Sunday Morning: “Bad Day at Black Rock” by John Sturges
A man gets off a train in a desolate Western town where nobody ever gets off the train. He’s a stranger in one of those towns that doesn’t take too kindly to strangers. He’s well-dressed and missing an arm and carries himself as if a tornado wouldn’t rattle him, so we have to assume he’s a detective of some sort, although it’s never quite made clear. Nevertheless, everyone tries to rattle him, from the hotel clerk to a local roughneck, played by Lee Marvin. And who among us would not be intimidated by Lee Marvin?
Well, Spencer Tracy for one. He plays the stranger, John J. Macreedy, in the 1955 classic Bad Day at Black Rock, and he is sure of his mission throughout. He has come to the town of Black Rock to find the whereabouts of a resident named Komoko who has seemingly gone missing. Why exactly he’s searching for this man is unclear at first, and what happened to Komodo is unclear. It is clear though that everyone in town knows what happened and they’re not telling. The Hotel Clerk is hostile, the town sheriff is a drunk, the cowboys glare at him, and all the residents seem cowed by a local landowner named Reno Smith (Robert Ryan).
That’s pretty much all there is to the story, but the film doesn’t need anything else. The Duffer Brothers could stand to take notes; there are no wasted shots, actions, lines of dialogue, or moments of film. Everything serves the story. In fact, the first scene sets the basic tone of the film and then every scene progressively increases the tension from the scene that came before it. As we watch Macreedy close in on the truth, we also watch the town close in on him. By the last act, it seems highly doubtful he’s going to make it out of Black Rock alive. Paul Thomas Anderson has said that aspiring filmmakers should skip film school and watch this movie. As the streaming series has become the dominant narrative form, we seem to have lost our taste for lean, taut stories with no needless subplots. We mistake bloat for “epic” storytelling. This one is tight as a drum.
Thrillers of the era tended to be fairly no nonsense and Bad Day at Black Rock is one that straddles genres: its setting is Western and its storyline is noir. Certainly, the stranger who gets off the line at the town that doesn’t want him is a classic noir storyline, although he’s usually shadowed in night, not exposed in the full light of high noon. Critics of the time and today have tended to praise the “social conscience” of the film, the way it deals with racism, conformity, and arguably the stifling atmosphere of 50s McCarthyism, but the noir was always the closest Hollywood ever came to social realism in film. The protagonists are always social outsiders and outcasts. They’re always trying to catch a break in a society that simply won’t let them.
There’s also a classical tragedy aspect to noirs that I’ve seldom seen discussed, a feeling that one’s fate is inescapable, no matter how man struggles against it. Here, in a strange way, Mcreedy is not so far removed from Antigone, with the same deep sense of responsibility to the dead against all opposition from the larger society. Here too, respect for the dead amounts to civil disobedience and Smith is even a sort of mad king.
Admittedly, this might seem a bit of a stretch, but another thing that happens when you tell a pared down and simple story: it takes on the character of a parable. The town of Black Rock is moldering away and falling apart, rotted from within by the dark secret it keeps, but sunlight is the best disinfectant, as they say, and the town has plenty of that. Is the evil at the heart of town the anti-Japanese racism unleashed by the Second World War? Bigotry more generally? Greed and dishonestly? Closed societies where everyone has an eye on each other? I suspect the reason it’s still a perfect film is it has room to take on all those themes, but it’s still just a story of one guy who’s trying to find out what happened to another guy.
And so, friends, what are YOU watching, reading, pondering, playing, creating, or trying to cover up this weekend?
another fine essay, rufus!
a friend of mine got me to sit down and watch the dredd remake. in addition to being fun, there were some notable bits which may dovetail to the essay above (about an excellent film):
1) there was no real backstory, nor harping on backstory. things are messed up totally and…that’s all you get. such a wonderful break from exposition on top of exposition stuffed with more exposition.
2) the characters all react believably to events. it’s a goofy world, but a coherent one.
3) the runtime was so reasonable! 90 minutes, in and out, just like grandma used to make.
4) conservation of dialogue, which supports and is buffeted by point #1 above. the setting is a brutal, horrible place, and chit chat with strangers is treated like the potentially deadly encounters it could rapidly turn into.
5) said friend has never seen the raid, so now i get to introduce one of the finest actions films ever made to her. woot!Report
I’m not sure why 90 minutes became the standard for so long- it must have to do with reel length, but I am becoming a huge fan of the done in an hour and a half standard. When you get to 3 hours for a movie, it’s usually easy to see what could have been cut.
I remember really loving Dredd, which was also much closer to the comic books than the earlier attempt to adapt them to film. I was a fan of the comics when I was a teenager, probably because Anthrax wrote a song about them. I need to rewatch the Raid soon too.Report
Reel length seems reasonable. Most movies were shipped on reels each with 2,000 feet of 35mm film, which ran just over 22 minutes. So four reels is about 89 minutes. In the days when the studios were cranking out hundreds of films per year, there was probably a lot of pressure on directors to cut things to under 90 minutes, just to avoid the printing and shipping costs of an extra reel.
When my dad was about 16, he ran the projection booth for the theater in the tiny Iowa town where he grew up. Film was highly flammable, and the light source was open carbon arc lamps. (In an amazing “coincidence”, the length of the carbon rods burned up in the lamps was such that the lamps had a lifetime of just over 22 minutes.) When he went to college on the GI Bill, his short story “The Night the Film Broke” was accepted for the university’s literary magazine.Report
That’s a cool story! Does the short still exist?
Also reminds me of this documentary, which was really fascinating:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEbHM8VsvloReport
That particular issue is the only issue the university doesn’t have digitized. My sister has the original paper copy of the magazine that my Mom and Dad kept. You’ve reminded me that I need to nag her to take pictures of the pages and send them to me. I can flatten them using software, then run them through an OCR engine.Report
Freddie wrote a fun post complaining about Stranger Things a few days ago. One of his complaints is that every five minutes doesn’t need to be a cliffhanger.
You want some time to breathe.
If you’ve ever wondered about whether you want to play a video game that doesn’t suck, I’d suggest Disco Elysium. You play a detective who wakes up hungover as heck and he’s fixing to solve a murder case. The body is out back, by the way. And there are a whole bunch of people who were involved. And you get to talk to them.Report
I feel like Stranger Things could end now and it would be fine. Honestly, I think it could have ended with two seasons and been fine. Or been a trilogy of films and said all the same things. I get that people enjoy streaming series and I can watch them, but they frequently tell a three act story that could have also been a movie without losing much.Report
My wife and I finished season 4 on Friday. I’m going to watch it until the end due to sunk cost fallacy but it has definitely passed the point of way more run time than it has the story to tell.Report
I feel like there needs to be a parent stepping in- maybe the Duffer Mother?- to lecture them with something like “No new characters until you figure out what to do with all the characters you have!”Report
After Steve stopped being a jerk, I couldn’t get enough of Season 1 and Season 2 surprised me with how much fun it was.
Season 3 has me mostly saying “oof” and “I remember that!” and I only kinda enjoy the latter.Report
A great film. I am currently reading Trust by Hernan Diaz which is about a lonely and enigmatic financier named Benjamin Rask who grows even more wealthy from Black Friday of 1929 and how that arises more suspicion. The novel is divided into four parts, each with a different author. There is also a novel within a novel that takes New York by storm in 1937.Report
I rewatched the 1996 Irma Vep movie from Oliver Assayas. A lot of the beats were very much “this is a foreign/indie film from the 1990s” and the commentary on French film’s place in the world requires someone to know a bit of French film.
For those who don’t know: Les Vampires was a classic French series from the early 1900s about a criminal gang called Les Vampires who are lead by a the beguiling Irma Vep. In the 1996 movie, a washed up French director is tasked to doing a remake of Les Vampires and he decides to cast Maggie Chueng as Irma Vep. The washed up film director is played by Jean-Pierre Leaud who is most famous as Truffaut’s alterego, Antoine Doniel.
Other than that, the film is pretty mediocre and I am not sure why it is considered to be a 1990s classic. Enough of a classic that HBO Max decided to make a TV series out of it. The 1996 movie seems to mainly consist of Maggie Cheung being very politely confused most of the time. The biggest subplot involves the wardrobe lady having a crush on Maggie and trying to seduce her awkwardly. Maggie finds this out from an older woman (who might be married to the cinematographer of Irma Vep, it is unclear) asking her “do you like to sleep with girls?” in broken but blunt English and then spilling the beans that the wardrobe lady likes her. This is not the only person on the film crew that tries to seduce Maggie Cheung. Though I suppose in 1996, casting a Hong Kong actor in a European movie would have been more of a novelty than it is today. There is a also a little press interview where Maggie Cheung defends state-sponsored French cinema from a young, brash reporter who thinks French film is only “for the intellectuals.”Report
Yeah, we were talking recently about Irma Vep. My film writer girlfriend was saying she saw it at the time and thought it was just okay. People seem to really love it for some reason. I haven’t seen it, although I’ve seen the silent films. I should probably get around to watching the movie at least.Report
I just watched an episode of the HBO max reinterpretation Irma Vep (also by Assayas) and I hated it even more. The characters are all nastier and more mean-spirited. The first episode spent a lot of time on a weird Lesbian subplot with psychodrama as S&M*. It felt like something “oh so very French” for Americans.
*The imported actress playing Irma Vep is now a big American movie star. She was sleeping with and cheating on her assistant. The assistant decided to leave and go hetero and marry a big time action director (the director of her latest blockbuster). The opening scenes had the actress state that open relationships do not have to be equal for all. The subsequent scenes have the tables turned and have the former assistant dominating and the actress begging her the come back. I just found everyone unlikable.Report
I think in the 90s there was still a supply constraint that rendered pretty much everything that made it over here a candidate for classic status. My mother came to the US from France as a child and her and my dad would see every French movie. Every once in awhile they’d go to a theater but for a married couple raising kids in the ‘burbs that mostly translated to everything on the 4 or 5 little shelves in the back of the local Blockbuster. I can very much see how something like Irma Vep would have been a novelty to an American audience at the time but now seems silly or trite.Report
Yeah, it probably seemed very different in 1996 compared to most of what was produced domestically.Report
I’ve also began to watch For All Mankind on Apple TV, it is an alternative history series where the Soviets beat the Americans to the moon by about 2.5-3 weeks and this is a catalyst for the space race never ending. Right before the American’s attempt their second moonlanding, the Soviets get the first woman on the moon. This causes Nixon to think he needs to get American women to the Moon ASAP, etc. The series is a lot better than the premise sounds but the 2nd and 3rd Seasons are supposed to be much better than the 1st.Report
I can attest that all seasons, at least IMHO, are very good. A bit soapy, but what good TV drama isn’t?Report
Haven’t watched it; from the descriptions, it starts out as an alt-history that is very, as it were, grounded in the technology of the time, but by the end of the second season they’ve abandoned the idea of hewing close to reality and have just turned into fairly generic near-future skiffy.Report
There are space hotels apparently.Report
Just the one.
The technology always seems plausible if you consider the Soviets are constantly pushing the Americans.Report
I have heard about this film for maybe 2 decades, but I have never seen it. What is y’alls go-to for viewing classic films?Report
We just watched in on the Criterion Channel recently. They have a bundle of technicolor noirs. It’s a good site generally.Report
I’ve been watching Severance of late. Mark’s reason for joining Lumon hits a bit close to home, but I kind of like the foreboding atmosphere of the show. It’s quite strange.Report
I gave up on that show because I think it raised more questions than answers. The show would have benefited from being given a strict limit. “You have 11 episodes. That is it. There will not be a second season. We expect a beginning, middle, and end.” Basically, a BBC show, not an American one which looks to exist for perpetuity.Report
So many western movies (or movies needing to depict desolation) use the Owens Valley for it. Owens Valley was one of my playgrounds as a teen and young man and I still periodically visit there even after moving out of California. My mom is buried within a couple of miles of the locations used for this movie.
Recognizing Los Angeles or New York locations is one thing. Owens Valley locations feel special to me, more personal.Report