We Are All Journalists Now
At this point it needs to be said: We are all journalists now. We all know we cannot trust the main media outlets to report the truth.
We the People of this world, in this era of internet accessibility from darn near everywhere, with our smart phones loaded with Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Instagram, and Discord servers, have the ability to report to the world in real time what we see, whether it is a bee collecting nectar or a cop expressing blood from a human. We have immediate upload capability to Youtube, Rumble, Vimeo, Oddysee, so we can immediately upload the videos of those events, for the world as well — if we choose not to live stream as it happens.
We all know — or should know by now — that we can not trust the police “to serve and protect” the citizenry, but we sure as hell can expect them to follow orders from our elected politicians–with all the force they choose to use.
As journalists and chroniclers of our time, we need to keep our cameras focused upon all forms of law enforcement, and every politician at all times, and upload those videos regularly. We need to teach our governments that the surveillance state goes both ways. How did Governor Newsom get caught mask-less at an event in violation of his own mandate? A citizen saw it and filmed it. This is how we take back power from our bloated bureaucracies — one video at a time.
Will the governments retaliate? Most likely. Should that stop us?
“If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.”
–Thomas Jefferson
Per Statista in 2019 there were 697,195 police officers in the United States (this article does not specify if that includes Federal officers.) In comparison, the United States population for 2019 was 327,542,328 non-law enforcement citizens. That means law enforcement is only 0.002% of the total population or 470 citizens to each police officer. They can’t arrest 470 people videoing them at the same time.
Don’t be the person who says, “I don’t need to video this because look at all the other cameras here,” or “I don’t need to upload this because look at all the other cameras here.” Assume that no one else will upload the event. So what if 20 to 30 versions of the same event get posted? That is 20 to 30 different vantage points, 20 to 30 different views that may end a brute’s career or exonerate an officer who was in the right. We wouldn’t have known how George Floyd — among others — died, had no one videoed it or been brave enough to upload it.
Tips for budding video journalists:
- If possible, live stream the events so if your phone is confiscated the video is already up and live.
- Try to not curse during the recording if you have to explain details. This allows local news to use the footage and not run afoul of the Federal Communications Commission.
- Stay silent — let the events speak for themselves.
- Save your comments for text in the description box, and let the video do the work.
- If things get too tense for your comfort don’t be afraid to bail–live to record another day.
- A picture is worth a thousand words and a video can be worth a life–maybe even your own. Talking and/or trying to interact with the scene also brings attention to yourself. Yes, we have the right, and some would say the duty, to record the police; but lets face a simple fact, law enforcement does not like it when we do. So unless you like the taste of pepper spray, you’re best to video from a safe distance, stay quiet, and stay safe.
Writing is much the same as video for rules of safety. Write things in your own words. Live tweet as events happen. Live post to Facebook, or wherever you post things. It doesn’t matter if you passed English or not so long as the events get told! Can you write in a foreign language? Post in that language! That increases the number of eyeballs that actually see the events through your eyes.
We all hear about events like the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests, and what is happening in Europe, and Australia right now. That information is getting out through ordinary people recording from their balconies, or in the midst of the action as it happens.
Do you intend to enter a protest as a participant or citizen journalist? Along with your trusty smartphone you may want to invest in a bodycam as they are fairly affordable and could be useful to prove you didn’t start something if you get hauled before a judge later. Let your lawyer handle that! Speaking of lawyers, if you plan on going to the “action” consider finding one to represent you should things go wrong. Having a lawyer’s card on you can in some cases keep you from being detained longer than need be.
The issues happening in the world right now with government over-reach and government over-reaction can be stopped without escalating things further if we act now, and if we expose things to the world as they happen. We can bring this peacefully to an end, but we all need to act, we all need to report. And when it comes time to elect our government officials, we all need to remember who has been there, and vote them out. We didn’t get where we are today in an instant; we got here because of apathy and a duopoly of power convincing us that they were they only choice. Use your social media to hold politicians accountable as well as law enforcement. You remember an article about Sen. John Doe where he did something naughty from three years ago? Share it. Politicians do this to each other all the time, so why leave all the fun to them and their operatives? We can do it too. Politicians have turned public service into a life long career. It is up to us to bring in new faces and new ideas and holding them accountable, preferably on video, is how we can do it.
“Politicians are like diapers, they need to be changed often, and for the same reasons.”
-Mark Twain
Memory cards are good, but authorities shouldn’t be trusted to preserve evidence they don’t like. Spend a bit more and get the bodycam that has Bluetooth or Wifi so it can stream the video through your phone to the cloud.Report
Some states have laws to restrict filming, at least with audio. I seems to recall my state views audio recording (in pair with video or not) as a violation. I’s suggest folks get familiar with those restrictions.Report
I think I just saw a video of Austrlian police shooting (rubber?) bullets at retreating protestors.
So, good points about filming.
However, one of the things I’m noting in this post-journalism world is that I’m not sure what the video I just saw was about… Just now? Last week? Once upon a time at a different protest not about Covid? I don’t know or trust the source… videos come out all the time and are edited… not to mention deep-fakes (which I think will feature prominently in upcoming elections)… but then who are the curators and who’s curating the curators?
What if the next Reichstag fire is a fake video? Or a consortium of fake videos?
Not exactly gainsaying filming things… but I’ve also seen things on video that weren’t entirely what the video led us to believe.Report
I love this comment.
I wonder if there isn’t someone or ones out there who would even go so far as to make a good deep fake video, put it out there, and make sure it gets exposed, which in turn is meant to cast doubt on video sourcing.
I mean, wow, I read that sentence and even I think I’m conspiracy-theorizing. And yet, this is the exact strategy of “information warfare”.Report
I hear you… took me a while to figure this Trump Deep fake out… but I work for a silicon valley company… so, I haz the skills.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iC1-FOwDtV0Report
When the Capitol Hill Occupied Protest originally started, Raz the Warlord quickly established himself as the local peacekeeper.
One of the first altercations recorded was him keeping law and order but being filmed doing it, and immediately turning to the people filming him and turning that into an altercation as well.
The more people filming the better.Report
Sure, you can read the New York Times if you want, they get lucky sometimes.
But if you want the straight dope, check out JGoebbels1488 on YouTube.
He exposes the real truth the (((globalists))) don’t want you to know.Report
Trust official sources that have official relationships with officials.Report
That’s kind of my point.
Judith Miller has a known bias and a known degree of credibility. So people can approach her writing with a reasonable degree of skepticism.
Citizen Journalist is as often a lunatic or foreign agent as they are a credible source and very rarely is there any way to peirce the veil of anonymity to assess their credibility.
There is no such thing as a perfectly credible source. But some are more credible than others.Report
The answer to this and to Rufus below is to assess the media. Or, rather, each medium.
There is a pattern that when people stop uncritically trusting the mainstream media, they start uncritically trusting the fringe media. This is the force behind modern conspiracy thinking. There’s a reason why the most violent acts are usually performed by the people I think of as “leftorightists”, who are willing to die for a set of impossibly contradictory beliefs. They haven’t bought into an extremist position, they’ve bought into the principle of extremism. I think Chip and I would at least agree that uncritical consumption of extremist media is dangerous.
I know I’ve said this a lot, but the crucial skill of our time isn’t obtaining information, but accurately filtering it. We’ve got to be assessing the quality of our news outlets all the time, especially the stuff on our own sides, because that’s what we’re most familiar with. We need to call out the nonsense and discourage (or at least stop encouraging) others from consuming it.Report
I agree with all of this.Report
I agree with chip on agreeing with this. We have a giant fire hose of info and data. Our key needed skill is processing all that into something useful.Report
Two new curriculum for middle and high schoolers (gotta start young, but not too young):
1) Probability and Statistics (not just the algebra, but extracting context and meaning from it).
2) Assessing authority, as in assessing who is saying what and how much authority on the ‘what’ we should give them. Include stuff like determining consensus, Gell-Mann amnesia, Dunning Kruger effect, and all the knock off effects (like uncritically giving authority of topic B to an expert of topic A, just because they are an expert on A).
And to kick one my horses, when it comes to trusting authority, it is imperative that when authority is caught out lying, regardless of how or why, the individual needs to visibly suffer consequences, or trust erodes.Report
“Rank sets your pay, Authority gets things done, Accountability is what you pay for both” a wise old Chief told me once a long time ago…Report
Yep.
Everybody wants the rank and authority, nobody wants to pay the accountability…Report
And start teaching critical thinking and logic. It’s not hard to tease out biases in reporting when you’ve watched enough of it it and know more about the topic matter than the “journalist”.Report
Logic & CT are pre-reqs to assessing authority.Report
the problem with teaching people to think is that sometimes they think wrong thoughtsReport
Let’s see who opposes it when someone tries to do it.Report
Assessing authority can go very badly when not done correctly:
https://www.sbsun.com/2014/05/04/exclusive-rialto-unified-defends-writing-assignment-on-confirming-or-denying-holocaust/Report
Note my mention regarding what constitutes consensus…
Also, lots of adults truly such at assessing authority. See also: TrumpReport
There’s a discussion happening in academics about this, but it seems like everyone outside the field, and a lot of people in it, don’t understand it.
The traditional coursework has gone from basic mathematics, through algebra and geometry, and toward calculus. But that was originally the path for students in what we now call STEM. Students who weren’t bound for college science degrees wouldn’t have those requirements.
(It’s funny to think about, but even within my lifetime the role of statistics has changed. Even biology was considered a very soft science in my youth, a collection of information rather than a discipline.)
So, the question being asked today is whether non-STEM elementary and secondary kids should follow the sequence of courses which heads toward calculus. A different approach would have less pre-calc and highlight more practical stats. But this idea gets tied into the general lowering of standards (and sometimes, not unfairly). And it can encourage pushing even younger students onto tracks. It’s a really interesting area of potential reform.Report
You can do basic stats without an algebra class. You get more out of stats with an understanding of algebra, but you can get a functional understanding with arithmetic.
The trick is making sure that the students don’t assume they have the deeper understanding without the higher level math.Report
Actually, you could apply that thought on a macro level. A better understanding of stats might help a lot of fields to realize that their statistics are only providing the illusion of scientific rigor, like poets walking around in lab coats.Report
I don’t necessarily think the kind of critical thinking discussed has to come in a math class context. I still think there’s some great critical-thinking-for-laypersons out there from Carl Sagan. At the very least it gives quick tricks to spot the kind of weak and lazy thinking that seems to permeate a lot of journalism.Report
Agreed. I didn’t really talk about the critical thinking side of things. That might actually be more messed up than the math and stats side. These days the authenticity of lived experience is winning out over whiteness expressed in the form of objectivity.Report
This is all good advice and it gets me thinking about the idea that we cannot trust the media.
I think there’s a way of coming up with a rule of thumb that’s a bit along on the lines of saying more that we can’t trust the media out of hand. In the same way we generally agree it’s good to get a second opinion for a medical diagnosis. I feel like just trusting the media out of hand is an obviously bad idea, but so is the sort of knee-jerk “the media always lies” position that some people take- which is NOT how I read the OP for the record- where it becomes what they call a “thought-terminating cliché.”
Maybe “question the media”?Report
As a rule the mainstream media rarely tell outright lies. What they often do is fail to properly contextualize the true facts that they do report, presenting a carefully curated set of cherry-picked a anecdotes and statistics that give a wildly inaccurate view of the bigger picture.
In a sense, it’s worse than lying. Lies can be fact-checked. You can say that this factoid that the NYT reported just isn’t true, and here’s the proof. False narratives constructed out of true facts can’t be debunked so easily.Report
To be clear, I don’t think they’re intentionally dishonest. I just don’t think they’re smart enough to do better.Report
I’d agree with you 20 or even 10 years ago. Now, no. Not saying it’s coordinated though.Report
That’s interesting. Reminds me of a recent article by a guy who wrote another book on a topic Bob Woodward had covered, and he said pretty much the same thing- Woodward got everyone’s quotes basically right, but it was like he didn’t understand the context or import of any of them, so he consistently misunderstood what people were saying.Report