Georgia, Everybody Loves You Now
All the lights are turned on Georgia. I don’t know much about the state, but that’s okay. Neither do most of the people doing the light turning. The important thing is that the state and its citizens do exactly what I want them to do when I want them to do it.
Take Brad Raffensperger, Secretary of State of Georgia. My co-blogger Andrew has done good work documenting Mr. Raffensperger’s steadfast commitment to doing his job. Mr. Raffensperger has eschewed illegally manipulating the votes in that state to Trump’s favor. And yet he is (or was) a Trump supporter. Before the election, if he had been on the radar of any my liberal friends (fun fact: he wasn’t), we would have considered him one of the Very Bad People Who Must Be Condemned At All Costs.
Now all is forgiven. Everybody wants to know his name. He is a Man Of Principle Who Speaks Truth To Power And Honors His Oath To The Constitution.
But nothing lasts forever. During the upcoming senate runoffs, Mr. Raffensperger might steadfastly honor his oath by enforcing voting laws that are inconvenient for the Democrats. Or maybe in the coming years he’ll run for Congress. Maybe he’ll caucus with the Absolutely Horrible No Good Bad Guys.
Let’s take a look at Georgia the state. In case you haven’t heard, it flipped. Four years ago, it went for Mr. Trump. This time around, it went for Mr. Biden. According to the 270 to Win website, Georgia hasn’t voted for a Democrat since 1992, and that was probably a Perot thing.
I have never been to Georgia. Very few of my friends have, either, outside of a connecting flight in Atlanta on their way to somewhere else. (To be fair, some of them have probably attended conferences in that city.) If you had asked any of my friends about their opinions of Georgia, you’d probably get some tsk-tsk’ing about everything that’s wrong with the region in which the state finds itself–and with the type of people they imagine live there.
Never mind that the city in which most of my friends reside and work has its own checkered past and present. No, my friends don’t approve of the police violence, or the rioters who use the police violence as justification for the riots. But gosh darn it, people live where people want to live. They want to live in Big City, but in well-policed neighborhoods safe from the rioters.
Yes, I know that tu quoques are fallacious.
By the way, my alderman–and local Democratic committeeman–expressed his support a couple months ago for working with the Trump administration to bring soldiers into the city. But he probably voted for Biden so it’s all good.
At the moment, everybody loves Georgia . Its voters have walked away from their mistakes. Now, it is a Very Important Place, The Center Of The Stage for the fate of the nation.
But nothing lasts forever. Everyone awaits Georgia’s reply in the runoff races for the Senate. So do I. If the Republicans win, you can bet my friends won’t be gathering around to sing the state’s praises. The jokes will resume, even though the same people who voted for Biden will still be living in the state.
Or maybe Georgia will finally make the switch and earn my friends’ love and admiration.
It’s all been done before. Not too long ago, my own home state made the switch. It used to be a backwater. Well, it was a quaint and popular backwater. Some famous celebrities had second homes in its ski resort towns. It had 300+ days of sunshine. Its capital city was a “cow town” in a not wholly unendearing way. But the state passed an anti-gay rights amendment in 1992. Some of the people who owned second homes there announced their support for boycotting the “hate state.” I’m not sure if they sold their second homes, though.
Worse, the state voted reliably for Republican presidential candidates. True, Mr. Clinton squeaked out a couple of victories, but that was probably a Perot thing.
What changed? Well, some corporate giveaways and anti-union policies created a lower downtown hot spot and new jobs. Those developments attracted people who claimed to be against corporate giveaways and for union-friendly policies. But they still want their paycheck. And the waiter better be snappy if he wants a good tip.
Yes, I know that tu quoques are fallacious.
And more: the same initiative process that enabled people to enact the anti-gay rights amendment enabled people to legalize cannabis more than a decade later.
And even better: the state has been voting reliably for Democratic presidential candidates since 2008. The jokes have ceased, even though most of the people who voted the other way still live there.
Look, I’ve laughed at jokes about the South. I’ve made, and sometimes voiced, over-generalizations about the region even though I know that things are more complicated than that. I don’t (usually) speak up when my friends make those same generalizations. To be fair, the generalizations are equal opportunity. Any person who votes the wrong way or believes in the wrong type of Christianity is fair game.
Also, too (and I’m sincere about this): I really want the Democrats to win in Georgia. I’ve thought about donating (a modest amount of) money to their campaigns, even though I’m ambivalent about being one of those guys who pokes his nose into another state’s business and thereby fulfills stereotypes about a moneyed elite.
I remember the anti-gay rights amendment. I eventually came around to repudiating it, but in the short term, the boycott campaign steeled my resolve to support it. Shame on me, I guess. But I’m probably not the only person who votes out of spite.
Yes, I know that tu quoques are fallacious.
Some people were bad yesterday and might be bad tomorrow. I haven’t learn much about them as actual people with actual needs. But I love them today and that’s what counts.
“Georgia on My Mind” was right there.Report
As marker of where we are that a public official simply performing his duty without regard to partisan interest is considered a shocking and hotly debated issue.Report
Too true.Report
Not really.
There actually is a history liberals have with Brad Raffensperger. Except it’s a history with that _office_.
So, last election the _currently_ Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, was running for governor, and somehow, didn’t have to recuse himself from that.
There was a…lot of irregularity in that election, including the same bullshit there is _every_ election, where for SOME reason the state government makes sure to seriously underfund voting in large population centers. The fact that you can almost make a direct linear graph of ‘length of the voting line’ and ‘percentage a county tilts Democratic’ is surely a complete coincidence.
Brad Raffensperger won the Secretary of State position to replace Kemp.
So, no one ‘hated’ Brad Raffensperger, but we were fully expecting we _would_ hate him, because we were expecting he would be doing the same thing. And he probably would have, and we’d all probably hate him and his ISO-standard Republican voter suppression in 2020. Which, admittedly, is not all _that position_, it’s the Georgia legislature and governor and everyone (As I’ve mentioned before, our state has _laws_ to make sure that rural counties get near-effortless voting.), but the SoS always plays a role.
Except he didn’t have a chance to do that. Instead, we had Covid.
And for the first time _ever_ we had an election that truly reflected the will of the state of Georgia, a state that is currently an estimated 52% white non-Hispanic.
And the thing, the joke here is: Brad Raffensperger didn’t have anything to do with this. He didn’t make any rules, he didn’t set anything up. He made no chances whatsoever, there were no special provisions made for Covid.
And yet we had the smoothest election ever, because half the population, including huge chunks of those high population areas that had always had long lines…voted absentee.
Why didn’t they do that before, if it’s been possible all this time? Well, because the state has never encouraged it, has never really presented it as an option. You can live your entire life in Georgia without knowing that anyone can vote absentee for any reason. Never really thinking of it as an option.
Suddenly, it’s something everyone is talking about, and a lot of people took it.
And here’s the punchline: Democrats aren’t going to stop doing this. We just figured out a way to beat the voter-suppression lines! (1)
But, because Brad Raffensperger didn’t do anything to stop this…and, really, couldn’t have…he never actually got the chance to do any voter suppression..and this might continue _into the future_ as elections here are likely to be fundamentally changed as Democrats have just figured out how to work around Republican voter suppression…so he might never end up the villain.
Of course, it rather depends on what Republicans do when they do the math and realize exactly what has happened.
I fully expect some of them to try to reign in absentee voting.
1) As did a _lot_ of states, apparently.
This election is a DAMNING indictment of EVERY SINGLE STATE that keeps somehow having ‘some large cities that screwed up the vote, and it’s the fault of the local people, usually Democrats, running the election’.
It turns out, if you reduce the amount of voters by just only 1/3rd, the election runs completely smoothly EVEN IN THOSE PLACES, which means all those states ever had to fix things do was upsize budget and machines and everything by that amount in those cities. That was it. That would have solved every single problem! There’s no ‘incompetence’, it was simply the state not distributing enough resources per voter.Report
I’ll admit I simply didn’t read most of your comment. But I’ll take your word for it that you know more about this than I do.Report
Your loss, it was a great comment.Report
You’re probably right.Report
DavidTC:
I realize my comment was glib and I apologize. I’ve just finished reading the whole thing, and you raise some good points.
My only counter is that my friends (and I) have done absolutely nothing to apprise ourselves of any of that. And if you had asked them (or even me) about a Republican secretary of state in a southern state, they (and probably I) would have assumed we knew what we didn’t know because we haven’t done any of the work to learn it. And now they (and I as well, even though my post snarks about it) tend to praise him, not having learned enough to know, as you point out, that he didn’t actually do anything.
To be clear, my “counter” doesn’t obviate the points you make. So thanks for clarifying what went down.
ETA: In addition to what I just wrote I’ll say this: If someone takes the time to write a substantive comment on my OP, I have an obligation to at least treat it with respect. I failed to do that with yours. I apologize.Report
Obviously, I wouldn’t know anything about your friends, but Kemp’s role as Sec of State while also running for governor was a big story, widely discussed in liberal media, both big media and social media. It was the election in which Abrams opposed Kemp, so many liberals were watching closely. The controversy was all over Twitter and Facebook, big accounts, and small, so many of us watched this election to see how Kemp’s replacement would conduct himself. If you were to search Kemp, Abrams election on Twitter, you would learn that liberals are STILL discussing Kemp’s conduct in that election with respect to the most recent election.Report
That’s probably more of a testament to my own ignorance (and laziness) than anything.
ETA: In other words, you’re probably right.Report
The difference between a blue GA and a red GA seems to have been scandalized suburban women who couldn’t take all of Trump’s intemperate tweeting, yet the media establishment is so desperate to have Stacy Abrams as the right kind of face for Democratic victory that she’s getting a huge share of credit that doesn’t appear to be borne out by the numbers. Nonwhites as a share of the GA electorate didn’t spike, and compared to 2016, appear to have shifted rightward.
But just like #metoo plucked Tarana Burke from relative obscurity because they needed a Strong Black WomanTM as a front to cover the self-imposed shame of privileged white women.Report