Regardless What Hollywood Sells You, West Side Story Is Not A Latino Story

Luis A. Mendez

Boricua. Floridian. Theist. Writer. Podcaster. Film Critic. Oscars Predictor. Occasional Psephologist. Member Of The Critics Association Of Central Florida, The International Film Society Critics, And The Puerto Rico Critics Association.

Related Post Roulette

32 Responses

  1. Great review, very insightful. Thanks for sharing it with us.Report

  2. Jaybird says:

    “Why is it that film got that heat but critics are glossing past that issue here?”

    I submit: most of that heat was astroturfed from competitors rather than from actual people.

    A handful of folks probably saw how well it works in the YA market and thought that they could use it to crab bucket in the movie biz.Report

  3. InMD says:

    I think future art made in the US will probably be more reflective of an increasingly multiracial country. That’s a good thing. We are evolving as a country, it will be apparent in newer stuff, and there will be stories now that there wouldn’t have been before. Again, all positive things.

    What essays like this IMO completely miss regarding relitigating art from the past is the inherent assumption that the demographics were remotely like they are now, not to mention how things like race were understood culturally. In 1961 when the original movie was made the country was 85% white and 10% black. Mass immigration from non-European countries was still years away. Also, while understood as a different ethnicity from Anglo-Americans, I believe Peurto Ricans were at the time considered white, at least as far as official things like the census was concerned. Even now most are of primarily European ancestry, even if the way some are self-identifying has evolved.

    My point isn’t that any of this stuff is beyond reproach or that sensibilities haven’t changed. What I don’t get is the projection, as though it would ever have occurred to people 60 years ago to make art for a fundamentally different time and place than the one they live in.Report

  4. From the remake featuring a straight gang vs. an LBGTQ gang;

    “When you’re cis-het, you’re cis-het all the way …”Report

  5. Rufus F. says:

    This sounds like what I’ve been expecting of the Spielberg remake. One of the things with West Side Story is it has a pretty solid shell of boomer nostalgia encasing it at this point, so it’s *kind of* about the Puerto Rican experience in NY and *very much* about boomers seeing this musical when they were kids. We’re sort of drowning in nostalgia at this point, even when it tries to “update” the objects of nostalgia.Report

  6. From Wikipedia:

    West Side Story is a musical conceived by Jerome Robbins with music by Leonard Bernstein, lyrics by Stephen Sondheim, and a book by Arthur Laurents.

    That’s four Jewish guys, three from New York City. (Lenny was from Massachusetts.) The original film’s screenplay was written by Ernest Lehman, who was, you guessed it, a Jewish guy from New York. Any remake at all faithful to the originals is going to reflect their sensibilities, so giving it to two more Jewish guys (Kushner is from New York, Spielberg from someplace called Ohio) at least avoids schizophrenia.Report

  7. LeeEsq says:

    West Side Story is Romeo&Juliet updated for mid-20th America. Since the United States did not have Montagues and Capulets, the did it with ethnic street gangs. The original plan was to a Catholic gang and a Jewish gang. They decided not to go this way because by the mid-20th century Jews were no longer seen as a criminal underclass despite Mayer Lansky. The creators didn’t believe the audience could suspend their disbelief and imagine a gang of tough working class Jewish teenagers in late 1950s and early 1960s New York. To make Jewish gang work, they would have to set West Side Story in the 1920s at latest. Obviously, they didn’t want to do a period piece in the 1950s.Therefore, they decided to change it to Puerto Rican immigrants to the main land because it was topical and they could have a racial angle.

    The brown face is bad but Hollywood always needs a bankable star for big money productions. Natalie Wood was about as bankable as you could get. Tony’s casting the 2021 remake was also because he was the most bankable star that fit the role. InMD is right when he notes that a lot of modern woke critiques of the past seem to be deliberately missing a lot of the historical context for the sake of presentism. I suppose people always did this but their seems to be a more deliberate attempt now.Report

    • Chip Daniels in reply to LeeEsq says:

      The central premise of the original play was that the differences between the two tribes was petty and meaningless, which is what makes the deaths so tragic since they were so unnecessary.

      The obvious choice from a literary standpoint would be to have one gang be white and one gang be black but that would have required an interracial love story which was illegal in some states at the time, not to mention a shocking taboo in the rest.

      Which makes it all the more logical, but hey whattayagonna do.Report

      • LeeEsq in reply to Chip Daniels says:

        Besides being taboo, a Romeo & Juliet story between a white teenage boy and a black teenage girl would have strained everybody’s disbelief in the same way that a Jewish teenage gang would at the time. People could see Tony and Maria as a couple but not Tony and Mary at the time.Report