The Lingering Stench Of Clean Bills From A Nose Blind Congress

Andrew Donaldson

Born and raised in West Virginia, Andrew has been the Managing Editor of Ordinary Times since 2018, is a widely published opinion writer, and appears in media, radio, and occasionally as a talking head on TV. He can usually be found misspelling/misusing words on Twitter@four4thefire. Andrew is the host of Heard Tell podcast. Subscribe to Andrew'sHeard Tell Substack for free here:

Related Post Roulette

6 Responses

  1. Philip H says:

    I’ve been a fed 19 years. We have yet to have “regular order appropriations.” And since we can’t terminate programs or start new one under a CR, we end up with weeks to do months to years worth of work once we do get an appropriation. To make it worse, the Congressional staff generally have all the appropriations bills written and ready to go within a month of the release of the President’s Budget Request. Which means their own bosses keep trashing their good work.

    And you are 100% correct – they don’t fear reprisals for the brinksmanship. We can’t put them on a performance improvement plan for failing at their primary duty. Believe me – its maddening.Report

  2. Chip Daniels says:

    California used to be chronically unable to pass a budget and had regular crises of exactly this sort.

    Until the Republicans were driven from power. Now we pass bills and budgets regularly.

    Can we please stop with the “Congress is broken” stuff?

    It simply isn’t true. We have one party, one party only, that is obstructing. One party and one party only that has no desire to govern, and seeks only power.

    In a healthy democracy, every party will have its Manchins and Sinemas, their cranks and rogues. But today the Republican Senators and Congressmen are all, every one of them, cranks and rogues whose only agenda is grievance, where it isn’t grift.

    There is no Republican counterproposal on the budget, no offer of compromise because there is nothing they want, except to inflict pain on the American public in hopes of gaining power from the resulting chaos.Report

  3. Saul Degraw says:

    I am going to chime in with Chip here. Who is this we? It is true that there are a handful of Democratic representatives along with Manchin and Sinema willing to through spanners in everything because they are stuck in the 1990s triangulating past and/or are working for some principals that are hard to ascertain but are likely corporate favors. Kathleen Rice and Sinema both campaigned in 2018 on allowing the government to negotiate drug prices but now are stating not so fast. Manchin is a just a true believer in stinginess at this point even though the 3.5 trillion dollar stimulus was very popular in West Virginia from what I read.

    The GOP are nihilists who are denied agency by the press and a good chunk of the population and always looking to score a partisan advantage point.Report

    • Brandon Berg in reply to Saul Degraw says:

      I find it odd that you and Chip believe that your certainty that none of the opponents of the $3.5 T (actually $5 trillion if all of the provisions are extended to the full ten years) bill could possibly have any good reasons for opposing it reflects worse on the opponents than on you.

      If the only reasons you can imagine that anyone might disagree with on this issue are graft or being a cartoon villain, you can’t possibly have an informed opinion.Report

      • Philip H in reply to Brandon Berg says:

        The bill – the extended one – runs $500 Billion a year. The not extended one runs $350 Billion a year. We spend over $700 Billion a year on defense. We could raise $168 Billion a year if we actually enforced our tax laws. We’d get $150 Billion a year if we revoked Trump’s tax cuts. So the $350 Billion a year version is easy to pay for.

        But its opponents don’t want to do those two things to pay for stuff that their own constituents will benefit from greatly. So far their biggest push back is we don’t want socialism – as if socialism now means rebuilding crumbling bridges, expanding rural broadband, and ensuring we have an adequately large and adequately paid workforce to care for our seniors. They don’t want to do those two things to move our economy away from fossil fuels (I’m looking at you Joe Manchin). And mostly they don’t want to do it because, with t he tax cut roll back, they would have to admit that after over 40 years of tax cuts, Trickle Down doesn’t.

        So yeah, either they are pursuing power for its own sake, or they have become cartoon caricatures. They sure as hell aren’t leaders, and they sure as hell aren’t offering any possibility of compromise that might benefit their own constituents, much less anyone else.

        Saul got it right:

        The GOP are nihilists who are denied agency by the press and a good chunk of the population and always looking to score a partisan advantage point.

        Report