At the Intersection of Loyalty, Rights, and Legitimate Reasons
One of the elements I enjoy the most about my career is work-related travel. I drive for much of my regional travel, and often, the best place to stay is near a freeway exit, simply because I’ll be up and on the road early the next day. I’ve learned how to concentrate hotel points and optimize the value of prioritizing various brands to defray the cost of personal travel on my vacation time. I have “status” under several hotel loyalty programs. Which really only means I’ve been ‘on the clock’ frequently before 6AM. Ah! The glamours of business travel.
Several years ago, on a late winter trip through a small southern town, I booked an overnight at a preferred loyalty-branded facility. It wasn’t a location I was familiar with, but it was situated conveniently between where I was coming from and where I planned to be going the next day. I had pre-booked my stay using a corporate rate, and I arrived at about 4:30 in the afternoon.
It was an older, mid-priced hotel. The architecture and footprint were unfamiliar, and I speculated that it had been acquired by the company and rebranded upon purchase. The property had exterior access doors to the rooms, and hallways and staircases opened directly to the parking lot. Not the nicest place, but I’d definitely stayed in worse. I parked under the porte-chochere, and walked inside to check in. I planned to get my room and then move my vehicle to park close to wherever it was. The check-in process was standard: I gave my name, I had my credit card and driver’s license handy, and I informed the young woman working at the desk that I had a reservation.
“Ah, yes I see. We have you right here. Tell me, are you traveling alone today?”
Assuming she was inquiring about how many keys I needed, I answered, “Yes.”
“Ah, and have you stayed with us before?” she asked, continuing to type in her computer terminal.
“Uh, no. Not at this location.” I replied.
“I see. Can I ask you, what brings you to town then?”
This was getting annoyingly chatty. Give me my room, already! I’d just driven three hours, and I’d had copious amounts of Diet Coke at lunch. I was antsy for a restroom.
“Business,” I answered her brusquely.
“Ah, and what is it that you do?” The question no longer seemed like idle-but-genuine-chit-chat. It felt like I was being assessed and scrutinized. I had been asked similar questions while checking into hotels before, but never in a way that made me feel like my response mattered. I went on the defensive.
“Excuse me, what? I’m confused as to why you’re asking me this.”
“Well, I will need to see a business card or something proving that you are who you say you are.”
In hindsight, I wish I would have just left right then and found another hotel. I had already presented my driver’s license. Heat was rising up my neck and I felt a rush of adrenaline. Why was this person questioning me? My inner radar was going off; something wasn’t right. I had loyalty status showing numerous prior stays at related properties which presumably she could confirm in her system; I had a drivers license with my photo confirming who I was. The reservation was made via a corporate travel department. Why was I getting the third-degree?
“Ma’am, we need to make sure women staying in our hotel are doing so for legitimate reasons.”
Welp, there it was: an answer where the quiet part was spoken aloud. It was all I could do to not climb across the desk and scream, “Do I look like a hooker, to you?” but I have too much respect and empathy for sex workers to actually do that. What does being a sex worker look like anyway? (Pssst: some of them are men.) If it looks like a forty-something woman in a in need of a root touch-up who is fighting a losing battle with gravity while wearing sensible shoes, I am guilty. Me and Mary Magdalene: there but for the grace of God, go I! But seriously, give me a key already because I’m about to float!
As it turned out, Marriott International had launched an initiative to combat human trafficking and sex trafficking that year. They presented their mission at hospitality conventions and seminars and advertised it in their ESG materials. By 2019, the company proudly announced an achievement milestone of training 500,000 hotel workers to recognize the signs of human trafficking. Celebrating the accomplishment, Dr. David Rodriguez, Chief Global Human Resources Officer of Marriott International announced, “As a global hotel company that cares about human rights, we’re proud to be training hotel workers across the Marriott system to spot the signs…combatting modern-day slavery starts with awareness.”
If I had a quarter for every badly implemented idea that began with good intentions to “raise awareness,” I would be less concerned with cultivating hotel loyalty points. In hindsight, I suggest that Marriott could make more of a contribution to their mission of “combatting modern day slavery” and “caring about human rights” if they re-assessed their business presence in China or their treatment of Uyghurs instead of scrutinizing adult American women checking into rural hotels.
While the crime of sex or human trafficking is abhorrent, advocates for both sex workers and trafficking victims warn strongly against conflating consensual commercial sex with trafficking. Arresting people engaging in consensual commercial sex is not the same as combatting sex trafficking. Critics of awareness-centered campaigns extolling hyper-vigilance and ‘if you see something, say something’ caution that these approaches can lead to the targeting of multi-racial families and women who have the gumption to travel alone. Just ask Cindy McCain. Anti-trafficking efforts relying on operations by law enforcement are largely ineffective and, though championed by media as successful, disproportionately affect already marginalized individuals. This, in turn, saddles them with criminal records and limits their prospects for housing and alternative employment.
I was not a victim. Nor am I a sex worker. I was a female business professional, traveling alone, who needed to pee. In reviewing the possible warning signs listed in Marriott’s training materials that could have triggered my additional scrutiny, I exhibited minimal luggage (yes, because it was obvious from the architecture that I could not walk to my room from the front desk), and I was anxious about getting access to my room courtesy of free refills during a lunch meeting and a three-hour drive.
It is possible the questions I received had more to do with the location and configuration of the hotel’s interstate exit and external doors than to me personally. I’m also willing to concede that the young woman working the front desk was just doing her job and simply lacked the skill of finesse. Good staff is hard to come by. It still frustrates me: my male colleagues don’t get questioned like that, and despite having checked into numerous hotels with my husband, we’ve never been asked if we plan on getting jiggy wit’ it.
Hotels are in the bed-renting business. As shocking as this may be to the fine folks at Marriott: people have sex in hotels. Sometimes, those people are women, and sometimes, those women may appear to be single. Not everyone who uses a bed — for sleep or other bed-associated activities — is a sex worker, and women have a right to travel for business.
Wait, what? Women have a right to travel for business?? Yes, we do. The Articles of Confederation explicitly stated that “the people of each State shall have free ingress and regress to and from any other State and shall enjoy therein the privileges of trade and commerce.” This is considered to have been so fundamental to the Framers, they found it unnecessary to enumerate it in the Bill of Rights rather believing it to be encompassed by our inalienable rights included in the Declaration of Independence. However, in 1823, the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania held in Corfield v. Coryell that citizens have a right to “pass through any State for purposes of trade, agriculture, professional pursuits, or otherwise” and derived its decision from the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution. Finally, the 1966 decision in in U.S. v. Guest, the Supreme Court noted the right to travel “has been firmly established and recognized.” As a citizen engaged in professional pursuits, I have the right to travel for business.
But what does the right to travel entail? Is it purely freedom of movement, or do women also have a right to accommodation by hotels? It’s a good question. Especially considered in tandem with one’s opinion on a private business’s willingness to bake cakes for gay weddings or enforce mask mandates. Frankly, having the right to stay at a long-overdue-for-a-remodel interstate hotel with convenient room-side parking is not really that exciting, and I know that the topic of public accommodation will trigger certain proponents of Federalism to rail against government expanse attributed to a broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause. We can save that debate for another time. Despite the both the unanimous SCOTUS decision in Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, and the many criticisms against the decision, federal law does not prohibit discrimination based on sex in public accommodations. Title II of the 1964 Civil Rights Act addresses public accommodation but only prohibits discrimination on the grounds of race, color, religion or national origin. In the state that the sad little roadside hotel and I were in, the answer was no.
What should I have done? Some believe trafficking — SEX TRAFFICKING! — is horrible and must be combatted by any means necessary, even if a few people are minorly inconvenienced. I was merely asked to produce a business card to prove my legitimacy as a female in the eyes of front desk worker at a hotel. Business cards that I order by the hundreds and give away like candy. I am neither a victim of human trafficking nor am I a sex worker. I’m also proud of and love my job. What was the big deal?
Was I being discriminated against? Did the hotel have the right to ask for my card? Should I have been flummoxed about being asked to present one, or was I overreacting?
Think about these questions.
Then, replace my business card with a Covid-vaccine card. Are the responses consistent?
I’ve wrestled with conflicted feelings since the advent of debates regarding vaccine passports and requirements to show proof of vaccination. I’m not talking about the anti-vaccination movement masquerading behind objections to “Gazpacho”-characterized demands to “Show your papers!” That is hyperbole aimed at people incapable of understanding nuance.
I’m questioning the reason behind requiring proof of vaccination from customers who are vaccinated, when in the Post-Omicron age, the reality is that both vaccinated and unvaccinated people can transmit the virus. I carry my children’s and my own vaccination cards in my wallet and thought nothing about preparing to show them during a family outing to see The Nutcracker in early December. However, in light of new information, I now raise an eyebrow at the continued practice.
Private businesses establishing standards regarding who they will serve is something I support in nearly all cases, but when both vaccinated and unvaccinated people can be contagious, I question the motivation for the requirement. Adult women should not be required to prove they’re not being trafficked any more than a person should have to prove they’re vaccinated for a virus that anyone can transmit. Maybe its only possible to reject these scenarios after contemplating them in parallel perspective if, like me, embarrassment about being unvaccinated for Covid would exceed any possible embarrassment derived from being a sex worker. That is the analogy after all: business card is to not a sex worker as vaccination record is to not unvaccinated.
I’m not sure many people could have anticipated intersectionalism between practices used to combat sex trafficking and covid-related vaccine passports. But after reflecting on my hotel experience and the vaccine related brouhaha of the last twelve months, I mind having to prove that I’m not engaging in commercial sex. I also mind proving that I’ve made what I believe to be a responsible choice. My position may continue to evolve. In the meantime, however, the one thing that does give me comfort, is that the single hotel loyalty card in my wallet keeping those vaccine cards company says “Hilton.”
I’m sure that the corporate effort was a massive success. Of the 30 plus years I’ve worked, I think I’ve had business cards for 1 job, maybe 2. Frankly I consider a “female centric” sex worker policy as sexist, and the probability of you, as you described yourself, as being a sex worker, is rather low. As to vax passports, well, welcome to the club. Did you not thing that that was going to be a “thing”? Wait to your car starts reporting data back to the cops. Many already do to the manufacturer and advertisers.Report
the probability of you, as you described yourself, as being a sex worker, is rather low.
How ungallant. And how narrow a view of what people are into.Report
“probability dude, PROBABILITY. But maybe you’re more for “lets screen everyone”, you know, like they do to little old ladies at the airport? Sure COULD be terrorist’s, let’s give em an enhanced pat down! The receptionist was following a checklist, once that did not allow for any deviation, because people aren’t suppose to think and evaluate, just do what they are told.Report
So you really don’t understand. Why am I not surprised?Report
For a few years, whenever I went to the doctor I was asked if I have a safe place to stay and various “check for domestic abuse” questions. I’m huge, healthy, a guy, and have no symptoms of that. I’m the polar opposite of that profile.
Ergo they were asking everyone. No matter how wildly inappropriate.
We saw this in stores with carding people for alcohol for a while. Card everyone. No matter how stupid. After a while they changed it to “card if looks less than [x]”.Report
They’re asking everyone because of stories like the OP; because of people who get very, very upset at the idea that someone thinks they look like a hoo-er and that’s why they’re asking her specifically about it.
If they ask everybody, it means that they aren’t profiling, they aren’t assuming, they aren’t being racist or gender-essentialist or heteronormative.Report
But it is also important to recognize that the profile isn’t absolute. There are large, healthy men who could be the victims of physical abuse. And who may be even more reluctant to report it or pursue help because of how atypical they are among victims.
That doesn’t necessarily mean this approach is the right or best away to approach that… just that asking people outside the profile isn’t necessarily “wildly inappropriate.”Report
Domestic abuse isn’t only something that happens to non-huge people or women, and it isn’t ‘wildly inappropriate’ to ask someone because they aren’t those things.
You can perhaps make a bigger argument for ‘they shouldn’t ask if the patient has no symptoms’, but it is incredibly silly to complain about ‘doctors asking questions of their patients in an attempt to make sure everything is fine’. That’s a thing that needs to happen much more often, not less, as many people are much more likely to come forward with a concern when directly asked about it as opposed to vague ‘Do you have any problems I should know about?’.
Having an actual checklist of ‘things that could be wrong’ and working down it is not a _bad_ thing, even if it does result in seemingly ‘inappropriate’ questions.Report
Dumb question: Are there numbers for how successful these questions have been?
Like, if we’ve found that 100,000 people get asked this and there have been a grand total of 0 trafficked humans freed, then that’s one calculus.
If we’ve found that 100,000 people get asked this and it uncovered a ring that freed up 20 trafficked humans, then that’s another.
On a purely utilitarian level: Has this been demonstrated to have worked somewhere?Report
Although you can easily flip that around by saying “do you really want to tell twenty people that we could have freed them from sex slavery, but didn’t because we didn’t want to inconvenience some white women”?Report
If there hasn’t been a single person helped by this, no, not even one, then I think that it becomes much harder to flip that around.Report
A larger point is that sex slavery would be easier to combat if prostitution wasn’t illegal. Fear of going from the frying pan into the fire is a big part of how such slavery perpetuates.Report
Legalized prostitution really wouldn’t fix that.
Prostitutes, in general, would be much better off if it was legal because of what you said, the obvious fact that prostitutes can’t currently go the police and have a rather large problem vetting clients. (Especially since we’ve decided to go after payment processing for them.) If it was legal, their business would be almost entirely safe.
But people in sex slavery…can’t go to the police even if their ‘job’ is legal. Not just because they often are physically unable to, but they are often in countries illegally or have organized gangs that would go after them or their relatives, etc. Prostitution becoming legal doesn’t really fix their problems.(1)
Prostitution being legal, however, would somewhat reduce the _demand_ for sex trafficking to start with. Right now, a good number of people visiting prostitutes don’t know or care if they are visiting someone who is in sex slavery. Make it legal, and…that changes things. Most people will, rather obviously, pick the legitimate business.
Some people will not, because it’s cheaper, or they can get underaged people, or all sorts of reasons, but the demand _in general_ should go down. How much, I’m not sure, especially when we’re just talking about demand in the US.
And in addition to that, it will stop letting sex slavery hide as prostitution. So…spotting it is easier.
But will it stop it? No.
1) And the same problems apply to people who are consensually prostitutes, but in the country illegally. Honestly, it applies to most people in the country illegally, but prostitutes would be exceptionally vulerableReport
Fair point, having an immigration policy that did not penalize victims brought here against their will would also go a long way towards helping.Report
No, because it’s, very very obviously, being asked of the wrong people.
Hotel rooms are not rented by people being sex trafficked. They are rented by the sex traffickers. Who travel with them. Duuuuh. (And plenty of the people being sex trafficked are obvious minors and in the country illegally and have no ID or credit card or money and all sorts of things that would make it extremely hard to rent a hotel room to start with, even if their owner allowed it.)
To catch sex trafficing, the hotel would need to speak privately to the ‘thirteen-year-old daughter’ of the man renting a room, to make sure she’s not being trafficked. Not an adult woman by herself. I don’t know if that’s a good idea or not, but it’s the actual place any such checks should be directed.
So how could the hotel get it so wrong?
Well, that’s what was asked of them by the organizations pushing this stuff.
So why did those organizations get it so wrong?
They didn’t. This sort of stuff is being pushed by conservative anti-feminist organizations who are trying to stop all prostitution, and honestly aren’t that bothered if it impacts woman traveling freely, and the entire ‘stopping sex trafficking’ is just their respectable premise.Report
When I’m traveling with my daughters and renting rooms, I have them stay in the car while I figure out where we’re going to be.
If you’re serious about asking questions, either you don’t ask them at check in or you somehow force everyone to talk to the front desk. Not sure if that latter is even possible without a re-write of the fire codes which will occasionally result in lots of people dying.Report
Oh, I’m not saying it’s a good idea to try to ask questions like this. I was just saying that the hotel is asking literally the wrong people.
And plenty of hotels are set up with controlled access into them where you always walk through the lobby on the way in. However, ‘plenty’ just means traffickers will use hotels that _aren’t_ set up that way, duh. In fact, they probably already do! Or just use motels, which this actually is. The less they have to haul victims through public spaces the better for them, I assume?
So you can’t really do what I said, I was just saying that, even if questioning people worked, you’d need to question the likely victims, of which the person renting the room is not one of them!
You also often would need to question them in _a language besides English_, so, uh…good luck with having staff to do that.
If I had to come up with an idea to reduce sex trafficking, it would be to put up messages, in multiple languages, inside the hotel rooms on the wall, telling them a number they can call on the phone or a thing they can say to any member of the staff that will alert the hotel what is going on.
In fact, I’d argue such a thing should be required by law. Just like businesses have to post ‘Here are your rights as workers’ and ‘here is our elevator inspection’, hotels should have to post ‘here is who you get in touch with if you are being trafficked or just kidnapped in general’.
Of course, this assumes there actually _is_ someone that people could call, which I kinda doubt. What happens when some sex trafficking victim who only speaks Korean calls a local 911? Or is there some sort of national number or something with translators on hand?Report
When checking into hotels, nowadays in Singapore, I’ve noticed that they ask for everyone’s IDs. So, everyone has to show their face to the concierge. But then, I don’t do motels in Singapore. Hotel stays in Singapore are for fun and motels aren’t.Report
At some point, the hotel will have so few positive hits, they will get lax, either because of human nature (it’s a pain to run through the script, especially when it’s busy), or because they are tired of business women getting offended at the sexist nature of the questions.
Alternatively, the hotel, or the brand itself, will notice that it is losing business to females traveling alone, and they will drop the script.Report
I think it’s probably less about actually accomplishing anything and more about marketing that they care.Report
Totally, and if there is a constant in business, it’s that showing they care can’t hurt the bottom line.Report
The low key moral panic over human trafficking has always seemed to me like an astro-turfed issue promoted by opaque and highly self-interested NGOs along with politicians in search of a crusade. As much as it’s treated as a feminist issue it and the efforts to combat it rely on some pretty sexist assumptions.
I’d say a good rule of thumb is to be skeptical of anything that seems to unite moral majority types with some subsect of the progressive activist industrial complex.Report
I’d say a good rule of thumb is to be skeptical of anything that seems to unite moral majority types with some subsect of the progressive activist industrial complex.
Let’s see: ’80s anti-porn crusades, anti-prostitution, TERFs…
…checks out.Report
The panic over sex trafficking is of a piece with the panic over drugs, which stems from the overall panic over OUTTACONTROLCRIME.
Fear sells, and motivates, and turns out votes.Report
“Then, replace my business card with a Covid-vaccine card. Are the responses consistent?”
I do wonder how many people will read all the way down to that line.Report
I did. And I admit it was a turn I wasn’t expecting.Report
Well, it’s not exactly an apples-to-apples comparison.
Is everyone being asked for the vaccine passport? Or just women traveling alone?
If everyone is asked for the vaccine passport, there is no profiling going on. There may be a level of discrimination if non-vaccinated people are excluded, though it remains to be seen if that remains a thing (to the extent it even IS a thing… very few places required the passport and some, like NYC, are about to do away with it).
I mean, flip it the other way… “Replace my business card with photo ID. Are the responses consistent?”Report
“Is everyone being asked for the vaccine passport? Or just women traveling alone?”
I didn’t write the essay; why are you asking me?Report
I was building off your bringing that up. I considered starting a new thread but figured I’d just connect with yours. It is an open question.Report
I don’t have a business card and frequently travel for business alone.
Why would I need a business card? Heck, my company doesn’t even provide them. If you want some, buy your own, and we’re a Fortune 500 company. There may be exemptions for some groups (sales, I’d imagine, and of course upper management) but not us. And while we don’t sell our product, we meet the customers who pay good money to have a say in where we focus our developmental efforts each year regularly. To train them, to discuss goals and developmental focus, etc.
I do have a COVID vaccine card, because they gave me one when I got vaccinated, and also Walgreens can send me another, and I needed it for my medical records with my PCP. I carry it with me because we’re in the middle of a pandemic and “mask or vaccine, mask, recent test, or card” is a common question.
Seems a weird comparison TBH.Report
As for “why are these companies making such a huge obvious deal over this”, it’s because it’s the law.Report
I drive for much of my regional travel, and often, the best place to stay is near a freeway exit, simply because I’ll be up and on the road early the next day.
My city recently annexed the area around another of its interstate exits. The city council was very unhappy that the county cops had a very low priority on dealing with the drug traffic and violent crime that was frequent in the hotels and their parking lots. Some of that is no doubt situational: I-25 runs from El Paso to Buffalo, WY and there are no other major north-south highways for at least 300 miles in either direction.Report