Repeal and Replace, Remix, Repeat
Rarely these days, as the Republican presidential primary hurtles towards the American electorate, can Ron DeSantis and Donald Trump be found singing off the same song sheet, but there is at least one golden oldie from the GOP songbook they recently harmonized on. Floundering in the polls and with his affiliated PAC having chaos and turnover, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis reached into Ye Olde Bag of Republican Talking Points and busted out…repeal and replace.
Seriously. And he wasn’t the only one.
Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida said on Sunday that, if elected president, he would pursue legislation that would “supersede” the Affordable Care Act, echoing former President Donald J. Trump’s comments, which Democrats seized upon last week.
“What I think they’re going to need to do is have a plan that will supersede Obamacare, that will lower prices for people so that they can afford health care, while also making sure that people with pre-existing conditions are protected,” Mr. DeSantis said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” He went on to say that repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act was a broken promise from Mr. Trump’s 2016 campaign.
“We’re going to look at the big institutions that are causing prices to be high — big pharma, big insurance and big government — but it’s going to need to be where you have a reform package that’s going to be put in place,” he said. “Obamacare promised lower premiums. It didn’t deliver that,” he added. “We know we need to go in a different direction, but it’s going to be done by having a plan that’s going to be able to supersede it.”
Mr. Trump called for the same thing last week, writing on his social media platform that he was “seriously looking at alternatives” to the Affordable Care Act. After President Biden’s campaign denounced the statement, Mr. Trump wrote: “I don’t want to terminate Obamacare, I want to REPLACE IT with MUCH BETTER HEALTHCARE. Obamacare Sucks!!!”
Except they don’t, can’t, won’t, and would never get the opportunity anyway.
When Republicans had majorities in congress and one of their own in the White House, they didn’t even try to do anything with the ACA/Obamacare. While in the fundraising and rhetoric “repeal and replace” was a big buzzword pulling big dollars into the cause and firing up the base, there was zero discernable action to actually do so. Meanwhile in the last decade, the ACA has never been more popular, and even if Republicans somehow got a trifecta and majorities enough to do so, politically the will to go after something pushing 60% approval is a steep hill to climb for congress critters.
So why are DeSantis and Trump bringing it up?
Some of it is habit, some of it is trying to find some traction in a news cycle that is bored to death with the current blowout Trump is putting together with only 40-odd days until the Hawkeye Cauci voting stars, and some of it is that someone told them this would be a great thing to talk about. But mostly, ACA/Obamacare is very unpopular with the voting base of the GOP primaries, and unpopular things are good things for candidates who want to open checkbooks and get responses from a saturated and worn-out primary voter populace.
A KFF poll in May found that 59 percent of Americans supported the A.C.A. Mr. DeSantis and Mr. Trump’s calls to replace it could play well in the Republican primary — only 26 percent of Republicans support the health law, according to the poll — but could become a liability in the general election because 89 percent of Democrats and 62 percent of independents support the health law.
That second part is why any and all versions of “repeal and replace” are, have been, and always will be nonsense smokescreens. Astute observers understood during the run-up to the ACA passage that once implemented, it was never going to go away, only expand, since once folks were used to it Obamacare would become another untouchable program that folks who vote come to depend on, flaws and all. Once the Supreme Court blessed it, that was essentially that. With 41 states having adopted the Medicaid expansion of ACA and the other 10 all in some kind of process/fight over doing so, growth is not only now becoming the status quo, but a widely voted upon status quo.
Florida, currently headed by Governor Ron DeSantis, is one of the states that has fended off Medicaid expansion thus far. To be fair to DeSantis, he is being consistent here; as a congressman he did vote on several healthcare measures aimed at the ACA, including the non-binding “budget resolution to begin the process of repealing the ACA” in 2017. His position is — at least on paper — stronger than Donald Trump’s, who had majorities in the US House and Senate when he became president and proceeded to do precious little legislatively with that advantage, let alone major healthcare reform. Nevertheless, the American people have heard for over a decade now various versions, covers, remixes, and revivals of the same song of ACA repeal and replace promising such if just enough Team Red members get elected in this upcoming most important election of our lifetime coming in (fill in the blank for the year here.)
Guess how that is working out.
Playing well to a base or not, the “repeal and replace” rhetoric was an empty lie ten years ago and is a more blatant, hollow promise now. It isn’t happening. And someone who was there the first time like Ron DeSantis especially knows it isn’t happening. But it is something that has to be said to get the nomination of the party of Lincoln these days. One item on a long list of things that “have to be said” even though the speaker of said thing knows well and good it isn’t going to happen.
In a normal, functional world with a functional press, such proffers would be immediately met with questions about how that would be done with a split House and Senate, against public opinion, and with various other more pressing issues going to take up the very limited window of legislative opportunity when a new congress comes in. But we don’t live in that world. We live in the world where “repeal and replace” will probably live on forever in the GOP lexicon while the actual ACA lives on forever as a government program that will do what most government programs do, especially popular ones: grow, expand, evolve.
Accept it, recognize the rhapsodic rhetoric of repetitious rubbish, hit skip, and adjust accordingly.
The chefs kiss on top of RDS’s line here is he doesn’t have a plan yet. It’s coming out in weeks. ACA has been around for years and none of the R”s have clue what to do other make empty promises. You would think all those geniuses would have plans lines up. Nope, not even gonna pretend to have done their homework. Just vaporware.Report
In Trump’s case, I’m serenely confident that he has no plan.
In DeSantis’ case, I think there’s an outside chance that he has a plan that will (only) appeal to major GOP donors and Federalist writers, but is currently going over the PDF with a fine-toothed comb to make sure it doesn’t have any sonnenrads in it.Report
We’ll know he is done with the plan when he lets out one of his famous glittering smiles.Report
This is a downstream effect of Democrats having passed a bunch of Heritage Foundation ideas that had been put into practice by a Republican Governor and Republican amendments to the bill to make it “free market friendly” instead of going after single payer.Report
OETRW that Republican Governor ran against his own plan after becoming the Republican Presidential nominee.Report
Oh he did, which makes this all the more laughably foolish to me.Report
That tricksy Obama and his trying to work with R’s by opting for free marketish solutions. It did work well politically, sort of.Report
The “ACA was nothing but a Heritage Foundation” plan is BS. The exchanges were yes, a Heritage Foundation idea, but there is the massive regulatory changes, the Medicaid expansion, and so on, that lefties seem to forget about when they want to dunk on Obama.
Also, there were not 50 votes for single-pater in 2009. Hell, there weren’t 10 votes for it, and single payer isn’t that popular, once you actually give the positives and negatives for it. Also, there are plenty of countries w/ much better health care systems than we do, that don’t have single payer.
If Obama would’ve tried to pass single payer, no health care plan would’ve gotten passed, 2010 would’ve still happened because the economy was crap, and Twitter would be full of people claiming Obama could’ve gotten it passed if he would’ve just fought harder.Report
The GOP politicians are just as fanatical as their base because the base primaries out the moderates again and again and again. They want to go back to the 19th century. It isn’t rocket science to figure this out.Report
I think a lot of them would accept later stage Jim Crow just fine.Report
related:
Republican Senate frontrunner in Montana calls for returning ‘healthcare to pure privatization’
Tim Sheehy, a lead contender for the Republican Senate nomination in Montana, said earlier this year that he wants to privatize the U.S. healthcare system, according to audio obtained by Semafor.
…
“I mean, healthcare worked before health insurance existed. Each town had a doctor that would drive to your house, take care of you and you’d pay him,” Sheehy said. “And guess what? It worked. It worked when you actually paid a doctor for services provided. And then we started getting into this HMO, insurance, mega-conglomerate structure.”
His office later walked back his comments:
In a email to Semafor, a spokesman for Sheehy said it was “clear that Tim was attacking insurance companies and acknowledging our health care system is broken.” They added that Sheehy believes there needs to be “greater transparency, competition, and shopping for services in our health care system,” as well as protections for patients with pre-existing conditions.
Asked if Sheehy supported Medicare privatization, they said: “Tim knows we must keep our commitment to every Montana senior to protect their Social Security and Medicare benefits. He believes our nation made a promise to our seniors and we must keep that promise. Full stop.”
If that sounds incoherent, its because it is.
https://www.semafor.com/article/12/03/2023/sheey-montana-senate-healthcare-privatizationReport
Well, back when doctors couldn’t do much for you the available service was cheap enough.Report
What I think is noteworthy is the utter lack of any kind of seriousness, on this guys part, and the entire GOP.
They have absolutely no idea what they want for healthcare policy but are incapable of not touching it.Report