are the calcifiers.Report
Post-apocalyptic fiction (which weirdly always seems to get lumped in with sci-fi) allows for interesting conversations.
A recent fave was “The Girl With All the Gifts.” On it’s surface, it is a quasi-zombie story about a virus that renders most people zombified but a small group of children as yet-to-be-explained in-betweens. They look and act like people most of the time but every now and then go all zombie, so there is much discussion in the book about how to treat “them”.
My girlfriend can’t get into such books but sometimes I talk about them and she’s intrigued. So we can lean into really fascinating talks about what it means to be human. But then at some point I have to interject with, “Yea, but then the kid ate someone’s face off. So they shot him.” Because, ya know, they’re still half zombie things.Report
It is the entire point of fantasy, to allow us to tell stories about our own culture through the guise of another, without people getting up in arms about it. Sometimes this is done by presenting cultures that have elements that are problematic or even repellent to us.
If we start imposing the moral rules of our culture upon fantasy, it will completely kill the ability of writers to do that.Report
One of my sons has a theory that modern storytelling is really weakened by our culture’s insistence that everything that’s for children should really be for adults, and everything that’s for adults must also be suitable for children (either actual children, or the perpetual children who are offended by everything constantly). It yields terrible products where the kid stuff is laden by constant pop culture references and plots that are preachy rather than entertaining or thought provoking, and the adult stuff is, as you say, calcified into insipidness and quasi-religious blather.Report
This was a great, Kristin! I was smiling and nodding the whole way. I watched the episode after this notroversy broke and I was like, “Really? That’s what everyone is upset about?”Report
Thanks buddy! Have a great Thanksgiving!Report
One of the best things about Star Wars, like the Dune series, is that it envisioned a world in which religion played a major role. As opposed to most other science fiction which envisioned only worlds in which people were entirely secular.
Dune was a lot stronger in this regard, showing that the actions of the characters was driven not by rational goals like power and money, but religious zealotry.
What gives both of these imagined worlds strength is how they show that regardless of technology, humans (and human-like species) will eternally behave in predictable ways.
I don’t know that the Star Wars universe features ethnic hatreds, but it should. A universe in which every species just automatically views every other species with collegiality and acceptance seems weird.
Like, what if some of the service species like tauntauns were sentient, and decided they didn’t like to be beasts of burden? Or what if there existed a world in which a stronger species decided that humans were rather tasty?Report
“I don’t know that the Star Wars universe features ethnic hatreds, but it should.”
Anti-Droid sentiment is present, although it’s not really foregrounded other than in “Solo”.Report
Please forgive my shameless self-promotion but I’d be remiss if I didn’t post my piece about anti-droid sentiment in the Star Wars Universe here: https://ordinary-times.com/2020/03/12/gone-with-the-wookie/Report
Wookiees have a handful of stories about problems with slavery. (The Empire classified them as “non-sentient” to get around a handful of slavery laws, for example.)Report
Even after emancipation their wages were kept artificially low because they were kept on their Wookie contracts.Report
Well, kinda the whole entire point of my piece was that I like Star Wars because it DOESN’T turn into a preachfest about ethnic hatreds (which is why people who purport to like Star Wars, getting all judgy over another culture’s eating habits seems so ridiculous to me), though I do acknowledge your point.
That having been said, I’ll point out that the Sand People were far from loved, people weren’t crazy about the Jawas, and Han Solo certainly had some things to say about hokey religions that used ancient weapons.Report
I think the controversy is a function of that part of the episode being a bit more true sci-fi than Star Wars usually is. Generally, all the aliens in Star Wars might as well be humans. The Frog People (the species still doesn’t have a proper name, at least as far as Wookieepedia seems to know) reproduce in a way that is genuinely inhuman, and while the question of “can you blame a small child for eating the unfertilized eggs of another intelligent species?” might be at home in some sci-fi stories, it came in a bit jarring for Star Wars.Report
That said, I’ve seen the idea of cross-species cannibalism handled with less finesse in Star Wars before. See: Dezono Qua.Report
But…humans are cannibals…
IDK, I just think this is another way to take a look at questions of ethics in a lighthearted way, to get people thinking without being preachy.Report
Robin Hanson has a great post about this today:
The whole essay is good.
The important insight, I think, is the desire for a shared moral universe. We can wave away the stuff that we all agree is a matter of taste. Who cares about matters of taste? It’s the moral questions that are important.
It’s when we get shown a universe that doesn’t agree with us that we end up with arguments like the one about Baby Yoda.Report
Neato! Thanks!Report