Reporting on DOJ’s January 6th Trump Investigation Ramping Up
There still seems to be way more talking about what they might do than substance to what they are doing currently, but something is matriculating from 950 Pennsylvania Avenue in regard to what the former resident of 1400 Pennsylvania Avenue had to do with the mess on January 6th, 2021 a few blocks down at First St SE.
The Justice Department efforts are separate from the inquiry underway by the House committee, which has sought to portray Trump as responsible for inciting the Capitol riot and for being derelict in his duty for refusing to stop it. Both Short and Jacob have testified before the committee, telling lawmakers that Pence resisted Trump’s attempts to enlist him in the cause.
Unlike the Justice Department, the House panel does not have the power to launch criminal investigations or charge anyone with wrongdoing.
More than 840 suspects have been charged in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot
The Justice Department probe began amid the smoke, blood and chaos at the Capitol and has led to criminal charges against more than 840 individuals, expanding to include an examination of events that occurred elsewhere in the days and weeks before the attack — including at the White House, in state capitols and at a D.C. hotel.
There are two principal tracks of the investigation that could ultimately lead to additional scrutiny of Trump, two people familiar with the situation said, also speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation.
The first centers on seditious conspiracy and conspiracy to obstruct a government proceeding, the type of charges already filed against individuals who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6 and on two leaders of far-right groups, Stewart Rhodes and Henry “Enrique” Tarrio, who did not breach the Capitol but were allegedly involved in planning the day’s events.
The second involves potential fraud associated with the false-electors scheme or with pressure Trump and his allies allegedly put on the Justice Department and others to falsely claim that the election was rigged and votes were fraudulently cast.
Recent subpoenas obtained by The Post show that two Arizona state legislators were ordered to turn over communications with “any member, employee, or agent of Donald J. Trump or any organization advocating in favor of the 2020 re-election of Donald J. Trump, including ‘Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.’ ”
No former president has ever been charged with a crime in the country’s history. In cases when investigators found evidence suggesting a president engaged in criminal conduct, as with Richard M. Nixon and Bill Clinton, investigators and successive administrations concluded it was better to grant immunity or forgo prosecution. One goal was to avoid appearing to use government power to punish political enemies and assure the tradition of a peaceful transfer of power.
The important part of all this, of course, is that unlike the January 6th Committee — which is getting press and prime time slots but has no authority to charge or prosecute — DOJ can actually do something other than talk and refer. 840 defendants so far, but it is one in particular that will dominate any further investigation: former President Donald J. Trump.
If DOJ and AG Garland push for a conspiracy or sedition case against Trump and/or members of his inner circle involved on January 6th, we will be in unprecedented territory, it will be the biggest political story ever bar none, and it will likely go on for quite some time. Plenty of folks in and out of the media want it to happen, and sooner the better for most of them, but like many things probably best for the rest of us to wait and let it develop.
Whatever is coming next, we are far from the end of hearing about January 6th. If Trump runs for president, as every indication points too, we are really in for a wild ride. Go tell your younger self from however long ago that the dominant issue in a presidential race could very well be the twice impeached former president fighting an indictment/trail for how his last term ended?
Strange days, indeed.
As many of us noted in the beginning, Garland is an old school RICO prosecutor. This has always had the hallmark of a RICO investigation. And now that he’s getting senior level WH staff testimony under oath, plus the January 6th Committee materials, he’s getting closer to the top. And unlike the House effort, his completing this probe next year doesn’t hinge on a successful election outcome for Democrats.Report
“If DOJ push for a case against Trump and/or members of his inner circle involved on January 6th, we will be in unprecedented territory”
The subhead gets it slightly wrong. We’ve been there ever since a sitting president tried to orchestrate a coup to remain in office.Report
You beat me to it: an armed mob attacking our Capitol building and the elected officials inside engaged in the peaceful transfer of power to subvert that process and empower their leader… that is the truly unprecedented part.Report
What is noteworthy for us citizens is how the different political factions have responded to the attempted coup.
The Democrats have offered too-modest-but-encouraging criticism, while the Republicans have become full fascist, inviting the foreign dictator Victor Orban to their conference and offering full throated support for the coup plotters.
Which in a way, clarifies the upcoming elections as one where the survival of democracy is the only issue.Report
Fingers crossed, time will tell:
New report from
@MorningConsult
shows big swing of indies to Democrats. Was -3 for Dems in May. Now +8.
It’s a new, bluer election now.
https://twitter.com/SimonWDC/status/1552253818087391233?cxt=HHwWgoC-xfKn24orAAAAReport
Digging further:
https://www.ndn.org/competitive-election-now
There’s still a lot of water to row until we get under the bridge of the election, but IF (and I stress IF) democrats can keep it up, we may well see Dems keep both chambers. Which would mean that not only would these investigations continue, but pressure from the left would mount to call Manchin’s bluff.
Very interesting times.Report
Call me a cynic but I’ll believe it when I see it. We’re into year 6 of the thing on the horizon that finally gets Trump forever, and every time it has amounted to nothing tangible.Report
most of those prior cases -except the Mueller Investigation – are still ongoing. I sense NYC and NY State may have lost some steam, but they are finally getting depositions. Georgia and the DoJ fake elector probes are full steam ahead, and the insurrection probe has gotten depositions form key senior WH staffers. So someone is likely to get indicted, and frankly enough of the big fish will want to preserve their own skins . . .
Its also worth remembering that Mueller pointed out quite starkly that he didn’t render a prosecution decision because DoJ policy told him not to. I really wish he’d been less of an institutionalist, but oh well.Report
If they ever get him my assumption is that it will be on some more mundane, state level witnesses tampering or quid pro quo corruption type of charge. The challenge as always seems to be the case with him is producing evidence of personal involvement or direction. Maybe the smoking gun will finally come up but the more time that passes that it doesn’t the more skeptical I am that it ever will.Report
We’ve decided to live with Covid, declare that monkeypox only affects Those People, SCOTUSed away any possibility of addressing climate issues or gun violence, and decided that medical care for reproductive issues can be held hostage to right-wing resentment. Even if Trump dies in prison, he won.Report
True.Report
I’m with you. The Trump Org are pros at dodging lawsuits. It kind of points up how ineffectual our legal system is at reining in someone who doesn’t give a sh*t.Report
lawsuits – yes. this is however the first set of criminal investigations he’s been entangled with that I recall.Report
Hasn’t someone in NY been going after his company criminally for a few years?Report
The NYC and NY State investigations that started right as his term ended were and are criminal in nature.Report
Eh it cuts both ways. I think it would without question be better for the country if Trump ended up in a jail cell for long enough to prevent return to any elected office. At the same time the burden of proof, and need to actually provide evidence was a pretty big factor in checking his crazy allegations of fraud. It’s not the system’s fault politicians and various officials keep promising steak dinners when they can’t even seem to secure the ingredients for hamburger helper.Report
We will see. The Republican Party has been busy these past couple of years trying to install election officials who they can trust to see fraud where none exists.
I was more referring to Trump’s private dealings. HRC ran ads featuring businessmen who’d been stiffed by Trump and they didn’t even move the needle.Report