Linky Friday: Unassailable Facts, and Other Fabrications
[LF1] Confusion reigns, is the gist of it: Mask-Wearing Guidance: A Timeline of Slow-to-Shift Messaging By Kalev Leetaru:
The end result has been a public told for two months not to wear masks, not because they don’t work but because those masks were needed for health care workers. For a public saturated with this “don’t wear” messaging from news outlets and fact checkers, it is not surprising that there has been resistance to current mandatory mask orders. The episode reinforces the critical need for officials to consider the impact of contradictory public health messaging, and reminds us of the limitations of fact-checking sites during a crisis when so much is unknown and guidance changes often.
[LF2] This keeps getting said but it’s really inarguable: Joe Biden is running a far more progressive campaign in proposed policies and promises than Barack Obama did. How Biden Could Be The Most Liberal President In Modern U.S. History
By Perry Bacon Jr.
[LF3] Ordinary Times friend and contributor Genya Coulter puts a bow on the CA-25 special election saga: An Open Letter to CA-25’s Newest Congressman, Mike Garcia, and His Impending Baptism By Fire
[LF4] The continuing adventures and evolution of food delivery in the time of coronavirus: The Artisanal Pizza You Ordered Might Secretly Be Chuck E. Cheese by Sarah Emerson at OneZero
So it was a surprise to learn that Chuck E. Cheese pizza can be consumed in the comfort of your own home, delivered via on-demand apps such as Grubhub, as was revealed last month when a Reddit user documented their experience of accidentally ordering from the children’s entertainment center. Pizza made in the kitchens of select Chuck E. Cheese locations is sold under the name “Pasqually’s Pizza & Wings” on Grubhub, allowing the business to generate revenue while technically remaining closed due to the coronavirus. The brand is owned by CEC Entertainment, Inc., which also owns Chuck E. Cheese, and a trademark registration was filed for the restaurant name on April 16, 2020. (The name derives from one Pasqually P. Pieplate, an Italian chef character and drummer for Chuck E. Cheese’s resident rock band.)
[LF5] Meanwhile, China is not done bringing Hong Kong to heel: China moves to impose controversial Hong Kong security law from the BBC
[LF6] Technically, probably. But then again if you are so gone in the head you believe this nonsense you probably are going to be in some type of cult or another regardless. Is QAnon the newest American religion? by Bonnie Kristian at The Week
[LF7] Folks have been clamouring for this: Man who filmed Ahmaud Arbery video charged with murder By Christian Boone in The Atlanta Journal Constitution. If your wondering how the guy that shot the now-infamous video of the murder caught a murder charge for it, here is some reporting, including an interview with Roddy Bryant from before these charges, that explain how on the initial police report McMichaels stated that “Roddy” (who took the video) was part of the attempt to corner Arbery with vehicles.
[LF8] If one place can do it, fair to question why others did not: Planning for the inevitable: How one nursing home stopped the COVID-19 spread by Carli Brosseau in The Raleigh News & Observer
[LF9] Could voting by mail be subject to voter fraud? Sure. Will it be exponentially more voter fraud than other methods, like some are suggesting including the president? Probably not:
Instead of engaging in a critique of the president’s rather atavistic position (the trend among states is moving rapidly away from it), I would simply observe that before much of anyone outside epidemiological circles had heard the word “coronavirus,” fully 34 states allowed for no-excuse voting by mail (even if the mail ballots in question were still called, as they generally are in most states, “absentee ballots”). Of those, 12 were state governments entirely controlled by Republicans, 12 by Democrats, and the other 10 had split partisan control. So the idea that this was a device one party favored and the other party opposed, or that represented one party’s raid on election integrity, is plainly not very widely shared. That’s particularly true in this pandemic year, when 11 of the 16 states have waived the sort of limitations that Trump favors. So all told 45 states are defying Trump’s wishes.
[LF10] I’m working up my own thoughts on this, but our friend Burt laid this out in the Commentareum so for emphasis reposting it here:
Seemingly rare is the nationally — or internationally — popular religious figure, who would be assessed by a non-adherent of that religion as all three of:
a) leading a personal life generally free of sexual and financial shenanigans;
b) has not fabricated academic credentials in some fashion; and
c) preaching behavior that is apparently well-rooted in the writings of their faith’s ancient holy texts.Now, don’t misunderstand me. I volunteer rather than concede that there are quite a lot of clerics out there in the world who meet all three of these criteria at the same time. Maybe even the overwhelming number. But I notice that those people tend to focus on their local ministries rather than on pursuit of national or international fame. I also notice that they don’t tend to engage in a lot of apologia as a means of outreach to the non-faithful and perhaps attempts to convert them.
(Query if apologia to non-believers is actually effective at gaining conversions.)Is this particular to Christianity, I wonder? We certainly see and hear more about Christian clerics doing questionable things than we do clerics of other faiths, but here in the USA, Christianity in its manifold flavors is very culturally dominant. Also, it seems to only be in the Anglosphere, and within that it’s mostly in the USA, that we encounter an abundance of clerics who feel the need to engage by way of apologia to do things like defend the literal truth of Genesis or otherwise engage in some sort of academic or logical confrontation with skeptics and doubters.
(Seriously, does this even work? Does it actually gain more than a token number of converts? My experience with arguments of this nature is that only those who are already firmly convinced they’re right even pay attention to this sort of thing, and hearing apologetic and counter-apologetic arguments almost always cements rather than softens the world view of the listener. It’s almost as if the apologist is simply throwing red meat out to the already-faithful in the hopes of inducing them to financially support their efforts to engage in unresolvable debates. Almost.)
[LF11] There are failures of logic, and then there is this doozy from the — admittedly — lying-on-the-floor low bar of Bill Mitchell:
Some have called me "sycophant" for unrelenting support of the president.
I am not.
I believe Trump was sent by God to lead America through this most perilous moment in our history, blessed with a vision and second-sight beyond his innate strategic brilliance.
He is our voice.
— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) May 22, 2020
[LF12] I’m in the minority here, but personally I think Biden should be worried that he can’t get more of a bump in polling out of the worst economic disaster in our lifetimes. But maybe I’m wrong: State polls suggest Biden has a clear national lead from CNN
[LF13] This interview of Joe Biden with the popular Breakfast Club is going to be all over the place today, so watch the whole thing for yourself and draw your own conclusion:
Politico sums up the sticky bits here:
“I’m not acknowledging anybody who is being considered, but I guarantee you: There are multiple black women being considered. Multiple,” Biden said of his search process for a vice presidential nominee.
It was then that an aide to the Biden campaign could be heard interjecting into the conversation, attempting to cut short the interview. “Thank you so much. That’s really our time. I apologize,” the aide said.
“You can’t do that to black media!” Charlamagne retored.
“I do that to white media and black media because my wife has to go on at 6 o’clock,” Biden shot back, apparently referring to a subsequent media appearance by Dr. Jill Biden, before adding: “Uh oh. I’m in trouble.”
“Listen, you’ve got to come see us when you come to New York, VP Biden,” Charlamagne said. “It’s a long way until November. We’ve got more questions.”
“You’ve got more questions?” Biden replied. “Well I tell you what, if you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black.”
LF11: There’s a difference between a sycophant and a true believer. I don’t know Bill Mitchell, but he really sounds like the latter.Report
LF13: Charlamagne had a surprisingly hard-hitting interview. If I were trying to argue that the Democrats have come to take the African-American vote for granted, I’m pretty sure that people would think that it would be unfair that I keep quoting Biden instead of, you know, talking about policy or something like that.Report
Okay, allow me to try to defend what Biden said for a second.
Did you see what Trump said about Henry Ford?Report
A point that probably cannot be made strongly enough:
Report
The upside of his “you’re not black” snafu is that it might simplify the VP selection process. Now he *has* to pick a black
personwoman.ReportYou know what’d be really funny? If it was Klobuchar anyway.Report
If he’s smart he will. The decision of the party is centrist/retake the blue wall and he should double down on it. The black vote is much less important outside of the South which will be mostly red regardless. The only argument I could see for putting race above all else is if the election rests on turnout in Detroit.Report
Klobuchar seems like the right pick to me as well. But we’re talking about Democrats here….Report
Oh believe me I know. The urge to hedge in exactly the wrong direction is just burning through the media and I assume also DNC leadership.Report
And to clarify, by less important, I don’t mean unimportant, but the game remains win electoral votes, not run up the score in urban/regional strongholds regardless of whether the state is in play.Report
Yeah, I see Harris as more likely because of this too.Report
I really don’t understand all the hullabaloo about Harris. Even black voters didn’t like her in the primary. Seems to me that putting her on the ticket won’t GOTblackV, won’t GOTprogV, and will scare off moderates (given the very high likelihood the VP becomes P during the term).Report
I think it’s important that the pick has a record of success where winning isn’t a given for Democrats. Minnesota is blue but not so blue that victory doesn’t have to be earned.
Harris has a sheltered quality to her that reminds me a bit of HRC. She’s the wrong way to go.Report
[LF13] I remember people dunking on Sanders supporters because Biden said that he’d very definitely select a black woman for his running mate, and Sanders wouldn’t match that.
As of yesterday evening, Biden’s campaign has asked Amy Klobuchar to “submit to vetting for selection as a Vice-Presidential candidate”.
So, not a black woman after all, then.Report
LF10: I hadn’t read the Zacharias thread until now. I adore that it was mostly a discussion of Blackberries, although I can’t explain why. We’re a funny crowd here.
I think it’s extremely rare for any kind of debate to persuade people, at least immediately. I remember hearing Ben Shapiro talk about how if you’re debating someone who is persuadable, try to persuade him, but if you’re debating someone who is unpersuadable, try to make him look bad. I hate that. Most every substantive exchange I have online, I’m aiming at the participant 5 years from now.
I don’t remember who it was who said that the job of a judge is to be 100% certain when he’s 51% right. I think we all tend to do that, or at least if we’re about 60% sure of something we’ll act the same if the percentage shifts around a little. We only formally change our minds when we notice the thing we used to be 60% sure of, we’re now close to 40%. The impact of many discussions, articles, and life lessons can sneak up on us.
Evangelicals are in a more intense position, though. As a Catholic, I believe that a person has to turn his soul over to Jesus and begin a long road toward perfection. An Evangelical sees it more as a light switch, on or off. Anyone he convinces will have eternal life from that moment on. The Evangelical perspective is “I once was lost but now am found / was blind but now I see”. The Catholic perspective can be seen in the last line of the Act of Spiritual Communion, a prayer that a lot of us have been praying because we can’t get to Mass: “Never permit me to be separated from Thee.” It’s not that Catholics don’t care about conversion; it’s that we see it as a lifelong experience.Report
Perhaps you could compare the different approaches to video games. There’s one model where you try to sell a hot game once, and there’s another online-RPG model where you make money with continuing subscriptions and selling lots of nifty power-ups.Report
[LF11] Remember when the Right used to call Obama “the one” to accuse us of worshipping him?
Good times.Report
I just don’t get Christian apologetics. Not at all. Christianity is the world’s largest religion, 29 percent of the world is Christian, or around 2.3 billion people. Jews, by contrast, the core population was only 14.6 million in 2018. We are a tiny, tiny group but it is Christians, especially protestant evangelicals, who seem to devout huge amounts of times and energy to stating Christianity is the only logical way to view the world.
Seems kind of insecure, no? Like Burt says, it is really suppose to be effective towards me.Report
Look at it the other way around. Thirty percent of the world is Christian because Christians try so hard to convince others that Christianity is true.Report
It’s the nature of an evangelical faith. Christianity teaches that everyone should be Christian, and Christians have an obligation to try and make that happen. Therefore 30% is not enough, they’ll keep going so long as the proportion of Christians is below 100%.Report
As insecure as doctors and nurses fawning all over you after an accident. It’s like they’re craving attention. Hint: they’re not fawning, and they’re convinced your life is at stake.Report
“You’re broken, and I am here to fix you” isn’t as appealing as one might think.Report
If you’re viewing it as a sales pitch, I can understand your point. If you’re viewing it as a diagnosis, then the question is whether it’s correct.Report
Hard to see it as much else, as it currently exists in America anyway.Report
I have reached an age where they are guaranteed to find “broken” things if they look. I’d like them to fix my hearing, which — once Kaiser starts doing non-essential close-contact stuff again — they can only try, replacing one set of hearing impairments with a different (possibly more appealing) set. OTOH, the kidney stone is symptom-free, has always been symptom-free, and I’m not letting them poke at it. Sleeping dogs, and all that.Report
LF-1: I think the about-face on masks probably has some relevance, particularly as things began loosening, mask requirements were the main restriction going the other way. But it seems to have taken a large life of its own.
In Illinois, we now have opinions from the Illinois Attorney General’s Office (2x), the US Attorney’s Office yesterdayand a Democratic trial judge, that the mask requirement exceeds the Governor’s emergency powers which are bound by thirty days without further legislative approval. And I still see no sign that the legislature is going to act; they convene at the end of today.
(The Governor tried to remove the challenges to his emergency orders into federal court on the grounds that there are federal constitutional issues involved; the US Attorney’s Office filed a statement of interest that asked the cases to be returned, there are clear state statutory limitations on the Governor that would obviate the need to address any federal constitutional issues)Report
[LF9] Let me first signal that in the midst of a pandemic, I think it makes perfect prudential sense to look at voting In Absentia. But In Absentia is the key political philosophical point.
But then, as a full fledged member of the Patriarchy, I should… I already get 5 votes now that I have three eligible children to vote. That will probably double the Solidarity party vote in Virginia this year alone. Of course in past years I had to assume my authority with regards proper voting was obeyed when they were alone in the booth… but this year, I can either do it myself or make sure they vote correctly under my benevolent eye.
In our mad obsession with technology and efficiency, we forget the importance of the physical space afforded by secret ballot voting. There are very good reasons… perhaps much *better* reasons to oppose click/mail voting than concerns about fraud. Or perhaps a better way to put it, there are more aspects to fraud than many seem to consider.
Or, like surveys from our pastors on “which Mass schedule we would prefer” we can assume that our votes are purely pro-forma anyway. In the end it doesn’t matter at all; all that matters is we think we were heard. I don’t think we’re there yet, but I think we’re trending that way faster than folks acknowledge.
I suppose I’m making a GKC Gate kinda argument… we think technology solves one problem, but we’ve forgotten the real problem we’re trying to solve: undue influence and the idea that each vote is measured, free and uncoerced.Report
You don’t make your family members wear GoPro cameras in the voting booth? I thought that was pretty standard, and how husbands and boyfriends made sure women didn’t vote for Hillary in 2016.Report