From Twitter Safety:
After close review of recent Tweets from the @realDonaldTrump account and the context around them we have permanently suspended the account due to the risk of further incitement of violence.https://t.co/CBpE1I6j8Y
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) January 8, 2021
(Featured image is “Free Bird” by Ennev and is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
Jaybird
Jaybird is Birdmojo on Xbox Live and Jaybirdmojo on Playstation's network. He's been playing consoles since the Atari 2600 and it was Zork that taught him how to touch-type. If you've got a song for Wednesday, a commercial for Saturday, a recommendation for Tuesday, an essay for Monday, or, heck, just a handful a questions, fire off an email to AskJaybird-at-gmail.com
Devcat is watching over, but if you notice any problems contact the editors and Devcat will be notified and deployed immediately.
on The Shepherds have a Credibility ProblemHere is John Kelly, swearing _under oath_, that Trump discussed having the IRS go after John F. Kell… on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What?You would be. Hey, question: Did you vote for Harris? If so, why do you think you are the person the… on The Shepherds have a Credibility ProblemIt is evidently the case that lying about trump being a Hitleresque mass murderer got donations and… on The Shepherds have a Credibility Problem“If half the country has decided that Trump is qualified to be president, that means they’re not rea…
on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What?Why would they have to ask the government?
on TrumpedIf only Jeff Bezos had allowed the Washington Post's editorial board to run that endorsement. on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What?You’re sitting here claiming it’s impossible to pick off voters when Trump/the GOP just picked off a…
on TrumpedAbrams... ran twice for governor, lost twice, and was an election denier on one of those. Other than…
on Puppy Love in the IG Era: Ten Favorite Dog BreedsChecked to see if any of the ten breeds were cats. Closed tab. on The *OTHER* stuff on the ballotLondon Breed has conceeded. San Francisco Mayor London Breed conceded the mayoral race to Daniel Lur…
November 7, 2024
The End of the Political Parade
November 6, 2024
No Matter which Candidates You Bet on, You’ll Get a Shock or Two
November 5, 2024
November 4, 2024
on Weekend Plans Post: Batchin’ It (Again) and It’s Snowing
on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What? on Trumped on Trumped on Trumped on Trumped on Open Mic for the week of 11/4/2024 on Trumped on Trumped on Trumped
on Trumped on Trumped
on Trumped on Trumped on Trumped
To be perfectly honest, I do think that his twitter feed is a historical document and ought to be made available to the public to read.
I mean, I understand the arguments why he can’t have access to it anymore and I understand the arguments for why it shouldn’t be readable for the next few months or so…
But I think it should be readable in the future.Report
I’d agree. At a bare minimum the whole thing should be archived in the Trump Presidential Library.Report
The official acount is still there.
https://twitter.com/POTUS?s=09Report
But, for the record, was locked yesterday evening as Trump try to post from there and a few other campaign accounts.Report
Do you mean the Trump presidential library, Gentleman’s Club, golf course, bar, grill, discount Only Available on TV store and gift shop. You can have your favorite trump tweet printed on any pair of edible underwear, oxygen tubing or sleeveless t shirt.Report
Yes that one! But instead of a Gift Ship they have a Grift Shop.Report
“Thank you for purchasing 3 combo pack Trump brand Ipecac/ Enema’s. Would you like to just give him more money for nothing in return? Just drop it in the Trump tip jar.”Report
Huge deals! Just YUGE!Report
And faux gold plated toilet accessories!Report
In Tokyo, there’s a famous tourist attraction called the Robot Restaurant, where they put on a show involving robots fighting each other while you eat mediocre food. I didn’t care much for it. It was extremely loud, and the robots were basically just animatronic parade floats rolling back and forth.
But before the show, they put you in a delightfully garish waiting room, and it has the most amazing bathroom. There’s faux gilding, and rhinestones! So many rhinestones! I went in and immediately thought, “This must be what Donald Trump’s bathroom is like!”Report
Rhinestones in a bathroom…. SHUDDER!!Report
The Trump Presidential Library will consist of 10,000 remaindered copies of The Art of the Deal; a few copies may persist into The AfterTimes, but most survivors will be illiterate anyway.Report
I believe that the Presidential Records Act, as amended, required Twitter to maintain permanent copies. This is the kind of thing that the Legal Department gets paid their big bucks to know in advance and insist be done — failure to comply is a “risk the company” sort of thing.Report
Just because they “should” know what to do to comply legally doesn’t mean that actually do. Reference Patreon and it’s legal issues.Report
Half of patreon’s problems come from stuff like Mastercard/Visa saying “if you have people doing the following things, you won’t be able to use Visa/Mastercard” and then Patreon saying “nope”. Not really a legal issue, not really.
Aella Girl on twitter (warning, she’s a cam girl though her twitter account is mostly worksafe otherwise) has a nice discussion about this sort of thing:
Read her whole thread. It’s interesting.Report
For the record: Stock price of Twitter, as of this moment, is $51.48.Report
Stock price of Twitter, as of this moment, is $48.71.Report
$46.40.Report
Excellent headline here
https://gizmodo.com/jack-offs-trump-1846023346/amp?utm_medium=sharefromsite&utm_source=gizmodo_twitter&__twitter_impression=trueReport
It’s been four years of sucking and blowing, but we got one great headline out of it. Worlds longest buildup to a punch line.Report
There seems to be a race whether some of Trump’s more vocal followers can cancel their Twitter accounts before they are banned.
Reportedly, Apple has given Parler 24 hours to implement a moderation scheme or the app will be removed from the App Store. For those who don’t remember, Apple’s terms of service allow them to remove installed copies of the app from the phones if it’s banned from the store.Report
But but but… freedom!Report
How much you wanna bet Google does something similar in the Play store?Report
Already done. (Well, “suspended”.)
Report
I wonder if there was a similar ban wave targeting accounts inciting and coordinating the left-wing insurrections we saw over the summer. Probably. I trust Twitter to be even-handed in enforcing this kind of thing. It’s weird that I can’t recall anyone making a big deal over it, though.Report
Maybe they never did this kind of stuff?
Report
As far as I know, the Chicago Teacher’s Union has not been banned from Twitter.Report
I’m actually surprised by this. I know the CTU leadership has shown itself to be pretty vile in the past, but I did not expect them to find their Twitter account calling for a lynching.Report
I sensed a great disturbance in the Force, as if 75 million twits cried out, and were silenced.
But it was just gas.Report
Heh, suspending Trump’s account two weeks before he’s out of power is the Elaine Chao of suspensions.Report
An interesting thought experiment:
Report
He would resign at 11:59 am giving us a full minute of Anarchy before Biden officially takes over.Report
On the whole Platform vs. Publisher vs. Club question… I’d consider introducing a new test for platform status: an open standard. That is, if the content generated on your platform is fully open for other services to write to, consume and distribute and curate… then you are a platform. Breaks-up the thorny/sticky issue of network effect and competition.
You can keep club status up to a certain point… beyond a certain number of subscribers, we’re obviously not a club so either a publisher or platform… so decide if the value of a monopoly of a limited set of users/content is more important than the value of a large platform business where the content/users are not monopolized.
There’s a lot more with regards content ownership and privacy… but moving towards business friendly models that offer protections where protections are warranted, keep competition in the forefront, and allow a platform to monetize its platform status as it gives up its user/content network/monopoly.Report
I don’t have a problem with the idea but I’m not sure it addresses the issue driving the argument. Like how does it change the incentives of any business that accepts platform status? And while I don’t think platforms should be liable for the torts of the content posters I’m also not sure the price of protection should be allowing mass misinformation or acting as a channel for commands to engage in criminal activity.
The operative question is who has discretion, the business (which may act capriciously) or the state via regulatory incentives. To paraphrase Rush, even if that state is telling platforms they may no longer decide they still have made a choice.
Edit: unless maybe I’m misreading you and the price isn’t giving up discretion, but rather creating interoperability with competing platforms?Report
Well, so much for my plan to cut/paste/send to Ajit Pai with a note: problem solved in a comment, dude.
I guess I’d put it this way, we should stop ignoring that there aren’t tech races to establish platforms/protocols with winners/losers. On the one hand, we want to encourage Tech Races, and we live with winners/losers. But we still have to make sure that when Winners win they monetize the value not the moat. So at some point having won the network-effect race, we allow the monetization at the transaction level, not at the network level… so phase 2 of a healthy capitalism allows other folks to build businesses on top of platforms that are regulated to provide platform status.
It’s a bit like electricity vs. electricities… or a phone network vs. networks… that’s what the original 230 was meant to address… the network backbone… but we’ve moved forward from mere electricity to mere communication protocols to mere network exchanges… and the network exchanges can be local/small/curated or broad/open/transactional. When you win, you win the transaction war… but at the expense of the curated content/data owner wars.
That’s why I’m not a simple repeal-230 guy… there are rewards and incentives we want to keep, and incentives we want to discourage… with the idea being that you monetize the value not the monopoly.Report
And then it hit me: Tech allows for the long march through the institutions to take shortcuts:
Report
Sometimes freedom dies in small doses mostly hidden from view…other times it dies big in full view of people watching it and cheering.Report
Last I checked private companies could pretty much do whatever they want, especially when they decide an client has violated their terms of service. Not sure that’s an impingement on freedom however.Report
These companies are, essentially, monopolies. Most of the times the left has been very anti monopoly. What gives? These platforms have massive user bases and a certain subset is being negatively impacted by deplatforms, etc. where migrating new a new/different platform is a challenge (now impossible since Parer is gone)Report
Under US anti-trust law, being a monopoly is not illegal. But being classified a monopoly in court makes certain business behaviors illegal. The first step in any anti-trust proceeding is to define the market that has been monopolized. Back in the 1990s, everyone was surprised when the federal courts agreed that “desktop computer operating systems” was a market. Once they did, there was no question about Microsoft engaging in illegal behavior, the only question was what the remedy would be. I am fairly eager to see what “market” Facebook is accused of monopolizing.Report
Cool, can I come to your house and crap on your living room floor with no repercussions? Cause otherwise, you’re limiting my freedom.Report
You live in Seattle, right? Or was that a different Jesse? Anyway, right now Seattle has a fairly significant problem with people literally crapping on the commons. Not quite in people’s homes, but close enough. And a lot of people in your ideological vicinity are saying that stopping them from doing so would be limiting their freedom.
So…you’re not wrong about this particular issue, but man, that’s an unfortunate choice of metaphor.Report
But don’t worry, I have it on good authority that Seattle city government doesn’t cater to Progressives at all.Report
It sure is weird the response called for is police instead of public restrooms.Report
They tried public restrooms, they were taken over and used for drugs, dealing, and (IIRC) prostitution.
What they need is housing and social services.Report
Seems like you could get money from that somewhere . . . .Report
They have money, what they don’t have is space.Report
They have the space, what they also have is NIMBY’s.Report
If you have space, but are effectively barred from using it, you don’t actually have space now, do you?
(I am painfully aware of the NIMBYs in the area)Report
I’m probably just overly cynical/bitter about my own tribe and housing construction policy but I feel like that reasoning lets local government, and NIMBY off the hook too easy. The space is there. The technology exists. The economics are sound. There’s no mountain blocking construction, no surging ocean burying the land.
People are crapping in the parks and the sidewalks because too many well off, comfortable and by and large liberal people don’t want housing density, use their votes and influence to block it via regulation and tell themselves “hey I toss those bums a fiver when I see them at the intersection, that’s enough money for a tent and drugs so my conscience is clear”.Report
I hear ya. I’m just saying that it doesn’t really matter why the space is not accessible at the moment, just that it is, and until that is dealt with, you don’t have space.Report
How big do you think the intersection is between people who applauded Masterpiece Cakeshop and people whining about the Trump Twitter ban? My money is on a null set.Report
“Let’s establish a rule.”
“Okay, let’s establish it.”
“Let’s apply the rule.”
“Okay, let’s apply the rule.”
“Let’s apply a different rule elsewhere.”
“Let’s not.”
“WHY DO YOU HATE RULES, HYPOCRITE?”Report
“I’d like a cake.”
“No, and there are no other cake shops in the world.”
“I’m going to complain about this on social media.”
“Go ahead, there are many platforms with equal market influence.”Report
It begins:
Report
I just made a similar comment on another thread, but it belongs here more. These moves greatly increase the likelihood of a Trump news network. He craves attention, and he has followers, but if he’d remained on Twitter he would have been just another noisemaker. But this gives him a cause and a need for a new platform.Report
These moves greatly increase the likelihood of a Trump news network.
Does Twitter care about that? Should Twitter care about that?Report
Twitter itself shouldn’t care about that. People who are excited by Twitter’s decision, thinking it will lower the volume on Trump, should.Report
Ah.Report
Well he would have to be able to run a money making business which has never been his strong point. At some point at least, he would try to do it with other peoples money. But that is the free market.Report
Alternately, why should I care if Trump starts his own news network? How would it be different than what Fox News has been doing for the last five years?Report
So, you don’t watch Fox News, I guess.Report
lolReport
These moves greatly increase the likelihood of a Trump news network.
What will Trump’s role at this network be? License the use of his name for $X million per year? Provide all the extra cash that will be necessary to keep it afloat for the first few years? Hands-on management like Murdoch in the early days? Live on-screen daily talent? Once per week pre-recorded heavily edited show?
You could convince me about the first one. The others, those seem like huge stretches for today’s Trump.Report
(Mis-hit the report and not the reply button again, gah. I’m having a day.)
There was a thread on Twitter some weeks back detailing how this would work: That Trump could demand – and get – an exclusive contract with Newsmax or OANN that would basically break their bank as they couldn’t bring in the ratings to support it. My added thought was this turns Trump from content to competitor, even more so now after Wednesday.
And in any case, I’m not sure how much of a network presence he’ll get camped out in Rio or Moscow. RT guest contributor?Report
Well he would have to be able to run a money making business which has never been his strong point. At some point at least, he would try to do it with other peoples money. But that is the free market.Report
The only thing more annoying than the people whinging about “ThE fIRsT aMeNdMeNt” is knowing that most of the whingers know full well that it doesn’t apply here, and that they’re just winding people up and fundraising.Report
Per the International Business Times, Donald Trump is being removed from Home Alone 2 to be replaced by Christopher Plummer.Report
The article was updated to report that it was a joke by Dan Slott.Report
OH THAT DAN SLOTTReport
Hilarious. Apple and Google just pulled the Parler app because it has too many posts encouraging violence.
Pulling a social media app where conservatives can freely incite violence against politicians and media personalities will, of course, only widen our already existing divisions. Think about that…Report
Amazon Web Services has just stopped hosting them.Report
But that will only make them mad. When they get mad they might make a lot of violent threats. Which would be bad. So they have to have a place to make all their fun violent threats or…ummm….Report
Yup. Allahpundit, on conservative reasoning about conservatism right now, said it best: “appease our terrorists or suffer the consequences”.Report
When Allahpundit & I have to basically make the same arguments to people – not great, Bob! Not great!Report
Golf? Not anymore!
Report
Adjacent:
Report
Better late than never, but really, how many junk lawsuits does a guy have to file before the bar takes action?Report
The New York State Bar Association has nothing to say about who is or isn’t a lawyer in New York State and doesn’t discipline them, unlike some states that have what is called a “mandatory bar association.” Lawyer status is regulated by the state court system. (The administrative setup is unclear to me and uninteresting unless you face potential bar discipline or represent someone who does.) NYSBA is essentially a trade association and business networking outfit that NY lawyers may join or not as they see fit. Although I haven’t studied NYSBA’s rules on membership, I assume it can dump members it finds undesirable, and that its in-house lawyers know what hoops it has to jump through to do that.
That said, other than embarrassment, the main effect of being thrown out of NYSBA is that you are no longer eligible for member discounts on publications, continuing legal education, and what-have-you. I’m not so sure about sponsored insurance.Report
Well that is disappointing…Report
Frogs, Scorpions…
Report
Unintended Consequences:
Further down the thread:
I’ve been wondering if there are going to be weird side effects to banning Emmanuel Goldstein.
There’s a lot of catharsis that comes in keeping him around and, if Trump is skilled at anything, it’s in maintaining the two minutes for just another 15 seconds more.Report
Banking:
Report
Signature Bank is posturing: they are closing Trump’s two personal accounts with them. According to his disclosure forms, Trump has personal accounts (ie, checking, saving, money market, small trust) at several US banks. The big break with US banks happened years ago, when they quite lending money to Trump, the Trump Organization, or any projects in which those were involved.
I don’t recall the FDIC rules about demand deposit accounts at all. I’m not sure that Signature can arbitrarily terminate client accounts.Report
As much as I enjoy seeing bad people get what’s coming to them in this life instead of the next, I find myself troubled by the whole “Social Credit” thing that seems to be creeping in.Report
Man, you incite one coup and people are all up in your business.Report