Thousands of US Troops Headed to Afghanistan To Cover Embassy Withdrawl
The Biden Administration can try to spin this any way they want, but the embassy actions say the fall of Kabul to the Taliban is coming sooner rather than later.
The Pentagon is sending troops to Karzai International Airport in Kabul to help evacuate U.S. embassy as the Taliban continues its offensive in Afghanistan: "This is not an abandonment. This is not an evacuation. This is not a wholesale withdrawal"-State Dept spokesman Ned Price pic.twitter.com/5ve8bQpFjH
— CBS News (@CBSNews) August 12, 2021
The Biden administration will temporarily send thousands of additional military personnel to Afghanistan to provide security as the United States airlifts American civilians from the U.S. embassy there, the State Department said Thursday.
The departures take place as the Taliban continues a dramatic advance, seizing major cities across the country and moving to isolate Kabul, the Afghan capital.
State Department spokesperson Ned Price said the new military deployment, which comes just weeks before the Pentagon is scheduled to conclude its withdrawal under a timeline established by President Biden, would facilitate the departure of civilian staff.
Price said a “core” diplomatic staff would remain at the heavily fortified U.S. embassy to continue their diplomatic and consular work, but declined to say how many that would include. The United States will also accelerate departure of Afghans who have previously worked with the U.S. government and have applied for asylum in the United States.
“The embassy remains open,” Price said. “This is not abandonment. This is not an evacuation. This is not a wholesale withdrawal.”
Taliban fighters capture 10th provincial capital after days of sweeping gains
But the decision marks a tacit admission that the United States is uncertain how long it can ensure the safety of its staff in a country where conditions are changing on a daily, and sometimes hourly, basis. On Thursday, Herat and Kandahar, the country’s second- and third-largest cities, were on the verge of falling to the militants.
In April, Biden announced that he would fully withdraw military forces in keeping with a February 2020 deal the Trump administration struck with the Taliban. News of the American departure after two decades appeared to have energized the Taliban and undermined the confidence of Afghan forces as they face their adversary.
Two U.S. officials familiar with the new military deployment said the additional forces will be sent mostly at the airport as the United States relocates some diplomatic functions from the embassy compound a few miles away to the airport.
They will augment the force of approximately 650 American troops who have been in Kabul since the U.S. military effectively ended its withdrawal from Afghanistan last month.
The moves to protect the embassy withdrawals is because the Taliban is rolling over the country:
The Taliban captured Afghanistan’s third-largest city and a strategic provincial capital near Kabul on Thursday, further squeezing the country’s embattled government just weeks before the end of the American military mission there.
The seizure of Herat marks the biggest prize yet for the Taliban, who have taken 11 of Afghanistan’s 34 provincial capitals as part of a weeklong blitz. Taliban fighters rushed past the Great Mosque in the historic city — which dates to 500 BC and was once a spoil of Alexander the Great — and seized government buildings. Witnesses described hearing sporadic gunfire at one government building while the rest of the city fell silent under the insurgents’ control.
The capture of Ghazni, meanwhile, cuts off a crucial highway linking the Afghan capital with the country’s southern provinces, which similarly find themselves under assault as part of an insurgent push some 20 years after U.S. and NATO troops invaded and ousted the Taliban government.
While Kabul itself isn’t directly under threat yet, the losses and the battles elsewhere further tighten the grip of a resurgent Taliban, who are estimated to now hold over two-thirds of the country and are continuing to pressure government forces in several other provincial capitals.
Thousands of people have fled their homes amid fears the Taliban will again impose a brutal, repressive government, all but eliminating women’s rights and conducting public amputations, stonings and executions. Peace talks in Qatar remain stalled, though diplomats met throughout the day.
The latest U.S. military intelligence assessment suggests Kabul could come under insurgent pressure within 30 days and that, if current trends hold, the Taliban could gain full control of the country within a few months. The Afghan government may eventually be forced to pull back to defend the capital and just a few other cities in the coming days if the Taliban keep up their momentum.
The onslaught represents a stunning collapse of Afghan forces and renews questions about where the over $830 billion spent by the U.S. Defense Department on fighting, training those troops, and reconstruction efforts went — especially as Taliban fighters ride on American-made Humvees and pickup trucks with M-16s slung across their shoulders.
That writer and editor should be ashamed of themselves; this is only a “stunning collapse” if you’ve been living under a rock for the last 20 years, have utterly ignored the Global War on Terror since 9/11, or lack the ability to read.
Everyone knew this was coming. Now, it is here.
It was STILL the right call. If, after all the billions of dollars and all the blood poured into that rathole, the Afghan government is still only capable only of embezzling foreign aid and failing to fight off the Taliban then departing is the only sensible option. The best time to leave was probably right after they blew the place up. The next best time to leave was the start of Obama’s administration (but he trapped himself with talking about Afghanistan as “the good war”) and the next best time to leave is now.Report
Well the embassy wasn’t originally intending to leave. No one knew if the Government in Kabul would fold this catastrophically. I imagine the troops being moved to help with the embassy removal are part of the bad case scenario plan for leaving. As for Trump- that clown didn’t even have plans to manage any given day at the White House, let alone a plan to leave Afghanistan.Report
Uh huh, no doubt Trump is busy planning to be reinstalled tomorrow I hear. A literal demonstration of Trumps planning capacity and grasp of reality. As for Biden, so far he’s done pretty well. Better than I’d hoped and feared.Report
I’m sure if you give it another forty, fifty years of spilled blood, you’ll come up with a good plan.
Sunk cost fallacy, except you’re spending other people’s lives.Report
Have you read the stories coming out about what’s happening? I’m no foreign policy expert but it seems like bearing the cost of 3000-ish troops there indefinitely to stave off what’s going on right now would arguably have been worth it, for humanitarian reasons if nothing else. We’re getting ready to spend trillions of dollars on ourselves, and even the poorest Americans are way, way better off than the Afghanis at this point. Yes, the nation-building project was doomed from the beginning, but the US involvement did actually make some very positive differences in many lives there, and that’s all going to sh!t now.Report
Yes I’ve read the usual suspects saying “Oh we’re down to just spending hundreds of millions a year there instead of billions and the humanitarian considerations.”
I just can’t give it any credit, there’s simply no credibility for that group with me at least. At some point if the Afghanis can’t or won’t do it for themselves then we need ta stop doing it for them.Report
Actually having a plan to evacuate an embassy is the State Department’s job. They may execute through the military for a variety of reasons, but DoD has no functional control over an embassy.Report
There is a huge amount of the sunk cost fallacy going on, in the discussions I’ve seen.
“If we leave, we may as well as not have gone!”
Yeah. Like North said, we should have dismantled the old government and left a card on a folding chair that said “don’t make us come back”.
The “Pottery Barn Doctrine” was foolish as hell.Report
I will say it. As personally execrable as Trump was in manner, principles and bearing; the administration of George W Bush policy wise was the biggest calamity to befall this country in at least a century, probably more Trump doesn’t even come close.Report
They had 20 years to build a military and establish sufficient legitimacy to control the territory. They failed and I see no reason to believe they’d ever succeed.Report
Yeah, this is one of those things where even if the policy decision is correct… we still have to account for 20-years of activity that needs unwinding. I had a bad feeling when we abandoned the Bagram Airbase like hikers from an air BnB. The scary thing is that it has all the appearance of believing our own bullshit/PR about Afghanistan’s puppet govt prospects.
I was fully prepared to witness a debacle under Trump… I’m a little surprised that team Biden is surprised by the debacle… we were supposed to be getting people who ‘know about these things’. Then again, witness the Masktastrophe debacle and various other less than well managed episodes, and I’m left wondering if Biden/Harris just doesn’t have enough Clinton machinery to be effective. Boring might be *a* selling point, but only when its coupled with competent.Report
Yeah. “We believed our own BS” is a good way to describe why stuff isn’t working in the current year.Report
The feel i’m getting is the military advisors in 2009 said to Obama, with Biden in the room “Mr. President, if you pull out now the Afghan government will collapse over the course of a few years, give us more money and time and we can leave with our heads held high.” Obama bought it (and he had to because of his own talk on the subject). Now in 2020 the military advisors said the exact same thing to Biden and he said “I ain’t falling for that one again.” The problem isn’t that Biden believed the Military advisors.. it’s that he didn’t realize that it’d be even worse than they predicted and instead of collapsing in slow motion the Afghan government is imploding in fast motion and now everyone is scrambling.
I am not sure what to say about this. It’s not that Biden believed them, he clearly didn’t, but he failed to believe that they were sugar coating even the outcome of his deciding on withdrawal. He assumed the worst of the outcomes they proposed but didn’t assume worse than their worst case scenarios.
And, ironically, it’s still good that we’re getting out.Report
All plausible… which means that Biden has to publicly fire some Pentagon folks for advising him on the slow collapse theory… for the good of the organization.
I’d maybe redirect a little to suggest that if we accept that the Pentagon was attempting to thwart policy for it’s own interests (and I’m sure it has been) then this might be a passive aggressive attempt by the Pentagon to make the policy look like a debacle… which the President should publicly flog. High profile careers should be ruined for not executing a withdrawal well.
Which is to concur that if the only option was to stand on a desk at the Pentagon (metaphorically) and demand immediate withdrawal… then that should also have been part of Biden’s management of the process.
On the one hand, I really don’t think anyone will care about Kandahar (or Afghanistan at all) returning to the Taliban, and I suspect the Embassy will be fine until everyone leaves – then some sort of public ‘desecration’ – it will be the couple/few thousand dead collaborators that will be the bad press…Report
If the end result is some people in that 5 sided building being subject to accountability then maybe it was all worth it after all. Probably not. But at least there’d be an argument.Report
We shall see. I certainly agree with you and InMD that some career ending defenestration of some military hawks would be in order. I will cynically note, however, that doing so would first require that the administration admit there was a debacle which requires a scapegoat and that, obviously, remains to be seen.
To your last point I’m going to one up you on cynicism regarding the electorate. I think that is the x number thousand dead from the Taliban will only matter if the Taliban somehow manage to get their hands on a significant number of westerners. If the dead are all or overwhelmingly Afghan/non-western then I suspect our war weary electorate will collectively shrug and move on to the next subject.
Further, there’s no political hay to be made about “losing” Afghanistan absent a lot of dead Westerners. The left won’t want to bring it up since, obviously, it’s happening under Bidens’ watch and the right won’t want to bring it up since neocons are an exiled minority and since the subject of “just who did this war start under anyhow” isn’t a comfortable question to ask for them.
I dare say the people most sad about us leaving will end up being Pakistan (muh money), Russia, China and Iran.Report
Regarding the electorate I think it’s just as possible that this is a soft + for Biden in certain critical constituencies. I may well be proven wrong but this smells to me like the kind of thing the media loses its head over only for it to turn out that Biden was way closer to the median American voter than any plugged in politico or talking head could possibly imagine.Report
I hope you’re right, the old man has pulled it off before but ya only have to fish it up a couple times.Report
How dare you question my cynicism, sir.
Although, I concur with your assessment of the Neo-cons… my cynicism there says that the right will not hesitate to engage in ‘who lost Afghanistan’ diatribes regardless. Old habits, any stick with which to beat the dog, and all that.Report
Oh certainly, but those diatribes have to actually have some cachet with the electorate otherwise Biden will just brush it off.Report
“High profile careers should be ruined for not executing a withdrawal well.”
…
Not having any plan for evacuating Kabul is dereliction of duty.
…
Never fear, Trump’s people are here (and they’re competent.)Report
Heehee aren’t Trumps “competent” people busy measuring the drapes for moving back into the White House *checks watch* today?Report
I think you’re replying to the latest pair of sockpuppet names.
Seriously, we have a really dedicated troll.Report
It is pity their perseverance isn’t married to commensurate wit.Report
Reminds me of when I was being sent to cover the evacuation of the embassy in Somalia, and instead of doing that, we spent 3 months sailing in a box before our relief arrived.
As for the OP, I agree with North, et.al., we weren’t able to alter whatever it is there that prevents effective governance without dictator style of control.Report
What in the hell have we been doing for the last two decades? What the hell?Report
Paying mountains of money to the Afghans who promptly embezzled it and shipped it out to Pakistan, Abu Dhabi and other financial shelters. Playing hide and go seek with the Taliban in the mountains. Playing soldier with Afghanis for a cycle and then that trainer would get promoted with commendations and a new trainer would come in. Basically feeding foreign scumbags and domestic military industrial scumbags for twenty fishing years.Report