Not Talking About My Generation
So the Boomers are wagging fingers on Fox News at the Gen Xers, who are Facebooking about how they could care less about the Millennials, who are Tweeting and meme’ing the Zoomers, who are mocking all of them on TikTok. Which means, of course, this is a good trench in which to fight out the culture wars, or something.
Fox News correspondent Gillian Turner: “Cancel culture is spreading like wildfire. There is a call for Generation X to lead the charge to save America from the social media mob. Can they do it?” pic.twitter.com/zxmxkppQ3i
— Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona) March 15, 2021
Oh. Good. Hell. God, am I sick of this nonsense.
Let us set aside the highly questionable outrage du jour of “cancel culture” that others have been and probably will be debating for the foreseeable future. Let us focus on the labeling, racking and stacking of generational cohort labels against each other.
Forgive me for shallow analysis here but it is made-up stupidity and to make it into cultural battle lines, even more pointless.
“A lot of demographers will tell you that we like to work with cohorts, as opposed to generations,” he explained. “We’re always looking for … demographic patterns: Marriage, fertility, family formation, those types of things.” The Baby Boomers were themselves a cohort: a group that shared a certain set of demographic characteristics. Generation X doesn’t.
In its work, the Pew Research Center uses generational boundaries like “Millennial” (which it defines as those born between 1981 and 2000, a somewhat early end point compared to others). “They are somewhat arbitrary,” said Kim Parker, director of social trends research at Pew, of the generational descriptors. But generations as a concept can be “a worthwhile tool for storytelling, taking a lot of data and trying to put it into an interesting prism that speaks to people.”
She acknowledges that this can yield a negative result. “A lot of times, people are frustrated. They think, ‘I’m not a Millennial! I don’t feel those same things in the way that you’re generalizing.’ That’s one of the shortcomings.” Parker has advice for those who are on the bubble between two identifications. “Pick the younger generation, of course!” she said. She also pointed out that there is “real bleeding across lines” in terms of what makes a “generation” unique. So, if you feel like a Millennial, say you’re a Millennial, who cares. (Here, take Pew’s “How Millennial are you?” quiz.) Generations are like “Whose Line is it Anyway?”: The boundaries are made up and the labels don’t matter.
Except. Every so often, there’s a generation, like the Boomers, that hangs together as a distinct demographic cohort. And maybe, just maybe, the Millennials will eventually be determined to have met that standard.
“Right now, we’re in a kind of a unique period where young adults are undergoing some rapid demographic changes,” PRB’s Mather said. “They’re getting married much later; fertility rates are dropping. If some of those changes become long-term, I can see that today’s young adults might fall into some new cohort that we can define based on their unique characteristics.”
In other words, and in a rather apropos bit of irony, trying to apply the standards of the rather unique generation we call Boomers to everything is mucking up the works describing the generations which followed. “A worthwhile tool for storytelling, taking a lot of data and trying to put it into an interesting prism” isn’t science; it is branding. While there can be applications for that, it can also be a false label to easily identify not-easy-to-explain things.
The Boomers have a uniformity to them because they came from a much different world. Post-WW2 America was a unique time period perhaps unmatched in human history in economic growth and general prosperity. The real lines of generational shift of the last 40 years or so, encompassing the much-discussed and oft-derided Millennials, is not dates on a calendar but technology. Growing up pre-and post internet is not growing up pre-and-post smart phone is not growing up pre-and-current social media age. Just those three overlapping developments will have societal implications far beyond dates, or traditional generational markers, as will whatever the next big technological innovation is.
Admittedly, I’m grumpy and biased on this issue. I don’t really fit into any of these nice, neat categories. My parents are Boomers but waited until rather late in life to have me, which generationally gapped me from the same generation in my family, sometimes by 10 or even 20 years. My oldest first cousin on my mom’s side, grandchild number 1 as we rank my generation in our clan, was only 4 years younger than my mother who, by the by, birthed the youngest grandchild, me, number 19. As either the youngest Generation X or oldest Millennial, depending on which number you are using, it’s hard to tell if I fit either. I grew up rural, and in West Virginia, and in a rather traditional home, so I was probably culturally behind even further than that. I graduated high school when the internet was still primarily something done in the computer lab at school. I was too immature for college so after working for a while I enlisted active duty and found my path that way. I was already a father by the time smart phones came out. I didn’t have a social media account of any kind until age 36. I did college piecemeal over many years using my benefits and GI Bill. In short, there isn’t a neat, clean column that I would slide into for the purposes of “making a lot of data and trying to put it into an interesting prism” like the demo-gods would like.
But I am also being too harsh, probably. There needs to be some kind of sloganeering for this type of information. There isn’t anything inherently wrong with trying to have “a worthwhile tool for storytelling” to present your science. The problem comes when the storytelling becomes the be all, end all some folks are looking for. The world is smaller, time moves faster, culture is progressing. Or that is what we tell ourselves, anyway. Certainly, the old standards of 40-year generations probably won’t apply now or in the future. But the least we can do is maybe not use such a broad brush in trying to make large, diverse groups of folks fit into convenient soundbites any more than we have too. Doing so is like looking through the wrong end of a telescope, distorting your perception of the world as it really is. Worse, it will distort your impression of people, limiting your ability to discern things as they really are rather than as the preconceived notion of a demographic cohort.
Part of the problem on a practical level here is whatever cohort you are trying to categorize isn’t static. The trend for the last few generational labels is to make a huge deal of them as teens and young adults, then as they age up move to the next group of teens and young adults and fret over them, since most of the writing and media coverage of that demographic is directed at older folks fretting over such things. But they don’t stay teenagers and young adults. They grow up. They have relationships. They have careers. Some of them have children and families. Some of them do not. Some succeed. Some do not. The cohort that fit a study at 20 will not neatly fit those same criteria at 40, or 60, or 80.
As much fun as it is to bash the American Boomers, consider the arc they are currently nearing the end of. Growing up in economic boom of post-WW2 world, coming of age in 60s chaos and 70s malaise, raising children in the 80s and 90s, and then watching the world change rapidly through events like 9/11 and technological advances that have revolutionized every aspect of everyday life. As much as Generation X likes to joke they had to develop as people dealing with Boomers, it is probably only fair to point out thathaving to raise Generation X probably affected how Boomers became how they are as well. As for Millennials and Zoomers and whatever will be coming next, this song and dance will continue with slightly different lyrics, a little different sound, but the same familiar drumbeat of “what’s wrong with those darn kids” by the olds even long after they cease to be kids. Those now entering adulthood had completely different experiences with colleges that are multitudes more expensive, careers that didn’t even exist for their parents coming up, and a technology-driven society that has shrunk the world while making the individual worldwide from the palm of their hand at the same time.
Yes, it is hard to not just lump folks into easy to define categories. Do it the hard way, the right way, and be a better participant in the discourse for it. The kids are alright, as soon as you admit they aren’t really kids anymore. You just have to act like an adult about it.
Speaking as someone on the older side of Gen-X, I’ll say this: I totally support the Millennials and Zoomers. You guys are awesome. Your TikTok vids are funny. It’s okay to make fun of us olds. We can be kinda grumpy sometimes.
That said, obviously we should judge people according to their character, not their age, but I’m sure the younger crowd knows that.Report
I would comment, but your generation is censoring so much it’s not worth it.Report
There’s much to be said for shared experiences.
My cohort remembers watching The Day After on television (or our parents watching it) and being terrified of Nuclear War. We saw War Games in the theater. We saw music videos on MTV. We don’t really remember Vietnam but we remember all of the Vietnam movies and rented most of them from Blockbuster.
And now we have conversations with full-grown adults who don’t remember 9/11. Kids old enough to drive don’t remember the debates over Iraq.
And they look at us and make cultural references that sail over our heads. “That was a BTS song.” “Backstreet Boys?”
The only thing we can do is run up to them and say “I HEARD A NEW SONG WAIT WATCH ME WIMP WATCH ME NAY NAY!!!!” and start dancing.
“Have you heard of the floss dance? I’ve been working on it.”Report
The Boomers — full disclosure, I am one — spent most of their formative years with only three television networks; most remember B&W TV; music was largely limited to records and AM radio (until you went to college and discovered FM). While I had at least fingers in delivering the underpinning technology for today’s communication tech, I’ve been a very limited adopter of it. My kids, and now my granddaughters, live in a very different world because of that.
OT, but I feel mildly embarrassed every time fillyjonk and other teachers complain about the online class technology. 25+ years ago when I did a prototype internet seminar system, I really thought that by now such systems would be “casually” good. That is, having it online rather than in-person wouldn’t be that big a deal.Report
Report
Generational generalizations are lazy and almost always poor. There is so little you can know about someone just based on their birth cohort. You kids stop doing them. You aren’t explaining anything.Report
I tend to find more in common based upon where I grew up than when. I could be at a crowded party where I don’t know many people, and if there is someone who grew up in the Mid West there, we will be drawn towards each other like magnets.Report
Insert standard list of Xennial grievances here.Report
Typical.Report
I agree in part and dissent in part. I think there are shared cultural, social, and technological experiences that can bind a cohort but the cohort should be a much smaller age range. The Boomers are officially anyone born between 1946-1965. This is an absurdly large group. My parents were born in 1946 and 1947 and are boomers. Kevin Drum was born in 1959 and is also considered a boomer. Putting them in the same generation is absurd because when my parents graduated from college in 1968, the Vietnam War was a very real thing and so was the draft. Kevin Drum missed this easily.
Gen X is somewhat better as a group because it has fewer historical events that can serve as stark contrasts like the Civil Rights Movement and the Vietnam War. What binds Gen X together whether it is an early Gen Xer like my older brother or me is an ability to remember functioning in the pre-Internet world. Though I know people born my age who hate being tagged as part of older Gen X and prefer Xennial or Millennial for reasons I find obscure and probably mainly deal with issues related to older siblings.Report
I actually think the analog/digital childhood is the better dividing line than the weird early 80s split, understanding of course that it will always be somewhat arbitrary.Report
I think what divides older Gen x, which I basically see as being in your twenties during the 1990s, and late Gen X, roughly that your twenties was during Bush II and the first half of Obama’s 1st term, is that older Gen X seems to have bummed around more during their early twenties before getting professional level jobs or going back to school. Late Gen X seems to have been very career focused from the bat. This is mainly because city living was still cheap when early Gen X was in their twenties, so you could pay rent by things like bar tending or bike messaging. The bum around experience seems a lot less in late Gen X.
The Real World, Singles, Reality Bites, and Friends gave me a severely misguided idea of what my twenties would be like.
A pithier way to put it is that late Gen X thinks that Ben Stiller’s character in Reality Bites was the more responsible adult while early Gen X sympathized more with Ethan Hawke and Wiona Ryder’s characters.Report
A pithier way to put it is that late Gen X thinks that Ben Stiller’s character in Reality Bites was the more responsible adult while early Gen X sympathized more with Ethan Hawke and Wiona Ryder’s characters.
Mots justes.Report
Agree on giving the Boomers too many years. Later Boomers missed Vietnam and hippies as social influences, just for example.Report
The youngest boomers were wondering what they were going to get for their birthdays and learning how to read and write while the older boomers were fighting in Vietnam, protesting in the United States, or just dealing with the expanded freedoms of the late 1960s.Report
One of the laziest parts of generational cohort identification is how it is so parochial about what experiences are being shared.
I recall seeing the movie Cooley High, a 1975 movies about a group of young black high schoolers in 1964 Chicago. I only saw the blurb, that it was about teenagers in the early 60s and just assumed blithely that it would have a soundtrack filled with Beatles and Stones music.
Of course…there was none of that. The soundtrack was what black kids in the early 60s were listening to- Motown, soul, R&B.
Because…what the white Boomers were sharing and experiencing in 1964 was different than what other Boomers were sharing.
We could do the same for any other age cohort, and show that the differences within the cohort are larger than the differences between them.
Look at any Trump rally, and see all the Woodstock generation shaking their fists at these kids today.
Except- the Woodstock generation only was shared by some; For every Boomer hippie placing a daisy in a rifle barrel, there was a Boomer National Guardsman holding the rifle.Report
I’m whitish by American standards but growing up to Democratic parents in a Democratic stronghold certainly seems to have given me a very different childhood than many Americans born between 78 and 82. Like I recently learned that there was a big moral panic over one of the cartoons I watched as kid, Thunder Cats, because parents thought it would lead children away from Christianity to Eastern Mysticism (TM). The parents in my suburb might have eye-rolled at what we 80s kids watched but nobody thought they were Satanic or were going to lure us away from Judaism.
Kids of my generation raised in more conservative parts of the country seemed to have received more active anti-drug propaganda than kids in my area did. I do not remember anybody from DARE coming and doing an anti-drug presentation during elementary school. My parents would have personally rolled their eyes at a lot of the war on drugs propaganda.Report
I got the drugs propaganda is grade school. A cop came into school and warned us about drugs. It was really weird. Honestly, it made drugs seem strangely attractive, in a dark sort of way.Report
We had a whole series of them for months on end, including into middle school. Everyone had several D.A.R.E. t-shirts before it was over. I am also pretty sure it had the complete opposite effect in that it made drugs more interesting and alluring at a formative age. In fact, back when I bought my first bo- eh nevermind.Report
These were entirely absent from my elementary school experience. The only time we had a cop come over was to teach us about bike and road safety. He told us about how even though we felt really free with our bikes, we will know what freedom is really like when we learn how to drive.Report
My Southern Californian high school days (’74-’78) was like something out of Dazed and Confused, or That 70’s Show, where students could legally smoke in designated areas and the theater club showed Reefer Madness at lunchtime and drugs were the stuff of jokes.
Which is to say, my Late Boomer age cohort experienced a very different life than my older Early Boomer siblings who regaled me with dark stories of parochial school nuns and Hippie Era culture clash.
Which is also why I am pessimistic about the whole “Arc of the Universe” theory, that bends inevitably towards liberalism and justice.
The cohort that came after me experienced an environment that was in some ways much more restrictive and prudish than I did.Report
Related:
Utah campaign against porn marches on with phone filter plan
Conservative lawmakers in Utah have fired another salvo in their longtime campaign against online porn with a new requirement that all cellphones and tablets sold in the state automatically block pornography in a plan that critics call a significant intrusion on free speech.
https://apnews.com/article/utah-campaign-against-porn-phone-filter-plan-d2f3911b7887f2f145918d1718bf2504
Is this a last ditch rearguard action? Or the opening wedge of an American version of the Taliban?
I don’t know. But there are plenty of nations around the world which have moved from free to unfree, liberal to illiberal, secular to rigidly religious.Report
Rural Canada in the late the 90’s was the most boring High School experience one can conceive of I think. When the computer with the internet showed up in the library it was like the sky cracked open.
Holy agnostic fishing God(ess?) if I knew then what I know now.Report
Report