Pretty, Ugly
A guest post from dhex!
WARNING: PROBABLY NOT ENTIRELY SAFE FOR WORK OR YOUR YOUTUBE SEARCH HISTORY.
“Brutal” is an overused term in heavy music circles. It’s a term of endearment and anointment, referencing overall quality and emotional impact while describing neither. It’s also notably useless as a predictor of quality.
I once spent a whole night at the opera and found it pretty brutal in the traditional sense of the term, and that’s without considering the ticket price.
The things we do for love are often brutal to the self.
The essential quality of “art” is not beauty, but rapture. An ability to adjust, distort, or interrupt the flow of time. To help us forget we are rotting and everything that we love will be dead one day, perhaps sooner than we like. Perhaps right now.
The passage of time is brutal in every sense.
There’s whole giant bagful of beautiful uses of ugliness in music. Guitar distortion is the most obvious example, having mutated from accident, to intent, and now to the soundtrack to many a PBS pledge drive. However, it’s still a kind of creatively accidental arms race. We live in an age of bass cars, brostep, and brickwalled .mp3s, which I think are all signs that the kids these days (™) are into it as a generally accepted tactic of expression.
Now, I’m an old fart, sitting around the campfire in my 12-eyehole Docs and wistfully telling tales of Pan Sonic and Hrvatski double bills in the late 90s; breakcore slamming off the walls of an abandoned garage; of dirtbags and lock-ins dominated by unbearable volume blaring from poorly-considered Reaktor patches; compression and regression; acid squeals, overly resonated and resinated; barks, screams, shouts, and wheezes; bass your ancestors could feel.
And so much screaming.
Personally, I generally – and hopefully sparingly – use “brutal” as a description of how a piece affects my emotions rather than tone, quality, genre, and so on. This doesn’t help predictions of quality, but it at least narrows the use to those areas I think work best with the concept.
I might use it with one inflection to describe deep admiration for a moment of pleasant unpleasantness. But I can also express how incredibly painful I find overhearing “Love Shack”, one of the most brutal pieces of music of the 20th century.
“Brutal” encompasses qualities like:
– emotionally painful or notably hateful
– physically painful to listen to
– difficult to endure
– use of tension and (sometimes) release
– the role of various kinds of pain in live settings and performances, particularly as it relates to volume
– the invocation of memories that are painful, if sweetly so
One of the more brutal recordings I own is the 5th movement (Segment? Selection?) from William Bazinksi’s The Disintegration Loops. Not only because it’s such a fragment of a song, and so repetitive, but because it sounds like what that day in September felt like. I lived a few blocks from his loft, and used to see him around all the time. I actually didn’t even hear this until years later; descriptions of the work made it seem exploitative. They were extremely lousy descriptions of a very important (if accidental) set of recordings.
I spent many months listening to this piece on repeat before going to sleep, trying to make remembering less painful.
Somewhat less emotionally painful is my relationship to Coil’s body of work. Natural and unnatural tragedy robbed us of both members within a six year span. Having never met or known them, and only having seen Peter Christopherson as part of the first bit of the aborted Throbbing Gristle reunion tour, it seems almost stupid to say “their work was incredibly important to my life”. But their work was, and is, incredibly important to my life, my understanding of what music is and can be, and things I’d like to accomplish emotionally and electronically.
If I ever got a tattoo, it’d be the words “Persistence is All”, taken from a sticker included with this recording. All four movements of the Time Machines album are incredibly hypnotic, to the point where there was a “Don’t listen to this while driving!” warning on the first pressing.
Grinding walls of icy sweat. Chemical yearning. Penetration without emotion or attachment.
Now that I’m thoroughly depressed, I need some pick-me-up. How about the best grindcore album of all time?
Metal, like any musical genre, can be cartoonish. Perhaps more than most, though it has a while to go before hitting prog rock levels. Cattle Decapitation isn’t technically “Militant Vegan Deathgrind”, but I still describe them as such because if nothing else it sounds funny. Monolith of Inhumanity is an excellent album, and “A Living, Breathing Piece of Defecating Meat” showcases a talent for song titles that puts Cannabis Corpse to shame, but don’t Googs ‘em at work. Or watch their “official” videos at home. If I hit the lotto I’d get them hooked up with the Fatal Farm guys and foot the bill, because the videos are absolutely terrible and unimaginative; the wrongest impression.
Perhaps less outwardly offensive are Middle America’s best blackened sludge band, Coffinworm. “Strip Nude For Your Killer” is some kind of Italian grade-z horror film theme, but all I know is that there be nothing but puking vocals and weighty riffs. My four year old is in love with this track, and we both agree the transition from 5:40 to about 6:10 is absolutely top shelf.
Another thing I enjoy is how sometimes a band goes back in time, takes all the “it’s not even music!” criticism to heart, and decides to become the avatar of what mothers from 1980 believed heavy metal sounded like. Those moms meant stuff like Quiet Riot, who are quite un-brutal.
I’m here or there on the video, but the song is total quality as far as “experimental death metal” is concerned e.g. metal that metal fans don’t find particularly comforting. Even better: the band plays hooded and anonymous, and the lead singer used to rock a grandfather clock on his head and papacy robes.
Speaking of leading personalities, watching Michael Gira plan for his retirement by never retiring has been wonderful. Easily one of the most powerful live performers I’ve ever watched, the reformed and re-imagined Swans are truly something to be experienced. Go!
But back in the ‘80s, it was a toss up as to whether he hated himself or everyone else more. “You’re Not Real, Girl” is a hateful voyeurism, forced to listen to a couple you don’t know attack each other years after love turned into sadism.
Dang it, sad again – but robots can fix that!
I love Autechre beyond reason. Always will. Back when I wrote about music, I used my love to explain why I absolutely loathe the whole “difficult music” thing. This is one of their harsher turns, with broken glass beats, constant grinding, and vague melodic stabs.
The Third Eye Foundation made one of the best drum n’ bass albums of all time (Ghost) but some of the singles Matt Elliott released of remixes from other Bristolians (he was also in Flying Saucer Attack) manage to sound ugly and hollow and weird and beautiful but mostly just plain stressed out. I feel exhausted (in a good way) by the way he wrings emotion out of lo-fi timestretches.
If you’re anti-Zionist and you brickwall your DATs, clap your hands! Pointlessly prolific in the posthumous, and perpetually pro-Palestinian, this is VERY LOUD. Bryn Jones won the loudness war while being dead.
Pan Sonic took another approach to loud, with modified drum machines and tone generators pushing raw to maximum rawness. Their collab with Merzbow is worth picking up, though despite him being the biggest name in noise, I’ve never been in love with his solo work.
“Entertainment Through Pain” Reformed TG was great the one time I saw them, before Gen went off on his “being a total jerk” tour after Peter Christopherson died.
This must have been a hell of a gig though.
The rise of The Mashup was a new version of an old idea – like all new ideas – but I was always partial to the 90s conception of breaking a song upon the wheel of whimsy. Kid606 specialized in this back when.
I’m very fond of A Place to Bury Strangers, who JAMC’d well into the 21st century. Loud for sake of very, very loud.
No discussion of brutality is complete without mentioning breakcore. And no discussion of breakcore is complete without Venetian Snares, who took the DHR formula set by Alec Empire’s seminal album The Destroyer and made it faster, stronger, and uglier.
We’ll end by remembering that this world is a terrible place to be beautiful.
Wait — this is from dhex? But there are capital letters…Report
Shhh…I told him that OT doesn’t pay for posts on a per-word basis, but on a per-capital-letter one…Report
Man, this post is … merciless. I liked the last song, tho! And the third from the last (I think, the one that sounded like a brutal rendition of Explosions in the Sky). Also, the musical terms you use sound nice. Better than most technical terms, anyway.Report
I liked the William Baziniki piece. It reminded me of an old sound recording which is largely disintergrated which is probably the entire point of the piece. And I can see how your day in September comparison worked.Report
the tape loops were literally disintegrating. he just happened to finish the transfers on september 11, 2001.Report
Lots of thoughts, in no particular order:
The Bazinski piece was going nicely with the torrential downpour outside my window this AM.
I’ve never listened to Coil before, I was expecting something more ‘industrial’ and less ambient (not that there are no corners of dark ambient industrial, obvs.) Also, DOET is a Shulgin (RIP) compound.
I guess I’m not entirely clear on what differentiates “breakcore” from jungle – like, on that Venetian Snares track I CLEARLY hear the Amen break, again. Is it just more chopped-up/rhythmically stop-start?
The only APTBS I have is the first one, and I am somewhat lukewarm on it (though, my usual complaint about “all the good bandnames are taken” doesn’t apply to APTBS – always go with a biblical reference!). Are there others I should check out?
Just SEEING Alec Empire’s name got another song stuck in my head:
Pioneer of digital hardcore
(Alec Empire, Alec Empire)
Thought other music was a big bore
(Alec Empire, Alec Empire)
(Speaking of “brutal” music in general, I’ve always been kind of annoyed that “hardcore” and “garage” generally mean ENTIRELY different things in the US and the UK. I realize that there are a limited number of terms out there, but you can’t just re-use ones that are already taken. Like, if I just start making beatless drone loops of my ACTUAL Hoover, I can’t call that “House” music just because I vacuum there.)
Last, I was searching for a representative gabber track, to show a variant of “brutal” techno that my German friend was into for a while, and I stumbled across this AMAZING documentary about it from ’95. It’s pretty short (20 min.), make sure you turn on the closed captioning so you get the subtitles, it is totally worth your time for the comedy value:
Also, I wanted to talk about your Autechre post, but I’ll comment on that separately. Back in a little while.Report
re: breakcore
jungle never gets into ultra-high bpm areas; it doesn’t do a ton of distortion; it tends to the melodic, or at least straight rhythmic; it tends to keep to a */4 timesig; it tends to have a tremendous amount of bass.
etcReport
shorter version; compare alec empire’s the destroyer (1996) with roni size+reprazent (1997).
and then punch yourself to get the taste of roni size out yer mouth.Report
Roni Size was just awful. I bought that one highly-recommended, and quickly became very annoyed at it.
The technology was there to chop things up into small-enough slices to rearrange them into brand-new, complicated configurations (you might even say, into “new forms”).
And yet all he/they did with it was take some simple-as-heck drum loop, speed it up, then repeat it ad infinitum.
I know you aren’t a fan of “Timeless”, but listen to that track on some good headphones – the beats (even the bass hits, which form their own “melodies” – but you need some serious speakers or ‘phones to catch them all, they are DEEP down there at the bottom) are all over the place. Just massive and complex and hyper-detailed.
Roni Size sounds like there was some “jungle” preset button on his keyboard, that they pressed and then went out for lunch.Report
i recognize timeless is a classic, i just don’t personally enjoy it much. i prefer my straightforward drum n bass in the vein of third eye foundation.
can we get “roni size was just awful” as the new site tagline? i think everyone would agree on that.Report
RE: Autechre and the myth of ‘difficult’ music.
I may be missing the point you are making, but is it your contention that all music is (at least theoretically) appreciable by anyone, anywhere, anytime?
Or, is your meaning more that it’s best not to prejudice someone against a piece of music (we shouldn’t, for lack of a better word, ‘spoil’ them for the shock of the new) by warning them of its potential “difficulty”?
Because when I warn someone that something is “difficult”, I am not attempting to keep them out, but rather to ease their potential transition in, which I suspect may be jarring to them (depending on what I know of their personality or personal/cultural history).
IOW, I probably wouldn’t just hand my mom a stack of Cronenberg/Jodorowsky/Lynch films without some sort of explanation of what she was getting into.
It’s a very worthwhile record, but The Terror is, as its name implies, a little harrowing – if a Lips fan like me finds that particular record a little “difficult” to spend time with, what should I say when I am asked about it by a more casual listener (of either the Lips, or psychedelia, or rock music in general)?
Or, is your meaning more that, while “difficult” may be a property that adheres to the work due to any of the aforementioned factors, it’s nearly always a mistake to assume that the work was *intended* to be experienced as “difficult”, just for difficulty’s sake?
(Also, I see I mostly got off the Autechre train right around the time you think they got interesting, having purchased no full-lengths between LP5 and Exai, and the last EPs I got prior to the 1991-2002 compilation box were EP7 and Peel Sessions 2 – the latter of which was a gift that came in a white-on-white sleeve, so for the longest time I wasn’t even sure what exactly it was, aside from “Autechre”.)
(Also, my CD copy of Tri Repetae is shaded somewhere between ‘avocado’ and ‘brass/gold’).Report
I have heard of a composer being difficult with the horns section (deliberately writing music to make it sound as if the horns had screwed up!).
What would being difficult for the audience mean? I think highly contextualized music — Weird Al, except done for composers. Parody — or satire, if you will, of musical styles and stylings.
“Beneath the trees where nobody sees
They’ll chop off your head and cut you off at the knees
‘Cause that’s the way the
Teddy Bears have their picnic.”
… that’s a lyrical change, but it’s a waggish one that pokes fun at the oddly grim tone of the musical accompaniment.Report
@glyph
“I may be missing the point you are making, but is it your contention that all music is (at least theoretically) appreciable by anyone, anywhere, anytime?”
that is my contention. the “eat your vegetables” style of explaining cultural artifacts – it’s so very “i don’t even owwwwn a tv” – is frankly disgusting.
and i don’t think that’s what motivates fans so much as snobs and anti-snobs – fans like yourself would use it very thoughtfully. i might even use it to answer “oh mang i loved the seer what are early swans like?!?!?”
i think the core of my objection to “difficult” – particularly at the time that essay was written which was A LONG TIME AGO – is that it’s almost as useless as “brutal”, and not just because personal taxonomies are personal. it has a lot of baggage, namely – and to quote myself – “HOW DARE YOU PUT ON AIRS v. LOOK HOW SMART I AM YOU REDNECK”
that’s almost as boring as the donkpublican arguments.
i mean, it’s useless for me to use “difficult” in this context, because love shack is the most difficult piece of music in my personal taxonomy, and that’s only if i’m trying to be kind. i’m currently trying to beat it into another form to make it less difficult for me*, though it would likely increase the difficulty of people who didn’t think it was difficult in the first place.
it’s complicated.
* and in one sense, blunt the harmful intent of its creators. a tiny voice in the darkness crying out for the light.Report
addendum: the chunk of music snobs not between the ages of 14 and 20 is very, very small. like, a subset of a subset of actual human beings.Report