Forty-six and Two Ahead of Me
Joe Biden is going to be the 46th president of the United States of America.
There is yet to be some wailing and gnashing of teeth, to say nothing of our current president’s full reaction to the events of the last five days, but Joe Biden will be our 46th president. He will be the 8th president of my lifetime. He will be the oldest ever sworn into office. He will be paired with the first woman — and woman of color — to serve as Vice President. Even with a few results left to sort out, he will attempt to govern with a thinner-than-expected majority in the House of Representatives, and probably Mitch McConnell still holding a slight majority in the Senate 1. President-Elect Biden will have risen to the highest office in the land on his third try, having garnered more votes than anyone ever has, with the president he defeated being second on that list of most votes ever for the White House. The country, while processing all these things, remains divided in many ways. Donald Trump has 70-odd days left in his presidency, then Joe Biden will have four years to see what he does from behind the Resolute Desk.
So, now what?
Already, the speculation of the political sphere has moved to the normal things like agenda, cabinet appointments, possible executive orders, and other matters. The run-offs in Georgia for two senate seats will see attention and money pour into the state through the first week of 2021 that turned out to be pivotal to the 2020 campaign. Then there is the postmortem to try and divine what it all meant, not just in facts but for the already started 2022 midterm elections now underway even while the celebrating and mourning of 2020 continues.
Two years. That’s all the respite we get. And not even that long, in all practicality. With President-Elect Biden already having promised more “on day one” items than he could possibly do on day one, the pressure will be on to make an immediate impact. If he goes the executive order route, the court cases over them will commence immediately as will howls from his opponents and counter-cries of hypocrisy from his supporters. With his vast experience in congress, and as being the legislative point man during the Obama White House, Biden’s natural default to work through and with congress will be tested. Assuming he is still Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell will be a familiar face across the negotiating table, and under normal circumstances someone you’d think could work with known dealer Joe Biden, but who knows now. Mitch will be looking hold the line as the highest elected Republican in the land, trying to balance returning the party from the parts of Trumpism he detested but couldn’t do much about and reveling in the fully stocked judiciary he methodically loaded with conservative jurists for the last four years. With the majority, he will also be leveraging cabinet and other federal appointments. Thoughts of controversial figures like Susan Rice joining the administration probably ends with the Georgia races staying R. Meanwhile, Speaker Nancy Pelosi saw her majority shrink, and it may shrink some more as some races are yet to be sorted out, while having the usual dissent between factions in her caucus. While no doubt relieved to see old friend Biden at the helm, the same logjam of trying to get things through the senate will become harder than ever.
As for the current president, who knows how the next 70 some days go. While the left and Never Trump might still fantasize about 45 being physically dragged out of the White House to make room for 46, that isn’t going to happen. We are probably in for some epic stages of grief and a flurry of legal challenges, but Donald Trump will go come January. He won’t be forgotten, though, as anyone who pulls 70+ million votes for president — and very ready to claim a “stolen election” whether there is proof or not — isn’t likely to go quietly into the good night. Rumors of a post-president Trump run the gamut from running again in 2024 to launching his own “Trump TV” news network to returning to business and reality TV. Whatever he does, the running decorum and brotherhood of the ex-presidents’ club is not likely to be his jam, or their’s for that matter, and Donald Trump will no doubt be blazing his own trail as 45 moves into history and 46 takes his place. Two years to the midterms. Four years to contest for who will be 47, or if 46 will stick around, or what 45 might do, or who knows what might happen.
But what about between now and then?
President-Elect Biden’s big takeaway quote of his victory speech was “Let this grim era of demonization in America begin to end, here and now,” and I hope that is the case. I have my doubts. Whether it is bitter Trump supporters, the crazy makers who destroy things using current events as an excuse, or those looking to create lists of targets for retribution, plenty of folks aren’t interested in that idea. I suspect many others won’t make it past the first flurry of executive orders a President Biden might issue right off the bat. Surely such hot button issues like immigration and climate change will start to fall in the long-established trenches of partisan warfare once again. We have nearly 50 years of Joe Biden governance to draw opinions on, and such an informed opinion means we should not be too surprised at what is coming from such a well-established politician. We can guess and presume at most of what’s coming.
But you cannot react on what might be, only what is, so for now everyone should wait and see. What I hope and pray for and what I think will happen is not usually the same thing. Especially in politics. I don’t think Joe Biden’s statement of optimism and offer of an olive branch lasts very long in practical governance in a partisan environment and crisis at hand. I hope I’m wrong about that. Most of all, I know that just changing presidents will not magically fix many of the deepest wounds of the country nor the most broken machinations of government. I hope folks take this time to understand that things like Trump do not happen in a vacuum; there is a before that caused it, a during that enabled it, and an after to be reckoned with. We need to understand the first two as much as possible for the next time it might happen, whether Trump really does try to make a comeback or — more likely — the 2024 GOP candidates try to assimilated the electoral success of Trumpism without becoming fully MAGABorg themselves or suffering the same fate. I think President Trump might make this difficult on everyone not just in the near term as a lame duck, but as a very loud, very public aggravator after he leaves office. I hope he surprises me. I hope Joe Biden surprises me as well. But I think, and fear, that having won the White House by being himself, being himself might not be enough with the forces being brought to bear both by circumstances and the politics of the day. Forces from inside and outside his party. Forces not just political, but those that are always scheming against the leadership of our nation regardless who it might be to try and bring down the country and it’s president.
So we wait, hopeful for things not yet to be, hoping for the best but preparing for the worst, hoping that we all are still here to talk about the 47th president of the United States of America. After all, if Joe Biden can be elected President of the United States of America to replace President Donald Trump, we should know by now that when it comes to American politics, anything can happen.
And will.
70 some days to 46. Two years until the midterms. Four years before we do it all again.
This is a commentReport
Ce n’est pas un commentaire.Report
Is that a Tool reference in the title? That’s awesome.Report
It isReport
I remember when GW Bush was President elect, and Democrats said we had to wait on the recounts and court cases, and all we heard about was chads. Good times.
Thankfully, the BBC wrote a 2016 article called Vote Rigging: How to Spot the Tell Tale Signs.
Check.
Check.
I wish we could do that here. Check.
Check.
You think Democrats would at least be more subtle about rigging an election than Gabon, but sadly, that is not the case.Report
Must be a pretty neat trick For Democrats to do in all those places where Republicans control the election apparatus. With that kind of omnipotence, one wonders why they even bother seeking control of government.Report
And where would those places be? The fraud occurs in Blue cities. Wisconsin and Michigan have been eaten up with it for years, all coming from Detroit, Milwaukee, and Madison. And Philly and Atlanta are likewise always trouble.
Wisconsin’s Secretary of State is a Democrat who can’t be removed. He’s been in that office continuously since 1983. Wisconsin’s AG is a Democrat. Wisconsin’s Governor is a Democrat.
Michigan’s Secretary of State is a Democrat. Michigan’s AG is a Democrat. Michigan’s governor is a totalitarian Democrat.
Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State is a hyper-partisan Democrat. Pennsylvania’s AG is a Democrat. Pennsylvania’s governor is a Democrat.
Arizona’s Secretary of State is a Democrat. They do have Republicans in the other two positions, who may have to step if they can.
In Georgia, the problems are in a few counties that make up Atlanta. Atlanta’s last Republican mayor was born during the War of 1812.Report
I mean, why hold the election cheating to just the places that somehow happened to wait until the very end? Shit, I’d have cheated in Texas, New York, Ohio, Iowa! All those states along the Mississippi and Missouri, plenty of electors in there and plenty of tiny towns that still vote by stapling their ballots to cows, easy to knock over the vote truck and turn the county blue.Report
I’m more than happy enough to give Biden a chance. Good luck, Prez!
But I couldn’t help but notice how many criticisms of Trump over the last 4 years were aesthetic in nature.
And most of the praise I’m seeing Biden get seems to be aesthetic in nature.
Good luck, Prez.Report
Jaybird complaining about aesthically-based political criticism? Jaybird?Report
Not complaining. See it as “noticing”.
There’s nothing wrong with having aesthetic preferences.
Some might say that having them is a good way to signal sophistication!Report
Aesthetics preferences or an aesthetic orientation? There’s a difference, and not merely an aesthetic one.Report
Oh, I wouldn’t know how to measure that.
Not in any way that didn’t look like I was making a moral judgment in my own favor, anyway.Report
Replacing independent IGs with lackeys.
Replacing the FBI head for not being a lackey.
A plan to reintroduce the spoils system.
Politicizing the CVC to interfere with anti- COVID measures.
Pardoning miscreants like Arpaio and Gallagher.
Running a trillion-dollar deficit at full employment.
Nepotism.
Corruption.
But he gets a pass on all of this if people also note that he’s boorish.Report
There’s certainly no shortage of bad things that this obese orange buffoon did! The fatty was corrupt as hell! His disgusting face was plastered on the anti-Covid thing and his tiny hands signed the papers that politicized a freaking GLOBAL PANDEMIC.
I’m pleased as punch that we can go out into the streets and dance and cheer with the crowd that this Nazi is finally gone. Drink up!Report
“But I couldn’t help but notice how many criticisms of Trump over the last 4 years were aesthetic in nature.”
Obama was criticized by conservatives – here at this very site! – for how often he used the word “I” in his speeches (I noticed).Report
Those criticisms struck me as less damning than, say, criticisms for appealing to the AUMF every time we bombed a new country.
But, yes. There were a lot of aesthetic criticisms of Obama too. Terrorist fist bumps! Tan suits!Report
The Aesthetics of the War on Terror.Report
Anti anti T’s talked about the aesthetic criticisms to ignore the substantive complaints.Report
“I can’t believe that Trump is putting *CHILDREN* in *CAGES*!!!” (holds up picture from 2015)Report
“I can’t believe the Trump administration kidnapped thousands of kids from legal asylum seeking parents for the express purpose of permanently separating them!”Report
Yep, an awful horrible practice that could have been ended with a phone call on his part.
I look forward to seeing what happens when Biden reverses the policy and puts his back into family reintegration. Heck, they can make a big deal out of tearing down the wall! “There wasn’t more for us to tear down. He didn’t build much.” There, that’s a soundbite for ya.Report
“Yep, an awful horrible practice that could have been ended with a phone call on his part.”
Why would he end a policy he wanted implemented?Report
True enough. It was *HIS* policy that the DHS was enforcing and neither judges nor legislation could keep them from enforcing it.
There was a small grassroots movement to try to get github to stop working with the DHS. It didn’t go anywhere.
I’m honestly curious as to what will happen now that Trump is gone.
Maybe we can go back to how we did things under Obama.Report
I see the President as occupying a place of profound cultural influence and it seems like some of the things you identify as “aesthetic criticism” of Trump (or Obama before him or Biden after him) are more profound than that, in my estimation.
Criticizing Obama’s tan suit or Trump’s obesity is surely aestheic. Their responses to national tragedies like mass shootings or violence at political protests goes beyond that. It’s not insignificant thst Trump declined to attend the Kennedy Center Honors, for instance, or that he chose to stand in commemoration of Ruth Bader Ginsburg when she lay in state. I disapprove of the first and approve of the second, but these were cultural rather than governmental acts by him.
The extent of comment should be understood as “the line between an aestetic preference and a cultural cue is blurry but also important.” I don’t purport to know how to define that boundary, only that the President’s role as cultural leader is important.Report
As someone on Twitter pointed out, though…if you go back and listen to all the old liberal protest-song stuff about GWB, it actually lands even more squarely on Trump, who really does act like that. Like you could re-release “American Idiot” today and not change a note and it would work even better than it did back then…Report
What we don’t know is how much Trump was sui generis. I think he was a unique force. I’ve said it before but he does have the kind of dark charisma that I would associate with an especially nefarious carnival barker and he is a good salesmen in many ways. If he wasn’t born into a real estate empire, he would have been the best used car salesmen somewhere (well probably Long Island). I think a lot of Trump’s appeal was not what he said but how he presented and packaged. Mitt Romney tried to be hardline on immigration but no one really believed him because Mitt Romney is the central casting version of County Club patrician Republican.
On the other hand, no one would ever confuse Trump as a moral scold and despite the fact that Evangelicals glomped onto him, I think he also attracted a lot of guys with right-wing politics who are turned off by the primness of the Evangelicals. These are guys who are right-wing and also like to party hard and loud. They liked that Trump was a brash vulgar “rich guy” “billionaire” who was on the cover of Playboy, on Reality TV, and wrestling. These are guys who watch the version of Scarface with Al Pacino and take away all the wrong lessons.
I don’t know who else is in the wings to take over this position. Tom Cotton? He is an dweeb without charisma. Josh Hawley? Same. Plus both come across as moral scolds and not really party hard kind of guys. I don’t see the Bugaloo Boys getting excited about either. Or voters who liked Trump because of the machismo.
The Evangelicals are still part of a long and maybe not so slow anymore decline in power and prestige. Ther are still tens of millions of them but a lot of people under 40 are not going back to religion, even when they have kids. Plus glomping onto Trump caused them to lose whatever remaining shreds of good faith, the broader left was willing to give them. I don’t see how they recover.
On my side, it is unclear whether people will remain animated without Trump around. We also need to deal with the damn Senate and Electoral College which gives a good advantage to the GOP. States like Ohio and Iowa are getting older, whiter, and redder. There are more states like this than Democratic firewalls.Report
I really see Dan Crenshaw as the best bet for the Republican in 2024. He is yonng, a veteran, the eye patch comes him a certain mystique, and isn’t a moral scold from what I know. People on LGM says he comes across as a villain in a direct to video sequel of a summer blockbuster but I’m not seeing it. His SNL appearance shows he plays will to a normal crowd to me. Another guess would be to go for Ivanka because she has a certain amount of glamour and is a Trump.Report
It’s been said by others that the Republican Party is a cult looking for a leader, and I think that’s accurate.
They are organized primarily around cultural identity and grievances which can never be satisfied, much less negotiated with.
Its tempting to say that they are the party opposed to science and reason, but that sort of misses the mark.
A good comparison would be that they are similar in spirit to the Islamic fundamentalists.
American often think the Islamists are simply backwards primitives living in caves, but that is entirely wrong. They embrace science and rational thought, and are perfectly comfortable with modern technology .
But their view on human relationships, or how society ought to operate, rejects the Enlightenment entirely.
For the fundamentalists, there is a naturally occurring Rightful Order to the universe and any order that doesn’t comport with that is flawed and illegitimate.
Racism and misogyny are examples of this thinking. They are the poor man’s aristocracy, where any person no matter how mediocre or lacking in accomplishment, is granted superiority by virtue of their pink penis.
There are millions of Americans hungry for such a societal order, and even if this leader falls, they will find, or even just construct, another.Report
I sort of feel like I got Christmas early. Trump is gone. But the GOP Senate will keep Biden from getting too crazy. but the majority is slim enough that he can probably pick off the occasional RINO to get some stuff done. Drugs legalized in Oregon. Pot legalized elsewhere.
What is this strange thing I’m feeling? Is that what happy is like?Report
We may have 50 years of Biden’s record to judge by, but it’s worth noting that nearly everything he did in that time was toeing the party line. You can’t really call him an idea man. Maybe his first independent move was choosing a VP nominee, and he followed the racism and sexism of his party. He even speaks of himself as a transitional figure. Now, I’m sure there’s bound to be a rush of power the first time he realizes that everyone in the room has to say “yes, Mr. President”, but even so, I don’t see him being a leader.
Democrats see the world in three categories: the progressive Democrats, the moderate Democrats, and the reactionaries. They see the first group as where the world will be in 20 years, the second as where it is now, and the third group as representing caveman times through the 1950’s. Biden is likely to try to balance the AOC’s and Pelosi’s. That’ll mean pivoting between the left and the hardcore left, because thanks to the Big Sort, there aren’t many Democratic centrists.Report
The main tension that I am seeing now is between the “FINALLY! A *REAL* PRESIDENT!!! NOW THINGS CAN GO BACK TO NORMAL!!! WON’T IT BE GREAT TO GO WEEKS WITHOUT THINKING ABOUT POLITICS??!?!??” folks and the “Shit’s only beginning to get started” people.Report
Racism and sexism: not choosing a white male.Report
Picking someone on the basis of race and sex is racism and sexism.Report
That’s not true.
Picking a person because you think their race makes them a superior person is racist.
Adding people of their race to your pool of candidates because they have historically been excluded is simple fairness.Report
We’re at the point where disagreeing about tax policy is called racist. Calling a mob a “mob” is racist. Enforcing border policy is racist, because it affects nationalities differently.
Picking a candidate on the basis of race is racist.Report
Then picking Pence because he’s a Christian is anti-Semitism.Report
Trump’s daughter and grandkids are Jewish. Israel is naming settlements after him. Care to try again?Report
C’mon, you got it.Report
Picking Pence because he’s a goy would have been anti-Semitism.Report
More to the point, if Trump had said he was going to pick a Christian and was ruling out any Jews, I would have remembered it. That’d be messed up. Biden said he was going to pick a woman of color. If Harris had been an equally- or more-qualified white man, Biden wouldn’t have picked her. That’s not fairness, that’s discrimination.Report
She’s no Dan Quayle.Report