The Last Temptation of Elise Stefanik
For what will it profit them to gain the whole world and forfeit their life?
-Mark 8:36
“Moral cowardice that keeps us from speaking our minds is as dangerous to this country as irresponsible talk. The right way is not always the popular and easy way. Standing for right when it is unpopular is a true test of moral character.”
-Margaret Chase Smith (former Republican Senator from Maine)
Is character something that can be corrupted? Can someone be on the straight and narrow and become tempted to take a darker path? Or is character revealed by situations? Are the people who have become craven always been like that?
As Liz Cheney comes closer to being kicked off from House leadership for telling the truth about the January 6 insurrection, speculation has focused on New York representative Elise Stefanik. She has been endorsed by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and former President Donald Trump to chair the House Republican Conference. Stefanik’s rise is a study in character or in this case, lack thereof. She is a reminder of how the 45th President corrupts or reveals GOP pols.
And that is the question here. Was Stefanik always someone that would support the “Big Lie” that Trump and other Republicans are pedaling? Or did she make one compromise at a time until she became a MAGA Queen?
Stefanik was someone that I thought might be the future hope of the GOP. She was a moderate that seemed to oppose the President and pushed for more GOP women to run for Congress. Many NeverTrumpers saw her as someone that was an example of bravery in the face of moral turpitude.
So, what happened? Did she become compromised or is this who she was?
These days, it is quite common to think of the latter. Psychologist Adam Grant thinks that power doesn’t always corrupt to borrow Lord Acton’s phrase, but it always reveals. Writing in a 2019 op-ed, he believes power shows us who this person was all along:
“Power doesn’t always corrupt,” author Robert Caro has said, reflecting on Lyndon B. Johnson. “Power always reveals. When you have enough power to do what you always wanted to do, then you see what the guy always wanted to do.”
When we claim that power corrupts, we let powerful people off the hook. How you use authority reveals your character: Selfish leaders hoard power for personal gain. Servant leaders share power for social good. And the ultimate test of character for people in power is how they treat people who lack it.
Looking at Stefanik, that would mean she has always been opportunistic, ready to drop her beliefs at a moment’s notice. But that’s not how people saw her growing up as this Time Magazine article describes:
If you ask Stefanik’s childhood classmates what she was like as a girl, two words keep coming up: “integrity” and “ambition.” Growing up in upstate New York, Stefanik was friendly with Melissa DeRosa, now an embattled senior aide to scandal-plagued Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo. Both served in student government at the Albany Academy for Girls. In middle school, they teamed up to pressure administrators to install a snack machine…
…After high school, Stefanik went to Harvard, becoming the first in her immediate family to earn a college degree. Stefanik was one of few conservative women at Harvard’s Institute of Politics, but fellow campus politicos told me they admired her sharp reasoning, intellectual integrity and willingness to stick to her positions, even when they were unpopular on a liberal-leaning campus.
Integrity. If it came up once, you would think she really wasn’t someone with integrity. But it’s said over and over again. Now either all of these people who described Stefanik were liars or she really was someone of integrity. I tend to think she was someone that at one time believed in ethics, but she no longer does anymore. She changed.
It’s also important to look at that other word that describes her: ambition. Ambition can be good: it can force you to be better than you were and to reach for your goals and maybe even beyond them. But ambition is defined as “an ardent desire for rank, fame, or power.” The desire or love of power can lead someone to great heights, but it can also poison your soul. I think it’s her ambition that is key to understanding Stefanik’s downfall. I don’t think she was always the person she is now, but her love of power did make her choose to pick a route that more easily led to power and in that moment she made the decision to take power at all costs.
Elise Stefanik started out as a NeverTrumper politician that voted against the President over and over. She voted against the 2017 Tax Cuts. She voted against the emergency authorization to build the wall on the Mexican border. But I think as she looked at the future, she could tell that there was no future in opposing Trump. 2018 saw many Trump critics losing their seats. If you’re an ambitious person that has a desire for power there is going to be a deep temptation to take the route that will give you what you want. All you have to do is give up your soul.
As a pastor, I am familiar with the Christian concept of Original Sin. This concept says that all of us, you and I are imperfect. We have a propensity for sin.
The Book of Discipline of The United Methodist Church describes Original Sin in this way:
Original sin standeth not in the following of Adam (as the Pelagians do vainly talk), but it is the corruption of the nature of every man, that naturally is engendered of the offspring of Adam, whereby man is very far gone from original righteousness, and of his own nature inclined to evil, and that continually.
So, people become corrupted not by power, but by the love of power. This corruption can happen to anybody because at least from the Christian worldview, we are corrupted and inclined toward sin.
I don’t think that Stefanik has always been conniving and willing to lie. Adam Grant might think people are either saints or sinners, but the reality is that most people are both. We are complex beings that can be capable of acts of generosity and also acts of inaction, willingness to go along, or even acts of evil. I remember my Lutheran professors in seminary telling us that humans are “Simul Justus Et Peccator” which is Latin for “simultaneously saint and sinner. When it comes to Elise Stefanik, I think she was a person of integrity. But she came to a point where she saw there was no future in Never Trump and decided to throw her lot with the President. She is now more famous than she ever was as a critic. One can be a person of integrity until they are not.
Does power reveal or corrupt? I don’t know, but I do think that corruption doesn’t happen all at once. Instead, it happens, with every choice one makes. We are born with a propensity to sin, but for sin to matter, we have to make a choice each and every time.
That’s what Elsie Stefanik did. She has made one choice after another because of her love of power.
Margaret Chase Smith, a US Senator from Maine was willing to face Joseph McCarthy as he went chasing Communist ghosts. She was willing to publicly challenge the Wisconsin Senator, at a time when other Senators wouldn’t dare to speak up. She was willing to stand up for the truth even if it came at a cost. The same could be said of Liz Cheney who is telling the truth and that devotion for truth is coming at a steep cost.
Elise Stefanik was someone that was a person of integrity, but she was also a person of ambition. She made choices, one at a time until she became a loyal supporter of Trump.
Power didn’t corrupt Elise Stefanik. It was the love of power that brought her down.
Every one of us is susceptible to temptation. There aren’t people who are always saints and those who are always sinners. We all have the power to make choices. Stefanik chose to lose her soul, to corrupt herself. In our own lives, let us learn to not make the same choices.
Unless we know of temptations she resisted, I’d be inclined to call this “The First Temptation (etc.)” And there’s no reason to assume this is the last, when she’s only 36.Report
It was a take on the movie from the 80s, The Last Temptation of Christ. The title isn’t meant to be taken seriously.Report
I got it 🙂Report
The great tragedies are when someone is tempted to do a “little evil for a greater good”.
Like we can easily understand the yearning for some great noble cause, which only requires a little sacrifice here, or some corner cutting there, until one is completely mired in corruption and lost in a maze of moral confusion.
What is less understandable, and not even much of a tragedy, is to lose one’s soul in pursuit of something that is obviously evil to begin with.Report
As an old adage goes, “Everyone has a price.” US Representative is a better gig than most of us can ever expect to land. Influence, prestige, remuneration, benefits both short- and long-term, historically easy to keep. Now, suddenly, supporting Donald Trump appears to be a necessary requirement for a Republican to keep that gig. Certainly opposing Trump is dangerous to keeping it. This morning, Liz Cheney lost her leadership post. In 2022 she’s likely to lose a primary and her seat, and there’s a high probability her political career is over.
I’m quite sure I’ve got a price, and I’m happy that no one has ever really pushed me to have to decide how much.Report
She did not turn out anti-Trump over and over. She voted for Trump supported bills 78 percent of the time. I admit this is a lower percentage than Liz Cheney.
However, her biography is probably perfetctly petit-bourgeois reactionary. Maybe she was the first in her family to attend college but she still went to a relatively expensive private school. According to wiki, her parents owned a wholesale plywood distributor and I believe the only job she had besides political office was working for her parents. This is the kind of high-income but low education voter that made the bulk of the Trumpist base. Forever hating those libs and their secular-city ways.
She is a good candidate to lose her seat to redistricting though. This is what I meant from the other thread when the Republicans were transforming into a party for fascism and apartheid. They are starting to see any Democratic victory as wrong and illegitimate and think anything must happen to stop it.Report
I know I shouln’t be surprised but it is really weird encountering 80s kids that turned out really differnetly than yourself in politics and other cosmological matters.Report
Which is why I think people should stop with the whole “old white men who are dying off” stuff.
Fascism and reaction has always had a ready made appeal for people of all ages. People young enough to be my kids are running around talking like George Wallace and Phyllis Schlafly.Report
The Left always thought that the current generation of young people would come about and bring on the Revolution forever. People thought this about the early boomers, basically anybody who was draftable by the late Vietnam War, and they went on and got Reagan, Bush, and Trump elected into office.Report
Well, now the Millennials elected Biden. Permanent Democratic Majority right around the corner!Report
This is a danger of career politicians, in that past a certain point, there is only one employer, and if you don’t like the workplace, or get fired, there is no lateral shift available. You either take a demotion, or change careers.Report
Yeah and if you haven’t flattered or pleased someone enough to get a media perch, a policy sinecure or a lobbying gig you’re outta luck in the most adjacent fields to move into.Report
That’s part of the overall problem no? Your fallback careers generally favour acting like a partisan lunatic rather than judicious lawmaking.Report
Yes. Especially on the right.Report
On the other hand, there is something to be said about institutional knowledge and keeping with your job for a long time even in politics. Biden is an elder statesman and it shows and works to his benefit.Report
A good reason to oppose term limits (excluding the presidency- I think the 22nd was a good idea).Report
I worked for the state legislature here after term limits had been around long enough to bite. People complain about lobbyists gaining power. Permanent staff also gain a lot of power, as they become the institutional memory. “Yes, Sen. Johnson, we tried that six years ago. Here’s all the ways we got sideways with the feds…”Report
Yeah I’ve had the privilege of speaking to a number of people in or adjacent to elected legislative positions over the years and their stories are almost always identical to yours in theme. Both that term limits lock elected bodies into a perpetual state of inexperience and in other accounts that it’s the older experienced legislators that the staffers and state employees were wary of because you couldn’t get as many things over on them.Report
Oh, yeah, there are real benefits to having career politicians, especially in a system as massive as ours. And frankly I have no idea how to counter this particular drawback.
But it is a drawback…Report
How about a smaller country(s)? A transcontinental country of 330M people is going to run largely by bureaucracy. There’s just no way 536 elected officials working principally in one city on one side of the continent are going to have a handle on any details. Especially when job one is to get reelected, leading to job two of always be fund-raising.
Reading Philip H’s comments about the bureaucracy having whole notebooks of how to keep things running when the top people (and a couple of layers of appointees) get changed out is one of the cheerier things I’ve done in the past year.Report
Ideally that would be the point of the states, but everybody in state A just has to be all up in state B’s nitty gritty business, and everyone in state B wants to be all up in the minutia of state A’s business, and both are willing to leverage the federal government to make that happen.Report
Meanwhile:
I don’t think these are words just for public consumption, but a legitimate expression of her feelings.
AND
I think Cheney believes she can keep her seat, and when the dust settles the Trumpers will have lost, and she will be positioned well. I hope she’s right.
We have 30-35 percent of the country at war with the Constitution. Not good times.Report
It will be tough to unseat her. Her state has been represented by her family along time, and when it comes to the retail portion of politics in a reelection, she can press the flesh as well as anyone. Plus she has a Huge war chest independent of most of the PACs.Report
I also think if she’s willing to run as an indy after she loses the primary, the Democrats probably have an obligation to not run a real candidate in order to encourage a Dem + Non-Trumpy Rep coalition.Report
I’d endorse this path. What’re dem odds in that state anyhow?Report
Welp.
Report
From the horse’s mouth:
Report
Should we be relieved that she called him “President Biden” instead of “the usurper”?Report
OUR COMMANDER IN CHEATReport
BTW, the next generation of Bushes are crap too.
Report
They might not have figured out what kind of Republicans win elections but they seem to have figured out what kind of Republicans lose them.Report