Search
TEN SECOND BUZZ
- A Note from EmDecember 20, 20247 Comments
- From Tablet Mag: Rapid-Onset Political EnlightenmentDecember 19, 20244 Comments
- From The Wall Street Journal: How the White House Functioned With a Diminished Biden in ChargeDecember 19, 202447 Comments
- The Good Old Days, According to the DataDecember 17, 2024No Comments
- Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024December 16, 2024154 Comments
Features
Hot Posts
Thank You!
Thanks to your generosity, we were able to upgrade our service plan. Hopefully this will help us address some of our performance issues.
HELP ORDINARY TIMES
Recent Comments
- Jaybird in reply to Saul Degraw on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024When was the Gabriella Miller Act passed by the House? According to Congress's own records, it says…
- Saul Degraw on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024One of the things taken out of the Continuing Resolution was money for Pediatric Cancer research. To…
- Jaybird on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024Good news! Joe Biden successfully got Congress to agree to a funding bill and it passed. Elon Musk a…
- Michael Cain on The Church EntertainmentGrandpa drawings for holidays and birthdays seem to have become a tradition rather quickly. Here is…
- Burt Likko on A Note from EmHave had episodes like you describe too. It's nothing you need to apologize for. The muse will sing…
- Jaybird in reply to fillyjonk on Weekend Plans Post: The Ghost TownI know we say this every year but next year should calm down a little. And, yeah, this should be som…
- fillyjonk in reply to Jaybird on Weekend Plans Post: The Ghost TownWell, I feel like I deserve my 3 weeks off after teaching four different classes, serving on two job…
- Jaybird in reply to Jaybird on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024The alleged driver is allegedly from Saudi Allegia. You just *KNOW* that there's going to be a backl…
- Jaybird on The Church EntertainmentI can't find anything like this poem on the web. It's so spot on and it doesn't *FEEL* like somethin…
- North on A Note from EmWe miss you Em, I am just delighted to see anything from you. I hope you have a fantastic new year.
Comics
-
December 20, 2024
-
December 19, 2024
-
December 18, 2024
-
Moving Picture of a Handy Man Around the House
December 17, 2024
More Comments
- Slade the Leveller in reply to KenB on Weekend Plans Post: The Ghost Town
- Philip H in reply to Brandon Berg on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024
- fillyjonk on A Note from Em
- fillyjonk on Weekend Plans Post: The Ghost Town
- Brandon Berg in reply to Philip H on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024
- Jaybird in reply to Saul Degraw on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024
- Fish on A Note from Em
- Jaybird on A Note from Em
- Philip H on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024
- Philip H in reply to Doctor Jay on A Note from Em
- Doctor Jay on A Note from Em
- Jaybird in reply to Fish on Weekend Plans Post: The Ghost Town
- Fish in reply to Jaybird on Weekend Plans Post: The Ghost Town
- KenB on Weekend Plans Post: The Ghost Town
- PD Shaw in reply to Philip H on Fani Willis Disqualification Ruling: Read It For Yourself
Oh, and I was hoping for an example of a problem.
“See? This is the math we *USED* to teach!”
There’s a page from a math book from the 1920s here. Impenetrable at first glance but, nope, you can do these in your head.
Even if it’s been decades.Report
oh, wait
maybe you can only do #14 in your headReport
Most of the problems are amenable to a change of variable and the quadratic formula. Then once you realize that most of the answers are going to be small integers, or at least based on small integers, you can solve a number of them in your head by just trying small integers to see which work.Report
While I can sing the Quadratic to the tune of “Pop Goes the Weasel”, I can’t do it in my head anymore.
Sigh.Report
No, but for the first problem, you can run through small integers in your head and find that 1 and 4 work (so also -1 and -4). For the second, 2 and 3 work (also -2 and -3). For number eight, you chunk through the numbers that have integral fourth roots (1, 16, 81, 196, etc) to find that 196 works.
I always told my calculus students that if they were working one of my test problems and the algebra suddenly became unmanageable, they should back up because they had made a mistake. I wasn’t testing whether they could do overly complicated algebraic manipulation.Report
I don’t think you need the quadratic formula for any of these. There are enough moving parts that you’d probably want scratch paper, but these all seem fairly easily factorable.Report